Central Virginia
City of Charlottesville
City Council Meeting 10/19/2009
Auto-scroll
City Council Meeting
10/19/2009
SPEAKER_18
00:00:08
Today on Meet the Farmer TV, we're in the kitchen with In the Kitchen magazine.
00:00:14
Meet the Farmer TV is made possible by Planet Earth Diversified, Melly Productions, and Leslie P. Jenkins Photography and Graphic Design.
00:00:23
Culpeppers Channel 21, helping to preserve the agricultural history of Virginia, and Flavor Magazine, serving the Piedmont's local food and wine culture.
00:00:33
I'm Michael Clark, your host for Meet the Farmer TV.
00:00:36
Today we will talk with Rowena Marle, the founder and editor of In the Kitchen Magazine.
00:00:41
We'll go to her kitchen.
00:00:43
Arugula to Zucchini at the White House, Cigna Family Farm, and the CAT chat.
00:00:48
We're going to be a model for local food production.
SPEAKER_11
00:00:50
And the bill has, although it still has bills on it.
SPEAKER_44
00:00:54
You'll probably live long enough to sell a few dollar pound of milk.
00:00:58
He said, but you ain't never going to block these flat ground ain't got any rocks in it.
SPEAKER_21
00:01:03
It's about market access.
SPEAKER_48
00:01:04
Plants don't have personalities.
SPEAKER_16
00:01:09
And I got one, so.
SPEAKER_39
00:01:10
We have a great solution to some of these crises that we're now facing.
SPEAKER_16
00:01:14
And you're watching.
00:01:15
And you're watching.
SPEAKER_18
00:01:16
And you're watching.
00:01:17
Meet the Farmer TV.
00:01:29
So tell me, how did you get the idea to start in the kitchen magazine?
SPEAKER_32
00:01:34
Well, I had 40 years of business experience and I knew at some point I was going to stop that craziness.
00:01:44
But I didn't make a lot of plans.
00:01:46
I thought I'd either open a restaurant or have a catering business because my love has always been food.
00:01:53
and when the time came I didn't have enough steam left to do that and so I thought well I still want to share my food heritage because I wanted to have you know a small restaurant where I could cook southern country food that I'd grown up on.
00:02:13
and I still wanted to share that heritage and so I kept thinking and it took me about six weeks to come up with a format for In the Kitchen but the taproot for it has always been the meal planner which is a calendar of every month that I use a menu for each day and one recipe in the menu
00:02:42
and I began that when I was a single mother when I had to work and take care of a child and do all those things and the planning was good, I'm a good planner and so I used to map out what I did daily and shop accordingly and then I always knew what I was going to have for dinner that night
00:03:08
It also allowed me to do what I really like and I'm hoping that I'm teaching this to readers and that is to prepare, we call it progressive cooking, where you cook
00:03:22
Every time you cook, you cook something for the next meal or for future meals.
00:03:27
You make twice as much rice as you need or you bake more potatoes than you need or you cook a roast and you plan, when you cook it, to have meals left during the week and when you get lucky enough to bake ham, then you've got two weeks.
00:03:44
or more of food because the bone makes the best soup in the world and those kinds of things.
00:03:50
So in the Kitchen Monthly Meal Planner teaches progressive cooking just because it's there.
00:04:01
People didn't pick it up at first, didn't pick up the idea.
00:04:05
So this year
00:04:09
I realized that the subtleties that are in the magazine, that I was the only one that was getting them.
00:04:17
So this year I've had articles about the subtleties of In the Kitchen, how it progresses and the fact that I, how my abbreviations go in the monthly meal planner and that kind of thing.
00:04:30
And as a result, I've gotten more questions and more people commenting about the meal planner after at least 10 years.
SPEAKER_18
00:04:39
Now tell me, you started out in June 2000, so the internet was sort of there, but not like it is today.
00:04:49
How's the internet changed?
00:04:51
I mean, it's affecting print publishing everywhere.
00:04:54
How's it affecting you?
SPEAKER_32
00:04:55
I think it probably has, up until this year, affected it very little because I've always had a website
00:05:04
as hobbled together as it was.
00:05:07
But nobody ever used it.
00:05:09
I never got any comments or anything.
00:05:11
But now that your program is on the air and so many people are referencing the little taglines that they get for internet addresses and things like that, then I'm finding that I'm losing out by not having those.
00:05:30
And so on October 20th of this year, we're going to launch our website.
SPEAKER_18
00:05:39
Oh, big new website?
SPEAKER_32
00:05:40
Yeah, big new website.
SPEAKER_18
00:05:41
In the Kitchen Online?
00:05:42
InTheKitchenOnline.com So it's the same website address that's current, it's just going to change format on the 20th of October.
SPEAKER_32
00:05:49
Right.
00:05:50
and it's going to be very interesting and very interconnected.
00:05:57
I don't have all the lingo for what goes on in the electronic world but there will be lots of things to see and it'll be connected through the magazine so it's going to be interrelated.
00:06:09
We call it the companion.
SPEAKER_18
00:06:12
And so this program will be linked to that website and people can watch the program.
SPEAKER_32
00:06:17
Oh, won't that be exciting?
SPEAKER_18
00:06:20
Ten years of print and now a big new website and I'm getting multimedia.
00:06:27
And you're now a video star.
SPEAKER_32
00:06:28
And now kicking and screaming.
SPEAKER_18
00:06:31
Just another thing to have to do.
00:06:34
The next thing we know we'll see Rowena texting.
SPEAKER_32
00:06:37
I swear I will not Twitter or tweet.
SPEAKER_18
00:06:44
Well tell me, how did you start a magazine here in Charlottesville?
00:06:49
Did you find anybody to help or somebody to bankroll the project?
00:06:54
How did you get that to go?
SPEAKER_32
00:06:56
Well, I had been in the local builder organization as their executive.
00:07:02
for many years.
00:07:04
So I have a lot of good friends in the building industry and in related industries.
00:07:11
And my good friend, Ron Martin, loved the idea.
00:07:15
I made one call on him.
00:07:17
and he decided that he wanted always to have a newsletter but he didn't know how he was going to distribute it and through the years he really hadn't made a list of his customers or prospective customers so this was a good opportunity for him to get his newsletter out because from the start we printed 10,000 copies and he put his newsletter in until he died
00:07:47
and we wrote it together many months and then with his son some months and it was a wonderful thing because essentially he bankrolled it for me.
00:07:57
It wasn't expensive to do.
00:07:59
I designed it to be an inexpensive medium because I wanted it to be a tool for local businesses.
00:08:07
That's why I put it on newsprint.
00:08:10
That's why I did the photographs myself so that local advertisers
00:08:16
could advertise inexpensively and get their word out.
00:08:21
I've also been really lucky to have people who've always wanted to write for it.
00:08:28
And they all contribute their talents to it.
00:08:31
I don't pay writers.
00:08:33
And I always have people waiting in line who want to write for In the Kitchen.
00:08:38
Good writers.
SPEAKER_18
00:08:40
So has it been a good experience?
00:08:43
You're going to continue doing it for another 10 years?
SPEAKER_32
00:08:45
Does the creek don't rise?
00:08:48
Yeah, I probably will.
SPEAKER_18
00:08:51
So you're really living what you're writing.
SPEAKER_32
00:08:53
Oh yeah.
00:08:53
Ron and I source 80% of our food in the winter and 90% in the summer from local producers.
00:09:04
We go to the farms.
00:09:07
We go to the farmer's markets.
00:09:10
We have friends who have gardens and we source our food locally.
00:09:16
I grew up on a farm in Green Springs, Central Virginia.
00:09:22
We raised almost everything we ate.
00:09:26
We bought coffee, baking soda, salt, just a few things at the fuel feed and seed store and everything else we raised.
00:09:40
and my grandmother taught me to cook.
00:09:43
That is, I learned by her side.
00:09:45
She wasn't
00:09:48
She didn't instruct me, but I learned at her side to make bread, to prepare meals for the family every day, to prepare special things for holidays.
00:10:04
As a matter of fact, I have some of her cooking utensils here in the kitchen, and I still bake fruitcakes in her fruitcake pans.
SPEAKER_18
00:10:15
So this is your real heritage that you're talking about?
SPEAKER_32
00:10:18
Yeah, this is the heritage that I wanted to impart and I have faithfully given recipes and developed many because my grandmother didn't have recipes.
00:10:33
When she died I couldn't find a cookbook.
00:10:36
I have found since envelopes where she had put lists of ingredients on bags of envelopes.
00:10:44
That's how I have her fruitcake recipe.
00:10:47
I learned to make biscuits at her side so I knew the feel of combining the ingredients and you know we had plenty of butter and buttermilk and all of the ingredients and we would take our corn to the mill and trade it for for some flour and so yeah this is my heritage.
SPEAKER_18
00:11:13
So you really learned cooking in an intimate
00:11:18
the situation with your grandmother and there really weren't a lot of measurements or things documented and written down and now you're having to convert all that and write it down for people that want to know precise temperatures and measurements and exactly how it's going to work out.
SPEAKER_32
00:11:34
You know she cooked on a wood stove.
00:11:37
What was the temperature of that?
00:11:39
She was a genius.
00:11:42
She had a helper who cut all of her wood and kindling and she would send Tommy out.
00:11:52
She'd tell him what they were going to cook that day and she'd send him out to get hardwood and softwood and kindling.
00:12:00
I never learned any of that.
00:12:03
As a matter of fact, the day she died
00:12:06
I knew we would have a house full of people.
00:12:09
My mother and my father worked off doing business for her before they brought her home.
00:12:14
And I knew that the house was going to be full and that we didn't have any biscuits made.
00:12:20
And so I went into the pantry and measured out
00:12:25
what would have been one night of biscuits and then multiplied that by the number that I knew we were going to need.
00:12:32
I needed 150 biscuits.
00:12:34
That's what I figured.
00:12:35
So I had to make 10 batches.
00:12:39
but I forgot that I didn't know how to do the stove but the man who helped my grandmother knew how to build a fire and by the time my parents got back and my grandmother got home we had 150 biscuits on the dining room table so that sort of reinforced it let me know that I could do it
00:13:04
And so when Christmas came, my mother liked the outside work on the farm.
00:13:09
My grandmother was the cook.
00:13:13
She said to my dad, I don't know how to make the fruitcake, but I did.
00:13:19
And my dad did, because he had helped her before I was born.
00:13:27
So together we put together a fruitcake recipe.
00:13:31
And the other thing we always did on Thanksgiving, we had hunters come to the farm.
00:13:37
And so we didn't have a Thanksgiving dinner.
00:13:40
We provided
00:13:42
Cornbread and Brunswick Stew for them.
00:13:46
And my grandmother just had a list of the things that went in the Brunswick Stew.
00:13:53
Many of them were canned in our cellar.
00:13:56
And it was a way of moving out one season and putting the new season up.
00:14:02
And that's how I learned to make Brunswick Stew, which is now in several good Virginia cookbooks.
SPEAKER_18
00:14:10
Well now, it sounds like your heritage and love for food comes from a really deep, heartfelt space.
00:14:18
It's multi-generational, you've got these intense emotional experiences with the food.
00:14:24
This is very similar to why some of the local food producers, alternative farmers, why they continue to farm when it's not the most profitable thing they can do, it's very difficult.
00:14:35
and they may question whether they can ever retire from their efforts.
00:14:40
So it's interesting that your love and connection with food kind of parallels that with the producers and the people that you're supporting when you write that magazine.
SPEAKER_32
00:14:52
Well after being away from it, because we left the farm when I was 18,
00:14:57
and then I went directly to college which meant that I was completely divorced from that type of life and then married and then went into business and a number of things so that it was
00:15:12
I sourced my food locally as much as I could during that time because it tastes better, you know.
00:15:24
It was a long time before those old juices started
00:15:31
coming to the surface, the reminder of my heritage.
00:15:36
About the only time I had to exercise that was for holidays.
00:15:42
And I'd roast the turkey and make the dressing and find a venison crown roast somewhere, even if I had to go out and shoot it myself.
00:15:54
I did do a few years ago yes we do we hunt and we have right now I have bird in the freezer and almost all my venison is gone because hunting season is coming up I have a couple of geese in there a couple of squirrels and so we yes we do eat game along with our good beef from Griffin's area and we like grass-fed beef and
00:16:24
from various beat bombers around here.
SPEAKER_18
00:16:29
So is this like the Beverly Hillbillies?
SPEAKER_32
00:16:31
You stop in the middle of the road, run, hold good traffic and you come out with your shovel and get the... You think that's your favorite?
00:16:44
Truth be told, we have harvested two deer from the road which we saw them killed.
00:16:52
But when Ron wants to pick the squirrel every now and again, I won't let him do that.
SPEAKER_18
00:16:58
I hit a deer with my large truck in Gordonville and it was right by the graveyard and the deer went into the graveyard and died and I called the sheriff and said hey I just hit a deer and they were like well we don't care and I said well can I take it and they go yeah fine you don't need the game board or anything
00:17:19
But it could create a local stir because there was some guy, you know, hauling a bloody carcass in the graveyard and he put it in the back of a big truck.
00:17:28
So tell me about some of your favorite issues in the magazine.
00:17:31
So what, we've got 120?
SPEAKER_32
00:17:34
Just about.
00:17:36
And then when you start multiplying the meal planner times 30 times 12 times 10, you think of the menus and the recipes we've got.
00:17:49
It's one of these days I might get around to writing a book.
SPEAKER_21
00:17:52
You never know.
SPEAKER_32
00:17:54
The first one, I love tomatoes.
00:17:57
I started with tomatoes and as I looked through getting things ready for you to see, I noticed that I have eight covers that have tomatoes.
SPEAKER_18
00:18:08
You must like tomatoes.
SPEAKER_32
00:18:08
On them.
00:18:09
Well, every summer, you know, in the kitchen is seasonal and what comes along in August is tomatoes and so
00:18:19
We don't get a good light angle.
00:18:29
And here is the most recent tomatoes.
00:18:31
And if you'll notice, we've changed our headline.
00:18:36
Gotten a little more modern here.
00:18:38
And that happened last December.
00:18:43
So we kept this for nine years.
00:18:46
I make haste slowly.
00:18:49
And actually, the meal planner has changed.
00:18:55
We now have, of course, what I call mine.
00:19:00
Centerfold.
00:19:02
It used to be all crammed onto one page.
00:19:05
But you see, this is what the other meal planner used to look like.
00:19:11
Talk about shorthand.
SPEAKER_18
00:19:15
That's why you had to explain all those abbreviations.
SPEAKER_32
00:19:17
That's right.
00:19:19
And most people know that I love chickens.
00:19:23
And the reason is I started raising chickens on the farm that put me through school.
00:19:30
So everybody knew that I like chickens and that's why I have more chickens in this house than is probably legal.
00:19:39
But this is one of my favorite covers because I love that old rooster and my friend who lives in Atlanta has just done this in oils for me which I proudly display in my kitchen.
SPEAKER_18
00:19:53
Now where was that taken?
SPEAKER_32
00:19:56
On a little farm south of Lynchburg.
