Central Virginia
  • Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission
  • Rural Transportation Advisory Committee Meeting 8/4/2026
  • Auto-scroll

Rural Transportation Advisory Committee Meeting   8/4/2026

Attachments
  • 00 Agenda - August 04 2026 RTAC.pdf
  • 03 RTAC 5-5-26 Draft Minutes.pdf
  • 04 FY27 Committee Draft.pdf
  • 05 RemoteParticipationVirtualMeetingPolicy.DRAFT August 2025.pdf
  • 06 FY27 RLRP August RTAC Meeting - Presentation.pdf
  • 06 FY27 RLRP Existing Conditions Demographics and Commuting - Draft 07.30.26.pdf
  • 06 FY27 RLRP Staff Memo - Draft Goals 07.30.26.pdf
  • Combined Packet - 08.04.26 RTAC Meeting - In-Person.pdf
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:00:02
      Meeting to order.
    • 00:00:09
      All right.
    • 00:00:11
      So do we have anybody from the public?
    • 00:00:17
      I don't think anybody from the public online either.
    • 00:00:21
      Let's see.
    • 00:00:23
      Is it time to do elections already?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:00:25
      It is.
    • 00:00:26
      We're only going further.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:00:29
      Mr. Chairman, I think they just put that on the agenda for fun.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:00:38
      Before we do the election of officers, if we could vote Dylan into the meeting.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:00:47
      I'll move to accept Dylan as a remote participant in the meeting.
    • 00:00:52
      I second the motion and call for a vote.
    • 00:00:54
      All those in favor say aye.
    • 00:00:56
      Aye.
    • 00:00:56
      All those opposed?
    • 00:00:58
      You may join us, Dylan, remotely.
    • SPEAKER_01
    • 00:01:02
      Greatly appreciate it.
    • 00:01:03
      Yes, I have a doctor's appointment in Lynchburg this afternoon.
    • 00:01:06
      So I want to make sure I get there in time.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:01:11
      Thank you for putting this on your schedule today.
    • 00:01:13
      All right, election of officers.
    • 00:01:17
      I will continue to serve as chair if you will have me.
    • 00:01:22
      OK.
    • 00:01:23
      Because there's a motion to vote.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:01:26
      Motion to keep Thomas shared of RTAC.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:01:31
      I'll second.
    • 00:01:33
      All those in favor say aye.
    • 00:01:35
      Aye.
    • 00:01:36
      All those opposed?
    • 00:01:38
      Motion carries.
    • 00:01:39
      Excellent.
    • 00:01:39
      Thank you everybody.
    • 00:01:42
      Who'd like to be vice chairman this year?
    • 00:01:46
      We have one with a doctor's appointment and they currently.
    • 00:01:50
      Would you like to remain vice chairman?
    • SPEAKER_01
    • 00:01:52
      I have no problem continuing in the role as vice chair.
    • 00:01:56
      However, if someone else is interested, I also have no problems with that.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:02:03
      Nobody seems to be crawling the walls for it.
    • 00:02:08
      So I motion to appoint you as vice chairman for another year.
    • 00:02:13
      Do I get a second?
    • 00:02:14
      Second.
    • 00:02:15
      All those in favor say aye.
    • 00:02:17
      Aye.
    • 00:02:17
      All those opposed, congratulations.
    • SPEAKER_01
    • 00:02:21
      Aye aye, thank you.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:02:24
      Very contested.
    • 00:02:27
      Okay, well now that we have the officers sorted out, is there any housekeeping items that the TJPDC wants to do before we go into minutes or anything else?
    • Sara PenningtonMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:02:36
      Just introductions.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:02:37
      Okay.
    • 00:02:39
      We'll go around the room.
    • 00:02:40
      Sandy, you want to start?
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:02:42
      Sandy Shackelford, VDOT, or to start, anything.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:02:44
      Tom Egeland, Louisa County.
    • 00:02:46
      Michael Murphy, Jaunt.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:02:49
      Jason Espie, Jaunt.
    • 00:02:50
      Alberic Karina-Plun, Albemarle County.
    • 00:02:53
      Jim Frydl, Greene, Kevin.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:02:55
      Kate Wythe, I'm with TJPDC.
    • 00:02:57
      I just started July 1 as the Director of Regional Planning, so it's nice to meet you all.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:03:02
      Fantastic.
    • Sara PenningtonMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:03:03
      Taylor Lowery, TJPDC.
    • 00:03:07
      And Sarah Pennington with TJPDC and RideShare.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:03:11
      Excellent.
    • 00:03:12
      And then people online would like to go order any water slides.
    • SPEAKER_01
    • 00:03:20
      I'm sorry, my computer glitched, so I missed the activity we're doing right now.
    • 00:03:25
      Just introductions?
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:03:27
      Yes, ma'am.
    • SPEAKER_01
    • 00:03:28
      All right, yeah.
    • 00:03:29
      I'm Dylan Bishop.
    • 00:03:30
      I am the planning and zoning director in Nelson County, and I just hit seven years.
    • 00:03:36
      Yeah.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:03:39
      Congratulations.
    • SPEAKER_01
    • 00:03:41
      I'll go Christine Jacobs, ED here at the Thomas Jefferson Planning District.
    • SPEAKER_00
    • 00:03:50
      My name is Ian Cole.
    • 00:03:52
      I'm an associate planner with Louisa County Community Development.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:04:02
      All right.
    • 00:04:03
      Well, thank you everybody for coming on this beautiful day.
    • 00:04:08
      Has anybody had a chance to read the minutes?
    • 00:04:11
      And if so, has anybody made comments?
    • 00:04:16
      Well in that case I motion to approve the minutes as written.
    • 00:04:18
      Can I get a second?
    • 00:04:19
      Second.
    • 00:04:19
      All those in favor say aye.
    • 00:04:21
      Aye.
    • 00:04:22
      All those opposed?
    • 00:04:23
      Excellent.
    • 00:04:25
      We are ahead of schedule.
    • 00:04:28
      Review for second members an alternate for this.
    • 00:04:30
      Okay.
    • Sara PenningtonMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:04:31
      Yes, so this was included in your packet.
    • 00:04:33
      Just we want to make sure every year we have the most up-to-date roster.
    • 00:04:37
      So if you have any changes as to who is your voting member and who is your alternate,
    • 00:04:45
      Just let me know.
    • 00:04:47
      Looks like, yeah, it looks like it, you know, all the regular voting members are staying the same.
    • 00:04:55
      Does anyone, Alberic, do you guys have an alternate yet?
    • 00:05:00
      We have been including Tanya, but I didn't know once Jessica had joined.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:05:03
      We have not discussed hardtacks.
    • Sara PenningtonMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:05:06
      Okay, I'll follow up with you, no problem.
    • 00:05:08
      Anybody else have any changes?
    • 00:05:10
      Obviously, we know from Dylan that we will be waiting for an alternate there.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:05:15
      All right, now our favorite topic of them all remote electronic participation.
    • Sara PenningtonMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:05:31
      Again, this is an annual policy that is adopted by the Commission.
    • 00:05:37
      They will be, I believe, adopting it or hopefully adopting it at their meeting on Thursday.
    • 00:05:43
      So this is mostly an informational item.
    • 00:05:45
      I did confirm there are no changes since last year.
    • 00:05:49
      So we just wanted to make sure that everyone is aware of it.
    • 00:05:53
      The key things here are that we can hold complete virtual meetings, which we usually elect to do in the winter, but everyone has to keep their cameras on during the meeting to be counted as present.
    • 00:06:06
      Also, as Dylan demonstrated earlier today,
    • 00:06:10
      If you do have to participate remotely, we do ask that it is for one of the listed reasons and that you do disclose that for the record of the meeting.
    • 00:06:19
      But those are kind of the main, I believe, key factors.
    • 00:06:22
      But again, just wanted to put it in front of you as an annual reminder of the policy.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:06:29
      Excellent.
    • 00:06:30
      Thank you.
    • 00:06:30
      I think the wintertime always works out.
    • 00:06:32
      There always seems to snow.
    • Sara PenningtonMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:06:34
      Yes.
    • 00:06:36
      It is hedging our bets.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:06:40
      Alrighty, well I guess we'll move into the rural long-range transportation plan and Taylor, if you don't mind, what can I share a little bit about last night?
    • 00:06:53
      So I'm sure that everybody's reaching out to your county administration, the county administration's been reached out by the TJPDC and your elected and appointed officials.
    • 00:07:02
      I presented a rural long-range transportation update to the Board of Supervisors for Louisiana County last night and
    • 00:07:10
      The recommendation that I have is that we defer the vote on the goals.
    • 00:07:15
      We still go over everything today, but that we defer the goals and objectives vote until the November meeting so that we have more time to gather more feedback from our elected and appointed official considering we just got all the information like mid-July.
    • 00:07:30
      And so that would be my push in some direction that I've gotten unless anybody has any
    • 00:07:38
      Does anybody have goals and objectives and they just write a role or does everybody feel like they could use a little more time to go over that with the proper individual?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:07:50
      I think we probably want to have the time just so that our elected bodies can weigh in and if they see anything that they want to add or change.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:08:01
      So keep that in mind.
    • 00:08:03
      Taylor's going to give us an excellent presentation.
    • 00:08:05
      All the things we did back in 2017 and 2018 I guess we're going to do again.
    • 00:08:10
      And then we'll just take all that information back and then we'll come back in November and have a vote.
    • 00:08:18
      Take it away.
    • 00:08:19
      Thanks for letting me steal your thunder.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:08:20
      Yes, of course.
    • 00:08:21
      I appreciate that introduction.
    • 00:08:22
      Good afternoon, everyone.
