Central Virginia
  • Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission
  • Planning District Commission Meeting 3/3/2022
  • Auto-scroll

Planning District Commission Meeting   3/3/2022

Attachments
  • 2c Solid Waste Management Plan 5-year Update Revisions - Memo.pdf
  • 3b Hazard Mitigation Update Presentation.pdf
  • 3c HOME-ARP Presentation.pdf
  • 4a TJPDC Draft Minutes 2.10.22.pdf
  • 4b i-iv January Financial Statements.pdf
  • 5a FY23 Rural Work Program Draft.pdf
  • 5b CDBG Regional Priorities 2022.pdf
  • 5c i-iv FY22 Amended Operating Budget.pdf
  • 6a 2021-26 Solid Waste Management Plan 5-Year Update Resolution.pdf
  • 6b ii HOME ARP Gap Analysis and Needs Assessnent RFP - Draft.pdf
  • 6b i Resolution for Issuance of RFP for HOME-ARP Gap Analysis.pdf
  • 7a ED Report March 2022.pdf
  • Full Commission Packet 2022-03-03.pdf
  • Meeting Recordign 2022-03-03.url
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:00:03
      All right, Sandy, if we could go on ahead, I'm going to call this meeting to order.
    • 00:00:09
      And first things first, if you could read the notice of electronic meeting.
    • SPEAKER_04
    • 00:00:13
      This meeting of the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission is being held pursuant to the Code of Virginia section 2.2-3708.2, which allows a public body to hold electronic meetings when the locality in which it is located has declared a local state of emergency and the catastrophic nature of the emergency makes it impracticable or unsafe to assemble a quorum in a single location.
    • 00:00:34
      The purpose of the meeting is to provide for the discharge of its lawful purposes, duties, and responsibilities.
    • 00:00:40
      This meeting is being held via electronic video and audio means through Zoom online meetings, and there will be an opportunity for public comment during that portion of the agenda.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:00:49
      Notice has been provided to the public through notice at the TJPDC offices to the media, website posting, and agenda.
    • 00:00:56
      The meeting minutes will reflect the nature of the emergency, that the meeting was held by electronic communication means, and the type of electronic communication means by which the meeting was held.
    • 00:01:04
      A recording of this meeting will be posted at tjpdc.org within 10 days.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:01:19
      Mr. Rutherford, you are- I know, that's such a rookie mistake after all these years.
    • 00:01:25
      Ned, did you say something, or are you talking to me?
    • 00:01:34
      Okay, I guess we're good.
    • 00:01:35
      All right, let's go ahead and do the roll call.
    • 00:01:37
      Ms. Shackelford?
    • SPEAKER_04
    • 00:01:39
      Sorry, Counselor Payne?
    • 00:01:41
      Mr. Sulli-Yates?
    • SPEAKER_20
    • 00:01:43
      Present.
    • SPEAKER_04
    • 00:01:45
      Supervisor Galloway?
    • 00:01:50
      Supervisor Andrews?
    • Ned GallawayMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:01:52
      Here.
    • SPEAKER_04
    • 00:01:53
      Supervisor O'Brien?
    • Ned GallawayMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:01:55
      Here.
    • SPEAKER_04
    • 00:01:56
      Mr. Smith?
    • 00:01:59
      Ms. Wilkinson?
    • 00:02:01
      Here.
    • 00:02:02
      Supervisor Barlow?
    • 00:02:06
      Supervisor Jones?
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:02:09
      Ms. Bishop?
    • 00:02:11
      Here.
    • 00:02:13
      Supervisor Herring?
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:02:15
      Here.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:02:16
      And Supervisor Rutherford?
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:02:18
      Here.
    • 00:02:21
      Did we miss anybody?
    • 00:02:22
      Did Ms. Jones say hi?
    • 00:02:23
      I know she's here.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:02:27
      I did.
    • 00:02:28
      I think I forgot to unmute myself from here.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:02:31
      All right, we got a quorum, right guys?
    • 00:02:37
      All right, so let's go on ahead and move on into matters from the public.
    • 00:02:43
      We have some comments by the public.
    • 00:02:44
      Limited to no more than two minutes per person.
    • 00:02:48
      Before we do that, Sandy, do we have any comments via email, online, website?
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:02:53
      We do.
    • 00:02:54
      We do not, no.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:02:56
      Gotcha.
    • 00:02:56
      Hearing nothing.
    • 00:02:57
      All right, this time do we have any public who would wish to speak at this time?
    • 00:03:02
      If you could raise your hand or just unmute yourself.
    • 00:03:08
      I don't see anybody.
    • 00:03:09
      Do y'all see anything?
    • 00:03:11
      Nope.
    • 00:03:11
      All right.
    • 00:03:12
      I close matters from the public.
    • 00:03:15
      Moving on to a public hearing, solid waste plan amendment.
    • 00:03:19
      Charise, take it away.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 00:03:24
      Hi, everybody.
    • 00:03:26
      So we
    • 00:03:28
      The solid waste, five-year solid waste planning update was put before the commission on October 7, 2021 to basically do the five-year update within the plan and to discuss the goals going forward.
    • 00:03:43
      And it was adopted, but since it's come to our attention that Dominion Energy is seeking a permit to build a new captive industrial landfill in Fluvanna County.
    • 00:03:58
      And according to the DEQ regulation, any deletion, secession, operation, or any change has to be brought before the commission and approved.
    • 00:04:11
      So the Virginia state law is requiring them to close the station that they're closing at the station's North Pond.
    • 00:04:26
      But before they can get the permit, it has to be written into the plan, which it is now on page 10, under facilities, and approved again.
    • 00:04:38
      So what we are asking of you all tonight is for the stated reasons, if the staff
    • 00:04:46
      would vote to accept the proposed changes so that we can send the plan back to the DEQ and that Dominion Energy can get their permit to move forward with building the captive industrial land.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:05:04
      Great, thank you so much.
    • 00:05:05
      Does anybody have any questions?
    • SPEAKER_20
    • 00:05:09
      What are the consequences if we say no?
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 00:05:13
      That's a good question since they, VDEQ, are the ones that's telling them that they have to close the current landfill they have.
    • 00:05:24
      So a little bit of background on that from what I understand when I asked about why they're being asked to close the landfill.
    • 00:05:31
      Apparently, they are contributing to waste into the James River.
    • 00:05:37
      And so they have to create a captive industrial landfill
    • 00:05:42
      and their deadline is this year to get that done.
    • 00:05:46
      So if we refuse, I'm not quite sure what will happen since VDQ is stating that they must do it, but they also must get approval from the commission to get the permit.
    • 00:06:00
      I can check back and get that answer to you if need be.
    • 00:06:04
      It is a conundrum.
    • SPEAKER_18
    • 00:06:06
      Yeah, this is Tony O'Brien speaking.
    • 00:06:09
      So this is all for the Brimo Bluff plant, I assume, when you're talking about the North Pond there.
    • 00:06:15
      Dominion, just to update the supervisors, is basically, and I'm not saying this is specific to this project specifically, I could be wrong and feel free to correct me, but Dominion is under regulations having to remove the coal ash that
    • 00:06:36
      is currently filled and this may be generating excess waste and part of the landfill that they have there as well too.
    • 00:06:43
      Fluvanna County worked with Dominion and instead of having Dominion ship all the ash pond to another county, they are doing a capped and lined facility almost directly next to where the existing capping is, but it is not lined.
    • 00:07:02
      And so that's all happening in that area for this currently decommissioned power plant, previously coal ash coal power plant there.
    • 00:07:16
      And I'm not sure if the two are exactly related and you can correct me, but I just wanted to provide that background if anybody had questions with regard to that.
    • 00:07:25
      At the end of the day, this is better for the health of the river
    • 00:07:30
      the James River there, and of course for any dust that is generated by the coal ash as well too.
    • 00:07:37
      And they have an extensive mitigation plan to deal with the transport and removal of the coal ash in one pond into the next pond.
    • 00:07:46
      I believe, and correct me if I'm wrong, they're part of where they have this coal ash also includes this landfill, so that's my understanding.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:07:58
      And if I'm not mistaken, we're not voting on this till later in the agenda, correct, Charise?
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 00:08:02
      Say it again.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:08:03
      Are we voting on this later in the agenda?
    • 00:08:07
      Yes, it's a resolution.
    • 00:08:09
      Okay.
    • 00:08:09
      Yeah.
    • 00:08:10
      All right.
    • 00:08:11
      So we're just opening a public hearing to see if any public are here to speak about it.
    • 00:08:15
      So we'll readdress it and vote on it later in the resolution.
    • 00:08:18
      So all right.
    • 00:08:20
      We'll hold on to it.
    • 00:08:23
      Let's go ahead and open it.
    • 00:08:24
      If there's no other questions for Charise at this time, let's go on ahead and open the public hearing.
    • 00:08:31
      I open the public hearing.
    • 00:08:33
      Is there anybody here from the public that wishes to speak about it?
    • 00:08:37
      I don't see any hands and I don't see a thing.
    • 00:08:40
      All right.
    • 00:08:40
      Let's go ahead and close the public hearing.
    • 00:08:43
      Thank you so much, Charise.
    • 00:08:44
      I guess, are you guys sticking around or are you heading out, I guess?
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 00:08:49
      It looks like Christine is coming up again later.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:08:53
      No problem.
    • 00:08:55
      Sounds good.
    • 00:08:56
      All right.
    • 00:08:56
      Let's go on ahead and move on to presentations.
    • 00:09:03
      Introduction of our COO PD.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:09:08
      Christine.
    • 00:09:12
      Unmuted now.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:09:13
      I am very pleased to introduce to you all.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:09:16
      Can you guys hear me?
    • 00:09:18
      Just confirm.
    • Christine JacobsExecutive Director
    • 00:09:21
      I am very pleased to introduce Ruth Emerick to you all.
    • 00:09:25
      She is coming to the PDC as our Chief Operating Officer and Program Director.
    • 00:09:31
      As in previous years, when we had a Chief Operating Officer, it'll be a split position.
    • 00:09:36
      50-50, 40-60 time spent on administrative items for the PDC versus billing to our programs.
    • 00:09:45
      We're really excited to have her.
    • 00:09:46
      She does come by way of Albemarle County, where she recently served as the program director.
    • 00:09:52
      She has extensive experience in GIS.
    • 00:09:55
      She has a graduate certificate in local government management.
    • 00:09:59
      She has a really strong background in managing projects, in relationship building, and in her management skills.
    • 00:10:06
      And we're particularly excited about bringing her on as a strategic thinker, thinking about systems level and operations level change, and her experience with leadership.
    • 00:10:17
      So we're very excited to have her.
    • 00:10:18
      I was going to give Ruth the floor if she wants to say anything to the commission.