00:20:00
She was having a backyard sale and Ron and I were putzing around and I saw this old rooster who kept fluffing around and he finally settled down and I took his picture.
00:20:14
You know, local is a relative thing, which I have not been able to tie down, by the way.
00:20:19
When I asked Whole Foods what they thought was local, they said anywhere you could drive to and get back in one day.
00:20:27
Well, that's 250, 300 miles.
00:20:34
I like to
00:20:35
say Virginia is my limit but yet that doesn't let me get up into the Chesapeake Bay and get all the seafood I might like to get and it's also a long way to Bristol.
00:20:49
So anyway, 100 miles is pretty much our limit for unless we specify
00:21:01
that it's somewhere outside of a hundred miles then I would say for in the kitchen a hundred miles is local and yet when the couple in Canada did that hundred mile meal
00:21:16
that was highly promoted in a lot of magazines.
00:21:20
Ron and I took the challenge and did our Thanksgiving that year in 50 miles.
00:21:25
And the only thing that we gave up was oranges and cranberries.
00:21:32
Everything else was sourced locally.
00:21:36
and we didn't have to alter what was our traditional menu except for those two things.
SPEAKER_18
00:21:43
Really the concept of local could be kind of distilled to like the original hunter-gatherers and you might go hunting for a week.
00:21:53
You know, the hunting party might be gone for days and travel many miles and then bring the food back, but I mean, you wouldn't declassify them as local because they went on a hunting trip.
SPEAKER_32
00:22:07
Good point, but I don't camp out.
00:22:11
So I've learned a lot doing in the kitchen.
SPEAKER_18
00:22:14
Well, that's pretty good photography to prepare food.
00:22:17
I see another one of those chickens on there.
SPEAKER_32
00:22:20
Oh, there's a chicken on every one of them.
00:22:24
And there's a chicken on the front cover of every one of them.
00:22:29
And there's a chicken at the end of each article.
SPEAKER_18
00:22:32
So really, In the Kitchen magazine is almost like your memoirs of three generations of food.
00:22:38
Yeah.
SPEAKER_32
00:22:41
Nice summary, Michael.
SPEAKER_18
00:22:46
So is there anything that we didn't touch on that you really want
SPEAKER_32
00:22:50
I just wish that more people would realize that they need to cook in order to get to feed their family nutritious food.
00:23:10
It's easier and cheaper to cook it than it is to buy it in the store.
00:23:16
Now I can make a cake
00:23:19
in probably 10 minutes and that includes getting the mixer out and washing it.
00:23:28
Well, by the time you've gone to the grocery store and bought the cake and made sure you, you know, it takes the same time.
SPEAKER_18
00:23:36
And then you have all that stress of driving and the traffic and a huge carbon footprint.
SPEAKER_32
00:23:42
Not only that, you have ingredients in it that you have not chosen yourself.
SPEAKER_18
00:23:48
Not something that your grandmother would have as a list from the root cellar or from the paper.
SPEAKER_32
00:23:54
Yeah, but some things you can't even pronounce or spell.
00:24:00
So that's why I think that preparing your food
00:24:05
is so important to the health of our nation.
00:24:11
But what's more, I believe that the old lineage of people who need to go stay together.
00:24:20
Ron and I eat together every evening.
00:24:22
I pack his lunch every day.
00:24:24
I can't tell you how much money that saves, but the companionship and the doing it together is wonderful.
SPEAKER_18
00:24:35
So there's really not only this increased nutrition, but there's an increased emotional and spiritual health of cooking food in the kitchen.
SPEAKER_32
00:24:45
My granddaughter can cook and she's 11.
00:24:49
My daughter is a good cook.
00:24:51
She doesn't particularly like to cook, but she knows the importance of cooking.
00:24:56
But now Leah, who's 11, can pretty much take on the responsibility of preparing a decent meal.
00:25:06
She doesn't do it every night, but she can do it.
00:25:10
And we started when she was like three or four, you know, dipping muffins in juice.
00:25:15
There's always something in the kitchen that children can do.
00:25:18
Well, that's pretty amazing.
00:25:20
Take the time to show them how to do it, because they like to do things and they like to be helpful.
SPEAKER_18
00:25:31
So you don't need an Xbox or a Wii, you just need a kitchen.
SPEAKER_32
00:25:35
Right.
00:25:36
What's a Wii?
SPEAKER_18
00:25:37
It's some funny electronic game that you play.
SPEAKER_21
00:25:40
Oh.
SPEAKER_18
00:25:45
It's like you hold a mouse or you hold something and you can be like it's a baseball bat or a golf club and the TV mimics, whatever you're doing.
SPEAKER_32
00:25:53
Yeah, I don't have a lot of gadgets in my kitchen.
00:25:55
We don't need to go there.
00:25:57
It's just that my kitchen is simple.
SPEAKER_18
00:26:00
Well, you started with wood stove.
SPEAKER_32
00:26:02
Yeah, and a wooden bowl and your hands and pitcher of milk that didn't have to be refrigerated because you got it from the cow that day.
SPEAKER_18
00:26:18
Well, that's wonderful, Ruina.
00:26:20
Is there something you'd like to ask of the readers and subscribers of In the Kitchen?
SPEAKER_32
00:26:25
Well, I'd like to invite them to become more active with interactive with In the Kitchen.
00:26:32
With the website, it will be easier than writing a note.
00:26:37
They can just email it and
00:26:42
It will be easier, I think, for me to be more interactive with the readers.
00:26:47
And I wholeheartedly invite them to do that.
00:26:51
And remember that the launch is on the 20th of October.
SPEAKER_18
00:26:56
All right.
00:26:56
Well, thank you very much.
SPEAKER_32
00:26:58
Oh, thank you, Michael.
00:26:59
It's been a lot of fun.
SPEAKER_18
00:27:01
Well, there you have it.
00:27:02
Lina Albemarle's In the Kitchen magazine, a whole multi-generational memoir of food and recipes and importance of local food, the spiritual and emotional nourishment of cooking in the kitchen.
00:27:18
And thank you for joining us for another Meet the Farmer TV.
SPEAKER_21
00:27:23
Today, we're at the White House Farmers Market.
SPEAKER_18
00:27:30
Let's see what fresh produce has come to DC.
00:27:34
From arugula to zucchini at the White House Fresh Farm Market.
SPEAKER_44
00:27:39
My father used to ask me to say, boy, he'd say, what do you want out of this life?
00:27:45
And I think for a second, I said, well, Dad, I'll tell you what.
00:27:48
I said, I'd like to be able to sell a tomato for over $2 a pound.
00:27:52
and I would love to plop a piece of flat ground banana rocks in it and he thought for a second he said you'll probably live long enough to sell a two dollar pound of mayo he said but you ain't never gonna plop a piece of flat ground any rocks in it and it's the truth
SPEAKER_18
00:28:26
Meet the Farmer TV is made possible by Planet Earth Diversified, Melly Productions, and Leslie P. Jenkins Photography and Graphic Design.
00:28:35
Culpepper's Channel 21, helping to preserve the agricultural history of Virginia, and Flavor Magazine, serving the Piedmont's local food and wine culture.
SPEAKER_02
00:28:48
Sorry I'm late.
00:28:49
Traffic was a mess.
00:28:51
I must have raced through every neighborhood just to get here.
00:28:55
Listen, there's something I've been meaning to talk to you about.
00:28:58
I don't want you to take this the wrong way, but lately I've been feeling really, well, confined in this relationship.
00:29:08
This may sound selfish, but I'm still young and I want to go places with no limitations and at my own pace.
00:29:18
I have to go.
00:29:20
Listen, it's not you.
00:29:24
It's me.
SPEAKER_40
00:29:38
Ooh, that's gonna cost ya.
00:29:42
What?
SPEAKER_07
00:29:59
I was just walking along the sidewalk and a car rolled up next to me and a girl got up and actually ran up behind me and started punching me in the back of my head.
00:30:08
She came to school with like a broken nose, black eye.
SPEAKER_43
00:30:12
At our school recently we've actually had a locker first and then we bought the gun.
SPEAKER_42
00:30:16
These teens are speaking out about violence in their schools and in their communities.
SPEAKER_40
00:30:20
Youth at night were throwing gangs.
00:30:22
I don't know if they were drunk or not, but we would all wake up in the morning and find glass.
00:30:27
Um, broken, windshields, stuff like that.
SPEAKER_42
00:30:30
Experts say violence among teens, especially when it comes to bullying, is out of control.
SPEAKER_29
00:30:35
When kids do kill themselves because they can't take it anymore, it's known as bullicide.
SPEAKER_42
00:30:40
Can tougher laws and more restrictions at our schools make a difference?
00:30:44
and what can be done by teens to combat bullets on the streets and in their classrooms.
00:30:49
Plus, in our student spotlight, we'll tell you how two drive-by shootings inspired this week Ridge High School senior to take action.
00:30:57
At issue?
00:30:59
Doing safety.
00:30:59
Today on Student Voices.
00:31:18
Hi, I'm Brian Harper.
00:31:20
Welcome to Student Voices, the series that gives young people a chance to speak out about issues they care about.
00:31:26
In our studio today, we have teenagers from all around the metro area.
00:31:29
Let's find out more about each one of them.
SPEAKER_11
00:31:33
I'm Tessa, I'm a Stockmore at Denver School of the Arts and I live in Centennial, so I'm out of the team.
00:31:39
I think that people are kind of going to the extremes and like wanding people and searching their lockers.
00:31:43
Truly idiotic.
SPEAKER_06
00:31:45
Hey baby, I'm Robert, I live in Portland and I go to Horizon High School and I'm a senior.
00:31:49
I was about to be a fight in like the stairwell of our school.
00:31:52
If they would have kept fighting they would have went into like the stairwell and fallen in love with people and a lot of people would have gotten hurt.
SPEAKER_43
00:31:58
I'm Adam, I go to Cherokee High School and I live in Centennial.
00:32:01
Yes.
00:32:02
I like to play the drums, read my issues, debate.
00:32:05
And I feel that your points are out of order and inadequate.
00:32:09
No, I'm going to teleport.
SPEAKER_03
00:32:10
Hi, I'm Karina.
00:32:11
I'm a junior at Stanley Lake High School, and I live in Aurora.
00:32:14
I'm a good girl, actually.
00:32:15
You know, everyone has a great view, and it's the line.
00:32:17
I might as well just follow it and not get in a teleport.
SPEAKER_40
00:32:20
My name is Angelo.
00:32:21
I live in Aurora, and I'm homeschooled.
00:32:23
I feel I am.
00:32:25
A bit safer in some way from someone who goes to public school.
00:32:30
I have witnessed that youth are destroying people's property.
SPEAKER_07
00:32:33
Hi, my name is Stephanie.
00:32:34
I live in Denver and I'm a junior at East High School.
00:32:37
I was actually walking out of school.
00:32:40
A car came up on the side of me and a girl got out and just ran up behind me and started punching me in the back of my head.
00:32:45
And since we didn't have cameras on the outside of school, they didn't catch her doing it.
SPEAKER_43
00:32:50
I would not advise fighting.
00:32:52
I'm Brian and I'm a junior that attends John F. Kennedy High and I live in Lakewood, Colorado.
00:32:56
The only time I would advise to fight is if you're actually in one already and that's the only way you can, like, defend yourself.
SPEAKER_09
00:33:03
My name is Sarah.
00:33:04
They call me Princess.
00:33:05
I go to Stanley Lake High School in Westminster, Colorado and I am a junior.
00:33:10
At my school, I
00:33:12
I feel pretty safe.
00:33:14
I don't feel like my life's in danger or anything.
SPEAKER_42
00:33:16
It's good.
00:33:17
What a group.
00:33:19
Also joining us are Barbara Coloso, author of The Bully, The Bullied, and The Bystander, How Parents and Teachers Can Help Break the Cycle of Violence, and Debbie Benefield, a PTA leader and state representative from Arvada, Colorado, who works on school safety legislation.
00:33:35
Before we get started, let's take a closer look at the issue.
00:33:40
Kids are growing up in a different time.
00:33:42
They are faced with more challenges and more violence than any other generation.
00:33:46
In Colorado, the tragic incidents at Columbine High School put every high school in the nation on alert.
00:33:51
Schools are taking every precaution to keep weapons out of school.
00:33:55
Just two years ago, one in 16 high school students reported carrying a weapon on school property.
00:34:02
One in three high school students reported involvement in a physical fight.
00:34:07
At school, students are tormented by error.
00:34:10
So much so that some even drop out.
00:34:13
25% of bullies have a criminal record before the age of 30.
00:34:17
At home, teens aren't always safe either.
00:34:19
Their drive-bys for stray bullets kill innocent bystanders.
00:34:22
Even being online poses possible threats for teens.
00:34:26
Lawmakers implement curfew times to keep teens from getting in dangerous situations.
00:34:30
At some malls, teens are asked to leave as early as 5 p.m. on the weekends.
00:34:34
It's got a lot of teens fed up and frustrated.
00:34:39
Now it's time for our student voices to speak out.
00:34:43
Okay guys, what do you think?
00:34:45
And Stephanie, I'm going to start with you.
00:34:47
You were actually attacked on school grounds.
00:34:50
Tell us what happened.
SPEAKER_07
00:34:51
It was after class and I was going out to the parking lot in my car and I was just walking along the sidewalk and a car about next to me and a girl got out and actually ran up behind me and started punching me in the back of my head and so I just turned around and asked her what do you think you're doing and she laughed and got back in her car and just drove off Anybody have any situations like this and no stuff like this going on other than their school or community similar things?
SPEAKER_09
00:35:20
It didn't happen to me but one of my friends, her name was Chelsea and one of her other friends, I'm not sure of her name, they were at a park and some girls just came up and attacked them and took their purse and stuff and then had their brother's cousins, who knows, come and attack them too because afterwards they called someone and I guess the girls that attacked them saw that so they came.
SPEAKER_42
00:35:45
So they actually got another attack because they actually tried to do something, call someone for help
00:35:49
Wow.
SPEAKER_09
00:35:50
She was just telling about it and she came to school with a broken nose, black eye and it was pretty crazy.
SPEAKER_42
00:35:57
Some pretty serious damage.
00:35:59
Robert, how about you?
00:36:00
Have you experienced that?
00:36:01
I have.
SPEAKER_06
00:36:01
I've seen people in my school and they get in fights.
00:36:05
I've seen a couple of them in the same day and it was actually pretty frightening because there were two in one hour.
00:36:12
and what happened right on the stairs right above us and we were watching it from the bottom and we were afraid that people were going to start falling over down the stairs onto us.
SPEAKER_42
00:36:22
Raise your hand if you've seen some kind of a fight or some violence in your school, even just this, wow.
00:36:27
So a lot of you guys have, yeah.
00:36:29
I want to ask about video games or movies.
00:36:33
Do you think that the violence that video games movies portray contributes to violence at school?
00:36:38
Has an effect on Angelo?
SPEAKER_40
00:36:40
A lot of them portray, you know, violence like weapons and, you know,
00:36:45
I don't think that it's just men.