    • 00:08:24
      So excited for this fiscal year 27 rollover plan update.
    • 00:08:28
      This afternoon, we will walk through the overall planning process, an overview of demographic and commuter information for the region, which was also included in written form in the packets for today's meeting, draft goals, and the next steps.
    • 00:08:43
      Before we jump in, I just want to thank everyone who's already reached out with questions, suggested revisions for some of the documents that we've sent your way.
    • 00:08:49
      I really appreciate it.
    • 00:08:51
      And that's what we're forward looking for in this plan update is to be able to collaborate with you all on this.
    • 00:08:56
      So please chime in with a question at any time.
    • 00:08:58
      All right, so what is the Rural Long Range Plan?
    • 00:09:03
      The Rural Long Range Plan serves as the long range vision for transportation improvements and investments across the rural jurisdictions of our region.
    • 00:09:11
      It's an opportunity to look at our regional transportation network together to identify local priorities for transportation and incorporate projects over the next 20 years.
    • 00:09:21
      The last time we adopted a Rural Long Range Plan was in 2018.
    • 00:09:24
      and at the establishment of the Rural Long-Range Plan program itself, it was actually intended to support local jurisdictions in completing the transportation chapter of the local comprehensive plan.
    • 00:09:34
      So that's certainly available as an option again for you this update, if that's something that your jurisdiction would be interested in, just let us know.
    • 00:09:43
      I also want to note that while this plan is not federally required, it is strongly encouraged for us to complete it by both state and federal partners.
    • 00:09:54
      All right, to kick off this update, as Tom already mentioned, we did send a staff member to local jurisdiction leadership to make sure everyone was aware that we were undertaking this update to the plan.
    • 00:10:04
      You all, as RTAC, you serve as the advisory committee for the Rural Transportation Work Program, and the plan is ultimately approved by the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission, which is made up of elected officials for your local jurisdictions.
    • 00:10:19
      We wanted to outline for everyone when they could anticipate voting items coming up,
    • 00:10:23
      When the things in the scope of work that you all saw in May could be anticipated to come before each of the committees and when we would have certain deliverables for you to be able to review.
    • 00:10:34
      So this schedule represents or attempts to illustrate the items that are in that scope of work.
    • 00:10:41
      Any questions on the schedule and timeline?
    • 00:10:44
      I was gonna know about the action, but Tom already covered that.
    • 00:10:47
      Yeah, sorry, I jumped ahead.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:10:48
      I thought it was a good segue, but yeah.
    • 00:10:52
      I think that having till November will give everybody time to review it and I very much ask all the members to reach out to the TJPDC as you're getting feedback and so that way we can come to the meeting in November and go these are the edits we want to make, let's go ahead and move it up.
    • 00:11:16
      I'm trying to think
    • 00:11:21
      And Taylor, I want to thank you for coming and meeting last night.
    • 00:11:23
      If I did not know if we were going to dive into any technical questions, is that something that you're willing to do for other localities if they plan on just presenting to their more supervised group?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:11:33
      And we're willing to help you all develop materials if that's helpful, if anything that you all need to facilitate that communication for most students.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:11:40
      So no excuses, November.
    • 00:11:42
      Everybody's got to come and put the vote ready.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:11:45
      If you're pushing the goals and objectives approval back to November,
    • 00:11:51
      Can you keep moving on the other items, or are they dependent on having a group of others?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:11:56
      So for the most part, we can keep moving.
    • 00:11:58
      The only thing that would be changed from this is we were anticipated to have objectives for you all also today.
    • 00:12:05
      But seeing as though we might want a little bit more time on the goals, we would have to devolve and objectives at the same time.
    • 00:12:10
      We do have a slide in this presentation a little bit towards the end for a discussion on what could inform the objectives.
    • 00:12:16
      So that would be open for everybody to read that.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:12:19
      I would love to go over that simply because I have a feeling, at least from my standpoint, that I'm going to get not only bold, but some objective.
    • 00:12:30
      So yeah, I'd like to see that slide.
    • 00:12:38
      Great.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:12:42
      All right, and then other different planning efforts that we know are ongoing.
    • 00:12:45
      The TJPDC is currently leading a regional housing study, which is great timing and a lot of really great data that some of our staff have already developed for each of the member jurisdictions that we can incorporate into this plan.
    • 00:12:57
      We know Greene County and Louisa County are working on comprehensive plan updates.
    • 00:13:02
      Nelson County working on an update to zoning and subdivision ordinance.
    • 00:13:06
      And then Albemarle County and the City of Charlottesville independently
    • 00:13:10
      Vitek Reed, and we're completing the locations.
    • 00:13:13
      Are there any other general planning efforts that you all are going on that we do need to get through here?
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:13:20
      The Louisa County Planning Commission, for the last four meetings, we've been working on the broke management rule.
    • 00:13:25
      So at some point this fall, that might see some daylight.
    • 00:13:28
      It might come out of a work session and to discuss it about the possibility of adoption.
    • 00:13:36
      I don't necessarily know.
    • 00:13:38
      We're not entirely involved under the transportation-related impacts, but that is a large thing that we are working on to protect the rural and agricultural character we have in left and right counties.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:13:52
      VDOT is doing two, well, one less thing to do, two pipeline studies in rural areas.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:14:06
      Is it time for SMART SCALE again?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:14:08
      And also looking over at our Jaunt friends.
    • Mike MurphyAlternate Member, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:14:13
      Well, we're trying to just do things now instead of studying.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:14:18
      That's exciting.
    • Mike MurphyAlternate Member, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:14:21
      That's the point of the meeting, right?
    • 00:14:22
      And I will say that part of it is engaged in a prioritization process for transportation initiatives that intersects with parts of U.S. funds.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:14:38
      All right, and now we can jump into the overview of the region.
    • 00:14:45
      So staff pulled primarily American Community Survey census data to look at population and overall demographics for the region.
    • 00:14:55
      So as you all already know, the TJPDC covers six jurisdictions in our planning district.
    • 00:15:00
      We're planning to attend.
    • 00:15:02
      That includes Greene, Nelson, Albemarle, RTAC, Louisa, and the city of Charlottesville.
    • 00:15:07
      This plan will cover the rural jurisdictions, so anything outside of the urbanized area.
    • 00:15:12
      However, as we go along, you all will also see information for the city of Charlottesville, considering a lot of the regional travel is also traveling into the urban form.
    • 00:15:20
      So we didn't want to exclude that.
    • 00:15:21
      It's kind of our separate two things.
    • 00:15:23
      But the intent of the plan and all of the recommendations will be for the rural jurisdictions.
    • 00:15:32
      All right, so
    • 00:15:35
      As I said earlier, a written compilation of all the data was included as a combined file in your packet for today's meeting and that represents sort of the first draft of the existing conditions that we put together for this plan.
    • 00:15:46
      We've heard that some of you already put some feedback on those materials, but there's certainly still time left to continue to review and send any other revisions our way as we work on finalizing this between now and your next meeting.
    • 00:15:59
      The first thing we'll talk through are population and projections for the region.
    • 00:16:03
      We've had a steady growth in population over the past several decades.
    • 00:16:07
      As of 2024, since this data, over 266,000 people live in the TJPDC community.
    • 00:16:13
      Well-known group projections anticipate continued growth with the regional population expected to reach over 340,000 by 2050.
    • 00:16:21
      The table on the slide illustrates population of projections by individual jurisdiction.
    • 00:16:31
      Louisa County is projected to experience the highest growth rate in our region while Albemarle County will experience the highest increase in total residents and approximately half of our region's anticipated growth.
    • 00:16:42
      Noted at the bottom of the table are growth rates for the region and Virginia as a state and as you can see we're expected to outpace the growth rate of the state and our region.
    • 00:16:56
      When Virginia first started facilitating the rural long-range planning process, one of the core goals was to help coordinate land use and transportation improvements.
    • 00:17:05
      So one of the key components of that, of course, is where people live and housing availability.
    • 00:17:11
      To promote households, housing and transportation are the two largest components of the household budget.
    • 00:17:16
      The reasons we make decisions about where to live are not just based on the cost,
    • 00:17:21
      of our housing itself, but it could also be based on where our job is located.
    • 00:17:25
      It could be based on where our family and friends are, our access to other destinations around campus.
    • 00:17:29
      So there are a couple of different factors that relate to how we make decisions about where to live.
    • 00:17:34
      Median housing costs vary considerably throughout the region, but housing costs are the highest in the city of Charlottesville and Albemarle County, which together also act as if we don't want to play that center forward.
    • 00:17:45
      So as previously mentioned, we are currently conducting a regional housing study at the TJPDC,
    • 00:17:50
      where there will be more granular data as far as housing goes, but also local strategies for housing policy.
    • 00:18:00
      This slide is taken from a presentation that was given by the Virginia Deputy Secretary of Transportation.
    • 00:18:06
      One of this administration's goals is affordability over the next four years, which again, touches on housing affordability, access to jobs, and both mobile transportation options.
    • 00:18:16
      So I thought this was a healthy graph that we were able to pull through.
    • 00:18:19
      According to the presentation that she provided, the average annual cost of transportation for a two-car household in Virginia would be upwards of $20,000 when you incorporate the profit of the vehicle, insurance, tolls, parking, and all of those.
    • 00:18:34
      It could be even more if you live in Northern Virginia.
    • 00:18:36
      That little pink section there on the graphic is additional parking and tolls for Northern Virginia region residents.
    • 00:18:46
      Households with the ability to be car-free have, on average, much lower annual costs.
    • 00:18:57
      Now we will look at some of the census data for each of the jurisdictions, sort of at a bad glance for each jurisdiction.