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 00:10:22
      Thank you, Christine.
    • 00:10:24
      I just wanted to say to everyone, I'm glad to be here and I'm very excited to work on all the things that we'll be working on.
    • 00:10:31
      There's a lot of good projects going on at the Planning District Commission, so I'm happy to be a part.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:10:41
      Excellent.
    • 00:10:41
      Well, welcome, Ruth.
    • 00:10:42
      We look forward to your employment with the PDC and
    • 00:10:48
      Again, as we always say to our new hires, if you ever have any questions, feel free and ask us.
    • 00:10:53
      Your success is our success, so always feel free to outreach whenever needed.
    • 00:10:59
      All right, moving on to hazard mitigation plan update.
    • 00:11:06
      Ian.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 00:11:06
      Hey, everyone.
    • 00:11:09
      Christine, would you mind sharing?
    • 00:11:11
      Oh, great.
    • 00:11:12
      Hey, everyone.
    • 00:11:14
      For those of you I haven't met, my name is Ian
    • 00:11:16
      Ian Baxter, I'm a planner here at the Thomas Jefferson Planning District.
    • 00:11:21
      You got it, Christine?
    • 00:11:23
      Okay, good.
    • 00:11:24
      Yeah, so I'd like to briefly give you guys just a quick update on the hazard mitigation plan update process.
    • 00:11:32
      We are currently in the midst of revising and eventually getting approved.
    • 00:11:40
      The 2018 plan is the last time that this was formally adopted by the localities in the planning district.
    • 00:11:44
      and FEMA requires us to update it every five years.
    • 00:11:47
      So I just wanted to briefly go through some of the key dimensions of the plan as well as sort of where we are at right now.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:11:55
      So if you wouldn't mind going to the next slide, Christine.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 00:12:03
      Great, so if you're not acquainted with the hazard mitigation planning process, essentially it has two components that are really valuable for localities.
    • 00:12:13
      One being obviously
    • 00:12:14
      Mcconnell.
    • 00:12:15
      So that's encouraging and requiring proactive plan making before natural disasters.
    • 00:12:21
      But also there's an incentive that FEMA requires natural hazard mitigation plans as a condition for eligibility in certain mitigation grant programs.
    • 00:12:30
      So localities will have to have either participated in a regional effort like we are here, you all are doing here with us, or have passed their own before being eligible for certain mitigation grant dollars from the federal government.
    • 00:12:44
      It's really a six step process.
    • 00:12:46
      I've underlined and highlighted the number six, which is where we are at.
    • 00:12:51
      So we're obviously it's 2022.
    • 00:12:52
      We are getting very close to having this plan completed.
    • 00:12:56
      But generally speaking, the main components of the plan are gathering information about the communities in the planning district commission or in the planning district.
    • 00:13:05
      So transportation, statistics, housing information, geographic and environmental information.
    • 00:13:11
      Performing a hazard identification and risk assessment which is basically looking to see what potential natural hazards are most common in the planning district and sort of determining how probable they are in the future and how damaging they could be potentially and incorporating statistics like loss of life, property damage, and environmental damage.
    • 00:13:34
      Also conducting both the vulnerability and capabilities assessment so
    • 00:13:37
      sort of thinking about the human impact that hazards could cause as well as estimating potential losses, both again in human life and economic losses, as well as a capabilities assessment, which is essentially a survey of each of the locality's capacity to mitigate natural hazards and sort of implement the mitigation efforts that are present within the plan.
    • 00:13:57
      And that is where we are at now, which we've just finished up finalizing our goals and objectives, which basically serve as the categories within
    • 00:14:06
      which the action items live.
    • 00:14:08
      And now we are working with each locality to update the 2018 hazard mitigation action items and generate new ones.
    • 00:14:21
      Yeah, and so this is a visual representation of the timeline.
    • 00:14:24
      I always find it a little easier to actually look at the months and years.
    • 00:14:29
      So this is where we are working within early 2022 where we've met
    • 00:14:34
      With, at this point, all of the localities, whether it be their staff, local emergency planning committee, or both in the cases of some counties, what we're doing in the meantime, as we've kind of sent them off to generate their mitigation action items, is we're working to finalize the draft plan that'll eventually go up for public comment, hopefully by the end of June is our timeline.
    • 00:14:57
      and then we'll have to submit it to VNEM and FEMA before coming back to all of your boards and getting it formally approved by the localities legislative bodies.
    • 00:15:07
      And I think the next slide is the actual, yeah.
    • 00:15:10
      And I just wanted to briefly show you guys the HIRA.
    • 00:15:13
      So this has been worked through our hazard mitigation working group which is comprised of locality planning staff and emergency management staff as well as a few stakeholders state
    • 00:15:26
      experts, and other stakeholders.
    • 00:15:28
      But generally speaking, what this HIRA is, is basically a general description of natural hazard events, data on events, so frequency, duration, severity, and financial impact.
    • 00:15:41
      We rank them in a matrix that I'll show in the next slide, but generally speaking, the
    • 00:15:46
      Data sources are really the National Weather Service and a lot of state departments including the Virginia Department of Forestry, Department of Energy, DEQ and DCR in order to try and get the most recent and accurate data concerning natural hazards.
    • 00:16:03
      And sort of another part of what the natural, the working group does is they provide, they sort of supply anecdotal evidence or at least maybe
    • 00:16:12
      Color to some of the statistics that we're getting so we can actually have some testimony from the professionals that work on a natural hazard response and it makes the data a little more accurate to what has actually happened in the planning district because sometimes national data sources are limited.
    • 00:16:32
      And if you look at our beautiful matrix on the next slide, oh no.
    • 00:16:42
      Oh, no.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:16:43
      Well, it's in the email.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 00:16:45
      It's in the email.
    • 00:16:45
      It's beautiful.
    • 00:16:46
      Yes.
    • 00:16:47
      So basically we ended up re-ranking.
    • 00:16:50
      So really the only difference between this and last in the 2018 plans, HiRA is that we included, FEMA required us to include communicable diseases and or a pandemic.
    • 00:17:02
      Ah, there you go.
    • 00:17:04
      And so that ended up coming in sort of in fourth in our rankings, but the top three hazards in our region, according to the working group and
    • 00:17:12
      The way that we basically did this was each locality returned their own matrix.
    • 00:17:18
      We ended up aggregating the scores and then putting them into one table.
    • 00:17:22
      The three hazards that are the most prevalent or most worth watching and preparing for according to the working group are hurricane high winds and wind storms.
    • 00:17:31
      We've combined that into one hazard flooding and then winter storms and winter weather.
    • 00:17:36
      Those did not change from the 2018 plan.
    • 00:17:38
      That is the same order of the top three hazards.
    • 00:17:42
      Basically, that's basically the base that we're working with to now generate these mitigation action items.
    • 00:17:49
      And basically, each of the action items is gonna have a table like this within the plan.
    • 00:17:57
      We're working with all of the localities to not only update the old ones, but we've supplied them a fair amount of resources to help generate new ones.
    • 00:18:05
      The emphasis being on those top three hazards.
    • 00:18:08
      FEMA and VDEM really want us, because we've ranked them, to really identify those as
    • 00:18:12
      sort of the high priority hazard mitigation action items.
    • 00:18:16
      But this is important I think for some of you all to hear because obviously within this table baked into it is cost estimates and funding methods.
    • 00:18:25
      And obviously while these aren't ordinances, these are simply action items that might be undertaken by the localities over the next five years.
    • 00:18:34
      One of the things we're really emphasizing with the planning and emergency management staff is cross departmental collaboration on these.
    • 00:18:41
      ensuring that the county and or city is aware that these are happening, or at least that this plan update is happening so that in 2023, our adoption process ends up being pretty seamless so that all the localities are eligible for the FEMA mitigation funds.
    • 00:18:59
      So I think the last slide is just the next steps.
    • 00:19:02
      Oh, no, you can ignore this slide.
    • 00:19:03
      This is just the key if you wanna take a look at it.
    • 00:19:06
      And this is basically a nice infographic that explains sort of it goes from goals, actions, and then we think about actually implementing them into an action plan.
    • 00:19:16
      But the next steps in terms of timeline is right now we've met with locality staff.
    • 00:19:20
      So actually, that one is already outdated.
    • 00:19:22
      Luckily, we are in the midst of basically providing them support as they revisit their old ones and generate new ones.
    • 00:19:29
      We're finishing the draft rewrite and we're going to allow for public comment in June.
    • 00:19:34
      We'll submit to both VDEV and FEMA.
    • 00:19:36
      Both of those have a pretty long runway in terms of the amount of time we have to give them for potential feedback, like between 30 and 45 days, I think for both.
    • 00:19:45
      So we've built out a considerable amount of time late summer and early fall to make sure that we have time just in case we need to revise anything.
    • 00:19:51
      And then in the calendar year 2023, we'll be working towards a formal adoption by all the localities.
    • 00:19:57
      including the towns within the counties.
    • 00:19:59
      So that's all I got.
    • 00:20:04
      Sorry, that was, so I should have just shared my own screen, Christine, I'm sorry.
    • Christine JacobsExecutive Director
    • 00:20:08
      No, I'll interject and apologize.
    • 00:20:12
      I keep getting a notice that my internet is unstable right now.
    • 00:20:15
      So I apologize for the tech issues.
    • 00:20:17
      That was my fault.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 00:20:19
      But I'd be happy to take, oh, Commissioner Solla-Yates.
    • SPEAKER_20
    • 00:20:22
      Yeah, the question I get a fair bit from the public is not so much about what will happen when terrible things happen here, but what will happen when terrible things happen downhill and people come here?
    • 00:20:34
      How are we thinking about that?
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 00:20:37
      Like in terms of being ready to sort of accept folks, new people, that's interesting.
    • 00:20:42
      As of right now, I think that is determined, the locality will have to determine that as sort of a dimension of their action items.
    • 00:20:52
      I'd be happy to sort of include something about that.
    • 00:20:54
      I think that's worth bringing up in the general plan, but for right now, mainly the writing that we do here at the PDC is concerned primarily with the weather events and the economic, yeah, exactly.
    • 00:21:06
      But that's not to say that this process doesn't lend itself for localities to be creative with their action items.
    • 00:21:11
      And I would encourage, you know, if that's something that the city wants to look at, that can definitely live within the action items section.
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:21:18
      Thank you.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 00:21:19
      Yeah, Commissioner Andrews.
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:21:22
      Yeah, I don't want to take a lot of time, but I really would love to get more information about how this matrix is put together.
    • 00:21:29
      You mentioned it being an average and it seemed to me that the spread of what different localities thought their risks were would be a very interesting thing to look at.
    • 00:21:40
      I also am curious as to what Kaiser Permanente's role is in this.