SPEAKER_11
00:37:02
I know that men have so much pressure to do all this crazy stuff, but I think that women
00:37:07
As a society, I think that we're trying to match or even overpower men from our history of not being able to vote or whatever and that we're almost trying to become equals.
00:37:21
And so by doing that, it's almost like we think that we'll be cool or we think that we'll be high enough if we do some of the stuff that men are doing and we take some of the ideas.
SPEAKER_42
00:37:32
It sounds like I heard a lot of people talk about the fights.
00:37:34
A lot of fights mentioned were between females.
00:37:36
I think it does because I see a lot of shows.
SPEAKER_03
00:37:50
Okay, so you hear music, you actually hear artists dissing each other in their songs, going back and forth and creating conflict.
SPEAKER_43
00:38:08
It's not like that those kind of, like, rap music is aggressive.
00:38:11
It's just that the people that are aggressive get the most attention.
00:38:14
Uh-huh.
00:38:15
And I find that, like, the media kind of, like, encourages it because it's, like, really, it's, like, really exciting.
00:38:19
Exciting.
00:38:19
And violent lyrics, kind of?
00:38:20
I think that people see, like the media says this is cool and people watch it because that's what's on TV and then they hear and it's kind of just a general trend.
SPEAKER_42
00:38:30
So there's a trend saying this is cool, this is what you should be listening to.
00:38:34
Not even paying attention, maybe the violent message that's portrayed.
00:38:37
Yeah, Brian.
SPEAKER_43
00:38:38
I think music and games and movies don't really promote violence.
00:38:43
You disagree?
00:38:44
Okay.
00:38:44
I think that's all in the person themselves, because I know a lot of people, and even myself, when we're angry or anything like that, music and games calm us down.
SPEAKER_42
00:38:54
Good point.
00:38:56
So schools are trying to make it a safe environment for you.
00:38:59
So oftentimes other things like locker searches, you know, things like that.
00:39:02
What's your reaction to that?
00:39:03
Tessa, what's your thought?
SPEAKER_11
00:39:04
I'm not a big fan of the whole locker search idea.
00:39:07
I think that adults are given rights that teens aren't.
00:39:10
Like they have their right to search and seizure and that a search of a locker is a total invasion of privacy and I see how if it could help students it's such a good thing.
SPEAKER_42
00:39:20
You don't feel it does, it sounds like.
SPEAKER_11
00:39:22
Well, no, not really.
00:39:23
It's our privacy, and really, who's going to, you know, store a gun in their locker when they know a search is imminent?
SPEAKER_42
00:39:28
Stephanie, what do you respond to that mean?
SPEAKER_07
00:39:31
At our school last year, students gave a tip-off to some security guards.
00:39:36
That kid brought a knife to school, and a gun to school, and he had them in his locker, so that is the one thing that I think is good about locker searches, is that if you get a tip-off, then you search.
00:39:50
I don't think anything should be taken lightly.
SPEAKER_42
00:39:51
Has anyone ever just taken a day off from school because they felt threatened?
00:39:56
Has anyone been threatened that much where they've taken time off?
00:39:59
Yeah, Karime.
SPEAKER_03
00:40:00
Yes, it was my freshman year and I had like, I don't know, like all these girls were like hating on me and they were talking trash about me and I felt threatened and I had times that I would skip school because I would feel
SPEAKER_06
00:40:13
It does get me mad that the threatening goes so far that people like feel that they cannot go to a place that's supposed to be safe for them like school because somebody's threatening them or bullying them that much.
00:40:35
That does get me mad.
SPEAKER_42
00:40:36
Okay.
00:40:37
There's actually some balls now that are imposing a curfew that's at 5pm.
00:40:41
Meaning that if you're not with your parents on the weekends, you go out to the mall, you hang out on the weekend, by 5pm, if you're not with your parents, you gotta go home.
00:40:49
What's your reaction to that?
SPEAKER_11
00:40:51
That's kind of insane.
00:40:52
Go home at five.
00:40:53
You're teenagers.
00:40:54
It's like, where do they think that we're going to go?
00:40:57
Home to our parents?
SPEAKER_42
00:40:58
So we decided to ask one local mom.
00:41:00
We decided to ask them why they imposed that 5 p.m. curfew on the weekend.
00:41:05
And here is what their spokesperson had to say.
00:41:07
So take a look.
SPEAKER_11
00:41:09
We welcome everyone to the shopping center.
00:41:12
It's just specifically on those evenings we want them to be supervised by a parent or guardian and in doing so our focus is still the same to create the safest shopping environment for everyone who comes to the shopping center.
SPEAKER_42
00:41:24
This is kind of sounds like targeting weekends when like you have this free time to go and so what's your reaction to this?
SPEAKER_40
00:41:30
It is ridiculous you know the times and everything it could be
00:41:33
We've heard a lot of opinions and attitudes about team safety, but that's just the first step.
SPEAKER_42
00:41:50
Coming up next, it's time to brainstorm.
00:41:53
Our student voices sound off about safety solutions.
00:41:56
And a little later on, we'll shine our student spotlight on a Wiederich High School senior who was determined to make his classmates feel safer.
00:42:04
So he took action and he got results.
00:42:07
But first, it's time for you to speak up.
00:42:09
Yes, we want to hear from you at home.
00:42:11
So go to MetroBeat.tv and link the student voices and tell us what you think.
00:42:17
We'll be right back.
SPEAKER_05
00:42:20
America is the most diverse nation in the world.
00:42:23
More colors and cultures and creeds than anywhere else.
00:42:28
Think about that and embrace the race, the human race.
00:42:32
Join hands with your neighbors and your city and make your community a more inclusive one.
00:42:38
To find out more, visit the website on your screen.
00:42:41
And remember, the U.S. is all of us.
SPEAKER_42
00:42:47
Here's what some of you are saying in a website.
00:42:50
Paul from John F. Kennedy says, I think more police, metal detectors, and surveillance cameras will help.
00:42:55
But I do think that the teachers and staff should help out more.
00:42:58
And watch out for gang activity and bullying going on in the schools.
00:43:02
No one likes to be a rat, but we need to rat out those who are bullying and tagging the schools.
00:43:07
Vanessa from Denver School of the Arts says, I don't think schools can really do anything about child safety.
00:43:12
Yeah, the guards and metal detectors may help, but the kids grew up acting like this, and school isn't going to take away all the violence that goes on in schools these days.
00:43:21
Kids will be kids.
00:43:23
Now that we've heard our students speak out about teen safety, it's time to brainstorm some solutions.
00:43:29
Let's begin with our experts who have the job of making teens feel safer.
00:43:33
State Representative Debbie Benefield is a driving force in a movement to create safe environments for all students.
00:43:39
And Barbara Colaroso, author of The Bully, The Bullied, and The Bystander.
00:43:44
First, Barbara.
00:43:45
In your book, you cite several examples of how bullying can lead to death.
00:43:50
Explain to these teens just how dangerous bullying can be and what we can do to combat it.
SPEAKER_29
00:43:55
Well, if you recognize in the book, I mentioned three characters, the bully, the bullied, and the bystander.
00:44:01
These are three characters in a horrific tragedy.
00:44:04
When kids do kill themselves because they can't take it anymore, it's known as bullicide.
00:44:09
When the kids were talking, they mostly talked about physical violence, although that is the least amount of violence done.
00:44:15
The majority of bullying is verbal in nature and it alone can pack a tremendous wealth.
00:44:23
We now have it with the cellphones and the internet combined for cyberbullying where kids are attacked because of their race or their religion, their gender, their physical or mental ability, economic status.
00:44:36
or just simply because they're new and they get attacked by their peers and they're thinking what did I do because they didn't do anything wrong but they can understand what they did because bullies
00:44:49
aren't angry at the target.
00:44:52
They aren't even in a conflict with the target.
00:44:54
They have contempt for that other person, which is what bullying is.
SPEAKER_42
00:44:58
All right, so let's brainstorm some ideas that you have.
SPEAKER_07
00:45:01
I think cameras are a good idea.
SPEAKER_42
00:45:03
Cameras, okay.
SPEAKER_07
00:45:03
Because there are a lot of cameras around my school, but none going to the parking lot or in the parking lot, and it would have been a lot.
SPEAKER_42
00:45:11
Clearly bullying is a huge issue, but there are other safety concerns that impact teenagers in the classroom and at home.
00:45:25
Debbie Benefield, a state representative, you have the job of improving conditions for these students.
00:45:30
What are the key challenges that you see regarding teen safety in school and communities?
SPEAKER_33
00:45:36
What we're hearing is about role models and our leaders.
00:45:40
As funding for our public schools has decreased and our student numbers and the adult to student ratios have also increased, what we're seeing is our students not being able to see the types of behaviors that respectful adults give.
00:45:55
Any time we can hear young people's voice and empower them,
00:46:01
to be those role models, they usually are going to show us the way to go.
SPEAKER_42
00:46:05
Do you have any suggestions that our teams could try to take on on how to solve this problem?
SPEAKER_33
00:46:10
When you as an individual student step up and show to your peers that you can engage and lead, I think that is the best thing any school environment can have.
SPEAKER_42
00:46:22
I heard a lot of people saying that peer groups are kind of, when they're real tight and they're together, that actually helps promote violence because people don't get to know each other.
00:46:30
So what are things that you can do to help change that?
00:46:33
Are there things that you would individually be willing to change or try to make a difference in those peer groups and break them down a little bit?
00:46:40
Because people are already in groups.
00:46:43
Do you try and get those groups to become more of a community?
00:46:45
Okay, and how would you do that?
SPEAKER_43
00:46:47
If you kind of take, say like you have two religious youth groups, like a Jewish group and a Christian group, maybe you have them do something together as opposed to always staying with their own religion or, you know, like maybe kind of getting groups to come together.
SPEAKER_42
00:46:59
So, euthanized involves a couple different religions even, could be a way just to really get you, that's one step, you see.
00:47:05
Tessa, I want to talk to you real quick, you talked about a lot of searches, you don't like to talk to searches.
00:47:09
But what if, would you be willing to give that up if you felt it created a safer environment?
SPEAKER_11
00:47:14
I would give up some, it's like I like the idea of cameras.
00:47:17
I really like the idea of cameras.
SPEAKER_42
00:47:19
So you'd give up that privacy, cameras would help cover that?
SPEAKER_11
00:47:22
The surveillance would observe people and that way they're not in our personal space but they're still making sure that we're safe.
SPEAKER_42
00:47:28
Okay, that's the way you'd help promote it, alright.
00:47:30
Sarah, did you have a thought?
SPEAKER_09
00:47:32
I'm in a club at a school called Unity.
00:47:33
I always come up with the idea to go clubbing, like cause there's a lot of clubs throughout the school, Oasis, which is a Christian club, just Geek Club, which is a science club, and there's a bunch of clubs, and the way they said to integrate it, so if we go clubbing, like one day while they have a meeting, our Unity club will go check out what they're doing, and
SPEAKER_42
00:47:53
Sit in other meetings and kind of hang out with them.
SPEAKER_09
00:47:55
Absolutely, and see what's going on with that.
SPEAKER_42
00:47:56
Great.
00:47:57
So the student voices in our studio have come up with some good ideas.
00:48:01
What about the rest of you watching at home?
00:48:03
Remember, we want to know what you have to say.
00:48:06
So simply go to netrobeat.tv and give us your ideas.
00:48:10
And coming up next, it's time to take action.
00:48:13
We'll help our students figure out how to put their ideas into action.
00:48:17
But first, we'll shine our student spotlight on a Wheat Ridge High School senior who took action and got results.
00:48:22
Not only at school, but in his community.
00:48:25
We'll be right back.
SPEAKER_05
00:48:28
America is the most diverse nation in the world.
00:48:31
More colors and cultures and creeds than anywhere else.
00:48:35
Think about that and embrace the race, the human race.
00:48:40
Join hands with your neighbors and your city and make your community a more inclusive one.
00:48:45
To find out more, visit the website on your screen.
00:48:49
And remember, the U.S. is all of us.
SPEAKER_42
00:49:00
Welcome back to Student Voices.
00:49:03
All of the greatest ideas and plans in the world don't mean a thing unless you take action.
00:49:08
That's why in each episode of Student Voices, we'll showcase a special teen who is making a difference in his or her community.
00:49:14
And today, you'll meet one student who is determined to take action against the fear of violence that faces him and his classmates every day.
SPEAKER_41
00:49:23
Kids, they weren't as open.
00:49:25
They weren't as free to go to parties.
00:49:28
They wanted to go
00:49:30
Lauren Martinez is a senior at Wheat Ridge High School.
SPEAKER_42
00:49:37
He was hit hard by the violent deaths of some of his classmates.
SPEAKER_41
00:49:41
Two of the victims were tragically shot while attending parties.
00:49:44
One of the shootings was at an after school party, it was a weekend, and some uninvited guests showed up to the party and people at the party didn't want them there so they were asked to leave.
00:49:56
As the students were leaving, they pulled out their guns and they did shoot out the house and one of our students was killed.
SPEAKER_42
00:50:03
In the past two years, a total of four Wheatridge High School students unexpectedly lost their lives because of violent crimes,
SPEAKER_13
00:50:10
Welcome to the Power of One.
SPEAKER_42
00:50:30
School officials helped lead the way.
00:50:32
They recruited the efforts of the Power of One, an initiative that teaches students that even one choice, one person, can make a difference.
00:50:40
After showing the motivational video, the Power of One committee was formed.
SPEAKER_13
00:50:44
Kids sitting around the table talking about what they could do in the school and out of the school that would make a difference.
SPEAKER_03
00:50:52
It's just a way to get the whole school together and show that we can help other people.
SPEAKER_41
00:50:57
We wanted to unify the community and our school and so we wanted to put together a safe place where us kids can come together and have some fun.
SPEAKER_42
00:51:09
With some creative thinking and hard work, Lauren and his team raised more than $7,000 for the first annual summer jam.
SPEAKER_41
00:51:16
That summer jam, it turned out great.
00:51:18
We had music, we had festival type atmosphere.
SPEAKER_42
00:51:22
The festival was so successful, Lauren was approached by Mike Barron, the lead organizer of a community-wide festival.
00:51:32
I wanted to get kids involved and wanted to have a night dedicated just for kids.
SPEAKER_41
00:51:36
I was very thrilled because that's what the power of one is all about, getting the word out into the community and bringing the community together.
00:51:43
As always, Lauren enlisted the help of some of his friends.
00:51:46
So myself, Mindy Duncan, and Kayla Navi, we were able to go to the Carnation Festival and recreate what we did at the Summer Jam.
SPEAKER_13
00:51:54
People were out there seeing teens have fun in a great positive way.
SPEAKER_42
00:52:00
Lauren and the committee has since presented their campaign to other schools at various conventions that address teen issues.
SPEAKER_13
00:52:06
It has gone beyond my imagination because I have really seen how confident kids are if you give them the opportunity.
00:52:17
Lauren's always fun with David.
SPEAKER_20
00:52:19
He's very, very enthusiastic about it, for sure.