    • 00:19:04
      So, Albemarle County is the largest jurisdiction by religion and land area.
    • 00:19:08
      As of 2024, the total population was just under 115,000.
    • 00:19:11
      The median age was 39.7 years.
    • 00:19:16
      Median household income was $104,000, and the amount of households with no vehicle available was 4.9%.
    • 00:19:26
      For the city of Charlottesville, they serve as the urban core in the center of the Charlottesville-Albany Metro Metropolitan Planning Organization.
    • 00:19:35
      Total population was around 45,000.
    • 00:19:38
      The median age in Charlottesville is 33.1 years.
    • 00:19:41
      That's the audience and our jurisdictions.
    • 00:19:44
      median household income is over 74,000 and the percent of households with no vehicle available at 11%.
    • 00:19:51
      For Atlantic County, total population between 24 with just over 28,000, median age 43.5 years, median household income 96,000 and households with no vehicle available at 40%.
    • 00:20:13
      For Greene County, as of 2024, total population was 21,000, median age was 40.3 years, median household income at $89,000, and households with no legal available at 3%.
    • 00:20:26
      Over in Lisa County, the total population was 140,000, median age 44.8 years, median household income around 86,000, and households with no legal available at 3%.
    • 00:20:46
      And for Nelson County, the total population was 14,732, median age 51.3 years, median household income 72,000, and households with no vehicle available 6%.
    • 00:21:05
      Any question about demographics before we jump into some of the commuter?
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:21:14
      because we're here.
    • 00:21:17
      John is sitting next to me.
    • 00:21:20
      We have a breakdown of like 3% of households going out of April and religion county.
    • 00:21:25
      I'm not looking for it right now, but is there a breakdown or someone has statistics of what these smaller percentages are made of?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:21:35
      Yes, like the actual numbers.
    • 00:21:36
      Yes, that should be in the written documentation, offices, double check for water parking, but if it's not, I can quickly pull that.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:21:43
      Just the curiosity, so.
    • Mike MurphyAlternate Member, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:21:45
      It's also in the Rural Transit Needs Assessment, items delivered to the reason and all the other partner agencies, month 25, end of 2024.
    • 00:21:57
      And so what creates
    • 00:22:06
      percentage of population with disability, percentage of population in poverty.
    • 00:22:12
      So there's some other controlling factors outside of those that are listed here.
    • 00:22:16
      I think maybe one more layer tailored particularly to transportation or globally that transit would be of that population, like what percentage of it is actually of driving age and older, right?
    • 00:22:34
      Just so that you have that
    • 00:22:36
      captured understanding that particularly at Charlottesville, there's a big chunk of people who actually can't be on the road to eternity.
    • 00:22:45
      That's awesome.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:22:47
      Thank you.
    • 00:22:48
      Just curiosity.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:22:49
      Yeah, thank you.
    • 00:22:50
      I appreciate you all.
    • 00:22:53
      All right.
    • 00:22:54
      So we also looked at census data for average commute times in the region.
    • 00:22:58
      Mean travel time to work is 28.3 minutes overall, but it varies considerably for each jurisdiction.
    • 00:23:06
      So Albemarle and Charlottesville have the shortest average commute times and the highest percentage of workers who work from home.
    • 00:23:12
      The region's more rural counties experience longer average commutes, with Louisa's average commute time being the longest.
    • 00:23:19
      And also notable is that Nelson County has a significant share of their residents that work from home.
    • 00:23:24
      And if you look to the right on the chart at the bottom, it has Virginia and the United States the percent of workers who work from home.
    • 00:23:31
      A lot of our jurisdictions in this region are higher than both the United States and Virginia.
    • Mike MurphyAlternate Member, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:23:36
      Taylor, is that the most refreshed data point you can get on work from home?
    • 00:23:45
      Because obviously, major employers here and all over the country are taking a different approach to return to work initiatives.
    • 00:23:57
      And I'm just wondering how this slide and this data point's going to look when they see the 2026 numbers.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:24:05
      So this was the latest available that was able to be pulled for census data.
    • 00:24:11
      But I'm happy to do some digging and see if there are other data sets that might be available for that.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:24:16
      Is your question whether or not like if you telework, if that's like accounted for in terms of the average, or just accounting for that as like part of the bigger context?
    • Mike MurphyAlternate Member, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:24:27
      Yeah, I think it's part of the, you know, it's both, right?
    • 00:24:30
      You know, is it a part of the average, is a math question, right?
    • 00:24:35
      The bigger question is, when it comes to transportation, are they part of drive-time traffic, all that kind of thing, of course.
    • 00:24:44
      And I can just say, for sure, we know both local and national employers, where between 2024 and now, the percentage of people who are allowed to work from home has plunked.
    • 00:24:57
      So I think that this is likely to look different.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:25:01
      I appreciate that question, too, because Louisa County, we're working towards getting fiber to every household and business in the county, and I'm surprised that it is as low as it is, although I think that's made up by the fact that we have a longer clean time, right?
    • 00:25:15
      So maybe more people are in employment that does not offer that, or they've been asked to come back to work.
    • 00:25:22
      So yeah, the statistics are interesting.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:25:28
      I appreciate those.
    • 00:25:36
      All right, so what we did for the first iteration of this high level meter analysis was we used data from census on the map.
    • 00:25:45
      So that is an interactive web map that anyone is able to access.
    • 00:25:48
      It does breakdowns of community related data, and we pulled it for every jurisdiction in the region, just to get a high level understanding of where people are traveling between home and work.
    • 00:25:59
      And so this data is based on administrative employment records, federal administrative records, Census Bureau data,
    • 00:26:06
      and it links where workers live and where they work.
    • 00:26:10
      Now there are a handful of limitations for these.
    • 00:26:12
      I wanted to point that out for you all to keep in mind as we talk through some of these.
    • 00:26:16
      It puts one person and one job together and it assumes that one person has one job, that's one limitation.
    • 00:26:23
      This also only represents commuter-related travel.
    • 00:26:26
      So if people are traveling for any other purpose, that's not gonna be represented in this data here.
    • 00:26:32
      It also indicates
    • 00:26:33
      where people work, so where the location of their job is, but it doesn't say how they get there, like what roads they use, and it doesn't say what mode they use to get to work.
    • 00:26:42
      This is also based on employment records, so if anybody is self-employed, they are likely not captured in this dataset either.
    • 00:26:49
      And so we wanted to start here just to get an idea about where people are traveling both within and outside of the region, and then what we'll do as far as next steps is we're working on scoping a streetlight analysis to show us a bigger picture of all travel.
    • 00:27:03
      So we can see more trips and not just work-related trips.
    • 00:27:06
      So we will have something that will supplement this at a later date.
    • 00:27:10
      I kind of wanted to give you all a heads up on that.
    • 00:27:12
      And the latest year available for this was 2023.
    • 00:27:20
      All right, so the first thing we used this data for was to update a regional commute matrix that was included in the previous Grow Along Range plan.
    • 00:27:27
      So a version of this table was in the last plan from 2018.
    • 00:27:31
      This table shows the movement of residents between their home location and work location within the region.
    • 00:27:36
      It also shows how many resident workers in each jurisdiction travel outside of the TJPDC region as a whole.
    • 00:27:42
      You'll see some of those locations on the slides that'll follow this one.
    • 00:27:47
      Just under a third of the residents in the TJPDC travel outside of the region for work.
    • 00:27:52
      And this table also shows us that the strongest meeting relationship in our region is between the city of Charlottesville and Albemarle.
    • 00:27:59
      So now we'll look at each individual jurisdiction's work-related commuting characteristics.
    • 00:28:05
      Any questions about this before I proceed?
    • Mike MurphyAlternate Member, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:28:09
      When you add all these up and imagine the next number of people looks like 120, 130,000 people are coming in to the region to work, how does that match what
    • 00:28:25
      The workforce needs are of employers and I'm just curious like when we talk to employees and find that you know they find a lack of available resources of workforce ready people in the region or there's a surplus or it's just about right and like how does how do these numbers match what the employers want?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:28:50
      That's a really good question.
    • 00:28:51
      I will preface by saying we do not have an economist on staff.
    • 00:28:55
      So we look here at the green one looking at the data.
    • 00:28:58
      In the slides coming up, there is a metric for each jurisdiction that shows out of the number of jobs in each jurisdiction, how many people are commuting in to use those jobs, which can give us somewhat of an idea.
    • 00:29:09
      Like if you have 80 some percent of the jobs that you have being filled by people outside of your jurisdiction, that can speak to the local employment base.
    • Mike MurphyAlternate Member, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:29:19
      I'm just looking at this bottom column here right now, like quick map, didn't really look at it carefully, but over 40,000 people are coming from outside the PDC to inside the PDC to work, which means to me that there are needs that need to get met that can't be met by our floor are not being met by our residents.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:29:44
      I appreciate that.
    • 00:29:45
      And also in the written documentation, there's also the top 10 employers in each jurisdiction, which could be helpful in helping us figure out the answer to that question.
    • 00:30:03
      All right.
    • 00:30:05
      So before we jump in to these, I want to talk through how to understand this graphic and these percentages.
    • 00:30:13
      So the commute in portion on the left is actually just what we were talking about following up on Mike's question.
    • 00:30:19
      It represents how many individuals living outside of a jurisdiction commute into that jurisdiction for work.
    • 00:30:26
      So that number on the left is calculated as a share of jobs located within the jurisdiction.
    • 00:30:31
      Living and working within the jurisdiction, so the one in the middle, and commute out, the one on the right,
    • 00:30:39
      are calculated as a share of employed residents.
    • 00:30:42
      So those two use the same denominator, so they will add up to 100%.
    • 00:30:46
      Does that make sense?