    • 00:21:45
      How do they evaluate?
    • 00:21:47
      Are they evaluating property and business risks as well as health risks?
    • 00:21:52
      I'm fascinated by this.
    • 00:21:54
      Sorry.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 00:21:54
      Yeah, so definitely.
    • 00:21:56
      So all of the matrices will be included in the appendix of the plan.
    • 00:22:00
      I'd be happy to send them over to you just for you to take a look for sure.
    • 00:22:04
      Kaiser Permanente simply created that matrix.
    • 00:22:07
      That was just the
    • 00:22:08
      That's the high run matrix that we used last time.
    • 00:22:11
      I know that it was adapted from a hospital specific scenario, but because it has components of property damage, economic disruption and loss of life, it was able to be adapted to a more broad, you know, municipal wide risk assessment.
    • 00:22:28
      But yeah, I'd be happy to provide that.
    • 00:22:30
      I mean, I think it's kind of interesting to see sort of where some localities have highlighted
    • 00:22:36
      You know, certain hazards versus others.
    • 00:22:38
      Cause there's obviously slight variations depending on where you are in the planning district.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:22:46
      All right.
    • 00:22:46
      Any other questions for Ian?
    • 00:22:50
      Hearing none.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:22:50
      Thank you, Ian.
    • 00:22:51
      I guess we will be seeing this again.
    • 00:22:53
      Are we good?
    • 00:22:56
      All right.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 00:22:56
      Awesome.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:22:57
      Not tonight, but in the future.
    • 00:22:59
      All right.
    • 00:23:00
      Wonderful.
    • 00:23:01
      Thank you, sir.
    • 00:23:02
      Back to Charise.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:23:10
      I'm going to share my screen.
    • 00:23:12
      OK. Hopefully everybody can see my screen.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 00:23:23
      So the Home American Rescue Plan, Home ARP in short, it's, if I can navigate my screen.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:23:37
      Sorry, I'm having my own issues with navigating.
    • 00:23:55
      So I apologize, my screen is frozen.
    • 00:24:01
      No worries.
    • 00:24:03
      Can Christine share it for you?
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 00:24:05
      No, I had to share it because it was corrupted on her end.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:24:13
      Looks still corrupt.
    • 00:24:18
      Is this the home ARP overview?
    • 00:24:22
      I have it open.
    • 00:24:22
      Yes.
    • 00:24:24
      If you want, if I can share my screen, that would be fun.
    • 00:24:30
      Hmm.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:24:39
      Sorry, everyone.
    • 00:24:45
      Thank you.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 00:24:48
      Appreciate it.
    • 00:24:49
      So the home ARP overview, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021
    • 00:24:56
      It is appropriate $5 billion to provide housing services and shelter to individuals that are experiencing homelessness and other vulnerable populations.
    • 00:25:08
      It was an act that was signed into direction by President Biden in March of 2021, I believe.
    • 00:25:22
      Homework funds, they must be used primarily for individuals and families that meet certain requirements.
    • 00:25:31
      So it's different from our home investment partnership program, which you guys have heard me speak about every year when the action plan comes around.
    • 00:25:42
      Can we go to the next screen, please?
    • 00:25:46
      My screen not working, having me befuddled.
    • 00:25:48
      I apologize.
    • 00:25:50
      And could we make this a little bigger or a little smaller for me to see the whole thing?
    • 00:25:56
      Thank you so much.
    • 00:25:57
      I appreciate that.
    • 00:25:58
      So the qualifying populations are the unhoused as indicated by the McKinney Homeless Act definition, the at risk of becoming unhoused, persons fleeing attempting to flee domestic violence, sexual assault,
    • 00:26:15
      Stalking or Human Trafficking, other populations and that was defined as prevention of once again becoming unhoused people who are in and out of being unhoused who may not currently be unhoused at the time they fall into this category to serve those of greater risk of housing instability and veteran households households with veterans as had a household or veterans within the household
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:26:45
      Next slide, please.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 00:26:50
      I think I skipped a slide because the qualifying activities weren't in there, and I apologize for that.
    • 00:26:56
      It's important that you know that these funds can be used for acquisition.
    • 00:27:04
      They can be used for tenant-based rental assistance.
    • 00:27:07
      They can be used for serving the population with down payment assistance, utility help for social services that need to be provided to the area.
    • 00:27:20
      And I'm making sure I didn't forget one of these qualifying populations or eligible activities.
    • 00:27:29
      I believe that's all that falls into that category.
    • 00:27:33
      And to keep in mind, the eligible activities must be used for the qualifying population.
    • 00:27:42
      That's what makes it different from the home investment partnership.
    • 00:27:45
      The home investment partnership mainly depends on 80% or below AMI, whereas the home art program is more dependent on the qualifying population.
    • 00:27:58
      So the AMI isn't really taken into account.
    • 00:28:02
      So within our region, we here, our six localities will receive collectively, our region will receive 2.4 million, a bit above $2.4 million.
    • 00:28:15
      And the way that's broken down is that the TJPDC will receive 15% for planning and administration of the program.
    • 00:28:24
      The rest of the 75% will go to the localities and it will be split
    • 00:28:31
      evenly among the localities.
    • 00:28:34
      And within that, for the program, there is about $313,000 for actual projects.
    • 00:28:43
      And for capacity building and operation each, there's $17,370 that can go towards that.
    • 00:28:50
      So setting up the program,
    • 00:28:55
      paying for utilities while working on the program.
    • 00:29:00
      So completely setting the capacity for administering the program going forward, which can include hiring someone to administer program to build that capacity and operations, just the regular operations running every day of the sub-recipients who will receive the funding for the program.
    • 00:29:21
      Next slide, please.
    • 00:29:25
      So in order to receive full funding, we have to do an amendment to the 2021, which would be the previous annual action plan.
    • 00:29:35
      We have the 5% right now of the administrative funds to set up the program that TJPDC does.
    • 00:29:42
      But in order to get the rest of the funding for the program, we have to do this amendment.
    • 00:29:47
      And this amendment will require us to have a consultation process
    • 00:29:54
      with the community and we started doing that, or actually we finished doing that with the localities.
    • 00:30:01
      We contacted the localities and we talked to them about the funding and how it can be used and how it differs from the home investment program.
    • 00:30:10
      We have to do public participation.
    • 00:30:13
      And that will involve, we haven't done it yet, but which will be, you know, a public participation process through Zoom in person, depending on how things go.
    • 00:30:27
      And online, we will have
    • 00:30:30
      the allocation plan for this amendment and a description of the home or qualifying populations within the jurisdiction.
    • 00:30:38
      So letting the public know what are the qualifying populations like I did earlier.
    • 00:30:43
      Next slide, please.
    • 00:30:48
      The next steps would be consulting with the area of populations who work with qualifying populations.
    • 00:30:54
      So for example, the CLC, we have TJAC here and they work with the unhoused.
    • 00:31:00
      meeting with them, meeting with other organizations who work with the populations I mentioned before, you know, the domestic violence centers, getting their input on how they feel the funding can be used in our area, filling in those gaps of the items that we normally don't deal with here at the TJPDC when we're dealing with other housing funding.
    • 00:31:27
      We will do a creative gap analysis, which is a requirement to go into the amendment and submit that to HUD and create and submit an amendment to the 2021 action plan for the release of the funds.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:31:46
      Next slide, please.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 00:31:50
      Oh, I had a slide in there about questions.
    • 00:31:56
      So if anyone has any questions about this, please direct them to me and I can answer your questions for you.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:32:07
      All right.
    • 00:32:07
      Any questions for Sharice at this time?
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:32:09
      I just want to point out, I'm sorry that I didn't say this earlier, but when you scroll down the presentation by page, you're missing the fact that there were two slides per page.
    • 00:32:23
      So every other slide was missing from the presentation because it was further down the page.
    • SPEAKER_20
    • 00:32:29
      Apologies.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 00:32:31
      Oh no, that's fine.
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:32:34
      They're all there.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 00:32:35
      Okay, well that's good.
    • 00:32:36
      They're all there.
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:32:37
      They're all there, so not to worry.
    • 00:32:41
      Thank you, thank you.
    • 00:32:45
      I'm going to ask the question.
    • 00:32:46
      I'm the newbie, so you'll have to forgive me.
    • 00:32:50
      But this says that the funds get divided equally.
    • 00:32:55
      And I would like to understand how that is arrived at.
    • 00:32:59
      Is that required?
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 00:33:04
      We had to follow the same agreement we have with the Home Investment Partnership.
    • 00:33:10
      And within that agreement, the funds are divided equally amongst our jurisdictions.
    • 00:33:18
      It's been longstanding like that.
    • 00:33:20
      And it's possibly something that maybe in the future we'll look at.
    • 00:33:25
      But right now, under the agreement that's in place, we have to follow that agreement for any HUD home funding.
    • 00:33:33
      So that's why that decision was made.
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:33:39
      Just let me write it down.
    • 00:33:40
      What's that agreement again?
    • 00:33:41
      I just want to make sure I understand.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 00:33:43
      It's the internal home consortium agreement that we have with our localities and sub-recipients.
    • Christine JacobsExecutive Director
    • 00:33:51
      So Commissioner Andrews, can I add to that as well?
    • 00:33:54
      When the home consortium was established originally, all six jurisdictions came together to determine what the allocation of those funds would be.
    • 00:34:03
      So all six jurisdictions determined that they would do equal share of that funding.
    • 00:34:08
      It has been like that since the inception.
    • 00:34:12
      Internally as staff, we have discussed the pros and cons of that approach for our region.
    • 00:34:18
      There are trade-offs if we were to go with another way of doing it.
    • 00:34:21
      For example, going with a per capita or doing a competitive process often can
    • 00:34:28
      significantly reduced the funding to our rural jurisdictions.
    • 00:34:31
      However, it is not a very common practice to take the funding and split it equally across six localities.
    • 00:34:37
      Most consortiums do not use that approach.
    • 00:34:40
      So it is something we are very interested in exploring, but making sure we do it in a very intentional way so that there aren't unintended consequences of a change.
    • 00:34:49
      And it would require all six jurisdictions, the members of the consortium,
    • 00:34:53
      to agree to an allocation change.
    • 00:34:55
      For the purposes of the home ARP funding, we are required to use the existing agreement in order to allocate the home ARP funds.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:35:06
      Thank you.
    • SPEAKER_20
    • 00:35:10
      I had a similar question, but was wondering, is that related to the sort of the gap finding exercise that's required or is that, are you looking at different gaps?
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 00:35:21
      We are actually looking at different gaps within our region.
    • 00:35:27
      For instance, home does not deal with domestic violence or human trafficking.
    • 00:35:36
      Like I said, it is mainly based on the AMI, 80% or below AMI.