SPEAKER_42
00:52:23
Lauren Martinez, one person helping kids feel safe again, one student's voice being heard.
SPEAKER_41
00:52:29
I feel it was amazing that we were able to branch off from the power of unity and bring the school together and then our community hears about it.
00:52:40
All of the adults hear about it and we're able to bring the power of one out into the community because it's not about the power of one at Waveridge High School, it's the power of one within the community, within the state, within the United States.
00:52:53
The power of one as a whole, as a whole world.
SPEAKER_42
00:52:56
Wow, so Lauren took some pretty tragic situations, her shootings, students feeling pretty unsafe, and turned it into a festival.
00:53:04
Like, switched completely.
00:53:06
I mean, it made people feel safe, got people involved and brought them together.
00:53:09
What's your reaction to this?
00:53:10
What do you think about what he did?
SPEAKER_07
00:53:11
I didn't hear about the power of Juan at all and I only heard about the negative media attention that school got and I think it's sad that we don't hear about the good stuff that happened but I think what he did was really great.
SPEAKER_43
00:53:22
Wow, the thing that Juan did was great but I think what was most important about that video was that it wasn't just him that was doing it, it was like his friends were doing it with him and a big group of kids were doing it.
00:53:31
I think a lot of kids are kind of like, oh, it's not really cool.
00:53:35
It kind of sucks.
00:53:37
They have a negative attitude about helping the community.
00:53:40
And I think if you get a lot of people involved, it becomes this big group.
00:53:44
And it's like a community that wants to do something.
00:53:47
Yeah.
00:53:48
And if you will start saying, wow, there's a lot of people interested, that's really cool.
00:53:51
That's when it kind of takes off as opposed to one person.
00:53:53
That's weird.
00:53:54
You have to kind of build a network of people that really want to do it together and you can really make it.
00:53:58
Okay.
00:53:58
Tessa, you got an idea?
SPEAKER_11
00:53:59
What can be done?
00:54:00
Well, again, kind of like he did, he gave teens a good impression with the community, which I think leads to less violence.
00:54:06
So, I know a couple of years ago I was involved in a movie that did something like that.
00:54:11
So, again, through art, because I'm a big art fan.
00:54:13
You can make things that will show the community your true voice, kind of like the show.
SPEAKER_42
00:54:18
Debbie, what are some of the things that students can do to take action like Lauren did?
SPEAKER_33
00:54:24
Well, I think the biggest key is what one told us.
00:54:26
He went out to the community and partnered with several other community leaders.
00:54:32
My own personal experience with young people, the partnering and if we as adults can help, because we understand systems, if we can help give them the tools to make
00:54:45
a community fair come up.
00:54:47
We all know that you've got to have permits and you've got to have the police and you've got to make some safe stuff.
00:54:51
Sometimes that can be a stopper for a young person but if we partner and if that young person reaches out and we do that partnering we have started the beginning of one plus one equals two and that just ripples right on out.
SPEAKER_42
00:55:04
Great.
00:55:05
Barbara, what are your final thoughts on what kids and teens can do to take action in this situation?
SPEAKER_29
00:55:11
First of all, I have to say, wow.
00:55:13
The ideas that came up here today were absolutely stimulating and exciting and rich.
00:55:20
And I think the final comments that the young people are making is how important it is that we as a community recognize
00:55:28
That we have to be actively involved and engaged with our young people and not see them as an entity separate from all of us.
00:55:37
That we get actively involved instead of every kid matters.
00:55:41
Final thoughts, Adam?
SPEAKER_43
00:55:42
I think it's not very difficult to find kids who are interested in making a difference because if you look at all of us here, we're here for a reason, we're all interested in
00:55:49
doing something and helping out and talking about and having that discussion.
00:55:52
So I think, you know, we could do something, other kids could do something.
00:55:54
There's tons of people out there that want to help.
00:55:56
So it's just a matter of getting people motivated to do it.
00:55:59
Excellent.
SPEAKER_42
00:56:00
We want to thank Barbara Colaroso and Debbie Benefield for joining us today.
00:56:05
And of course, we want to thank our student voices.
00:56:07
Thanks for everything you guys have given today and sharing your ideas.
00:56:10
I think we're looking forward to seeing what happens.
00:56:12
Plus a special thanks to Lauren Martinez and the Wheat Ridge High School students and teachers who helped tell their empowering story.
00:56:20
Like Lauren, all of the students that we feature in our student spotlight will have a chance to compete for Student of the Year.
00:56:26
If you'd like to find out more, nominate a student, or just simply get involved, just go to our website at MetroBeat.tv.
00:56:33
I'm Bryan Harper, thanks for watching, and be sure to join us next time on Student Voices.
SPEAKER_34
00:56:56
When I first moved to the US in 2001, my family didn't have a car and it was a little bit difficult to adjust to the new lifestyle.
SPEAKER_16
00:57:13
When I first moved to Charlottesville 40 years ago, I checked out this library first thing.
SPEAKER_46
00:57:23
I love books, always have.
00:57:25
As far back as I can remember, I remember using the public library because my mother used to take me to story programs.
SPEAKER_34
00:57:31
Just to have these resources available, I think it's quite an amazing resource.
00:57:37
One of the first experiences with my family that I had was we came to the library and we checked out 30, 40 books and I thought we were crazy because everybody kind of looked at us like, why are you checking out so many books?
00:57:48
In Bangladesh, where I'm from, we don't have that many libraries.
00:57:51
We only have maybe one in my town.
00:57:52
Just to have these resources available just for any school topic, I think it's quite an amazing resource.
00:57:59
I love books.
SPEAKER_38
00:58:00
always have.
00:58:01
I go to the bookmobile in which goes to Crozet because I live in Greenville.
00:58:06
The bookmobile driver is very, very helpful.
00:58:09
She picks out books for me.
00:58:10
She knows what I like.
00:58:11
I give her a list.
00:58:12
She'll even pick out books if I don't go there.
00:58:14
I can leave a bag and she'll take out the old ones and put in the new ones.
SPEAKER_46
00:58:18
I think the best thing about the public library is that it serves all people, from preschoolers all the way through our retirees.
00:58:27
We really do have books and materials that are of interest to everyone.
SPEAKER_16
00:58:32
It's a nice place to sit and comfortably read books, magazines.
SPEAKER_17
00:58:36
Reading things, novels or non-fiction, opens up new worlds.
SPEAKER_30
00:58:44
Jefferson Madison Regional Library has had continuous bookmobile service since 1946.
00:58:50
The bookmobile visits a wide range of types of places in the county and the city, everything from preschools to senior communities.
00:58:59
It's important for children to be exposed to books when they're very young and that's what helps to create lifelong readers.
SPEAKER_46
00:59:08
For students and even preschool students, we have a lot of educational materials or materials that will help people learn how to read.
00:59:17
For people who are retired, we have information that's good for life-long learning and also for entertainment.
00:59:24
And for people in between, we have entertainment and educational materials.
00:59:29
So we really have something for everyone at the public library.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
00:59:55
I'd like to call this meeting to order, and we're going to start with the Pledge of Allegiance.
SPEAKER_21
01:00:01
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
SPEAKER_27
01:00:17
Ms. Koch, can you call the roll, please?
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:00:27
Thank you.
01:00:27
We're going to start with a couple of announcements.
01:00:30
Holidays are coming.
01:00:32
and one of the upcoming holidays that is a big favorite of my children and many children is Halloween and once again this year we have the 2009 downtown safe Halloween presented by Charlottesville Parks and Recreation.
01:00:46
Saturday, October 31st from 2 to 5 p.m. at the Charlottesville Pavilion.
01:00:50
It's free and open to the public with games, slides, bounces, pumpkin and face painting, costume contests, prizes and safe trick-or-treating on the downtown wall.
01:00:59
So come on down and enjoy the festivities.
01:01:03
Also, once again this year, we are gearing up for our annual holiday, the Charlottesville tradition in the downtown mall and searching for the perfect treat.
01:01:14
The city is asking for the generous donation of an appropriately large tree from the community at large.
01:01:19
This tree should be an evergreen under 25 feet tall and have easy access for removal.
01:01:24
The citizen who donates the tree will be recognized that the tree lighting and the removal will be handled completely by city staff at no charge to them.
01:01:31
Interested citizens should call Rick Berwick at 970-3129 and I'm sure he'd be happy to hear from you.
01:01:40
In terms of other business for tonight's agenda, I do have one item that I'm going to bring up at the end of the meeting relating to a letter, a proposed letter to our Senators Webb and Warner regarding climate change legislation.
01:01:56
Are there any other announcements or other items to be added at the end of the meeting?
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
01:02:01
I have a couple of announcements.
01:02:04
The Charlottesville Municipal Band, under the direction of Steve Lainan, will present a free fall concert of band music from the British Isles on Sunday, October 18th at the Martin Luther King Center at Charlottesville High School.
01:02:17
The Albemarle Pipes and Drums will greet concertgoers with an outdoor performance beginning at 3 o'clock.
01:02:24
The city of Charlottesville and the Thomas Jefferson Health District is having a second annual health summit, continuing efforts to reduce infant mortality.
01:02:34
This will be on Wednesday, October 21st from 8.15 to 3.30 p.m. Now this is our continuing effort to address the African American infant mortality in the city.
01:02:46
Registration can take place online at www.sharlasville.org slash recreation.
01:02:52
Just click on register online.
01:02:54
You can also go to the parking rack index and just pick up that application and also register for the summit there as well.
01:03:08
We had our government services day on Friday and within the
01:03:15
there was one that said, please do not toss this.
01:03:19
And it was about foster parenting in Charlottesville.
01:03:22
And it says, let's keep Charlottesville kids here in Charlottesville.
01:03:26
Please consider foster parenting one of the 180 children in custody of the Charlottesville social services.
01:03:33
We urgently need more foster parents who live in Charlottesville so these kids don't have to lose their community on top of their other losses.
01:03:41
If you would like more information, please call Amy Nash
01:03:45
at 970-3329.
01:03:46
Thank you, Ms. Edwards.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:03:50
Any other announcements or other business?
01:03:54
Okay, we're going to move on to awards and recognitions.
01:03:56
We have a very special resolution tonight.
01:03:58
You've been hearing about it both at our last city council meeting and in the media, I hope, relating to an effort by the city to address a historic wrong that was committed 50 years ago here in our community in the era of massive resistance.
01:04:15
Before we vote on this resolution, I'd like to read the resolution aloud.
01:04:19
It has been slightly amended from the version that was considered by council on first reading, or when it was first introduced at our last city council meeting.
01:04:30
A resolution of the city council of Charlottesville, Virginia.
01:04:34
Whereas on May 17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court ruled against segregated schools in the United States with a landmark Brown versus Board of Education decision.
01:04:45
and whereas the Commonwealth of Virginia implemented a strategy of massive resistance to public school integration between 1954 and 1959 and whereas on July 26, 1955, the parents of African American students in Charlottesville petitioned the school system to transfer their children to white schools and were denied
01:05:04
And whereas, on May 6, 1956, the parents, assisted by the Charlottesville branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, NAACP, sued the school board to admit their children.
01:05:16
And whereas, on August 6, 1956, U.S. District Court Judge John Paul ruled in Allen v. School Board of the City of Charlottesville that the school system must integrate Lane High School and Venable Elementary School.
01:05:28
and whereas, on September 19th, 1958, in an effort to prevent the desegregation of the Charlottesville School System, the Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia ordered the closing of Lane and Venable.
01:05:40
And whereas, Lane and Venable were shut down for the period of five months, and the Charlottesville School System remained segregated for the remainder of that year.
01:05:48
And whereas, on September 5th, 1959, Judge Paul ordered the immediate transfer of 12 African American students, three to Lane High School and nine to Venable Elementary.
01:05:59
and whereas on September 8th, 1959, those 12 students bravely integrated the Charlottesville School System and whereas the struggle for equality in the Charlottesville Public School System and our city forever affected those involved.
01:06:13
Now, therefore, be it resolved that we, the undersigned members of the Charlottesville City Council, praise the courage displayed by the 12 students and their families, the work of the NAACP and others who supported the integration of our school system,
01:06:25
believe that the closing of Lane and Venable in our city from 1958 to 1959 was a disgraceful act and mourn for the pain that was caused before, during, and after the integration of our schools.
01:06:37
And for all the wounds known and unknown, we do hereby apologize and sincerely hope that all of us can learn from the injustices of the past as together we strive to create a more just community.
01:06:50
Now assuming this resolution is approved by City Council tonight, we are going to send copies of the signed resolution to every one of the students who integrated Lane and Venable, and I'd like to read the names of those students to you tonight.
01:07:03
I know at least one of them is here with us tonight.
01:07:06
The nine at Venable Elementary School were Charles E. Alexander, Raymond Dixon, Regina Dixon, Maurice Henry,
01:07:15
Marvin Townsend, William Townsend, Sandra Wicks, Roland T. Woodfolk, and Roland E. Woodfolk.
01:07:24
And the three students who integrated Maine High School were Donna Martin, John Martin, and French Jackson.
01:07:32
And so in approving this resolution tonight, we not only acknowledge those students and their family members, but the community at large who suffered through this injustice.
01:07:45
We certainly want to acknowledge the work of the NAACP, as I mentioned earlier, and specifically the work of their then president, Eugene Williams.
01:07:54
I want to ask if any of the students that I just named or their family members are in the audience, if you would please stand so that we can acknowledge your presence here tonight.
01:08:14
That's Mr. Don Martin here.
01:08:16
And I would like to ask other councillors if you have any thoughts you would like to share before we actually take a vote on this resolution.
SPEAKER_10
01:08:24
I'd like to make two comments.
01:08:26
First of all, it's long overdue.
01:08:29
I don't know why it did not happen so we had to waste 20 years but I'm glad to be part of it and I think this is the right thing to do.
Julian Taliaferro
Vice Mayor, City Council
01:08:37
I would say that I think it's
01:08:46
A time for us to step forward and really try to atone for what happened many years ago.
01:08:53
At the same time, to you Mr. Martin and all of your colleagues who entered school at that time, I just want to say that
01:09:04
It took a great deal of courage to do that and I appreciate you all stepping forward and having the courage to do that because it was really, I think, well, I guess I would view it as an act of bravery to do it.
01:09:17
Thank you.
David Brown
Member, City Council
01:09:25
You know, there were only a handful of school systems in Virginia where schools were closed and we were one of them, so I think it's very appropriate that we
01:09:35
There's a lot of things I like about this resolution, but one of the things I like is it honors the families and the students who did that integration.
01:09:45
I grew up in rural Virginia, and the school system I was in until I was in fourth grade was all white.
01:09:53
There's a lot of kids from my fourth grade class who I no longer remember, but I certainly remember specifically Reverend Anthony Ruffin,
01:10:03
Louise Foreman and Anthony and Alvin Davis who did integrate that class.
01:10:10
It's a strong memory for me.
01:10:12
So I think it's important that we recognize that.
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
01:10:18
And I can just echo what's been said, that it is long overdue.
01:10:24
And I don't want to underestimate the pain that the entire community experienced, the African-American families and students as well as the white families.