    • Mike MurphyAlternate Member, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:30:50
      Why?
    • 00:30:52
      How did you all treat UVA as far as geography?
    • 00:30:55
      I realize it lies in the city limits.
    • 00:30:57
      Some of the addresses were never part of the city and part of the county, and neither person's tax rolls.
    • 00:31:03
      What did you do there?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:31:04
      So the data for this gives us whole jobs for each jurisdiction.
    • 00:31:09
      And so we did not pull it at a granular level to show us employers specifically, just jobs that are located within a jurisdiction.
    • 00:31:18
      So that have an administrative address located in our particular jurisdiction.
    • Mike MurphyAlternate Member, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:31:23
      So you would imagine the hospital employees to be people traveling to the city, even though most of the hospital never became part of the city.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:31:34
      Okay, so with that being said, for Albemarle County, we see 8%.
    • 00:31:45
      We did note here both percentages and actual numbers so that you can see sort of a level of scale for these.
    • 00:31:53
      So 65.8% of workers commute in to Albemarle County, and then out of the employed residents for Albemarle County,
    • 00:32:01
      40.5% of residents that live and work within the county and 59.5% of employed residents commute out to another jurisdiction for employment.
    • 00:32:10
      Also on this slide are top worker origins.
    • 00:32:13
      So for the people who work in Albemarle County, where do they live?
    • 00:32:17
      And you'll see Albemarle County, Charlottesville, Fairfax, Henrico, and Richmond.
    • 00:32:22
      Fairfax was an interesting one for me that came up for a couple of our jurisdictions.
    • 00:32:26
      So I thought that was beautiful.
    • 00:32:28
      And then top meeting destinations,
    • 00:32:30
      Four resident workers that live in Albemarle County include Albemarle, Charlottesville, Rubana, Karina, Lisa.
    • 00:32:43
      For the city of Charlottesville, 82.6% of workers employed commute in to Charlottesville.
    • 00:32:51
      34% of Charlottesville's employed residents both live and work within Charlottesville.
    • 00:33:00
      and 66% of resident workers in Charlottesville commute outside of the city for work.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:33:14
      Go ahead.
    • 00:33:16
      I thought you had a question.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:33:20
      We've got top worker origins and top community destinations.
    • 00:33:30
      For Fluvanna County, 63.4% of workers who live in and out of the employee residence in Fluvanna County, 16.6% both live and work in Fluvanna, and 89.4% of employee residents of Fluvanna believe it's half over.
    • 00:33:54
      Some of the things about the building, Albemarle and Charlottesville,
    • 00:33:57
      Gluvanna is a top news destination, Louisa, and Fairfax County.
    • 00:34:05
      And you see in the top corner of origin, so for the mentor on the left, we see Buckingham County, and then we also see the Chesterfield County in there.
    • 00:34:14
      So that's some traveling from outside of Louisa and that's coming in.
    • 00:34:22
      For Greene County, 62.4% of workers are reading in for this job.
    • 00:34:28
      Out of the employed residents of Greene County, 17.1% live and work in Greene, and 82.9% do read out.
    • 00:34:36
      Some of the places that they're going, outside of the planning district, we can use Fairfax and Orange.
    • 00:34:42
      Places where people live that work in Greene County, we can do Orange, Madison, and Rockingham.
    • 00:34:49
      So there are additional jurisdictions outside.
    • 00:34:52
      For Louisa County, 65.1% of workers are commuting in.
    • 00:35:04
      Out of the employed residents of Louisa County, 23.9% of residents both live and work in a county.
    • 00:35:10
      76.1% could be in and out of the county.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:35:19
      Since some of the housing studies have pointed out that
    • 00:35:23
      Within these numbers, people who tell it to me, so they may work from home, actually not drive, but they work out of accounting in this data, correct?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:35:36
      Yes, this does not specify any work from home agreements, any certain number of data that they might be making this at.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:35:45
      So this is telling you where people live and where people, like where the business
    • 00:35:50
      Address is for where they were.
    • Sara PenningtonMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:35:53
      Yes.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:35:53
      For this website, you might not consider that you could have one home base for an organization that might not be listed under this address.
    • 00:36:03
      You could have workers who might be in the field for most of their job that could be on the roads like that.
    • 00:36:08
      There are a couple of nuances that everybody knows about.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:36:11
      It's safe to assume that you're trying to really figure out a number that that percentage of teleworkers in your community
    • 00:36:20
      would all set all of these numbers.
    • 00:36:21
      So if it's 15% of people in the community are teleworkers, every one of those numbers might be 15% out.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:36:34
      Maybe.
    • 00:36:34
      It could be.
    • 00:36:38
      We did reach out to the VDOT's report meeting and the ability planning division as well about what data is available for a meeting to look at.
    • 00:36:47
      And they did tell us that this was the best step
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:36:49
      That's something to be available.
    • 00:36:55
      Question.
    • 00:36:55
      Sandy agrees with me.
    • 00:36:57
      How is the city of Richmond not a top community destination for Louisa County?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:37:02
      So they might be in the top 10.
    • 00:37:05
      I think I included 10 maybe in the written recommendation.
    • 00:37:08
      I'll have to look.
    • 00:37:09
      There are also places surrounding Richmond that might not be the city itself.
    • 00:37:13
      Like in Braco, or places that are in Richmond like MSA.
    • 00:37:17
      That makes sense.
    • 00:37:19
      That makes sense.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:37:20
      Probably won't be good if I don't use it downtown.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:37:25
      That's probably six, seven.
    • 00:37:27
      And I'm happy to send you the Excel export that shows the number of games you're set for our victory.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:37:35
      It doesn't have to be this week.
    • 00:37:37
      It could be next week.
    • 00:37:38
      I would be fascinated to see that if it was live.
    • 00:37:41
      Happy to share that with everybody.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:37:46
      Great question.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:37:49
      All right, and then for Nelson County, 55.7% of Northrop are commuting in.
    • 00:37:55
      Out of the Nelson County employee residents, 25.8% live and work in Nelson, and 74.2% commute out to other jurisdictions.
    • 00:38:07
      So with Nelson, we'll see some locations that we haven't seen yet represented, at least local origins and community destinations lists, including Amherst, Augusta,
    • 00:38:17
      We see Blanchford is there as well.
    • 00:38:19
      And so I think it's really good to demonstrate how we have ties to places outside of our region as well.
    • 00:38:29
      All right, before we jump into the section about the goals, any other questions about this meeting?
    • 00:38:35
      Nina, I really appreciate all the questions that you all are ready to have.
    • 00:38:43
      Okay.
    • 00:38:44
      So the past plans, even though this is not a federally required plan, past plans have aligned with the federal planning factors that are outlined in federal records.
    • 00:38:53
      Those are the ones that are listed on your screen and the graphic would be rectifying ones.
    • 00:38:59
      So you'll see these reflected in the draft a little bit.
    • 00:39:01
      We share for your view.
    • 00:39:03
      Alignment or anything that we can do to point to these really goes a long way and ultimately demonstrate usefulness and the ability to articulate when we're doing things with federal grants.
    • 00:39:14
      So on your screen are the draft goals that were also included in your packet and circulated for review.
    • 00:39:25
      I do want to note, no changes have been made to these as of yet, but we have received feedback from Albemarle economic staff specifically to give us feedback.
    • 00:39:35
      So I'll note those as we go along.
    • 00:39:37
      For Goal 1, safety.
    • 00:39:39
      Improving the safety of the transportation system for all users by reducing crashes, fatalities, and serious injuries.
    • 00:39:45
      The feedback that we received from Albemarle County staff on this one was to only go zip on fatalities and serious injuries.
    • 00:39:51
      That would bring us in alignment with the safely blue ridge, a regional comprehensive safety action plan.
    • 00:39:57
      For Goal 2, mobility and accessibility.
    • 00:40:00
      Providing reliable access to destinations for all users by incorporating various modes of transportation.
    • 00:40:05
      For this one, we also heard feedback from Almorro County staff that transit wasn't incorporated and that the Indians fold and maybe instead of seeing transit incorporated, I thought maybe that could fit really well under Goal 2.
    • 00:40:18
      For Goal 3, economic development, support freight movement, workforce access, agriculture, tourism, and economic development.
    • 00:40:25
      For this one, the feedback that we got from Almorro County staff that maybe to regain this economic vitality.
    • 00:40:31
      to reduce the emphasis on just physical development for things that you would do to impact Houston.
    • 00:40:38
      Full court landings and transportation coordination, rule five is system preservation and maintenance, and rule six is community and environmental stewardship.
    • 00:40:49
      Any other feedback on these or thoughts?
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:40:52
      I have some initial feedback, not from my record, but official purchase from the planning standpoint.
    • 00:40:58
      This book is out here that we've got later.
    • 00:41:00
      Community environmental stewardship, you know, we're really focused, Louisa County, right now on protecting the rural agricultural character.
    • 00:41:08
      And so I don't know whether putting some wording of that sort in, so it's not just environmental stewardship or like this area does have a lot of agricultural character to it.
    • 00:41:20
      Nelson, for example, relies on, you know, a lot of agricultural resources for their tourism, green as well.
    • 00:41:30
      I have a feeling the girl's sex will change slightly to be more ag-focused.
    • 00:41:37
      Anybody disagree?
    • 00:41:38
      Rural counting, Stephanie?
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:41:40
      Well, I have some clarification questions.
    • 00:41:43
      Is it more about environmental protection or is it more about protecting agricultural businesses?
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:41:52
      I would like to see both.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:41:55
      Because one of those, I think,
    • 00:41:59
      might be more related to building a new self-transportation foundation.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:42:04
      And Tim Harp?