    • 00:35:42
      So the gap analysis is to look at those qualifying populations, especially the ones that we don't service,
    • 00:35:51
      and to see where there are gaps in housing or social services that this money can be used for within our region that, you know, to give us those answers, like how best this money can be used in our region.
    • 00:36:08
      Thank you.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:36:12
      All right, any other questions for Sharice?
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:36:17
      All right, I'm hearing, yeah,
    • Christine JacobsExecutive Director
    • 00:36:20
      Sorry, Chair Rutherford, I just wanted to note this will come back up later as a resolution.
    • 00:36:23
      Yes.
    • 00:36:24
      Later in the agenda, we are asking as the resolution will get there, I'll explain a little more, but we would like to seek the services of a consultant to help us with the gap analysis, to look at the qualifying populations and where the greatest need is so that we can share that information with the localities as they determine where they're going to use their funding that they're doing it in a data driven
    • 00:36:46
      Way.
    • 00:36:47
      So as the resolution that's coming up is just to seek consultant services since it's not already in our budget and we actually just got notice from HUD today so this is not included in your packet but that will be on a reimbursement basis only if the annual action plan is approved and so it would require the commission to use our funding to hire a consultant, submit the annual action plan,
    • 00:37:12
      If and when approved, we can then seek reimbursement from that 5% planning grant money.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:37:19
      Great.
    • 00:37:20
      All right, so if we could just, so we can get to the agenda, we'll save any questions we have when we get down to the resolutions for the ARC.
    • 00:37:28
      All right, moving on to the consent agenda.
    • 00:37:32
      Christine, if you could just give us what you want to say on the financial report, or if there's anything you need to add.
    • Christine JacobsExecutive Director
    • 00:37:37
      Yep, very quick.
    • 00:37:37
      We're about seven months through the year.
    • 00:37:39
      If you think through January, that's 58% through.
    • 00:37:42
      We've received 58, 53, excuse me, 53% of our budgeted income, and we've expended 51% of our budget operating expenses.
    • 00:37:50
      So we're tracking well there.
    • 00:37:53
      January, we saw a net gain of 9,246, which means we have a revised net gain for the fiscal year in the amount of 11,756.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:38:03
      Excellent.
    • 00:38:04
      Thank you so much.
    • 00:38:05
      And also just reminded myself that we forgot to do roll call earlier.
    • 00:38:09
      So when we do the vote on the consent agenda, if that could also be roll call, that would be great.
    • 00:38:14
      Yeah, I know.
    • SPEAKER_04
    • 00:38:16
      Yeah.
    • 00:38:17
      We did it.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:38:18
      Oh, did we?
    • 00:38:20
      Okay, great.
    • 00:38:20
      All right.
    • 00:38:21
      I wasn't sure if we did enough.
    • 00:38:22
      Awesome.
    • 00:38:23
      Thank you guys for keeping me straight.
    • 00:38:24
      So let's go on ahead.
    • 00:38:26
      If anybody has any edits for the minutes, anybody have any comments about that?
    • 00:38:31
      Hearing none, is the Chair's opinion that we approve the consent agenda as presented?
    • 00:38:35
      Do we have a motion?
    • 00:38:37
      So moved.
    • 00:38:38
      Motion for Mr.
    • 00:38:39
      Herring.
    • 00:38:39
      Do we have support?
    • 00:38:43
      Second.
    • 00:38:44
      Second for Mr. Andrews.
    • 00:38:47
      Moving on to discussion.
    • 00:38:48
      Any discussion?
    • 00:38:50
      Hearing none, let's just go ahead and do a quick roll call.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:38:54
      Councillor Payne?
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:38:55
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:38:57
      Mr. Sulli-Yates?
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:38:58
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:38:59
      Supervisor Galloway?
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:39:03
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:39:05
      Supervisor Andrews.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:39:07
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:39:09
      Supervisor O'Brien.
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:39:10
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:39:12
      Mr. Smith.
    • 00:39:14
      Ms. Wilkinson.
    • 00:39:15
      Yes.
    • 00:39:16
      Supervisor Barlow.
    • SPEAKER_00
    • 00:39:18
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:39:19
      Supervisor Jones.
    • 00:39:21
      Yes.
    • 00:39:22
      Ms. Bishop.
    • 00:39:24
      Abstain.
    • 00:39:28
      Supervisor Herring.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:39:30
      Aye.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:39:32
      And Supervisor Rutherford.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:39:34
      It's a long day, guys.
    • 00:39:39
      It's a long one.
    • 00:39:41
      All right.
    • 00:39:42
      Thank you all for proving the consensus.
    • 00:39:44
      Moving on to new business transportation work program.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:39:48
      Lucinda?
    • 00:39:52
      Thank you.
    • 00:39:53
      I'm going to share my screen.
    • 00:40:15
      but I froze up for a second there.
    • 00:40:18
      Sorry about that.
    • Lucinda ShannonTransportation Program Manager
    • 00:40:20
      Here we go.
    • 00:40:24
      So I'm going to go over the fiscal year 2023.
    • 00:40:27
      Can you guys see my screen?
    • 00:40:29
      Okay.
    • 00:40:32
      I'm going to go over the fiscal year 2023 rural transportation draft work program and budget.
    • 00:40:40
      We're sharing the draft with you for your comments and questions.
    • 00:40:43
      It'll go to the Rural Transportation Advisory Committee next and then come back to you in April for final approval.
    • 00:40:57
      I don't know if you guys can hear me, but my computer's completely gone black.
    • 00:41:05
      Can you hear me?
    • 00:41:07
      All right, so I don't know what the slides are, but let me just tell you that the work plan has a budget.
    • 00:41:16
      Oh, there we go.
    • 00:41:19
      Sorry about that.
    • 00:41:19
      My computer overheats.
    • 00:41:23
      Each year the PDC receives $58,000 from VDOT to assist the rural jurisdictions in transportative replan- planning activities and there's a 20% match which equals $14,500 and this gives the rural transportation program a total of $72,500 for each year.
    • 00:41:47
      The program covers Greene, Louisa, Fluvanna, and Nelson counties and the rural areas of Albemarle County as they are shown in light green on the map there.
    • 00:41:59
      The dark green is the MPO area.
    • 00:42:03
      Each year, the TJPDC staff develops a work program based on VDOT priorities and jurisdictional needs.
    • 00:42:12
      Last year, the work program included a
    • 00:42:16
      work on Route 29 North Corridor Study, a Rural Town and Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Assessment, a Zion Crossroads Gateway Plan, and general planning and application support.
    • 00:42:32
      This year, in addition to ongoing activities like program administration and planning and application assistance, there are two new activities which arose from our partners and also they align with current regional transportation planning efforts.
    • 00:42:47
      They're a rural transit needs assessment and prioritizing pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure recommendations.
    • 00:42:57
      The rural transit needs assessment would be a collaborative project with Jaunt,
    • 00:43:02
      Staff from both agencies will work with rural jurisdiction staff to identify populations and geographic areas that are transportation challenged.
    • 00:43:12
      The project will develop a report identifying and quantifying the need for additional transportation services in rural jurisdictions.
    • 00:43:20
      The resulting needs mapping can be a base to develop service scenarios for rural jurisdictions that desire more transit services.
    • 00:43:30
      This project complements additional planning efforts like the Regional Transit Vision Plan, the Regional Transit Governance Study.
    • 00:43:39
      John is currently doing a transit development plan that it'll
    • 00:43:43
      compliment nicely, and also some local jurisdictions are working on their comprehensive and zoning updates, which will also be a good compliment for this study.
    • 00:43:52
      The second major project is undergoing, it's under the last task, task 2.4, it's
    • 00:44:02
      activities around transit, travel demand management, and pedestrian and bike infrastructure.
    • 00:44:07
      The bulk of this year's Task 2.4 will be to prioritize the recommendations in the Thomas Jefferson Area Bike and Pedestrian Plan.
    • 00:44:17
      VDOT has recommended that we prioritize the recommendations in this plan to better direct planning resources to support funding applications for rural bike ped projects.
    • 00:44:28
      The staff will work with the jurisdictions to develop a methodology to prioritize the recommendations and then the methodology will be used to develop a prioritized list of projects that will be eligible for VDOT funding.
    • 00:44:42
      The projects are not eligible for VDOT funding unless they're prioritized so this is stressed to us by VDOT.
    • 00:44:50
      This last slide shows the fiscal year budget 2022 and the proposed fiscal year budget for 2023 just for comparison.
    • 00:45:02
      You can see the program administration will not change and the activities section will focus on the rural needs assessment and supporting rural planning and grant applications in the last item which I covered previously.
    • 00:45:20
      That's all I have.
    • 00:45:23
      This will be brought back to you in April for final approval, but I just wanted to bring this to you now for questions and comments.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:45:32
      Do we have any questions for Ms. Shannon at this moment?
    • 00:45:39
      Not hearing any, thank you so much.
    • SPEAKER_20
    • 00:45:41
      Sorry, I do have my hand raised.
    • 00:45:42
      All right, wow.
    • 00:45:44
      Does this interface at all with the old bike 76 corridor study we did in 2012?
    • Lucinda ShannonTransportation Program Manager
    • 00:45:50
      Gosh, I don't know.
    • SPEAKER_20
    • 00:45:52
      Check it out.
    • 00:45:53
      It's a good study.
    • Lucinda ShannonTransportation Program Manager
    • 00:45:54
      Yeah, I'll have to check that out.
    • 00:45:56
      Yeah.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:45:59
      All right.
    • 00:46:00
      Any other questions?
    • 00:46:03
      Hearing none.
    • 00:46:04
      Thank you, Lucinda.
    • 00:46:06
      Moving on to Community Development Block Grant, Christine.
    • Christine JacobsExecutive Director
    • 00:46:12
      This is a quick item.
    • 00:46:14
      Each year DHCD reaches out to regional bodies to ask us to reach out to our local governments and create a prioritized list of potential CDBG applications, Community Development Block Grants.
    • 00:46:27
      The purpose of this is to ensure that we are prioritizing what is the most important to our local governments.
    • 00:46:35
      You'll see in your packet there's a letter that's sent that we fill out and send back
    • 00:46:39
      I reached out to all of the chief executive or administrative officers of the jurisdictions as well as lead planning or housing staff.
    • 00:46:47
      to share if there were anticipated CDB applications.
    • 00:46:51
      We heard back from Albemarle County and the town of Scottsville regarding two different projects, so I listed them in this application and then prioritized community development projects, housing and housing rehabilitation projects, and public infrastructure so that those can score better if they are submitted.
    • 00:47:11
      Basically, what DHCD does is use this priority list to
    • 00:47:17
      And so if a jurisdiction does submit a project and it meets one of the regional priorities, it gets bonus points in that category for meeting one of the priorities.