01:10:35
A lot, everyone suffered.
01:10:38
And also, it is because of the bravery of the parents and the families and the community
01:10:47
but I especially think, I just wonder what, number one, to be the parent and to be brave enough to send your child and also to be that child to step into the classroom and I don't also underestimate the value of what happened then allows me to do what I do now and if it weren't
01:11:18
For your bravery, I wouldn't have the bravery that I have every time I entered this room.
01:11:26
So I greatly appreciate it and I'm glad to be a part of council at this point in our history.
01:11:36
But it also means that we have to begin to let go and begin to make some
01:11:47
meaningful changes and take meaningful action so we can make sure that several years from now, when my daughters are on council, they aren't apologizing all over again for the decisions that we're making then.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:12:15
Thank you very much.
01:12:15
Very well said by all.
01:12:17
I'm going to ask, instead of having an electronic vote, that we ask our clerk to call for a voice vote on the resolution, if you would please.
01:12:27
Yeses.
SPEAKER_10
01:12:29
Yes.
01:12:30
Yes.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:12:31
Yes.
01:12:33
Yes.
01:12:34
Resolution passes.
01:12:35
Thank you very much.
01:12:46
Thank you, Mr. Huja.
01:12:47
Mr. Martin, is there anything you would like to share with us tonight on the occasion of passing this resolution?
SPEAKER_12
01:12:56
Well, I guess I would be remiss if I didn't say something, but actually I didn't come prepared to make remarks, but certainly 50 years after all of this occurred,
01:13:11
I really appreciate you taking the time, making the effort, and recognizing the need and importance of such a resolution.
01:13:19
It will, I'm sure, go a long way in your efforts to deal with this issue of race, and I understand that you are embarking on a discussion.
01:13:31
and some time in the near future.
01:13:35
So I applaud your efforts and your willingness to do this.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:13:41
Thank you, Ms. Martin.
01:13:50
each of the counselors to sign the resolution.
01:13:53
As I said, we'll get copies out to each of the individuals that we mentioned.
01:13:57
So thanks again to counselors, to Assistant State Manager Maurice Jones for spearheading this effort, and once again to the community and the students and the families who helped us through that unfortunate episode in our community's history.
01:14:14
We are now going to open up the meeting to matters by the public and as always when you come forward please limit your remarks to three minutes and give us your name and address.
01:14:24
The first person is Anne Carter.
SPEAKER_37
01:14:30
Good evening.
01:14:31
I'm Ann Carter.
01:14:32
I live at 715 Archdick Avenue.
01:14:36
I'm continuing in the vein of a resolution.
01:14:39
I'm here to thank the council and the city of Charlottesville for a successful 50th anniversary
01:14:53
at the beginning of the end of legally separating students in public schools by race in Charlottesville, Virginia.
01:15:02
We had a very successful program, September 26th.
01:15:06
at Venable School, encouraged by the principal of Venable School, James Mathison.
01:15:14
July 14th, I was at the Capitol and I was asked to do that by Donald Martin to be on the committee for the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Commission and the Brown versus Board of Education Scholarship Committee members.
01:15:36
also on their committee.
01:15:38
of the non-commissioned committee members, Dr. Rosa Atkins and the honorable Dave Morris and Anne Carter, co-founder and president of Our Legacy, Incorporated.
01:15:50
At that time, I explained to the commission what we intended to do here in Charlottesville, Virginia to commemorate the integration of the schools, the 50th anniversary of the closing of the schools and Brown versus Board of Education.
01:16:08
And as I said before, on September 26th, at Venable, we had a very successful program, I think it was May 21st.
01:16:19
I want to thank Holly for leading our announcement in the last
01:16:25
That really stopped interest in the community.
01:16:31
And on Sunday, I thought there was more intent with them doing something for Charlottesville to make that slip as good as possible when you're outside of Charlottesville.
01:16:42
But on Sunday I was really proud to see on the board of Congress on the front page
01:16:51
what happened and from the school, which as you know was one of the schools that failed.
01:16:58
And again, I want to thank you for your input and of course Maurice was there with the dialogue on this.
01:17:07
All of this has come together.
01:17:08
I'm happy.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:17:16
and I want to publicly thank you as well and our legacy for your efforts in that endeavor.
SPEAKER_17
01:17:46
Ma'am, gentlemen, I'm Bob Fenwick.
01:17:49
I live at 901 East Jefferson Street.
01:17:53
Welcome to the dredge report.
01:17:57
I'd first like to say that there is a citizen group, Citizens for a Sustainable Water Plan, without which this community wouldn't be having this conversation on dredging and damming.
01:18:09
Their work is to be applauded and given the attention it deserves.
01:18:15
Several weeks ago I performed a basic dredging demonstration to show that dredging is not rocket science.
01:18:22
It is a basic application of heavy equipment.
01:18:26
When I did that I got a close look at what was clogging that particular development lake.
01:18:33
So I went to the Ribera Reservoir, the level of the water was pretty low, and I was surprised at what I found.
01:18:42
I found gold.
01:18:44
Not the shiny kind, not the black kind of petroleum, but green gold.
01:18:53
And that's what I have in this container here.
01:18:57
Most of us call this muck.
01:19:03
The reservoir is choked with this muck.
01:19:08
And it's worth a fortune.
01:19:11
When it's dried or dewatered, as the expensive consultants say, it looks like this.
01:19:21
This is the same as this, but this has been dried out.
01:19:25
And as any farmer can tell you, there is nothing better to fill into farmland or into a garden.
01:19:36
There are tens of millions of cubic feet of this muck in that reservoir.
01:19:42
This is decomposing biomass.
01:19:47
Dried and dried, this stuff will sell for $8 a cubic foot or more depending on how it's packaged and marketed and what you mix with it.
01:19:58
It is very possible that we are looking at a way not only to dredge the Rivanna reservoir for free,
01:20:05
but to have a substantial revenue stream for many years to come.
01:20:11
And this muck, this topsoil is on top of the sand and gravel which everybody has been talking about.
01:20:19
Those are two commercial commodities in and of themselves.
01:20:26
There is an industry waiting to happen out there.
01:20:29
There are jobs waiting to be created.
01:20:33
Green jobs.
01:20:35
and in the middle of this national recession, this is an opportunity we cannot afford to pass up.
01:20:43
So I would say, dredge here, dredge now.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:20:48
Thank you.
SPEAKER_38
01:21:03
Are you okay?
01:21:05
My name is Betty Ming, I live in the city of Charlottesville.
01:21:09
We have a handout before you if you want to follow along.
01:21:12
It's the second page of the handout, what you need to know.
01:21:18
And the bill for this handout will come to you soon.
01:21:24
We worked very hard on this and I hope we put together something that's understandable for all of you and will be useful.
01:21:30
It's what you need to know before making a sound decision on behalf of the citizens of Charlottesville about your dams, the new grand at Wagon Mountain Reservoir, the cost of a new 112 foot dam.
01:21:42
There's been $1,400,000 allocated for that study.
01:21:47
the existing dam at Ragged Mountain Reservoir.
01:21:49
There has been no money allocated to know the cost of repairing that dam or the cost of raising that dam 13 feet.
01:21:57
The dam at the South Fork of Granite Reservoir, there has been no money allocated to find out the environmental impact of allowing sediment to continue over the life of the dam or the risk of allowing sedimentation to continue over the life of the dam and its impact on city of Charlottesville residents if the dam should fail.
01:22:15
Also the cost to eliminate this risk.
01:22:18
There's also been no money allocated for the I-64 embankment that is needed if the dam is to be raised, the new dam to its full height.
01:22:26
A study to determine the feasibility, the stability of the embankment, moving the culvert, the hazardous spill prevention and VDOT approval.
01:22:34
Pipelines.
01:22:35
The cost of building the new South Fork to Rivanna Pipeline has been 25,000 miles allocated.
01:22:41
What is the route?
01:22:42
The easements, the land acquisition costs, the cost of pretreatment facility to remove silk before pumping.
01:22:48
Energy costs to pump water up to 935 millions over 50 years.
01:22:53
The cost to maintain pumps and the pipeline over 50 years.
01:22:57
B, the Sugar Hollow Pipeline, there is no money allocated.
01:23:00
The cost of repairing and replacing Sugar Hollow Pipeline, easement questions, are they still legal?
01:23:05
The cost to acquire if needed.
01:23:07
Dredging the South Fork Rivanna River, to be announced.
01:23:12
The restorative cost to return South Fork Rivanna to its original capacity in a short period of time.
01:23:17
Cost to maintain the capacity with periodic dredging and sedimentation prevention, gradual and continual cost to maintain capacity to meet current safe use over a short period of time.
01:23:27
Greenville, other infrastructure, no money allocated.
01:23:30
Observatory water treatment plant, cost to rehabilitate versus upgrade.
01:23:35
Southwater water treatment plant, cost to upgrade.
01:23:39
New pre-treatment facility at Southwater to remove sediment before pumping to Ragged Mountains.
01:23:44
A new demand analysis, no money allocated.
01:23:46
Factor changes during the last decade and project out every 20 years as is required by the state in 2011, that's almost here.
01:23:55
factor in new conservation information required by 2011, an environmental impact study that has never been done, no money allocated, the cost and benefit of comparative approaches to different scenarios, the consideration of loss of forest cover, wildlife habitat and air quality, energy costs should be included with streams and wetlands.
01:24:16
Cost share allocation, and I'll end with this.
01:24:19
How much of the cost of each component implemented should city residents be obligated to pay?
01:24:25
The county will diffuse this debt with increased population.
01:24:29
How will the city diffuse its debt to the cost of its citizens if we are not increasing population?
01:24:35
Please put that rate chart.
01:24:37
Thank you.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:24:38
Thank you, Ms. Marion.
SPEAKER_35
01:24:45
Good evening, DeeDee Smith, 2652 Jefferson Park Circle, and I would like to speak to one of those issues that's on that list, and that's the demand analysis.
01:24:54
I've come before you before to cite that this year we are 25% below water use as projected by our community water supply plan.
01:25:05
I was criticized for using one year, so those graphs in front of you?
01:25:09
to illustrate that this is not one year.
01:25:11
This has been happening for 10 years.
01:25:13
For the last decade, our water use has come down.
01:25:17
What's really interesting is it's really started to come down.
01:25:20
It's actually the past eight years because it started to come down just as the century turned, just as the 21st century came in, which I find very symbolic because this is the way the 21st century water use will play out.
01:25:34
Our water use will continue to decrease.
01:25:38
And if you look at those graphs, they're the same graphs, actually the same data is used and that data is in fact on the very last page.
01:25:46
I cited both my sources and I've given you the information.
01:25:49
They both come from the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority website.
01:25:52
And what you see on the top graph is the blue line is the projection upon which the community water supply is planned.
01:26:00
Those are Gannett Fleming's numbers.
01:26:02
The red line is the actual use.
01:26:04
As you can see, starting in actually 2000, the numbers started to come down and they have continued to come down.
01:26:11
That arrow is the last point that Gannett Fleming considered in projecting future water use.
01:26:17
It did not consider this decline in the last decade.
01:26:21
The second graph just shows you the percent below projections, below the point at which this community-wide supply is planned.
01:26:31
And that's important because you often hear this or that, particularly dredging, will not satisfy our future need as projected.
01:26:40
Well, our projected need is now 25% below.
01:26:43
So it's an irrelevant number.
01:26:46
My appeal to you is that in what you need to know, that you
01:26:51
you demand, you require that a new demand analysis be done because it will change the face of how you look at all of these factors.
01:27:00
Thank you.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:27:01
Thank you, Ms. Smith.
01:27:04
The next speaker is Collette Hall.
SPEAKER_45
01:27:14
Good evening Mr. Mayor and Councillors, Colette Hall, Lionel and Robertson Lane.
01:27:20
Item 3 on the agenda, McIntyre Way Interchange Design.
01:27:24
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has accepted FHWA, which is Federal Highway Administration's, invitation to participate in the Section 106 Historic Preservation Process.
01:27:40
End quote.
01:27:41
This is no true statement.
01:27:43
Federal Highways was quite reluctant to hold in the North Section 106 National Historic Preservation Meetings.
01:27:51
It was the ACHP who determined the meeting must be held and Federal Highways at first refused to attend.
01:27:58
And I even have the letter to print those very words.
01:28:05
Professor Brown one time had even liked people to just make random statements and throw out facts and figures and so I try to do it all and say something.
01:28:17
As a taxpayer, voter, Section 106 consulting party, and York downtown resident, the neighborhood which will be the most damaged by the letter creek parkway and the 250 interchange, I publicly invite and urge you to attend the advisory council on historic preservation meeting on Friday, October 9th, 830 to 1130 in city space.
01:28:42
City Council was the only individual group not invited.
01:28:46
Yes, I realize that staff is representing the city, but you as counselors will need to agree and sign the official memorandum of agreement on mitigation.
01:28:58
You will be asked to condemn and or buy property in the 250 right away.
01:29:03
You will need to allocate additional money to build the 250 interchange.
01:29:09
As this will be the last city council meeting before the October 29th, 7 p.m. final public hearing on the 250 Interchange design, I urge all Charlottesville residents to attend this public hearing and if unable to attend, to send written remarks to www.250interchange.org.
01:29:29
You'll find it on another topic.
01:29:33
The Rivanna Solid Waste Authority needs to leave the solid waste business to private enterprise.
01:29:40
Stop wasting rate payer's money on uncoordinated lawsuits.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:29:46
Thank you.
01:29:46
Thank you, Michelle.
01:29:48
Paul Nam.
SPEAKER_47
01:29:56
Mayor Norris and members of the City Council, my name is Paul Nam and I live at 1410 Grady Avenue.
01:30:04
Mayor Norris and members of the City Council, my name is Ins Pay Long and I live at 1410 Greedy Avenue here in Charlottesville.
01:30:13
I've come here tonight to make a few brief remarks about economic development.
01:30:17
Charlottesville is fortunate to have the University of Virginia located here with their outstanding record of educating and training young minds as well as students who are older in their undergraduate programs as well as in their graduate and professional programs.
01:30:33
The University of Virginia is making a unique contribution to this area and to our country.
01:30:39
The University of Virginia is one of many of our greatest assets.
01:30:44
The city of Charlottesville stands at the crossroads in its ability to grow economically.
01:30:50
at the Martha Jefferson Hospital, moving its campus to Pantops, and with the city campus getting ready to become vacant, with the Menlo Hotel standing like a white elephant on the downtown mall, and with the Waters Free parking lot being a prime downtown location, the city of Charlottesville has a unique opportunity to begin promoting itself as a desirable location for major businesses to relocate here.
01:31:18
We have the trained workforce, we have the prime locations to offer these businesses.
01:31:24
If we do this in an assertive manner, we can create the kinds of professional jobs so that our young people in the area who have the ambition to pursue their education at a college level will not have to leave their homes
01:31:43
to obtain jobs in the areas in which they were trained.
01:31:46
It will also add to our tax base so that individual homeowners can get some relief in their yearly real estate taxes.