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:42:05
      Go ahead, Jim.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:42:07
      I would agree.
    • 00:42:09
      I mean, I think environmental stewardship is the smog, the noise, the bifurcation on land with highways and roads, whereas land use, it's a use of the property and promotion of the property and how to afford it and how to do that.
    • 00:42:29
      Your thoughts about preservation, I think, fit more under the Laney's category.
    • 00:42:35
      It's okay if it's related, but I think the environmental is more about the true environmental impacts, fuel leaks, small.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:42:45
      And that gives me clarification of just trying to figure out where goal six was going.
    • 00:42:50
      And part of the thought is tractor movement, people riding horses and roads too.
    • 00:42:57
      A lot of that happens in our counties,
    • 00:42:59
      believe it or not, and I have seen many people complain about it, unfortunately.
    • 00:43:07
      Jim, I appreciate your insight.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:43:10
      I think we have some Louisa residents that ride across public roads in Albemarle most of the time, at least once a year.
    • 00:43:18
      I agree with that.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:43:25
      Does anybody else have any initial feedback and goals on understanding if we're going
    • 00:43:29
      More of that come November.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:43:31
      Is your concern that agricultural maybe isn't like emphasized enough?
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:43:35
      Yes, I think the word agricultural would be nice to have in one of the goals.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:43:40
      Noted.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:43:41
      I guess for, I'm trying to figure out how to make this make sense even in my head, but for economic development, would redevelopment be something different from that?
    • 00:43:50
      Like, I guess this is for rural areas, for places like for the
    • 00:43:56
      and then counting at Scottsville or Batesville to try to kind of bring back some of the, you know, country stores or other things like that.
    • 00:44:03
      I don't know if that would count as redevelopment or if that was longer development, exactly.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:44:08
      I always wonder if redevelopment might be captured under Goal 4, but maybe supporting efficient growth, like with redevelopment.
    • 00:44:16
      David, open on your thoughts.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:44:17
      You can next time pick some.
    • 00:44:19
      I mean, I think, and I'm always struggling with that in the last 10 to 15 years where they have,
    • 00:44:27
      who promoted rural related businesses and then they restricted it, even though it was still allowed, and there were certain changes maybe eight years ago getting out in that same dentist.
    • 00:44:41
      Once an area becomes rural and that old store is no longer in use, did they want to allow it to come back into use because it provided a local service or did they want to prevent it because it was taking away the rural area?
    • 00:44:56
      You know, it is a struggle because it could be used in different ways.
    • 00:45:01
      You know, we have problems in Greene County where our loudest members of the population feel like tourism is destroying the rural area as opposed to protecting it.
    • 00:45:16
      And then they'd rather see a housing development on a farm than a winery.
    • 00:45:23
      So, you know, it's all perspective.
    • 00:45:26
      We had some people that wanted us to define rural and have a small area plan with detailed goals for what is rural.
    • 00:45:40
      And yet 15 people in the room have a different opinion on what was rural.
    • 00:45:46
      It's not as easy as cleaning up the downtown center.
    • 00:45:50
      You want it to look like this.
    • 00:45:53
      Well, first it makes farming as rural, and then the first it makes
    • 00:45:56
      houses on two acres is rural, somebody makes up for winery and events is rural, another person thinks something else.
    • 00:46:04
      So it's a challenge and that's a problem.
    • 00:46:08
      Of course, it's also job security.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:46:14
      I could see just listening to some of this feedback that there might be a tension within Gulf War the way it is now sort of between
    • 00:46:23
      supporting like what we would say as transportation as they have used and maybe like the other sort of value that seems to be coming up as like respecting like the local context and culture that might be more rural and agricultural in nature.
    • 00:46:40
      So I don't know, just thinking through that, it might make sense as you have these discussions that those end up being split out into two separate ways.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:46:48
      So to Tom's point, agriculture is mentioned under economic development,
    • 00:46:53
      which is typically you would think of things like 151 where you have agribusinesses but preserving rural character maybe could add a little more we could flush that out a little more under land use transportation because one is preserving something and the other is providing an aspect of it.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:47:15
      And you're absolutely right because one locality might go we want to preserve agricultural and we think that wineries do that and then the other might
    • 00:47:23
      Just like Jim said.
    • 00:47:24
      So one of the reasons I kind of threw that out there is I didn't want to start the conversation with us anywhere.
    • 00:47:30
      Like, what are the things that are poking out?
    • 00:47:34
      I think we're just going to have to wash it out as we talk to the elected appointed officials.
    • 00:47:41
      I mean, does anybody right now feel as if we're gotten direction that the goals are pretty good the way they are?
    • 00:47:46
      OK.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:47:53
      I think that unless you have one page or one novel for each goal, it's not going to answer all the questions.
    • 00:48:03
      And it's going to be different in every community.
    • 00:48:10
      We have people who have a problem with a rural church that has 200 people come at the same time and read at the same time at events and picnics.
    • 00:48:20
      But if you put a winery next door and have the exact same number of people,
    • 00:48:23
      That's the end of the war.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:48:26
      So it's all about perspective.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:48:33
      So we'll summarize all of this feedback and send it around to everyone so that you have it to be able to reference if it's helpful in your conversations with your elected officials to say there's some feedback that TJPDC has already done and we can provide that.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:48:46
      So yeah, that's a good way to conclude this.
    • 00:48:49
      So if we're getting feedback,
    • 00:48:51
      You want every member of RTAC to email that to you before the November meeting if we can.
    • 00:48:57
      Preferably not the week before.
    • 00:48:58
      We'll see.
    • 00:49:00
      And then we can maybe flush out an updated version of that to share with everybody before we vote.
    • 00:49:07
      Do you have like a target date that you think in mind that that would work if we're going to vote in November?
    • 00:49:11
      Would it be like middle of October, end of October before we get a version two goal that we can shop out for a vote?
    • Sara PenningtonMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:49:19
      Yeah, so the November meeting has been 10, so we would be sending the packet out to you ideally around the 3rd or 4th.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:49:26
      So, I don't know, early October?
    • 00:49:31
      Yeah, possible.
    • 00:49:31
      Give us time to compile all of it.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:49:34
      What I'd suggest and then run out with this, the very next slide sort of answers some of the questions and shows the correlation between some of the things we just discussed and reaching the goals.
    • 00:49:46
      I don't know if it's easy to
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:49:47
      I think that I'm actually going to use the PowerPoint when I'm discussing it.
    • 00:50:01
      If that's okay with you, I think it's a great PowerPoint.
    • 00:50:06
      As Jim was saying, it adds more flavor to the goals.
    • 00:50:11
      It also provides a great breakdown of the demographics that you've provided earlier.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:50:16
      And this will also help us, this slide was my attempt at getting us closer to objectives, right?
    • 00:50:22
      Thinking how are we going to have such measurable things in our plan?
    • 00:50:25
      And so starting from what data do we even have available to be able to measure these to give us sort of a discussion slide, something to talk around, you know, but also open to hearing feedback on these as well.
    • 00:50:37
      Are there other data sources?
    • 00:50:38
      Are there different ways to measure these things that maybe we haven't thought about already would be helpful feedback.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:50:44
      So why don't we make like a goal of October 1st that if we, everybody can get some feedback to the TJPDC October 1st and that way we can try to come together with a decision in November.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:51:00
      Appreciate that.
    • 00:51:01
      So we had a lot of discussion already on goals, but thank you, Jim, for moving us along to this live.
    • 00:51:10
      We've got a few discussion questions up here.
    • 00:51:13
      Anything that folks would add as far as what the success looks like for these proposals, what data sources, are there outcomes that we can't measure with quantitative data that maybe have different measurements of success?
    • 00:51:27
      Just really looking for your input here as well.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:51:42
      If you're only looking at fatal and serious injury crashes, you may... because you're only looking at where the incidence is and specifically I'm thinking like in the towns or in the growth areas, thinking about like the multimodal infrastructure, you might not be able to capture like safety benefits associated with improving the built infrastructure for people to walk around in a growth area, for example.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:52:14
      Is reliability for account development the reliability of the same commute every single day?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:52:20
      I think the... could be.
    • 00:52:22
      Like I think really it is the predictability of your trip.
    • 00:52:25
      Like how often can you make your trip and it is an expected trip versus some days it might take this long to recover from an incident or you know 30 minutes versus a 10 minute trip.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:52:39
      There are a couple different performances related to it.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:52:43
      I don't know how you got in but I think accessibility maybe not the same type of the definition but is important for economic development because how many businesses have we seen fail because it's too hard to get into or you know it's just so that your whole network and the arrangement of your network also helps with success
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:53:12
      One of the things you could do with some of these is just if you wanted to take a more qualitative approach it could just be sort of like answer yes or no like this is
    • 00:53:42
      Is this an improvement on a quarter-earth day by significance?
    • 00:53:49
      If it is, then maybe you'd have economic development.
    • 00:53:55
      You can say yes and support that goal.
    • 00:53:58
      Or just maybe looking not necessarily at quantitative data, but what data is there that can give you information on the characteristics of the number and the location for some of these.
    • 00:54:15
      I mean, obviously it takes what's helpful and what's regardless of that.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:54:23
      Outside of Charlottesville, the infrastructure condition is important, but outside, in many ways, the localities control.
    • 00:54:36
      We work with our partners at VDOT, and we all know that they're overfunded and have a lot of money
    • 00:54:43
      So you can get it just about anything.
    • 00:54:46
      There's at least a small representative and that's the smallest little crack in the road and they'll go rush out and get a complete plan.
    • 00:54:55
      But I mean, it's important and it's valuable.
    • 00:54:59
      It's also, we've seen it in some of our comprehensive planning, development exercises.