    • 00:47:28
      So we'll need you all to accept this and adopt it as a part of a process where so I can send it back in time to the HCD.
    • 00:47:40
      Any questions?
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:47:43
      All right, not hearing any questions at this time.
    • 00:47:48
      Can we get a motion?
    • 00:47:49
      So you need this motion to approve as presented.
    • 00:47:52
      Do we have one?
    • 00:47:54
      Any motions out there?
    • Ned GallawayMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:47:57
      So moved.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:47:58
      Motion from Mr. Galloway.
    • 00:48:00
      Do we have a second?
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:48:06
      Second.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:48:07
      Second from Mr. Payne.
    • 00:48:09
      Any discussion?
    • 00:48:11
      Hearing none, roll call.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:48:14
      Counselor Payne?
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:48:15
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:48:17
      Mr. Solla-Yates?
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:48:19
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:48:21
      Supervisor Galloway?
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:48:23
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:48:25
      Supervisor Andrews?
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:48:26
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:48:28
      Supervisor O'Brien?
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:48:29
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:48:31
      Mr. Smith?
    • 00:48:32
      Ms. Wilkinson?
    • 00:48:33
      Aye.
    • 00:48:35
      Supervisor Barlow?
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:48:36
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:48:38
      Supervisor Jones?
    • 00:48:39
      Yes.
    • 00:48:40
      Ms. Bishop?
    • 00:48:42
      Aye.
    • 00:48:44
      Supervisor Herring.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:48:47
      Aye.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:48:48
      And Supervisor Rutherford.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:48:51
      Aye.
    • 00:48:52
      All right.
    • 00:48:52
      Thank you guys so much.
    • 00:48:54
      Moving on to an amended annual operating budget.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:48:57
      Christine.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:49:05
      Can I get verification?
    • Christine JacobsExecutive Director
    • 00:49:06
      You guys can see my screen.
    • 00:49:07
      We've had enough tech issues.
    • 00:49:08
      I don't want to talk without you being able to view it.
    • 00:49:10
      Okay, great.
    • 00:49:10
      Thank you.
    • 00:49:12
      So the annual operating budget in our previous meeting in February there was a detailed memo of the changes from the originally adopted budget to this new amended budget as anticipated between February and March we had another series of changes so I just wanted to walk through a couple of those before you all consider this
    • 00:49:32
      The first major one is that we did receive projections on the Make Ready work for the Virginia telecommunications grant for the VATI grant.
    • 00:49:42
      And so we anticipate in FY22 there's a potential for up to 1.75 million that could be sent down out of our grant.
    • 00:49:50
      So I did want to include that in the budget as well.
    • 00:49:52
      If we get closer towards the end of the fiscal year into May and we find out that that Make Ready work wildly is different than what was projected, we can at that point re-amend the budget and right size that amount so that it doesn't throw off, make our variances too great in either direction.
    • 00:50:12
      So that's what we're projecting.
    • 00:50:14
      There's also from last month to this month, there's a
    • 00:50:18
      Just a change in how we reported it.
    • 00:50:20
      We had the VATI administrative fees mistakenly put as state revenue.
    • 00:50:24
      That's technically federal revenue.
    • 00:50:25
      So that was moved.
    • 00:50:26
      We also went through the first month of the Blue Ridge cigarette tax remittances.
    • 00:50:32
      And so we are conservatively projecting somewhere in the neighborhood of just under 200,000 in a month.
    • 00:50:38
      We know that will change as the program ramps up and there's not the sell-through period any longer.
    • 00:50:43
      And so we're projecting about 1.17 million in cigarette tax remittance through FY22.
    • 00:50:49
      Again, for us, that will be processes to pass through onto the local governments.
    • 00:50:55
      So that is also included in this amended budget in the local revenue category.
    • 00:51:00
      Other small federal, state, and local revenue changes due to the staff vacancies that we've had throughout FY22.
    • 00:51:07
      Each month we re-amend how much we may need to roll over in our MPO funding.
    • 00:51:13
      So we did make one adjustment to that this month.
    • 00:51:16
      Also due to the vehicle shortages and the EVA, some of the state contracts for purchasing vehicles have been closed.
    • 00:51:23
      We're going to move the purchase of a vehicle for cigarette tax into FY23 instead of this current fiscal year.
    • 00:51:30
      So that has been moved.
    • 00:51:31
      And then finally, there are small changes that we made.
    • 00:51:34
      One of them in particular, the hazard mitigation plan, we anticipated that we might need to contract out some technical support, but we now have folks on staff that will be able to support that technical support work.
    • 00:51:46
      So we were able to move that back into the budget and not as a pass through.
    • 00:51:51
      That is the high level of what I have.
    • 00:51:53
      We anticipate our revenues to be somewhere in the neighborhood of 5.833 million.
    • 00:51:57
      That's what's projected.
    • 00:51:58
      If you look at the bottom, it will show we anticipate a net gain of 78,000.
    • 00:52:03
      Again, that could change drastically depending on how much we need to spend in admin for a body based on the spend down of the actual grant and also with some upcoming anticipated personnel changes that may also affect that bottom line by the end of the fiscal year.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:52:21
      Excellent.
    • 00:52:22
      Great job, 78 grand is a good number.
    • 00:52:25
      We like it, but we'll see how it turns out.
    • 00:52:29
      We've had some excellent budget savings over the last several years.
    • 00:52:32
      And for some of our new members, the PDC has had a fairly healthy war chest over the past several years.
    • 00:52:41
      And Christine has done a great job at preserving that as well.
    • 00:52:45
      All right, any questions for Christine?
    • 00:52:51
      Hearing none.
    • 00:52:52
      Let's go on ahead and move on to resolutions.
    • 00:52:57
      Solid Waste Plan, Christine.
    • Christine JacobsExecutive Director
    • 00:53:00
      This is what Charise presented to you all earlier based on the new captive industrial landfill in Fluvanna County and the required amendment that we have to do to the Solid Waste Plan so that we can resubmit to the EQ for review.
    • 00:53:11
      Staff would recommend a motion to adopt the Thomas Jefferson Solid Waste Planning Units 2021 Solid Waste Management Plan revision as presented.
    • 00:53:19
      The resolution is in your packet.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:53:21
      Excellent.
    • 00:53:22
      Do we have a motion to approve as presented?
    • SPEAKER_17
    • 00:53:26
      So moved.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:53:27
      Motion from Ms. Bishop.
    • 00:53:28
      Do we have a second?
    • SPEAKER_17
    • 00:53:30
      I second.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:53:31
      Second from Andrea.
    • 00:53:34
      All right.
    • 00:53:36
      Any discussion?
    • 00:53:37
      Hearing none.
    • 00:53:38
      Sandy?
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:53:39
      Councilor Payne?
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:53:42
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:53:44
      Mr. Solla-Yates?
    • 00:53:45
      Aye.
    • 00:53:47
      Supervisor Galloway?
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:53:48
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:53:50
      Supervisor Andrews?
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:53:51
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:53:53
      Supervisor O'Brien.
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:53:55
      Aye.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:53:56
      Mr. Smith.
    • 00:53:58
      Ms. Wilkinson.
    • 00:54:00
      Aye.
    • 00:54:01
      Supervisor Barlow.
    • SPEAKER_17
    • 00:54:03
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:54:04
      Supervisor Jones.
    • 00:54:06
      Yes.
    • 00:54:07
      Ms. Bishop.
    • 00:54:09
      Aye.
    • 00:54:10
      Supervisor Herring.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:54:13
      Aye.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:54:14
      Supervisor Rutherford.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:54:16
      Aye.
    • 00:54:17
      Great.
    • 00:54:17
      Motion passes.
    • 00:54:18
      Moving on to home art.
    • 00:54:20
      Christine.
    • Christine JacobsExecutive Director
    • 00:54:21
      This is related to what Charise presented earlier that we are going to seek the services of a consultant to help us do a needs and gap analysis for the required annual allocation plan amendment to HUD.
    • 00:54:34
      We will be evaluating the size and the demographic composition.
    • 00:54:37
      of the qualifying populations so that we're directing our funds where the greatest need is.
    • 00:54:42
      We did include in your packet a draft request for proposal, however I want to make sure I share that that's definitely in draft form because we would like to go back to all six localities and make sure
    • 00:54:52
      If we're going to go through this process of getting a consultant in, is there anything that we can include in the scope that benefits the work that's already happening in this area so that it can support not only the home art program, but potentially other eviction prevention programs?
    • 00:55:06
      So we do want to revise that scope with input from staff in the jurisdictions.
    • 00:55:12
      With that, staff recommends a motion to approve the resolution to authorize the issuance of a request for proposal for consultant services to develop a home ARP needs assessment and gap analysis.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:55:25
      Right.
    • 00:55:26
      Do we have a motion to that effect?
    • 00:55:30
      So moved.
    • 00:55:32
      Motion from Mr. O'Brien.
    • 00:55:33
      Do we have support?
    • 00:55:38
      Second from Tommy.
    • 00:55:40
      Let's go on to discussion.
    • 00:55:42
      Hearing none, Sandy?
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:55:46
      Chancellor Payne?
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:55:48
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:55:50
      Mr. Solla-Yates?
    • 00:55:53
      Aye.
    • 00:55:53
      Aye.
    • 00:55:53
      Supervisor Galloway?
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:55:54
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:55:55
      Supervisor Andrews?
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:55:57
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:55:58
      Supervisor O'Brien?
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:56:00
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:56:01
      Mr. Smith?
    • 00:56:02
      Ms. Wilkinson?
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:56:04
      Aye.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:56:05
      Supervisor Barlow?
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:56:07
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:56:09
      Supervisor Jones?
    • 00:56:10
      Yes.
    • 00:56:11
      Ms. Bishop?
    • 00:56:13
      Aye.
    • 00:56:14
      Supervisor Herring?
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:56:15
      Aye.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:56:17
      And Supervisor Rutherford?
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:56:20
      Aye.
    • 00:56:21
      Alright, thank you guys so much.
    • 00:56:22
      Moving on to FY22 Annual Operating Budget Resolution.
    • 00:56:26
      Christine?
    • Christine JacobsExecutive Director
    • 00:56:28
      This is the budget that I just presented to you all.
    • 00:56:30
      This will be our final amended budget that we will use for audit purposes unless there is need for a final amendment based on make ready, spend down on the body grant.
    • 00:56:40
      But with that, staff would recommend a motion to approve the FY22 Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission's amended operating budget as presented and the resolution is in your packet.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:56:52
      All right.
    • 00:56:53
      Do we have a motion to approve as presented?
    • 00:56:57
      Mr.
    • 00:56:59
      Herring, let's get a second.