01:31:54
And I want to thank all of you for your time.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:31:57
Thank you, Mr. Mayor.
01:31:59
Jay Ferguson.
SPEAKER_16
01:32:07
Good evening.
01:32:07
My name is Jay Ferguson.
01:32:09
I live at 721 Cargill Lane.
01:32:11
I'm currently the chairman of the Fairmount Theater, and I wanted to read you the following letter from our organization.
01:32:17
The Paramount Theater of Charlottesville sincerely endorses the City of Charlottesville's resolution praising the courage of those who supported the integration of Charlottesville's school system, acknowledging the wrong of massive resistance, and mourning and apologizing for the pain and wounds suffered in the struggle for school integration.
01:32:34
The adoption of this resolution should encourage all in our community, of all ages and backgrounds, to reflect on our history.
01:32:41
The Paramount Theater today remembers the sorrow that the brave school children who integrated Charlottesville schools in 1959 were still compelled in that era to sit only in the Paramount Theater's segregated balcony.
01:32:53
The very idea that many citizens of this community could have been forced to buy their tickets at a separate window
01:32:59
enter by a separate door and sit separately from other citizens in a legally and governmentally sanctioned system seemed so inherently un-American that one wonders how it could ever have been so.
01:33:12
But it was.
01:33:16
And it was something that Paramount had to confront during the revitalization of the theater as a place where all our community members are welcomed, no matter race, ethnicity, age, or social preferences.
01:33:29
Where a group of citizens gathered nearly 20 years ago to save the Paramount, the theater's ugly history of segregation had to be confronted.
01:33:35
An important question was whether the Paramount, once restored, could be embraced by all of our community's citizens as their own theater, as a place that belongs to all, where all are welcome on equal terms.
01:33:47
To confront history, one must preserve its record.
01:33:50
During the Paramount's restoration campaign, many members of our community volunteered their time to document the African American experience at the theater, assembling, archiving, and interpreting oral and written histories and photographs of its workers and movie patrons.
01:34:05
When the theater's restoration was complete, the Paramount's third street entrance was dedicated in a solemn ceremony as a place to remember the past, yet look forward with hope to the future.
01:34:16
The Paramount today grieves for the pain and indignities suffered by the theater's African-American patrons and workers during the era of segregation and celebrates the courage of all those who fought for civil rights.
01:34:27
In the nearly five years since the reopening of the theater, nearly 40,000 school children have poured through its doors for over 50 educational performances.
01:34:35
like the programs they experience, including How Do You Spell Hope, a story of the Underground Railroad and Wings of Courage, a historical biographical performance about an African American pilot during World War I.
01:34:48
These children are a rainbow that represents our region's great diversity.
01:34:53
One of our most satisfying opportunities this year for the Paramount was to be able to open our doors to the people of Charlottesville for a broadcast inauguration of President Barack Obama.
01:35:02
For our community's African-American heroes of the civil rights struggles of the 50s, 60s and beyond came to the Paramount and finally, finally got a chance to choose for themselves where they wanted to sit.
01:35:14
As Paramount Board Member Colonel Martin Burke said from the stage, not all memories of the Paramount are good ones, but today is a great day.
01:35:21
We have made progress, but there is a lot more to do.
01:35:24
The city's resolution of acknowledgement, sorrow, and apology is an important step forward.
01:35:28
The Paramount Theatre, mindful of its own history and dedicated to a better future for all, is honored to support this resolution and to provide a venue where we, the entire community, can join together to celebrate the arts, our community, and our future together.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:35:45
Thank you Mr. Ferguson.
SPEAKER_04
01:35:47
Pat Wiesberg Mayor Norris and Council,
01:36:04
I'm Paul Whisberg.
01:36:05
I live at 1159 Kensington Avenue in Tampa.
01:36:09
I'm here representing Alt Energy.
01:36:11
We're a local company, solar energy company, at 1132 East Market Street.
01:36:16
And I wanted to, first of all, let you know how much we encourage you to, in your legislative request to the state legislature, about the energy
01:36:33
I wanted to give you an idea of another issue that I was hoping may or may not be included in this upcoming suggestions, but that would have to do with
01:36:49
identify opportunities to improve our energy culture which is something that we work on on a daily basis and one of the things that you suggested in strengthening local building codes I think is a really essential way for us to make a real large mainstream type of impact as opposed to individual projects which tend to have a
01:37:14
a more difficult time gaining traction.
01:37:17
And so another area that's gotten considerable attention I think on both state and federal level and considerable funding would be the issue of jobs training.
01:37:31
And I think there is an opportunity for us to maybe reconsider some of the best ways to go about providing a trained workforce for a lot of the new technologies that are going to be
01:37:43
I'd like to suggest that the state actually authorized funds to build renewable energy projects in municipal structures so that twofold.
01:38:01
First of all, we're a small company, but I have no lack of candidates that are extremely qualified and intelligent as a previous gentleman stated, but Charlottesville has a
01:38:13
an exceptional workforce, well-educated workforce in addition to an exceptional depth of knowledge in a lot of areas that we can use in our energy industry.
01:38:29
One of the ways that if we could get the state to suggest funding some actual projects it has a really an outstanding benefit and that is that real projects mean that I can hire people and actually give them a job which I will do and also what it does is if there are municipal buildings that there are
01:38:50
you know a perfect match and that they benefit everyone because we all support the utility energy infrastructure of all of our municipal buildings so I think it's a win-win situation and I was hopeful that you might suggest to the state that they something as simple as a per capita distribution
01:39:08
for actual projects in addition to providing a consultant team that would find practical applications that are cost effective for these systems might actually give projects for companies like mine to bid on and it's the projects that I need to hire workers, not job training in schools in addition to that.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:39:31
Thank you, Mr.
01:39:32
Whisper.
01:39:33
Stratton Salitas.
SPEAKER_27
01:39:42
Good evening, I'm Stratton Salitas.
01:39:44
I live at 704 Grave Street.
01:39:47
Thank you all for your resolution acknowledging those heroic individuals who integrated our school system 50 years ago.
01:39:57
As you all know, this was not a battle which Charlottesville was the only participant of.
01:40:09
This was a national
01:40:12
I think institutional racism perhaps changed its face and here in Charlottesville I think we are in denial of that fact.
01:40:29
When people talk about the Meadow Creek Parkway being a 40 year old road, a lot of them don't realize that it actually dates to a plan from 1959 and the portion of the road going through the park and the portion of the road going through Vinegar Hill were both in that plan.
01:40:49
And just a short while after that plan, the reasons for which were slum removal,
01:40:56
traffic congestion and to increase parking, Vinegar Hill was destroyed and Ridge McIntyre, the first part of that plan to run traffic through the center of the city in order to increase suburban growth and put the burden on inner city residents, both financial burden and the traffic burden,
01:41:20
was played out here in Charlottesville.
01:41:23
And now, this is the final part of that plan, this interchange and McIntyre Road extended.
01:41:31
And you might think, well, the damage has been done.
01:41:33
Venuger Hill has already been destroyed.
01:41:35
But this still represents a theft from the inner city residents of Charlottesville, taking what could be transit money and instead using it to increase traffic through inner city
01:41:49
neighborhoods.
01:41:50
And furthermore, this is not being done in an honest fashion.
01:41:53
VDOT has submitted plans to the Corps of Engineers, which they do not intend to build, plans without an interchange.
01:42:02
Jim Tolbert, in June, I believe, was talking about that plan, the 17 lane at-grain
01:42:09
at grade intersection plan and he said specifically without an interchange this intersection would be terribly congested meaning 250 in the parkway.
01:42:21
The city never agreed to that and the process is going on right now as if the city had agreed to an at grade intersection and I hope that you all will direct the staff to clear this up and to really make sure that you are following federal laws if you plan on doing this.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:42:38
Thank you.
01:42:39
Thank you, Mr. Salinas.
SPEAKER_00
01:42:53
Mark Briggs.
01:42:56
I live at 2006 Stadium Road on September 25th.
01:43:04
I was accused of stealing $7 from a merchant's store and I was borrowed from her store.
01:43:16
and I've been a vendor, a street vendor on the downtown mall for over 20 years and I would never take anything from anyone and I have copies of the trespassing violation that the officer had wrote up on me and
01:43:43
And I think it was a little harsh with her accusing me of taking seven dollars when I can sell two products and get seven dollars.
01:43:57
So basically that's why I'm here tonight to correct authors.
01:44:06
And I was a little embarrassed about the situation.
01:44:14
I tried talking things out with her, but there was nothing basically we could come to an agreement with.
Jim Tolbert
Director of Neighborhood Development Services
01:44:27
Mark, what was the exchange that you had with the people?
SPEAKER_00
01:44:38
Also, you know, I had witnesses that came and vouched for me and told the officer that, you know, I've been a regular on the mall for years and I was, you know, very upset about the matter.
01:45:00
But she told me to stay out of her store and I never said anything inappropriately to her.
01:45:07
in any way.
01:45:12
And just like I said, I think it's a little unfair that she accused me of taking seven dollars.
01:45:27
But the event happened on September
01:45:31
25th, which was a Friday.
01:45:38
Like I said, I can sell two products and get $7.
01:45:42
That's why I'm here today.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:45:46
Thank you, Mr. Brace.
01:45:47
Appreciate you coming forward.
01:45:51
Kevin Lynch.
Kevin Lynch
01:46:00
Good evening Mr. Mayor, City Councilors.
01:46:04
At the last City Council candidates forum, which was last week, Mayor was there.
01:46:10
You'll recall that there was a question from the audience about the last third of the meeting.
01:46:14
Someone asked, how is it that so many decisions, so many bad decisions get made within adequate information?
01:46:23
Tough, tough question and I don't think anyone had a really good answer for that.
01:46:30
You all seem to be reading this letter, maybe I should let you finish.
01:46:38
But reading the council packet over the weekend, reading the background material for the packet, I think there's some clues in there.
01:46:46
First of all, we've got an agenda tonight that's packed with some pretty important decisions that you all will be making.
01:46:53
And I notice that there's not a single public hearing on any of these decisions, not on the interchange design, water issues, dredging,
01:47:00
the project at the intersection of Cherry and Ridge and so I wonder if that might be part of what's driving these
01:47:15
decisions that are getting less than optimal results, but also looking at the background material for these individual items that are up there.
01:47:25
I don't see where there's basis for you to make a decision.
01:47:28
Let's take, for example, the next thing coming up, conveying easement to Rivanna for Shanks Branch.
01:47:34
Now, the background material says that the existing
01:47:40
pipe is in a location that is close to the creek and it's going to be moved to a less environmentally sensitive location.
01:47:49
Maybe that's true.
01:47:50
In that case, wouldn't it be appropriate to have a map of the new location and the old location so that you as the body showing judgment could say, yes, this in fact is a better location.
01:48:04
Or are you just going to trust the staff report and say, well, it says in here it's a better location, so it must be a better location.
01:48:10
and Dota.
01:48:11
And maybe it is a better location, maybe it's not, but you're the ones that we elect to actually make these decisions.
01:48:17
Well, I'm glad you have the map that wasn't in the background material.
01:48:22
This map up here on the back wall right there, that's for the McIntyre Park or McIntyre Parkway 250 interchange.
01:48:34
And if you go to the 250 interchange design hearing,
01:48:37
That's the only image on it.
01:48:39
That's it.
01:48:41
There's no elevation, there's nothing that gives you a sense of what exactly are we getting here other than a planned view of an intersection there.
01:48:48
How high is it going to be?
01:48:49
What sort of signs is it going to be?
01:48:50
It's supposed to be a 30 million dollar project.
01:48:53
and the public hearing is in less than a month.
01:48:56
Now, I personally am not in favor of the parkway, but I strongly believe if you're going to do the parkway, if you are not going to vote against the parkway, which I think you should do, vote against the parkway.
01:49:07
If you're not going to do that, do it right.
01:49:10
Don't just slouch towards a half-assed solution, which is what this is right here.
01:49:14
I mean, either stop it or do a good job.
01:49:17
Don't do a bad job because you haven't really figured out what you want to do.
01:49:22
If we look at the water issues update, there's not even a report on the water issue update.
01:49:28
I suppose that the Rivanna sewer theory is going to pop up here with a report.
01:49:34
Maybe you've seen it.
01:49:35
Certainly the public hasn't seen it.
01:49:38
So it strikes me that it would be difficult to give substantive input on a report that doesn't seem to have been presented to the public yet.
01:49:48
Dredging Study Alternatives, that one I can go into a little bit more detail and I hope that you will consider that in more detail.
01:49:57
You know, the original RFP had 10...
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:49:59
Your time is up, so if you want to wrap up.
Kevin Lynch
01:50:01
Well, I'm going to have to get back to the dredging RFP, but I'll just say in brief, there's 10 things that the RFP said.
01:50:08
had to be done.
01:50:09
You really only need to do one of them now.
01:50:11
Actually, you need to do one beyond what Rivanna's going to do.
01:50:14
Rivanna has to do the bathymetric.
01:50:16
And then you need to figure out what the sediment composition is.
01:50:19
Everything else follows that.
01:50:23
So do things one at a time.
01:50:25
Don't commit yourself to spending a bunch of money.
01:50:27
Do things logically, and when you get results for the first phase, move to the next one.
01:50:32
And please make sure that you make decisions
01:50:37
Thank you sir.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:50:42
That concludes matters by the public.
01:50:45
Thank you all for coming tonight.
01:50:46
I will now open up to council member responses to matters by the public.
David Brown
Member, City Council
01:50:51
Who would like to start?
01:50:57
I'll reply to my friend Kevin since he was the last one to speak.
01:51:00
On the issues of public hearings, I mean, you brought up the Cherry and Ridge project.
01:51:04
There have been at least two public hearings on that at the Planning Commission the Councilors were at.
01:51:09
There's certainly been public hearings on
01:51:12
on the interchange previously, but I think it's good comment to talk about the need to make sure we have adequate information on that.
01:51:20
Not only is there a map of the easement, but I know I met personally with staff so they could go over the map and show me exactly where the easement would be, where the new sewer line would be, where the road is, what the topography is, and I'm assuming some of the other councilors did that as well, I'm not sure.
01:51:43
and the only comment I'll make is that I don't know any of the circumstances but I have known Mark Briggs for a long time and I appreciate him coming forward.
01:51:52
He's a friend of mine and I'd certainly would be a reference to his character.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:52:03
Anybody else?
01:52:04
Ms. Edwards?
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
01:52:05
Just wanted to make a couple of comments.
01:52:08
Anne Carter started on Madison Republic and she said she was happy.
01:52:13
and I'm glad that she was happy.
01:52:18
Starr to Bob Finwick for having the most provocative presentation during the public comment.
01:52:26
And to Paul Long, it's always good to hear from you and the issues that you have regarding economic development.
01:52:33
We all share respect in terms of developing our workforce.
01:52:39
Jay Ferguson, the Paramount.
01:52:42
I'd like to know if we could have a copy of that letter to be a part of the official meeting minutes for this council meeting.