    • 00:55:07
      People don't understand the relationship between certain aspects of government we're dealing with.
    • 00:55:13
      And as a lookout, we need to be careful about problems with subgrants.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:55:22
      And maybe with this one, some things that I've thought about for system preservation and maintenance.
    • 00:55:27
      I'll give you one of the questions you can kind of answer with this.
    • 00:55:30
      Will these projects maybe increase maintenance burden?
    • 00:55:34
      Will it enhance the network that we already have versus give us more?
    • 00:55:42
      That doesn't make sense, but it's something I've rolled around a little bit.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:55:46
      One of the other thoughts I had is you put on this, is that often kind of like a multiplier, sort of like how they do land use and SMART SCALE, where like if there are other needs, and there's also like a system preservation and maintenance thing that like gives it a little new stuff and priority.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:56:02
      When you make a good point, from a VDOT standpoint, it benefits us as a locality, we keep adding all this pavement, but yeah,
    • 00:56:12
      They don't have the money for the paper we have now.
    • 00:56:15
      And the way that it starts to set up, they don't really have a good way of setting it down.
    • 00:56:18
      So we're part of the problem.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:56:24
      At least, we're leading the way.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:56:33
      Well, I appreciate everybody letting me start a conversation here just to talk about the goals.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:56:42
      I have nothing further to add at this time.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:56:51
      Thank you guys for that.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:56:53
      And with that, I believe that was my last slide.
    • 00:56:55
      So as far as the next steps being commissioned, we'll get an iteration of this presentation in the same draft of the same auditions that you all saw.
    • 00:57:05
      So given that we want to press pause on the mode for now, they will not be taking action on the global set of meetings
    • 00:57:11
      They will get an overview of all the information that you all got an overview of today as well.
    • 00:57:17
      For your November RTAC meeting, so we will hopefully have finalized goals and objectives for everyone to discuss around, consider, and improve.
    • 00:57:26
      We also want to use some of this information to help us understand how we want to prioritize environments.
    • 00:57:32
      And that will be directly out to those objectives that we have, right?
    • 00:57:36
      Like if we're building some sort of matrix for
    • 00:57:41
      A spreadsheet exercise that helps us by working on our projects that should be informed by the goals and objectives that we adopt.
    • 00:57:47
      So we'll talk more about that at your next event.
    • 00:57:50
      The next phase of this, we will also be looking at the regional transportation systems that involves the streetlight analysis that we talked about.
    • 00:57:58
      And it also talks about looking at things like traffic volumes, the condition of the infrastructure,
    • 00:58:06
      more of a G5 on the transformation related information so a step forward from existing conditions and we'll also start a conversation about public engagement at that next meeting as well.
    • 00:58:18
      Any questions?
    • 00:58:19
      I really appreciate everyone being so engaged and asking really great questions and I'm just very happy this is recorded so you can go to that if you'd like to watch.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:58:29
      Thanks.
    • 00:58:31
      We'll hopefully get you good information about October 1st.
    • 00:58:35
      November 10th.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:58:40
      Thank you.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:58:41
      Thank you, Taylor.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:58:52
      All right.
    • 00:58:53
      I'm ready for a Culpeper District update.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 00:58:57
      Well, the big one is that we've been in 22 Smart Scouts.
    • 00:59:01
      We didn't.
    • 00:59:05
      The localities of the regional body has submitted 22 applications for SMART SCALE products.
    • 00:59:10
      But then Nicole Pepper just starts before the deadline last night, which was all of them.
    • 00:59:14
      Nobody missed the deadline.
    • 00:59:15
      So thanks to everybody for their hard work in getting those in.
    • 00:59:20
      We'll look forward to seeing what gets funded as part of those applications.
    • 00:59:28
      So as we sort of are winding down the SMART SCALE application efforts, I mentioned earlier that the Culpeper District is most likely going to be pursuant to pipeline studies within the TJPDC rural area.
    • 00:59:44
      The first one is with Greene County looking at the 607 intersection.
    • 00:59:50
      Primarily that is 29 and Cedar
    • 00:59:55
      Cedar Grove, yeah, Matthew Scott, thank you, Jim.
    • 00:59:59
      So, you know, there's a lot of traffic challenges out there right now.
    • 01:00:05
      We've done a study there before, but we want to do a more focused study, just looking at that one intersection where there's a lot of additional development, and I'm not going to call you in the sense expected, in the near future.
    • 01:00:14
      And the other one is the Louisa County at Shannon Hill and 33.
    • 01:00:19
      And do you want to say anything about what's going on at that intersection?
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:00:23
      So the Shannon Hill Business Park,
    • 01:00:25
      This is comprised of about 700 acres that was created prior around COVID.
    • 01:00:32
      And it was recently sold to the H-Core for data center campus.
    • 01:00:37
      So the majority of the 700 acres will become H-Core.
    • 01:00:43
      So that's where my new site is going to be right now.
    • 01:00:45
      VDOT is reviewing the site plan.
    • 01:00:48
      So I'll get after that.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 01:00:51
      I think there are also already some safety concerns there.
    • 01:00:55
      We want to take a look at them and see what we can do to help that intersection operate more effectively and safely.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:01:03
      And that intersection is close to, say, Richmond.
    • 01:01:07
      I mean, it's not as close to Dump Springs, but it is an accident for both Gidditch and Louisa County.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:01:15
      Wouldn't that actually improve the intersection when your IT numbers for data centers
    • 01:01:24
      That would be way lower than the industrial park.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:01:27
      But in theory, when the industrial park was created, there was going to be a lot more daily trips.
    • 01:01:34
      But after construction data center, if you're riding, there wouldn't be as many, I guess, factory or laboratory, whatever you're going to have in your industrial park.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 01:01:47
      So that's the next round of studies.
    • 01:01:52
      And then
    • 01:01:54
      The only other thing that I mentioned is that we got an update last week that the Office of Intermental Planning and Investment is not expecting to continue their growth and accessibility planning program, grant program.
    • 01:02:11
      So I just want to mention that.
    • 01:02:15
      Otherwise, if you don't have any questions, I'm going to answer them, but that's what's going on.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:02:22
      Sandy, thank you for all your hard work.
    • 01:02:30
      All right, Lynchburg District update.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 01:02:36
      Yeah, can you guys hear me?
    • SPEAKER_04
    • 01:02:39
      Yes.
    • 01:02:41
      This is Kelly Rowan, the planning manager for Lynchburg.
    • 01:02:44
      Sorry, I was a little late.
    • 01:02:48
      We also are submitting SMART SCALE applications at 21, one in Nelson County.
    • 01:02:57
      And yeah, we were working a little too close to the last hour yesterday, but they're in.
    • 01:03:08
      We also are looking at pipeline.
    • 01:03:11
      So for this,
    • 01:03:12
      For this area, I believe we just have one pipeline request that will be in Nelson County looking at 29 and Route 6 River Road intersection.
    • 01:03:29
      We will talk with Dylan and the county more at our fall planning summit that we have in just a few weeks just to make sure we're in agreement on
    • 01:03:42
      you know the extent of that and we're obviously coordinating with our CTB member as well on getting that that study location approved.
    • 01:03:54
      I think that's I think that's all for now we're kind of in that you know wrapping up one thing moving into the next round of things.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:04:05
      Thank you very much and thank you for all your help with SMART SCALE.
    • 01:04:12
      All right.
    • 01:04:14
      We need to reschedule some meetings.
    • Sara PenningtonMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 01:04:18
      Well, as Taylor and I, but mostly Taylor was working on schedule for the long range plan, and we were thinking about the possibility of a survey for public engagement.
    • 01:04:35
      As we were laying it out, we realized that the
    • 01:04:38
      If we kept our meeting schedule exactly as is with the February 2nd meeting, we would essentially be asking people to complete a survey during the holidays.
    • 01:04:52
      So we wanted to get your feedback on if you thought that was an issue.
    • 01:04:57
      We were a little hesitant.
    • 01:05:00
      And our proposed solution was to see if possibly moving the February meeting
    • 01:05:07
      to either of the two March dates listed would give a little bit more time for the survey to occur, not in the middle of Christmas and some time for us to, of course, analyze the results and present them to you.
    • 01:05:20
      So, yeah, it's really just here as, you know, something for us to discuss, to get your thoughts and your feedback on.
    • 01:05:28
      But we didn't want to come to you with just a problem and no potential solution.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:05:34
      I could do more circuit, but I cannot do 16th if we want another.
    • 01:05:37
      I mean, we have Vice Chair, so that's okay.
    • 01:05:46
      I mean, how long do we have to do the survey, I guess is the question.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:05:51
      We'd probably look to leave it open for at least a month and give our staff enough time to be able to work through those results and produce materials for you all.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:06:00
      If you all need us to move, we will move the meeting.
    • 01:06:04
      So anybody else looking at their calendar to see if the second or sixteenth works for you?
    • SPEAKER_04
    • 01:06:11
      I'm happy for everyone.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 01:06:20
      All those in favor say aye.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:06:31
      Aye.
    • 01:06:34
      All those opposed?
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:06:48
      Alright.
    • Sara PenningtonMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 01:06:50
      Well, we certainly appreciate your flexibility of helping us make sure that we have enough time to adequately get feedback for this plan.
    • 01:06:59
      So thank you again for that.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:07:01
      Well, thank you for your flexibility and for giving me feedback for the goals.
    • 01:07:08
      Round table favorite moment.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 01:07:12
      Dan, do you want to start?
    • 01:07:16
      I don't think I have anything in addition.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:07:20
      I'll go ahead and start.
    • 01:07:22
      So as I mentioned earlier, the Planning Commission in the last few months and work sessions were working on growth management tools.