    • 00:57:04
      Second from Mr. O'Brien, I think.
    • 00:57:08
      Moving on to discussion.
    • 00:57:10
      Hearing no discussion.
    • 00:57:11
      Sandy?
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:57:13
      Councilor Payne?
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:57:14
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:57:15
      Mr. Solla-Yates?
    • 00:57:17
      Aye.
    • 00:57:18
      Supervisor Galloway?
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:57:19
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:57:20
      Supervisor Andrews?
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:57:22
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:57:23
      Supervisor O'Brien?
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:57:25
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:57:26
      Mr. Smith?
    • 00:57:27
      Ms. Wilkinson.
    • SPEAKER_17
    • 00:57:29
      Aye.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:57:30
      Supervisor Barlow.
    • SPEAKER_17
    • 00:57:32
      Yes.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:57:33
      Supervisor Jones.
    • Tommy BarlowMember, Planning District Commission
    • 00:57:41
      Getting my my mutes mixed up.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:57:44
      No worries.
    • 00:57:45
      Ms. Bishop.
    • 00:57:47
      Aye.
    • 00:57:48
      Supervisor Herring.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:57:50
      Aye.
    • Sandy ShackelfordDirector of Planning and Transportation
    • 00:57:51
      And Supervisor Rutherford.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 00:57:53
      Aye.
    • 00:57:54
      All right.
    • 00:57:55
      Thank you guys so much.
    • 00:57:57
      Operating budget passes as presented.
    • 00:57:59
      Moving on to executive director's report.
    • 00:58:01
      Christine.
    • Christine JacobsExecutive Director
    • 00:58:03
      As I shared with you all earlier, we're excited to have filled the chief operating officer position.
    • 00:58:09
      We also have still advertised a finance director position and a cigarette tax compliance agent position.
    • 00:58:16
      This didn't make it in the packet because we just learned last week, but I'm very sad to share that Dominique Lavarotta on our team has accepted a position in the private sector.
    • 00:58:26
      So she will be leaving the TJPDC.
    • 00:58:28
      We will be then advertising for a Planner 2 position to be filled.
    • 00:58:35
      While we will miss Dominique terribly, she has done great work for us and we have loved working with her.
    • 00:58:40
      In all change, there is opportunity.
    • 00:58:44
      With Isabella O'Brien having an environmental science background, it does prevent a really good opportunity for her to move more into our environmental programming.
    • 00:58:52
      So she will be taking lead on the watershed improvement plan, the WIP program.
    • 00:58:57
      She will also be leading the Rivanna River Basin Commission, RRBC, and continuing to support the hazard mitigation and solid waste work.
    • 00:59:04
      So we'll make a bit of a staff change there to move her into environmental and then be able to hire a planner that will help support the MPO, rural transportation and general planning needs, small area planning, things like that.
    • 00:59:17
      So we will be advertising that soon.
    • 00:59:19
      Other updates, we are working diligently to reinstate the e-newsletter.
    • 00:59:23
      We would like to start putting back out a monthly e-newsletter updating the community and our stakeholders on our programming.
    • 00:59:29
      So we have created the template.
    • 00:59:31
      We are working to build the content and we should be putting that out within the next month.
    • 00:59:35
      We are also continuing to support the United Way's tax prep program, so they are still using our Water Street Center for the tax services that they provide to our lower income community.
    • 00:59:44
      And then David, I don't mean to call you out, I forgot to warn you of this, but did you want to discuss the ED evaluation at this point or did you want to wait until later in the agenda?
    • SPEAKER_02
    • 00:59:54
      I could certainly do that right now.
    • 00:59:55
      I just wanted to let the members of the subcommittee and the commission as a whole know the surveying that you all had asked for, hoping to push that out actually at the beginning part of next week.
    • 01:00:09
      Perhaps give you about a 10 day period to respond would do the same thing for staff.
    • 01:00:13
      We'll do some tabulations of the responses and I think that would still allow time for
    • 01:00:19
      The subcommittee to have a meeting either the week of the 21st or the week of the 28th in time to have your discussions prior then to the April 7th commission meetings.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:00:33
      Excellent.
    • 01:00:34
      Thank you, David.
    • 01:00:34
      So this is our goal to hopefully have this accomplished by our April meeting.
    • 01:00:38
      So guys, when the survey comes to your email, we're going to remind you several times, please fill it out.
    • 01:00:44
      It'd be great.
    • 01:00:45
      Thank you so much, David, for taking that on.
    • Christine JacobsExecutive Director
    • 01:00:48
      Okay, other updates on the VATI program.
    • 01:00:50
      We continue to work with DHCD and SEVAC Firefly to go through the punch list of items that are required in order to go under contract.
    • 01:00:59
      Firefly is preparing to conduct their Make Ready work in advance and as staff we are working on submitting a performance-based administrative budget for the program and going through the punch list items to make sure we have everything in place to go under contract hopefully by mid-April.
    • 01:01:17
      I gave you updates on blue and cigarette tax board.
    • 01:01:20
      The only thing to include is that they are going to have their next meeting on March 11th.
    • 01:01:25
      And we are still looking to hire for that compliance officer position to support that program.
    • 01:01:30
      Legislative General Assembly is winding down.
    • 01:01:33
      I'm going to read David's comments because I always feel like if I miss anything, he gives such a good update.
    • 01:01:38
      I want to make sure to read it.
    • 01:01:39
      So I apologize for reading to you.
    • 01:01:41
      But with adjournment scheduled for March 12th, a few locality requested bills have had success, but many more were not acted on favorably.
    • 01:01:48
      Crafting on the state budget for FY 23 and 24, including the types and amount of tax relief to be provided is one of the biggest outstanding issues to resolve.
    • 01:01:57
      Local officials and staff were kept updated on General Assembly happenings via weekly legislative updates.
    • 01:02:03
      So thank you, David, for providing that update.
    • 01:02:06
      And then for housing and transportation, the Central Virginia Regional Housing Partnership, the RHP is in the middle of their strategic planning process, and they will have a three hour workshop coming up with the consultants and able to dig into that process.
    • 01:02:21
      And then the MPO, the CA MPO staff continues to develop smart scale projects, and they held a smart scale round five public workshop on February 2022 that was well attended.
    • 01:02:33
      That is all I have for my updates.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:02:37
      Excellent.
    • 01:02:37
      Thank you so much, Christine.
    • 01:02:39
      Anybody have any questions for Christine?
    • 01:02:42
      All right.
    • 01:02:43
      David, what's the temperature like up on the hill?
    • 01:02:46
      You almost done yet?
    • SPEAKER_02
    • 01:02:48
      Well, not that I'm counting, but there are nine days left.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:02:53
      How's it looking?
    • 01:02:55
      Everybody going to be wrapping stuff up pretty efficiently?
    • SPEAKER_02
    • 01:02:57
      Most of the legislation, you know, is pretty much done in committee will be the first part of next week.
    • 01:03:04
      And it's largely just going to be where we end up on the budget.
    • 01:03:09
      There'll be a lot of negotiating over the next week, for sure.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:03:12
      Oh, yeah.
    • 01:03:13
      Oh, yeah.
    • 01:03:14
      Great.
    • 01:03:14
      Well, thank you so much for fighting the fight for us up there and on the Hill.
    • 01:03:18
      All right.
    • 01:03:19
      Roundtable discussion.
    • 01:03:21
      We are ahead today.
    • 01:03:23
      I am so happy with us.
    • 01:03:26
      Roundtable discussion.
    • 01:03:27
      Let's start with the city.
    • 01:03:29
      Mr. Payne, you're here today.
    • SPEAKER_15
    • 01:03:32
      Sure.
    • 01:03:34
      I'll be brief.
    • 01:03:36
      Two big things earlier this week.
    • 01:03:40
      The process for rewriting the city zoning began.
    • 01:03:44
      We had our first meeting with the stakeholders there.
    • 01:03:47
      And that will be a process that hopefully will take about a year to year and a half and we'll have a comprehensive rewriting of our zoning throughout the city.
    • 01:03:55
      To deal not just with zoning, but a lot of issues, not just density, but other issues throughout the code.
    • 01:04:02
      And like everyone else, budget season's underway.
    • 01:04:05
      We're going to get the first draft of our budget this coming Monday.
    • 01:04:08
      And the big challenge is just going to be figuring out how to fund
    • 01:04:15
      A proposed school reconfiguration and school construction, so definitely monitoring how the budget works out at the state level, what level of additional loans and other support for schools there be, but that's a big thing we're tackling now.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:04:31
      Right, zoning is a tough thing, I tell you what.
    • 01:04:34
      And budgets, and budgets, so getting to that season.
    • 01:04:38
      All right, moving on, Lyle.
    • SPEAKER_20
    • 01:04:42
      The only thing I'd like to add to that is just got sort of our annual update on sort of our state of the forest, which I'm looking forward to at the next Planning Commission meeting, which not good.
    • 01:04:55
      We lost a lot of trees in the winter and we're in deficit.
    • 01:04:59
      Don't know how we're going to get out of it, but that's yet another thing.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 01:05:06
      All right, Mr. Galloway, Albemarle.
    • Ned GallawayMember, Planning District Commission
    • 01:05:11
      I'll hit three things.
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 01:05:14
      This past month, we started looking at developer incentives for our housing Albemarle plan.
    • Ned GallawayMember, Planning District Commission
    • 01:05:20
      This was a piece that was worked on and called back by the board to work with developers to figure out what sort of incentives would work well to help them hit the targets of our affordable housing plan.
    • 01:05:32
      Housing overlay in our development area was discussed.
    • 01:05:37
      That's still being discussed and we'll see where that falls.
    • 01:05:40
      The board responded with many requests of additional some case studies and such to understand exactly what it would mean impact wise if this overlay existed.
    • 01:05:49
      So we'll see what comes with that.
    • 01:05:51
      It's not that we're waiting until the final vote on the incentives or that the incentives would be all included or would be
    • 01:05:58
      If we come up with seven incentives, there might be an eighth, ninth, and tenth that could be considered.
    • 01:06:03
      It's just that we're getting some actually put into the plan so that people know what we're thinking, and then others can be considered as we move along.
    • 01:06:11
      Obviously, it's budget time.
    • 01:06:12
      We just received our county executive's recommended budget this past week.
    • 01:06:17
      We opened up and had our first public hearing last night, and then the board will begin its work sessions in the coming weeks, as I'm sure everybody else is doing.
    • 01:06:25
      And then we did do, last night we had a conversation about when we will be back and meeting in person in Albemarle.
    • 01:06:32
      And it looks like the target is in April where we're doing it by a tiered structure in our tier one groups would be the board of supervisors, the planning commission and the school board.