01:52:51
And also, I'd like to hear more about what the Paramount is doing, so I appreciate the board taking the initiative to do that.
01:53:03
And the comments by Mrs. Salinas, we're in the beginning of the
01:53:08
redevelopment process for our public housing sites and getting more stories of what happened during the era that you describe and we're getting to actually get our youth involved with that.
01:53:21
So I think you're correct in making the connection between the culture of the city at the time when decisions were made and just connecting it all together.
01:53:34
and also for Mr. Briggs.
01:53:36
I think that when people come forth with concerns as you did, it means that people are really hurting.
01:53:45
And I appreciate the way you came forward and never mentioned the business.
01:53:54
I appreciate the grace and dignity that you displayed.
01:53:59
in sharing your concern and I would like a follow-up on that and also you mentioned that you try to talk things out but maybe this requires the intervention of the restorative justice part of our community and is it, you know, David's turn here.
01:54:16
is a part of that and maybe this would be a good opportunity for that to happen and in terms of restorative justice, I think that's the message I always hear from Betty Mooney and Dee Dee Smith and even from Kevin Mooney, what's your concerns about the plans for our water supply?
Julian Taliaferro
Vice Mayor, City Council
01:54:34
The only comment I'll make is
01:54:44
I'd like to get some more information on this trespassing bond notice in general, not only in Mr. Briggs' case, but in terms of what the process is and how all this works.
01:54:58
If I could, I'd be interested in seeing it.
SPEAKER_10
01:55:01
I just wanted to second Dr. Brown's comments about information.
01:55:08
We get to a fair amount of information
01:55:11
We do our own research also, just like Dr. Brown, I also went to visit the class and there's more information if you don't want to make a decision but sometimes concern when you do make a decision just because you always don't speak at the City Council meeting the one that you thought about it or worked on it, researched it, so it's a different kind of style, I also like to speak
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:55:42
Just a couple comments.
01:55:45
I wish we could dredge the south forkway van reservoir for free or even make money on it.
01:55:50
There are certainly, everybody has acknowledged that from day one that there are parts of the river and reservoir that can be dredged for maintenance purposes or opportunistic dredging where there is a market for the fill.
01:56:06
but if we're talking about charging for water capacity at a bare minimum we know it's going to be tens of millions of dollars and I don't want anybody to go away from this meeting thinking that we can get it done for free.
01:56:19
Secondly, I appreciate Dee coming forward and talking about demand projections because that's a strong concern I have as well.
01:56:29
I firmly believe we need to revisit the projections that our current plan is premised upon and so I thank you for continuing to challenge us on that.
01:56:38
I too appreciate Mr. Ferguson coming forward in the Paramount.
01:56:42
I think that was a powerful statement that you made and I appreciate
01:56:46
you coming forward tonight.
01:56:48
I agree with Stratton Salutis that we need to clarify this point, this sort of very basic important point that the city has said very clearly that we will not support an at-grade intersection and for VDOT or anybody to imply otherwise I think needs to be corrected.
01:57:07
So we'll get to that later.
01:57:08
One of the reasons why Mr. Lynch said we didn't have a public hearing on the interchange
01:57:13
Tonight is because we're not taking any action on the interchange tonight.
01:57:15
It's simply a status report on where we are with that.
01:57:19
But we are going to talk about the process and what we need to be clarified in that regard.
01:57:25
And then Mr. Risberg, thank you very much for coming forward and I will certainly
01:57:28
bring your suggestion up when we talk about our legislative agenda later on in tonight's meeting.
01:57:34
We do have a lengthy meeting tonight.
01:57:35
We have a lot of important items in the meeting and part of the reason is we're actually combining two meetings into one.
01:57:41
I neglected to mention at the outset we will not be having a city council meeting on October 19th because three of our members will be attending, or at least three of our members will be attending the annual conference of the Virginia Municipal League.
01:57:53
So just a heads up, no city council meeting on October 19th.
01:57:58
So, unless there's any other comments, we will move forward with our regular business agenda.
01:58:08
We have a number of items on the consent agenda.
01:58:13
Item A, approving minutes of August 17th, 21st and September 21st.
01:58:18
Item B is an appropriation of $157,143, a victim witness program grant, second of two readings.
01:58:25
Item C is an appropriation of $58,007 at Safe Schools, CDSS Grant, second of two readings.
01:58:32
Item D is an appropriation of $5,000 in Albemarle Schools Contribution for First Tea Program, second of two readings.
01:58:39
Item D is an appropriation of $55,942 Justice Assistance Grant, first of two readings.
01:58:46
Item F is an ordinance to quitclaim gas easement in Albemarle County to VDOT, second of two readings.
01:58:52
And item G, an ordinance petition process for enhanced speeding fines, second of two readings.
01:58:57
Are there any items to be pulled from the consent agenda or any comments or motions of the law?
SPEAKER_10
01:59:05
There's someone.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
01:59:06
For a second.
01:59:07
It's been moved and seconded.
01:59:08
Any further discussion?
01:59:09
If not, please indicate your vote.
01:59:12
Thank you very much.
01:59:13
Consent agenda is approved.
01:59:16
We'll now move forward to a second reading, second or two readings on the ordinance conveying easement to Rivanna Water and Sew Authority for a Shanks Branch Interceptor Sewer Project through McIntire Park.
01:59:26
Ms. Hildebrand.
Gary O'Connell
City Manager
01:59:39
Yeah.
01:59:42
Do you have some introductory remarks, or do you just want to start with the PowerPoint?
SPEAKER_30
02:00:03
I need to get them in there.
02:00:04
I have some
02:00:05
Pictures, maps, video, but she'll assist with the discussion regarding the relocation of the sewer line for Shanks Branch.
02:00:20
Basically, Rivanna's Shanks Branch line was initially constructed in 1954 and it's actually located right here in the green.
02:00:34
This line is 21 inch terracotta pipe and it's undersized to handle present operations and additional flow during rain events and additional capacity that's required by the city for development.
02:00:48
This actually shows in the
02:00:51
This area here, the service area that the Shanks Branch sewer line serves.
02:00:58
It serves the corner, West Haven, Preston Avenue, Rose Hill area, McIntire Road area, and a portion beyond the 250 bypass.
02:01:21
I want to orient you a little bit with this map.
02:01:25
This is Melbourne Road here.
02:01:28
This line here is the actual temporary easement that was granted by council to VDOT for the McIntyre Road extended.
02:01:42
This is the roadway here.
02:01:47
This shows in green the current sewer line that you saw in the service area map and then this red line starting here is the relocation of the sewer line and you'll notice that this is the trail and unfortunately it's not in a terribly different color but that's the trail way and in most places it is very close to the sewer easement except when it
02:02:17
It goes closer to the roadway and in a place where it can cross, it approaches Melbourne Road, so that will be a walkway for pedestrians later on.
02:02:29
As you can see, most of the, or all of the sewer easement of the new red line is within the VDOT easement that's already been approved by council.
02:02:46
I might also add that this relocation involves 1,100 feet of sewer line along Shanks Branch.
02:02:57
But then as part of the Meadow Creek sewer line project, we'll relocate the portion that goes from this point down to the Meadow Creek sewer line.
02:03:08
You'll see that later as part of the Meadow Creek sewer line project.
02:03:16
The current easement in the green is 20 feet wide and the proposed easement is 40 feet wide.
02:03:28
Rivanna has agreed to do a landscaping plan for the Shanks Branch Interceptor similar to what is proposed for the Motor Creek Interceptor where it's basically 40 feet wide but the outer 10 feet will be planted with the interior 20 feet being low ground cover.
02:03:48
This will allow them to still be able to maintain the sewer line and they'll have the appearance of what it looks like now where they're maintaining the existing
02:03:58
I might also add that the proposed easement deed has been modified accordingly and at your request and it includes the language associated with the landscaping plan as well as preserving trees wherever possible within the easement.
02:04:28
This is just a short video clip we took and we're actually standing just south of the southernmost manhole and I want to point out here, at this point, we're facing south so this is the direction of the 250 bypass and we're about 1750 feet away from the 250 bypass or almost a third of the mile at this point.
02:04:59
and I'd like to point out, if I can stop it, whoops.
02:05:05
With the pill we just passed is where the roadway will actually be constructed somewhat on top of that hill and we're standing at a much less elevation where the sewer lines are proposed and I know there have been comments about moving the sewer line within the roadway but unfortunately at this point at the existing elevation that the proposed sewer line it's pretty deep it's about 15 to 20 feet deep at this point
02:05:33
according to the plans, and if it was moved within the road right away, it would be an additional 15 to 20 feet deep for a depth of about 30 to 40 feet deep.
02:05:44
So, you've got, with that additional depth, you've got increased cost to construction, more difficult construction during the time, and it would also, it would be more difficult for Albemarle to maintain that roadway for the long term.
02:06:11
These are just some photos that were taken and this shows the point where the photo was taken and they're all facing south and notice we've got a cleared right of way.
02:06:27
This is a point just above that and there is a cleared right of way through the wood area.
02:06:38
and then up a little further.
02:06:39
They were going to take some photos at sea, but unfortunately there was a bee's nest at that manhole, so they weren't able to take any photos.
02:06:48
But this shows the northernmost manhole facing north towards Melbourne Road.
02:06:56
I want to talk a little bit about sanitary sewer overflows.
02:07:00
This has been a problem along the Shanks Branch Interceptor.
02:07:04
We have numerous manholes that overflow after events.
02:07:09
And unfortunately with overflows, because the sewer line is very close by Shanks Branch, the overflows can contaminate the waterways where we have raw sewage going into the waterways.
02:07:24
And when you and I overflow, our community is exposed to the diseases and pollutants that are carried in wastewater.
02:07:31
In addition, I'd also like to add that it's also a violation of the Clean Water Act as implemented by the Environmental Protection Agency.
02:07:41
And just last week, Hampton Roads Sanitation District, our largest wastewater treatment provider in the Commonwealth of Virginia,
02:07:49
civil penalty was bought by the Commonwealth of Virginia and EPA of $900,000 for excessive overflows that they have allowed to get into the waterways around the Chesapeake Bay.
02:08:03
And these particular overflows that were allowed harm the waterways around the Chesapeake Bay.
02:08:12
I want to talk a little bit about maintenance by Rivanna.
02:08:16
As you can see, since 2005, they cleared the ride-a-way through McIntire Park, clearing their 20-foot easement.
02:08:25
And then they have continued to mow it on an annual basis.
02:08:30
They've also completed a sanitary sewer line evaluation on Shanks Branch which indicated that they had numerous deficiencies in the sewer line.
02:08:40
This is just an illustration where when you've got smoke that's coming out of a sewer line that's laid beyond this rock area, it's probably not a good thing and you've got some cracks or joint problems within the sewer line and it'll need some attention either through maintenance or replacement.
02:09:01
They also have, because I mentioned before, the new line is going to be much deeper and one thing we'll be able to avoid then are aerial crossings throughout the Shanks Branch area and these are aerial crossings that are currently in the Shanks Branch area and what happens unfortunately, they can get damaged through just, you know, storms, you've got trimmings that can impact the pipeline
02:09:29
And if the line's put in deeper, we can get rid of these aerial crossings, which would be a very good thing.
02:09:35
Also, when you've got aerial crossings of sewer lines, there's increased maintenance, ongoing maintenance by benefits because they have to be looked at on a regular basis to make sure they're not being compromised.
02:09:52
This is actually an issue that I had in the Shanks Branch area in 2008 along the sewer.
02:10:00
As you can see, this little green pipeline is exposed.
02:10:04
It's coming out of the bank.
02:10:05
It's where the banks of Shanks Branch have eroded away and it's exposing the pipeline which can ultimately compromise the integrity of the pipe and you can have actual sewage getting into the waterways.
02:10:20
This is what they had to do to go back to restore the bank and make sure that pipeline would stay in the bank.
02:10:32
I mentioned that Albemarle has also done sanitary sewer evaluations.
02:10:36
They've TV'd the shakes, branch line, it shows multiple defects through kind of, you've got pipe that's not really a circle in diameter, so it's got cracks, needs some sort of attention, numerous cracks here.
02:10:51
They also have a root problem, terracotta pipe is inherent because it's got a lot of joints in terracotta pipe.
02:10:58
and roots from nearby trees can get into the line.
02:11:05
So you can see roots can impact the capacity of a sewer if they're not handled and you can get rid of them.
02:11:12
Unfortunately you can cut the roots out, you can rob the roots out, but usually if they're left too long they can leave cracks in the joints where the pipe eventually needs to be replaced.
02:11:28
and those are just some other route pictures.
02:11:30
I might also add that VDOT is contributing to this project for the relocation and replacement.
02:11:39
They're contributing $558,000 of the estimated cost.
02:11:44
They will be responsible for the betterment, in other words to enlarge the pipe and make it deeper.
02:11:52
Those estimates are about $815,000 of which 50% of that cost is due to the increased rock excavation due to the increased depth of the pipe.
02:12:03
And if Rivanna does not coordinate with VDOT on this project, then the city will have to bear this full cost for rehabilitation or replacement right on.
02:12:14
It is listed as a second priority after the Meadow Creek Sewing Project for Urbana in their capital program.
02:12:21
The city also has it as a second priority in their five year capital program to handle, to reduce infiltration and inflow that gets in the line.
02:12:30
And the city is actually proceeding with the contractor and they will be underway in the next few months to do rehabilitation and replacement of the collection lines within the Shanks Branch Basin.
02:12:41
And with that, I open up to questions.
02:12:43
I've got Tom here, Jim Talbert, Craig to answer any questions.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:13:12
Thank you, Ms. Hildebrandt.
02:13:13
Questions for Ms. Hildebrandt or other staff?
SPEAKER_10
02:13:22
I am pleased that you have became this last presentation of easement.
02:13:27
Thank you for the landscaping that you had asked.
SPEAKER_30
02:13:34
In the language for the Ease of Deed, a landscaping plan was added and it was also modified to incorporate preservation of trees wherever possible and the language that was in question was basically omitted from the Ease of Deed that was a concern from the last time.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:13:57
Other questions?
02:14:03
Ms. Edwards, you looked deep in thought.
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
02:14:05
I was just wondering, what would be game plan B?
02:14:12
What would be another option for the line in the route?
02:14:17
If it weren't so, I guess, divine intervention that VDOT is available to make the contribution, what would be the plan?
SPEAKER_30
02:14:31
The plan then would be, I mean, VDOT wasn't in the picture.
02:14:36
Rivanna has it listed as their second priority on their capital planning.
02:14:39
So, they would move ahead with replacement of that line because it needs to be upsized and without any contributions from VDOT.
02:14:51
And the city would be responsible for 100% of the cost since the city contributes the only flow to that line.
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
02:15:03
So would the route be the same?
02:15:05
Would there be another way of planning this?
SPEAKER_30
02:15:10
It would probably be, right now they've got it where it's scooted out from Shanks Branch a little bit, which is a good thing because they've had erosion problems in the past on their existing line and yet you kind of strike that balance of
02:15:28
keeping it close to the creek so it's not terribly deep, but yet you want to make sure you've got some buffer between the sewer line and the creek so there aren't issues later on.