    • 01:07:28
      The board is asking them to come up with options.
    • 01:07:31
      More information will be forthcoming.
    • 01:07:35
      But I don't have anything really from a transportation standpoint to speak about.
    • 01:07:41
      So I will turn it over to... Can I ask a question real quick?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:07:46
      Those growth management tools today includes anything like
    • 01:07:50
      access management or transportation related items that would change or impact growth.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:07:58
      Not at this time.
    • 01:08:00
      Mainly looking at zoning tweaks to zoning ordinance.
    • 01:08:05
      We've added 5,000 acres and counting for our ag volstel difference since September of last year.
    • 01:08:12
      And we are continuing to grow the number of acres from 5,000
    • 01:08:17
      We're looking at PDRs, PDRs, all things.
    • 01:08:22
      And really it's just going to be the Planning Commission is looking to provide options for us to discuss.
    • 01:08:29
      So I apologize.
    • 01:08:32
      It sounds kind of vague, but I haven't been in the leads working on it.
    • 01:08:37
      The Planning Commission has been doing a lot of heavy lifting and I think more will come out of the November meeting.
    • 01:08:42
      I'll probably have more information to share.
    • Mike MurphyAlternate Member, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 01:08:49
      I think certainly anything that's particularly to the folks that are not Charlotte, so Albemarle and carefully tracking the movements of the Cardo, you should perhaps take a look at that prioritization study that's happening as the Cardo board intends to vote on it in September.
    • 01:09:17
      There's a special meeting of that board in August 24th, which will revise some of those priorities.
    • 01:09:27
      While some of that is likely to wait some services for Charlottesville area transit that don't touch you.
    • 01:09:37
      Jaunt services are part of those priorities as well.
    • 01:09:40
      In part it is having a discussion about
    • 01:09:43
      How do they demonstrate the value proposition and incentivize your participation in some future version of CARNA by including some of the projects that have origins and destinations outside and with some credentials going out more.
    • 01:10:00
      So happy to talk with anybody about that who had specific questions.
    • 01:10:08
      I was out with the Lisa County Talk a little bit about it just a couple weeks ago.
    • 01:10:12
      and we'll be making around team people about what the Jaunt part of it is really.
    • 01:10:21
      Other than that, right now we're piloting on demand service in Greene County and we are advancing our acquisition of software that's going to make that available over
    • 01:10:38
      our whole 2071 square mile footprint over the next year or so which is exciting.
    • 01:10:48
      We're experiencing some steady growth in most of our services and particularly some of the commuter lines that are bringing in people.
    • 01:10:57
      As of July 1, we have access to demo grant dollars from the state for three projects
    • 01:11:06
      to folks involved on RTAC.
    • 01:11:11
      One of them is to create a clean connect for community route, a fixed route service for Greene County.
    • 01:11:23
      And that, I believe, may be in your inbox between Kathy and I to talk about in a couple of weeks.
    • 01:11:35
      and other is that here at the PDC there's the things about mobility management and one of the most common comments that they get is about when they get help coming into the urban core for appointments from Louisa and Fluvanna.
    • 01:11:59
      When that happens in the morning, they have to wait until mid to late afternoon to get that transportation back.
    • 01:12:07
      And so we applied for and were successful in getting money to create midday service for both of those jurisdictions.
    • 01:12:15
      And at the same time, we're going to engage in a little bit of planning period during the next six months.
    • 01:12:21
      And then we will deliver for 18 to 24 months on the servicing of it.
    • 01:12:26
      The idea of
    • 01:12:28
      making the service slightly earlier in the morning and later in the afternoon so that it really can be a real workforce service and insert the midday service for people who are coming in more so for appointments at the medical center or for other types of performance.
    • 01:12:45
      So more to come on those projects.
    • 01:12:49
      Other than that, mostly business as usual.
    • 01:12:55
      Thank you.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 01:12:58
      All right.
    • 01:12:59
      For Albemarle, the big thing that I'm working on right now is we've been trying to implement that VDOT rule of law about using unpaid work funds for things that have been paving.
    • 01:13:13
      So we're going to the board on September 2nd, with the proposals to do what we call the unpaid road improvement program.
    • 01:13:22
      And we're gonna suggest roads to the board, recommended roads to the board that
    • 01:13:29
      staff, things that could be a no-pay list for a few years.
    • 01:13:35
      It wouldn't be a permanent thing.
    • 01:13:36
      So we're looking at that and trying to workshop how to best work in this really broad and thorough process.
    • 01:13:43
      And the other big thing is that we are starting to scope urban and rural transportation plans from include rural area transportation as well.
    • 01:13:52
      So that's in the very early stages.
    • 01:13:54
      Jessica Dimmick is the head of the effort right now.
    • 01:13:57
      We're kind of just
    • 01:13:58
      figuring out what is going to entail a broadly working arm with the city as well, or to thank them for stuff.
    • 01:14:05
      So it'll be a cool effort, I think, over the next two or three years.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:14:10
      I think I hear a future presentation.
    • 01:14:14
      About you, Rick, about my favorite stuff?
    • 01:14:16
      About everything.
    • Sara PenningtonMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 01:14:19
      You had said previously once you have maybe a better handle on that favorite stuff that you would be willing to share with the group.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:14:26
      Like a five-minute flow chart, you know?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:14:28
      I haven't already done that.
    • 01:14:31
      I made one last week.
    • 01:14:32
      I could do that in, I guess, November meeting.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:14:35
      Okay.
    • 01:14:36
      Sorry to put you on the spot.
    • Sara PenningtonMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 01:14:38
      No, no, no.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 01:14:40
      I've already done that.
    • 01:14:42
      It's interesting because we're going to try to make it work with Royal Rustic so that it's not two separate programs but it's one thing where there's two separate I guess options in the room so fingers crossed it works.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:14:59
      Have you identified, because some of the roads don't qualify for improvements, some of the roads may qualify for improvements but
    • 01:15:13
      a couple of graphic volumes, drainage lines, an easement line, you may not really benefit from the improvement side.
    • 01:15:23
      How do you write that out?
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 01:15:25
      So for the roads that people would say are questions of a road, but it can't be paved for whatever reason, not an even key, there's too steep a grade, a whole host of stuff, they would still qualify for road improvement money because
    • 01:15:40
      You know, if it's a drainage issue and it's a structural issue, that can be fixed with the unpaired road bugs.
    • 01:15:47
      That doesn't mean a road, on I think all five, is to be a road rustic.
    • 01:15:50
      It's supposed to go through the whole process and the whole review.
    • 01:15:53
      But this is a way for us to address some of the issues we have in county where it really is just like one corner is really, really bad.
    • 01:16:00
      Where there's a section where everything that rains, we have a giant washout.
    • 01:16:04
      So it's more
    • 01:16:05
      kind of focused spot improvements.
    • 01:16:07
      It's not reconstructing a whole road, it's looking at spot improvements.
    • 01:16:12
      And some people, we have a lot of people, like Commissioner Longoria on the Green Commission, and now they're big on the recreational aspects of these rural roads, and we want to preserve that as well.
    • 01:16:24
      There's that balance between being able to drive on an all-weather road and also having the option to go grab a bike when you're running on some of these calmer roads.
    • 01:16:32
      So we're trying to kind of
    • 01:16:35
      balance that as well, which is why staff is recommending a few roads to not be paved for at least for now so that people over here in the county and the city and also around are able to enjoy places like Bridge Road, for example, as a continuing feature as a rural road and there's this rural affect to it.
    • 01:16:54
      A whole bunch of things and people have a lot of different things.
    • SPEAKER_04
    • 01:16:57
      Sounds fascinating.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:16:58
      And I get to hear all about them.
    • 01:17:00
      We've just, we've run into some roads where we look at the non-paving options.
    • 01:17:05
      and some of them are just, there isn't, because of the way the road was built, how narrow it is, the way the drainage is, having drainage isn't going to flood some lower property, all of the above, there isn't a good solution even on it.
    • 01:17:28
      So I don't know if you'd run into that.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 01:17:32
      Not yet.
    • 01:17:33
      I'm sure I will, if we're going to hit a point where we're going to have a project where it might be the best option to pay a small section and then when we run into that problem, we will, it's an iterative process that can time itself.
    • 01:17:45
      We'll have incremental improvements to this every year for rural aspects that have been doing it.
    • 01:17:49
      Things have changed.
    • 01:17:50
      So this is just a new year of new changes.
    • 01:17:53
      Yeah.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:17:54
      Okay.
    • 01:17:55
      That's been the big thing for a long time.
    • 01:18:00
      Thank you.
    • 01:18:01
      Just to follow up, last time I mentioned that we have the SMART SCALE project that we're working through where they locally administer.
    • 01:18:12
      They reached some major milestones, went through the CTB because the study showed that the original plan wouldn't work with the current traffic.
    • 01:18:26
      So it was redefined as a continuous green key.
    • 01:18:31
      What that is for anybody that hasn't looked it up is it's a partial signal usually, and the major thoroughfare isn't stopped.
    • 01:18:43
      It has continuously, traffic continues flowing, but there's a long acceleration lane that's built.
    • 01:18:50
      So in our case, it'd be a southbound lap onto Route 29.
    • 01:18:56
      So they'll stop northbound traffic,
    • 01:18:58
      You'll come across and head south, but you'll be in a separate protected lane.
    • 01:19:04
      And the morning commute and traffic going southbound doesn't stop, which is key.
    • 01:19:10
      If anybody's been on 29 North in the morning, it can get challenging, sending you to the airport for the police.
    • 01:19:18
      And so that required another $5 million in funding, and it was approved by the CDB.