    • 01:06:43
      And we believe we will be back in our lane auditorium meeting in person with some hybrid versions for participation, but also allowing for some folks to be there in person with us as well in the audience.
    • 01:06:55
      So other groups beyond those three, we'll start over the coming months, but that looks like what we're on target to do so far.
    • 01:07:04
      Then I'll leave it at that.
    • 01:07:06
      Thank you.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:07:08
      Mr. De Gallaway.
    • 01:07:11
      Jim,
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 01:07:13
      Yeah, I had three things written on my list to talk about.
    • 01:07:22
      Does anyone have any questions about what we've done with reconstitution, the budget, or so far on incentives?
    • SPEAKER_20
    • 01:07:33
      I actually have a question.
    • 01:07:34
      Are you looking at parking?
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 01:07:37
      We are, that is one of the things that is in the mix for potentially reducing some of the parking needs as an incentive for affordable housing.
    • SPEAKER_20
    • 01:07:48
      Interesting.
    • 01:07:48
      We are too.
    • 01:07:49
      It's going to be hard.
    • Jim AndrewsMember, Planning District Commission
    • 01:07:56
      If no questions, I'll let it go.
    • Ned GallawayMember, Planning District Commission
    • 01:07:58
      Thank you.
    • 01:07:59
      All right.
    • 01:08:00
      Chair Rutherford, make sure you call on Mr. Andrews first next time.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:08:03
      Okay.
    • 01:08:05
      I got you.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:08:05
      All right, April, I'll make sure I call him first.
    • 01:08:08
      Awesome.
    • 01:08:10
      Moving on to, let's go to Louisa.
    • 01:08:13
      We'll start with the new blood first, Rachel.
    • Tommy BarlowMember, Planning District Commission
    • 01:08:19
      All right.
    • 01:08:20
      Well, I'm sure Tommy will have some stuff to add, but I'll tell you one thing that's sort of a hot button issue right here.
    • 01:08:26
      And I talked to Sandy a little bit about this today is the VDOT Kettleson, TJ,
    • 01:08:35
      PDC meeting that was held, a virtual public meeting about the new bow tie
    • 01:08:41
      Design up here in Zions Crossroads.
    • 01:08:44
      And I will tell you, it did not go very well with the community.
    • 01:08:47
      They are very confused about it.
    • 01:08:50
      They do not understand it.
    • 01:08:53
      They have requested for an additional public meeting, which will be in person.
    • 01:09:00
      They didn't feel that they got their questions answered during the virtual meeting.
    • 01:09:05
      And I've received tons of calls
    • 01:09:10
      Our county staff has received calls.
    • 01:09:12
      Our former Board of Supervisor, Mr. Babicak, is not on board with the new plan, with the plan either, he says.
    • 01:09:23
      So we've asked VDOT to possibly sit down with us, sit down with me and county staff and our county administrator and just take another look and see some, get some thoughts on what are priorities in that plan and what are not.
    • 01:09:39
      I think there also might be a little confusion between the county and TJPDC about what's going to smart scale, what project we have moving forward.
    • 01:09:51
      So I think we need to get some clarity on that for Louisa County.
    • 01:09:54
      So we're all on the same page.
    • 01:09:57
      So unfortunately, you know, we're in the works of that, that the new bow tie, innovative as it is, and one of the first ones in North America, I understand, I don't know, but I have a feeling that some people
    • 01:10:12
      You know, I was here when we did the diamond up here in Zion's Crossroads, and that was very confusing to everyone.
    • 01:10:19
      And that's folded into our lives fine.
    • Lucinda ShannonTransportation Program Manager
    • 01:10:22
      You're still confused.
    • Tommy BarlowMember, Planning District Commission
    • 01:10:23
      Yeah, you can tell people who don't live around here.
    • 01:10:26
      A lot of stop and goes and break lights.
    • 01:10:30
      A lot of confusion.
    • 01:10:32
      You can always tell new people.
    • 01:10:33
      You're like, oh, they're not from around here.
    • 01:10:36
      So that's where we stand with that and of course we're in budget season but I'm sure Tommy has some such stuff to add and if anyone else has anything to add or heard about the diamond or rather the bow tie or especially on the Fluvanna side if they've heard anything any information back from the citizens you know please let me know because we do want to kind of sit down and work with VDOT and all the stakeholders.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:11:05
      Gotcha.
    • 01:11:05
      Did it actually get funded via SmartScale?
    • 01:11:10
      Not yet.
    • Tommy BarlowMember, Planning District Commission
    • 01:11:10
      Not yet.
    • 01:11:11
      No, it is just a proposed plan.
    • 01:11:14
      But the feeling in the community is VDOT has rubber stamped this and it's going to happen.
    • 01:11:21
      And they're not quite understanding that it's a work in progress.
    • 01:11:24
      And I know that Kettleson and VDOT put hours and months and years into this plan.
    • 01:11:31
      And there's a lot
    • 01:11:33
      Back, and then tell you the truth, I was very shocked.
    • 01:11:35
      And I think our county administrator was to just how strongly opposed after this public meeting on the 23rd of February happened that the community was opposing it.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:11:50
      Great.
    • 01:11:51
      All right, Tommy.
    • SPEAKER_00
    • 01:11:53
      Well, the rest of the report is pretty mundane.
    • 01:11:57
      We are slowly moving forward, or inching forward, I should say, with the James River water line.
    • 01:12:04
      Seems like it's moving forward in inch increments.
    • 01:12:10
      We got a long ways to go.
    • 01:12:13
      We're working on a solar farm ordinance.
    • 01:12:15
      We're getting a lot of solar farms, so we're trying to get ahead of that.
    • 01:12:20
      Like everybody else, we're in the budget season and it's always a struggle.
    • 01:12:28
      And one of the best things that I feel like when we get past that, it's just a big relief.
    • 01:12:37
      Like it's, we don't really have anything other than Rachel's end of the can is stirring up stuff with the bow tie, but the rest of the can is,
    • 01:12:50
      We're kind of just sailing along pretty smoothly other than for the budget price.
    • Tommy BarlowMember, Planning District Commission
    • 01:12:57
      Well, I have the Gordonville end now very upset about a solar project that's been proposed this week right outside the town of Gordonville.
    • 01:13:05
      It's the Turkey solar project.
    • 01:13:09
      That's the other end.
    • 01:13:10
      I'm upsetting them from Zion's Crossroads to Gordonville.
    • 01:13:13
      Well, not me, but
    • 01:13:15
      They're getting upset.
    • 01:13:17
      So there's a lot of feedback, unfortunately.
    • 01:13:21
      Well, I can't say, unfortunately, we're still working through it, but a lot of concern about a solar project outside of Gordon.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:13:32
      Gotcha.
    • 01:13:32
      Great.
    • 01:13:33
      All right.
    • 01:13:34
      Is that it, Tommy?
    • SPEAKER_00
    • 01:13:35
      Did you notice that Rachel's Internet service is working?
    • Tommy BarlowMember, Planning District Commission
    • 01:13:45
      Super strong, love it.
    • 01:13:49
      Western end of the county, come on Tommy, come this way.
    • SPEAKER_00
    • 01:13:52
      Well, Bob was on the western end of the county too.
    • 01:13:55
      Oh, that's true.
    • Tommy BarlowMember, Planning District Commission
    • 01:13:58
      He might've been on Comcast, so he's only a mile or two from me, so I don't understand that, I've heard.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:14:04
      Yeah, yeah, yeah, PTSD.
    • 01:14:09
      All right, moving on to,
    • 01:14:13
      I have two little things.
    • SPEAKER_17
    • 01:14:21
      We have hired a grant writer and who was a very good editor for our local paper and I know that
    • 01:14:30
      Louisa had a hard time making that job, paid for itself, and TJPDC had the same experience.
    • 01:14:36
      So we'll see how we do with our grant writer in Greene.
    • 01:14:40
      Of course, TJPDC, all the planners are grant writers.
    • 01:14:43
      It's not like they aren't.
    • 01:14:45
      Anyway, I would just mention that because I don't remember that we brought it up before.
    • 01:14:52
      On the subject of in-face meetings, we're having our first Ruckersville Advisory Committee meeting, which is the Ruckersville small area plan follow-up committee.
    • 01:15:03
      That's the first one since COVID first came up.
    • 01:15:07
      So that's next Thursday.
    • SPEAKER_01
    • 01:15:13
      All right.
    • 01:15:14
      Thank you, Andrea.
    • 01:15:14
      Mr.
    • 01:15:15
      Herring, tell me about the land.
    • 01:15:18
      Sure.
    • 01:15:18
      That seems to be the hot topic still.
    • 01:15:20
      It's going to be a hot topic from now until
    • 01:15:22
      Whenever, but that's not until April in our agenda.
    • 01:15:26
      I'm sure that Christine will show up for a meeting during that night.
    • 01:15:29
      A couple of things, we're still doing RSA situation.
    • 01:15:35
      We had a short meeting the last time we met and two supervisors went to the Orange County board meeting and two went to the Madison County board meeting during public comments to make some statements.
    • 01:15:47
      We're still trying to form our own authority
    • 01:15:52
      See if we can be removed from RSA so we can control our own destiny.
    • 01:15:57
      That's an ongoing saga.
    • 01:15:58
      Budget cycle for us.
    • 01:15:59
      We had our first workshop this past Tuesday, and to be honest with you, this is looking pretty good for Greene.
    • 01:16:08
      So things should go smoothly for us in the budget.
    • 01:16:13
      And to address, we have some issues, of course, with fire and rescue services.
    • 01:16:18
      We're trying to address those.
    • 01:16:20
      The grant writer position, Andrea mentioned, there's a presentation for the Board of Supervisors.
    • 01:16:24
      I think it was probably back in January, and she had already applied for eight grants at that time.
    • 01:16:33
      And she is meeting with other parts of the county government to do additional grants.
    • 01:16:40
      And we've been meeting in person
    • 01:16:43
      For quite some time now, not as long as I think it's Nelson, but one of the things we are working on is trying to improve our audio-video connections.
    • 01:16:51
      We do a Zoom combination with a Granica system, and we're trying to find a better way to integrate that.
    • 01:16:57
      Albemarle County does an excellent job at their presentations, and we're trying to find a better way to do that.
    • 01:17:02
      That was part of our last meeting.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 01:17:03
      That's pretty much all I have, sir.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:17:10
      I'll also announce that for a second.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 01:17:11
      All right, thank you, Mr.
    • 01:17:12
      Herring.
    • 01:17:13
      Moving on to Fluvanna, Tony.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:17:18
      Is Tony still here?
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 01:17:21
      Yeah, he's here.
    • 01:17:21
      Sorry, I'm here.
    • 01:17:23
      All right.
    • 01:17:24
      Okay, so yesterday, we passed our first affordable housing apartment complex in Fluvanna, and it's going to be located just off of 53 and 618.
    • 01:17:39
      We call Colonial Circle about 125 units.
    • 01:17:43
      and that's being done by the Pinnacle Group which does a good job running their affordable housing programs.
    • 01:17:50
      It narrowly passed and it is getting some support from the county.
    • 01:17:55
      So it was interesting to hear how Charlottesville and Albemarle are adding additional support measures for attracting affordable housing.
    • 01:18:05
      I think there's still unfortunately concerns when it comes to
    • 01:18:13
      Rooftops and what that means and a lack of understanding by some members in the community in terms of the real need for true affordable housing.
    • 01:18:25
      Previous board meeting, we actually turned down another affordable housing project, deferred it, but I believe that they're probably moving on for another apartment complex for senior affordable housing, which would have been located just down the road as well too.
    • 01:18:41
      and I was disappointed to see that happening.
    • 01:18:44
      So I know that TJPDC has done a lot of work to try to bring affordable housing messages to the communities and to the counties, but more work still needs to be done there because we certainly shouldn't be turning those down at this point in time.
    • 01:18:57
      We're in our budget season and we've been at it for a couple of weeks now.
    • 01:19:02
      Looks pretty good.
    • 01:19:03
      A big, big thing, of course, is dealing with the raises that are being imposed, not imposed, but being given by the state.
    • 01:19:10
      and matching those raises.
    • 01:19:13
      We're certainly headed in that direction, but the schools are asking for a pretty big ask and we're waiting to see how the final numbers come with regard to commissioner revenue in order to see if we can stay at a flat rate for this year, which is our goal.
    • 01:19:32
      Other than that, not a whole lot else to report, just business sort of as usual, you know, no,
    • 01:19:40
      As Mr. Barlow mentioned, the James River project is inching along.
    • 01:19:46
      The Zions Crossroads project for Fluvanna County, which is water coming from the DOC, is at the 99 yard line and somewhat stalled due to some litigation on that side.
    • 01:19:57
      But we expect that that'll be resolved within the next few months.
    • 01:20:01
      I know you've all heard me say that over and over and over again.
    • 01:20:04
      And I keep on waiting for that magic moment when we can actually say, yes, water is flowing.
    • 01:20:08
      Water is in the pipes and it's in the tower, but it is not flowing yet.
    • 01:20:13
      And then lastly, in response to Rachel's question about bow tie concerns from the Fluvanna County side, I have not heard of any.
    • 01:20:22
      I'll be sure to follow up with our county administrator and pass along any of those concerns if we have heard from those.
    • 01:20:30
      I have heard it mentioned, but I have not heard any major concerns from that standpoint.
    • 01:20:35
      So that's all I have to report.
    • 01:20:37
      Yeah, absolutely.
    • 01:20:37
      And welcome aboard.
    • Tommy BarlowMember, Planning District Commission
    • 01:20:39
      Thank you.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:20:41
      Thank you, Tony.
    • 01:20:43
      Dylan.
    • 01:20:46
      Nelson Caddy.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:20:47
      Yeah, I've got a few things going on.
    • 01:20:49
      So we're meeting about some smart scale applications, which the PDC graciously takes care of for us.
    • 01:20:57
      So looking forward to getting those in.
    • 01:20:59
      We're kicking off our comp plan update with our consultant this month.
    • 01:21:03
      So not next week, but the week after.
    • 01:21:06
      We are having our staff kickoff meeting with the Berkeley group.
    • 01:21:11
      Applications we've got coming forward.
    • 01:21:14
      We've got a 51 site mobile home park going to the board, a glassblower and art gallery on Route 151.
    • 01:21:21
      And we've got the service dogs of Virginia want to locate a facility.
    • 01:21:25
      So we're updating our ordinance about panels on the commercial side of it.
    • 01:21:30
      So lots going on, lots happening here.
    • 01:21:33
      So
    • 01:21:34
      Looking forward to that comp plan update that'll help us make those decisions a lot better and make recommendations, you know, more effectively.
    • 01:21:42
      And then I do have a question for David Blount that may or may not be of interest to everyone here, but I've been doing some research on survey county boundary lines, and I've asked everyone I can possibly think of.
    • 01:21:59
      And so I was curious if
    • 01:22:01
      There was someone I could reach out to or if those are maintained somewhere in a state department or something.
    • SPEAKER_02
    • 01:22:08
      I would maybe ask the Louisa supervisor from the Mine Run district to chime in here.
    • SPEAKER_00
    • 01:22:15
      Mountain Road district.
    • SPEAKER_02
    • 01:22:16
      Sorry.
    • 01:22:17
      I'm sorry.
    • 01:22:18
      I misspoke.
    • 01:22:18
      Mountain Road.
    • 01:22:19
      Mine Run is in Orange County.
    • SPEAKER_00
    • 01:22:21
      It is.
    • 01:22:25
      We have done a boundary line adjustment with Goochland and one with Hanover.
    • 01:22:32
      And as far as I'm concerned, both were Fiasco's.
    • 01:22:38
      Which county are you talking about?
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:22:42
      I've had two different surveyors shout about boundary lines with Augusta County.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:22:48
      Well, hold on.
    • 01:22:50
      I think we're going to resolve this ourselves, Dylan.
    • 01:22:55
      Are you talking about the Wintergreen side?
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:22:58
      No, it's not related to that.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:23:02
      I have my ideas, but we're going to annex it.
    • 01:23:06
      For those who don't know, there's this probably $10 million worth of real estate that is in Wintergreen, that is actually in Augusta, ironically.
    • 01:23:17
      So this has been a long, long time commitment that I've told Augusta that we were going to take our local dog hunters and
    • 01:23:25
      Nelson County flag and just stick it up there and call it a day.
    • 01:23:29
      Take it back.
    • 01:23:31
      So thank you, Dylan.
    • 01:23:32
      What else you got?
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:23:32
      That was it.
    • 01:23:33
      Thank you.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:23:37
      All right.
    • 01:23:39
      That's over to me.
    • 01:23:41
      Comprehensive plan.
    • 01:23:42
      That's going to be a very large conversation coming up.
    • 01:23:45
      It's going to be a year or two more than likely.
    • 01:23:49
      Conversations about affordable housing.
    • 01:23:50
      What does that look like?
    • 01:23:51
      Obviously having a manufactured housing community come to the county for new development has engaged an interesting conversation.
    • 01:24:01
      So we also have some definitions on vacation homes, which will be interesting for those who don't know.
    • 01:24:09
      Nelson County has probably close to six, 700 Airbnb VRBO homes, so short-term rentals in our county.
    • 01:24:17
      So we'll see how definitions of a vacation home for zoning purposes may or may not change.
    • 01:24:26
      But beyond that, the big news is the new county administrator role that will be opening up in the end of July.
    • 01:24:35
      So any pointers that you could send my way would be great.
    • 01:24:39
      Mr.
    • 01:24:40
      Herring sent me some and anybody else who has done this before or done an RFP greatly would appreciate any advice.
    • 01:24:48
      So that's how long did it take you, Dale?
    • 01:24:51
      Did it take you five, six months?
    • SPEAKER_01
    • 01:24:54
      Uh, yeah, if I remember correctly, we, uh, had an interim for our budget cycle.
    • 01:24:59
      We had to hire in December.
    • 01:25:02
      Right.
    • 01:25:02
      Uh, and an interview, he came on board about three or four months later due to prior commitment.
    • 01:25:07
      Um, so we have one from a year of the starting process, but we went through the process starting, um, from June till December.
    • 01:25:14
      Right.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:25:15
      Gotcha.
    • 01:25:17
      All right.
    • 01:25:18
      Well, sounds good.
    • 01:25:19
      Uh,
    • 01:25:20
      Other than that, Dylan, I don't know why I'm drawing a blank, but everyone's getting internet.
    • 01:25:25
      So I'm kind of running out of exciting things.
    • 01:25:26
      So we're going to shake things up.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:25:28
      It's the first time for everything.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:25:30
      I know, I know me being, me having all my words taken away, but I appreciate it.
    • 01:25:37
      And let's see what else do you want to touch on?
    • 01:25:40
      What's upcoming, Christine?
    • Christine JacobsExecutive Director
    • 01:25:45
      For the April meeting, what's coming up is the Rural Transportation Work Program brought before you for approval.
    • 01:25:52
      The draft operating budget for FY23 coming to you next month in draft version only for your review and for questions.
    • 01:26:00
      We'll need to appoint a nominating committee for the TJPDC Commission Officers next month.
    • 01:26:05
      And then we'll be bringing you Unified Work Program, the UPWP for the MPO.
    • 01:26:11
      as well as the Virginia Housing Grant.
    • 01:26:14
      We have the reviewers are, pardon, the reviewers are looking through the applications now and they will bring back to you all next month a recommendation for grants that we should give using the Virginia Housing money that we received.
    • 01:26:30
      That's all for next month.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:26:31
      Excellent and also if you all could please continue to monitor your emails for this upcoming survey.
    • 01:26:36
      Those will be going out Monday or somewhere in that range.
    • 01:26:40
      Did we decide, David?
    • SPEAKER_02
    • 01:26:44
      We are working to get the survey in the form that it needs to be.
    • 01:26:51
      We've run into a few challenges.
    • 01:26:52
      So if it's not Monday, it will be Tuesday and we'll probably just, you know, again, go to 10 days from there.
    • 01:26:58
      So yes, first part of the week.
    • 01:27:00
      Thank you for your patience.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:27:02
      No problem.
    • 01:27:03
      Not a problem.
    • 01:27:03
      All right.
    • 01:27:04
      Thank you, David.
    • 01:27:06
      Other than that, we're ending this meeting 33 minutes early.
    • 01:27:09
      So that is an impressive thing to do.
    • 01:27:13
      Nobody has anything else to say.
    • 01:27:14
      I don't hear anything.
    • 01:27:16
      Let's get a motion to adjourn.
    • 01:27:19
      We'll move.
    • 01:27:20
      Tommy's motion.
    • 01:27:21
      Do we have a second?
    • 01:27:24
      Second.
    • 01:27:24
      Second.
    • 01:27:24
      All right.
    • 01:27:25
      All in favor, say aye.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 01:27:27
      Aye.
    • SPEAKER_21
    • 01:27:29
      Excellent.
    • 01:27:30
      Anybody in opposition?
    • 01:27:32
      Great.
    • 01:27:33
      All right.
    • 01:27:34
      It's nice to see you guys.
    • 01:27:35
      Look forward to seeing you in April.
    • 01:27:37
      Monitor your emails, and we'll send out some reminders to make sure you fill out those surveys.
    • 01:27:43
      Thank you guys, see y'all.