    • 01:19:25
      Last Thursday, we had our design
    • 01:19:29
      Public Hearing, we're in our 30-day period now and then at the end of that with our VDOT doing a final review, we'll be able to put the bid out on the street and negotiate through that and actually start having payment down.
    • 01:19:50
      So it'll be quite exciting.
    • 01:19:52
      And then as Sandy had requested, Greene is looking at
    • 01:19:59
      offering an incentive and reviewing a particular parcel, but it's not specific to that parcel, which turns out not to be the right place.
    • 01:20:08
      But we're looking at creating a unmanned vehicle testing site so that companies that are in the area that are working in research development have a place to locally test their vehicles and
    • 01:20:29
      So we've come up with a lot of potential conditions.
    • 01:20:32
      We have a site that we're looking at, and we're actually going to have a demonstration with multiple pilots piloting this category of drones.
    • 01:20:44
      It's the drones that are 55 pounds smaller, which is the most common thing that's being tested now.
    • 01:20:51
      And so we're just looking through that.
    • 01:20:54
      We may identify that this is a good site or not,
    • 01:20:58
      It's a county owned facility.
    • 01:20:59
      We don't have to follow our own zoning, but we are, the board has asked and wants to follow through the same process.
    • 01:21:07
      So we'll require, especially use permit if it was a private application and we're doing that.
    • 01:21:13
      If we identify sites, we'll go through that process.
    • 01:21:16
      And so we're, you know, working through what it means, what restrictions we have, what fears that people have
    • 01:21:27
      We're having this demonstration to find out if the average fear, even closely resembles an actual impact or not.
    • 01:21:39
      So it'll be an interesting thing.
    • 01:21:41
      People are worried about these giant flying vehicles that are going to fly over their homes and spy on them.
    • 01:21:48
      And these are smaller drones that I'll find out next Monday,
    • 01:21:53
      I understand that once they're 50 feet in the air, you can't see or hear them.
    • 01:21:59
      And the conditions and things that we're working through from other communities are that they would have to remain on the property.
    • 01:22:06
      They're not allowed to fly over properties from our side, please.
    • 01:22:11
      The FAA has different regulations on that, but we would restrict it.
    • 01:22:14
      So unless there's an agreement with a contiguous property owner that allow additional area to fly, they can't leave the property.
    • 01:22:23
      noise restrictions, insurance requirements.
    • 01:22:28
      The contractors that would come in and have their own FAA licensing would provide signing with an improved or larger than normal ceiling to provide the benefit that they were looking for.
    • 01:22:43
      So to manage all that, they'd come in and manage themselves.
    • 01:22:47
      That's the general thought.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 01:22:49
      Can I ask a follow-up question?
    • 01:22:50
      Was this something that was requested or is this a county initiative?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:22:57
      It's something of interest with people that are located in the county and live in that industry and working through economic development and it seemed like an incentive to offer when we're on the 29th corridor where a lot of people that want to be able to do that testing want to locate so it's
    • 01:23:18
      A little bit of an incentive to try and attract people to the area and have an amenity for them.
    • 01:23:24
      And then because of that, the board asked us to look into it.
    • 01:23:29
      And because it's kind of blocked there also.
    • Sandy ShackelfordMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 01:23:31
      Interesting.
    • 01:23:33
      Thank you for sharing.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:23:34
      You're welcome.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:23:38
      Thank you.
    • 01:23:40
      Additional updates on our end.
    • 01:23:43
      The NPO submitted an application, a build application for a Barbana River bicycle and pedestrian bridge.
    • 01:23:51
      This definitely was the fourth time we submitted it, and we did hear back, unfortunately, that we were not selected again this year.
    • 01:23:56
      Just wanted to provide that update.
    • 01:23:59
      We also have a new CTP member, the name is Jim Moy, as of July 1st for the Hope Upper District, he is out of Mineral, Virginia.
    • 01:24:08
      That's exciting.
    • 01:24:09
      There's not a bio or anything up yet on SMTV's website, but he is serving in that role now.
    • 01:24:15
      Those are my two main updates that I should share.
    • Sara PenningtonMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 01:24:19
      I just have one quick one for RideShare.
    • 01:24:22
      We are currently, as of four days ago, just launched our August carpool contest that we're doing.
    • 01:24:30
      So any folks who are carpooling through our app
    • 01:24:35
      for the desktop and they log those trips are then entered for additional opportunities to win $100 gift cards.
    • 01:24:43
      So we're excited.
    • 01:24:44
      It's always fun to kick off the new fiscal year with something.
    • 01:24:48
      This is the earliest we've done one before, but I think it is really capitalizing on some of the momentum we had from programs last year.
    • 01:24:55
      So yeah.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:24:57
      Very cool.
    • 01:24:59
      Dylan, tell us all about Nelson.
    • SPEAKER_01
    • 01:25:04
      Yeah, so for SMART SCALE, like Kelly said, we're doing one application this round.
    • 01:25:14
      One of the, the bigger one we were looking at was recommended in Colleen, some R cuts.
    • 01:25:23
      I'm a big fan.
    • 01:25:24
      I was a big fan of this project and you know, after learning more about it, it was the, I might get these numbers a little bit off, but
    • 01:25:34
      I think in the Lynchburg district, or in our district, it was the 16th and 28th rated POIs out of the top 100 in the district.
    • 01:25:49
      So part of the issue is like, you know, one landowner with multiple businesses, various access points and purposes on one side,
    • 01:26:01
      You know, they don't support it.
    • 01:26:03
      So we had a pretty spicy meeting with them and VDOT and, you know, tried to come up with potential solutions.
    • 01:26:13
      But, you know, we had board members there and everything.
    • 01:26:17
      And anyway, ultimately, you know, the county determined that, you know, we weren't supporting that one this round and that in the interim,
    • 01:26:28
      that there might be other less impactful improvements that are identified in the Safe Streets for All.
    • 01:26:36
      So that's kind of in the works right now.
    • 01:26:40
      But the one application we do have is on 151 for rockfish schooling.
    • 01:26:49
      So we've tried to apply for this one in the last round.
    • 01:26:53
      VDOT fought really hard to
    • 01:26:56
      allow its acceptance as an application, but it was unsuccessful.
    • 01:27:00
      So unfortunately, because this is the way it works, we had to wait for a few more accidents to happen there to get thrown in the data.
    • 01:27:10
      So within the last couple of years that bumped it to being eligible for an application.
    • 01:27:17
      So, and let's see other things, the land acquisition,
    • 01:27:24
      that Nelson County recently purchased about 680 acres, give or take a few.
    • 01:27:32
      And it's got road frontage on both the 29 bypass right before you come into Livingston heading north and another highly traveled access road route 56.
    • 01:27:52
      Everybody in the county is looking to initiate really collaborative strategic planning, community-driven process to determine how that property is going to be developed so there's no plans.
    • 01:28:11
      Right now, we're just starting building relationships more with the EDA and the service authority.
    • 01:28:22
      Over the last four or five years working on the comp plan and the ordinance update, figuring out how important it is to have that collaboration with those agencies early on.
    • 01:28:38
      Currently under construction, we have a SMART SCALE project on the 29 bypass.
    • 01:28:44
      when you're heading north where Oak Ridge Road is and most people probably know that as the lock-in road, lock-in property.
    • 01:28:54
      So that's an older from a few rounds ago that got funded.
    • 01:28:58
      So that property hasn't had that particular event in a number of years but they do other events throughout the year and
    • 01:29:08
      We have one really large one that came last year.
    • 01:29:11
      I think it was Valley of the Seven Stars.
    • 01:29:13
      So they're planning on returning this year.
    • 01:29:15
      So and that should be completed in the next few weeks.
    • 01:29:22
      And then our, you know, Dunnean subdivision ordinance update, of course, we're have our public open house scheduled this month.
    • 01:29:29
      So we're about to get
    • 01:29:32
      The first final draft and have everybody be able to read that.
    • 01:29:39
      It'll be the first one pieced together open to the public since December.
    • 01:29:44
      So then we'll have hearings.
    • 01:29:47
      We're working on scheduling and adoption, transition.
    • 01:29:50
      And so I know Tom likes to have people do presentations and he's mentioned it on more than one occasion.
    • 01:30:00
      So I have
    • 01:30:02
      Some bones going, you know, for a presentation about that experience and that process and relating it back to, you know, transportation and RTAC and everything.
    • 01:30:15
      So maybe March, if we're needing something by then.
    • 01:30:23
      So y'all will obviously stay in touch about that.
    • 01:30:27
      But, and then,
    • 01:30:32
      Our rural planning caucus, of course, you know, I always have to plug it, is in October.
    • 01:30:39
      So check that out, rpcva.org, and if you have any questions, let me know.
    • Sara PenningtonMember, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee
    • 01:30:45
      It's a great event.
    • SPEAKER_01
    • 01:30:47
      Great event.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:30:51
      Dylan, thank you.
    • 01:30:52
      You got a lot going on, and thank you for your sacrifice in volunteering for the March meeting.
    • 01:30:58
      We'll take you up on that.
    • SPEAKER_01
    • 01:31:00
      All right, sounds good.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:31:03
      Does anybody have anything else they'd like to share with the group?
    • 01:31:09
      Any other housekeeping items from TJPDC?
    • 01:31:16
      Well, how about we motion to adjourn the meeting early?
    • 01:31:22
      All in favor say aye.
    • 01:31:23
      Aye.
    • 01:31:24
      Thank you everybody.
    • 01:31:26
      Bye.
    • 01:31:32
      Thanks Dylan.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:31:33
      They never vote.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:31:34
      No, you think you're giving a live vote?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:31:37
      Sorry.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:31:38
      No, I think so.