02:15:40
So I would say it's pretty close to the route that it would probably ultimately be in.
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
02:15:47
So for 1954, this was state-of-the-art technology for sewer lines in 1954.
02:15:54
Absolutely.
02:15:56
And so what we're doing now is state-of-the-art sewer lines and any other technology that we could be using for management of wastewater and sewer and everything is state-of-the-art.
SPEAKER_30
02:16:08
Well typically, you want to get your lines steeper nowadays.
02:16:11
Back then, they didn't have a lot of the big equipment that they do now to get lines steeper because you want to try to avoid aerial crossings.
02:16:19
You know, there is other more high-tech, you know, technology assisted boring lines, but usually that's only done, that can be very expensive, it can be
02:16:30
sometimes four to five times the cost of open cutting but it's usually only used where like if you're crossing Melbourne Road because you might necessarily want to open cut Melbourne Road so you use it in short lengths boring and then you don't have to open cut but other than that with replacement it's usually open cut
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:17:00
Can you just reiterate one more time, I think there's been a little bit of confusion among the public.
02:17:06
This is a line that only serves city properties, is that correct?
SPEAKER_30
02:17:09
That's correct.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:17:10
And so all the demands on this line are coming from within the city.
02:17:13
That's right.
02:17:15
Okay.
02:17:15
And I want to go back to Ms. Edwards' question.
02:17:17
So I think she was sort of asking a hypothetical here, and I'm going to take that hypothetical one step further, which is assuming there was no Meadow Creek Parkway, would you
02:17:29
Is there another alignment that we could use for this line that would not result in as much impact on the environment of McIntyre Park, specifically trees and foliage?
SPEAKER_30
02:17:41
Well, currently we've only got 20 feet cut.
02:17:45
Since they're going deeper, it's going to require additional width to be cleared in order to get the linen stalled, which is 40 feet.
02:17:55
It's proposed in the easement.
02:17:59
So, I would say no.
02:18:01
I mean, there's
02:18:03
You're going to need to use pretty big equipment to install this line at the increased steps.
02:18:10
And you're also increasing the size of the line from 21 to 30, so it takes a little bit bigger equipment.
02:18:17
And there will be larger manholes that have to be installed and those will be carried in.
02:18:23
Unfortunately, when you're installing sewer lines, they do have an impact and it is unfortunate sewer lines have to be put, the bigger lines have to be put along creeks and riverbeds in order to maintain gravity flow.
Gary O'Connell
City Manager
02:18:37
Maybe you could talk about that a little bit more because we have that around the city where we have high point sites, which is the case here.
SPEAKER_29
02:18:43
That's right, that's right.
Gary O'Connell
City Manager
02:18:45
Because I think the question is could you physically move it out of McIntyre Park and it's because of the
02:18:51
The gravity, which follows the creek, which is where the sewer lines are designed.
02:18:57
If you look around the city, that's the case all over the city.
SPEAKER_30
02:18:59
Yeah, your larger interceptors are always along creeks and waterways.
02:19:05
And then your collection lines, you've got a little more leeway because they can be in the streets.
02:19:10
And some of them are at pretty big depths.
02:19:12
I mean, we've got some sewer lines that are at 14, 15 feet deep in the streets.
02:19:16
Now I've got some that are probably 25 feet deep in the streets, but that's pretty rare.
02:19:21
But you don't have as much flexibility for locations of large sewer lines as you do a smaller collection line that can go in a street.
02:19:32
People, unfortunately, you can put them anywhere, but it's just going to cost you a lot of money.
02:19:37
could potentially be more destructive.
02:19:40
It's really difficult to install a large sewer line deep.
02:19:44
I've been involved in one where it was 60 inches, most for five and a half miles through a pretty rural area and at certain points we were 45 feet deep.
02:19:58
But that was rare.
02:20:01
Most of the line was 25 to 30 feet deep and we were within 100 feet of the waterway.
SPEAKER_10
02:20:06
I think the fact is that this is the soul of several of our citizens in the city.
02:20:14
All the soul which goes to this pipeline is in the city.
02:20:17
The second is that the current pipeline is inadequate for the size and condition.
02:20:23
The soul has to be equipped.
02:20:28
That's crack.
SPEAKER_30
02:20:37
That's exactly crack.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:20:43
Other comments or questions before we bring this to a vote?
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
02:20:49
I guess the concern that I have is just what another option would be.
02:20:53
And also the other concern I have is
02:20:58
How long has this been a number two priority?
02:21:01
And what is the urgency in having it done now?
02:21:06
And when will the work actually start?
SPEAKER_30
02:21:12
Tom may be able to help with that question.
02:21:14
It's currently in the five year plan that was published as a number two priority.
SPEAKER_48
02:21:23
We started about five years ago.
Gary O'Connell
City Manager
02:21:45
You should just be able to talk into that mic too, Tom.
SPEAKER_48
02:21:48
Shortly after I came to Charlottesville, and we identified at that time that the authority did not have any comprehensive plans on how to address and renew and rehabilitate interceptors.
02:22:02
We initiated a comprehensive sewer study, which involved looking at every interceptor in our system.
02:22:09
The idea was to identify problems
02:22:12
identified potential solutions and identified priorities.
02:22:17
It just happens that the two oldest lines in our system are the Shanks Branch Interceptor and the Meadow Creek Interceptor and not as too much of a surprise they came in as the top two priorities for rehabilitation and renewal.
02:22:31
As Ms. Helderbrand said, the city's been doing some extensive work as well looking at their sewer systems in terms of what kind of renewals need to be done
02:22:41
what can be done to reduce rainwater flow in pipelines.
02:22:45
There's a certain amount of work that can be done cost effectively.
02:22:48
They've determined and assessed to us that a combination of an extensive amount of funds that the city will pay to renew sewers in this basin coupled with a larger interceptor is the optimum way to
02:23:05
provide for the safe and effective operation of the system in the future that recognizes environmental priorities and eliminates some of the concerns you saw on the screen.
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
02:23:29
I guess my question was then when, if it's been a number two priority for the last five years, when will the work begin?
SPEAKER_30
02:23:40
Well, the idea is they'll address it after they've completed the MediCrate, the Semiline, which I'll give you.
SPEAKER_48
02:23:49
Well, the short answer to that is we try to do all of our planning and scheduling looking not just at what our needs are, but looking at what the whole community's needs are.
02:23:58
and as we were making plans to advance schedules to address the Shanks branch line, we became aware that there was a, that the city had some other plans and we decided the best course of action was to coordinate our efforts with the efforts of the city and VDOT and that's really what got us to this point was the need to
02:24:17
Not work independently, but to work together and coordinate these efforts that we needed with the proposal that the city had with respect to the park and the roadway.
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
02:24:33
This is part of my concern.
02:24:35
I guess the initial one being wondering if there's some other form of technology we could be using.
02:24:40
And two, since there's still a lot of unanswered questions regarding the parkway and the road, is it appropriate to make this decision now, wait until some of those things are answered or until the other interceptor line is completed?
SPEAKER_30
02:25:02
Albemarle is installing as part of the Meadow Creek sewer line the downstream portion of Shanks Branch so it would be appropriate at this point to coordinate with VDOT because then you get another stretch of 1100 feet.
02:25:21
They're doing as part of the Meadow Creek sewer line project the 640 feet between the two.
02:25:28
So it would make sense to go ahead and take the opportunity to reduce the overflows and speed up the process.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:25:40
Can you explain why tonight we're not considering the whole length of the Shanks Branch pipe?
02:25:50
We're only tonight considering the point from the one main hole midway through the park north.
02:25:57
When do we take into consideration the rest of the line?
SPEAKER_30
02:26:00
The downstream portion will be brought to you with the Meadow Creek easements.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:26:05
I'm sorry, I'm talking about South.
SPEAKER_30
02:26:10
That would be Rivanna's next priority when they look at it.
02:26:14
Yeah, that's their next priority, their capital program.
David Brown
Member, City Council
02:26:17
But does that involve engineering for the interchange?
02:26:20
Is that, I think that's what he's trying to ask.
SPEAKER_30
02:26:22
There'll be as well.
David Brown
Member, City Council
02:26:27
From our point of view, again, that one works too.
SPEAKER_48
02:26:32
It could make this easier.
02:26:35
From our point of view, the next phase of the work on the Shanks Branch Interceptor could be justified and should begin right away.
02:26:46
But again, we're trying to perform the work that we need to do.
02:26:50
in conjunction with all the city's plans.
02:26:53
And the location and the configuration and the design of your interchange has a great deal to do with where's the right place to locate the sewer.
02:27:01
So we're willing to work and coordinate with you rather than get ahead of you and do something that we end up having to redo.
02:27:08
But in terms of the need and priority and the environmental benefits associated with improving that system, that work could begin, if you were doing it based on those criteria alone, that work could begin immediately.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:27:21
Is it safe to say, I think you said earlier tonight, that I think it's important for the public to know that for the stretch of the pipe that we're talking about tonight, it's to be built in the existing right-of-way, or most of it would be built in the existing right-of-way for the parkways, for a magnetic diode extent, is that correct?
SPEAKER_30
02:27:38
All of it is within the already approved VDOT temporary easement.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:27:45
So they're going to clear that entire stretch of wind anyway.
02:27:48
We're not going to be talking about any additional clear... Where the line was built or not, that would occur.
Gary O'Connell
City Manager
02:27:53
That's correct.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:27:54
But that's not necessarily true for the southern part of the park, is that correct?
Gary O'Connell
City Manager
02:27:59
I don't think we know at this point because we don't know the final design for the interchange.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:28:03
I think somebody mentioned to me that our best guess is that it will require additional, it will result in additional impact beyond the BDOT construction easement for the remainder of the interceptor south of what we're talking about tonight.
SPEAKER_30
02:28:20
I don't think we know that information.
02:28:22
I know that the
Jim Tolbert
Director of Neighborhood Development Services
02:28:25
I think that's one of the unknowns at this point, as Tom said, but the other is that there's a portion of that easement, since the interchange project is our project, that VDOT won't be involved in, and so there won't be temporary construction easement, it's just where the line is drawn, what's the interchange and what's the road extended, so at this point, the reason, as he said, we can't move forward is we don't have the final design for the interchange quite yet, so it's premature to finalize the sewer design.
Gary O'Connell
City Manager
02:28:52
So if you move the interchange,
02:28:55
10, 15 feet or 20 or whatever it could affect where the sewer line would go.
Jim Tolbert
Director of Neighborhood Development Services
02:29:00
Right, quite possibly.
02:29:02
One other thing that Lauren hit on, but just to make sure too, is when she showed the area, the service area for this line, I think that that map, and I saw it last week, really hit home the importance of the replacement of the line.
02:29:17
It affects our downtown redevelopment.
02:29:20
Any West Main, any Preston includes the West Haven, the Madison, several of our public housing sites that we're talking about.
02:29:28
Redevelopment and density in this line capacity is a negative as we look forward to that down the road.
02:29:33
So this will enable us to have the sewer capacity we need to serve that entire area for the future.
02:29:39
So I think that's an important consideration when we talk about why the need for priority with the line.
David Brown
Member, City Council
02:29:47
Just make a couple comments to kind of address that.
02:29:50
One comment is that, you know, leaving the last time we talked about this, I think one issue was the degree to which we really needed this line.
02:29:59
Were we trying to upgrade something just because it was convenient or were we upgrading it because it was necessary?
02:30:04
And I think Ms. Hildebrand has done a really good job of thoroughly explaining the need for this upgrade, and I really appreciate that.
02:30:11
I think the second issue was did it make sense to try to have, as was suggested by several
02:30:21
the route for the pipe to be adjacent to the road and again I think that it's been pretty well explained to me that because of the topography the road's just up on a hill and on a ridge and this is down next to the creek and there's some real challenges to do that and those are the things that I left last meeting thinking we really need to clear up and I feel like CATEC have done a good job of doing that and I appreciate it.
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
02:30:51
I guess I'm still with some concerns since we don't have the final design for the interchange.
02:30:57
We really don't have a design for the sewer line.
02:31:00
And I would feel more comfortable just deferring that until we have more answers to the unknowns.
02:31:11
Listen, I feel like I'm in an odd place because right now I serve on the city council and I also serve on the Red and Water Sioux Authority and I'm not even willing to grant the easement to myself because there are just too many unknowns.
SPEAKER_10
02:31:28
Mrs. Edwards, I was trying to understand what your concern was.
02:31:32
Why do you think that it would be better to wait given that this part is already in the problem?
02:31:40
and the parties in the south section the mayor was talking about were still to be decided because of the interchange, should it affect the interchange?
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
02:31:51
I'm not underestimating the importance of the health and safety impacts for the sewer line.
02:32:00
I'm not underestimating the importance of the city residents who will benefit
02:32:06
from Liz.
02:32:07
But I don't feel that I could move this forward in good faith without having the final design for me to change.
David Brown
Member, City Council
02:32:20
You know, I'd like to come in.
02:32:22
I think that
02:32:23
I think a lot of thought has gone into making this as low impact as possible.
02:32:26
I think one thing that hasn't been emphasized that's important is that the route for the sewer line, for half of it, is underneath the trail.
02:32:36
So we have, however wide the trail is, 10 feet or whatever, is not going to be
02:32:43
I think we've done a good job of coming up with some better language for planting, so I think we should go ahead and move it forward.
02:32:53
Is that in motion?
SPEAKER_24
02:32:56
Do we need to amend the previous motion?
02:32:59
I don't think so.
02:33:00
The ordinance has not changed since it was moved and seconded.
02:33:05
So I think it was ready for a vote.
Gary O'Connell
City Manager
02:33:08
I think that reflected in the motion that the language was changed, just so it's...
SPEAKER_24
02:33:12
The language in the ordinance has not been changed since it was moved in second.
02:33:16
But the attachment to it, you don't...
SPEAKER_10
02:33:19
Does the law need to be changed during the last several years?
SPEAKER_24
02:33:22
The ordinance has been changed.
02:33:24
If you would like to vote on the change in the language of the ordinance, that's fine.
02:33:28
That's probably a good idea to have that in practice.
David Brown
Member, City Council
02:33:31
I'd like to move that we amend the previous ordinance to reflect landscaping and any other changes that have been brought for us today.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:33:41
This is for the amendment itself.
02:33:43
Any further discussion on the amendment?
02:33:46
Not on the actual easement, just on the amendment.
02:33:50
I agree it was a good amendment.
02:33:52
So a call for a vote on the amendment itself.
02:33:59
Before we call for a vote, I just want to go on record.
02:34:03
This actually is not, even though I'm I guess well known as an opponent of the medical calculate, this is not a slam dunk vote for me because I think
02:34:14
issues have been raised, very legitimate issues have been raised about the health of this pipeline, the condition of this pipeline.
02:34:25
I'm quite convinced that it's going to need to be replaced.
02:34:31
The fiscal watchdog in me says, yes, let's go ahead and do it now and save the taxpayers of Charlottesville some money while we have the opportunity to do so.
02:34:40
But when it comes downward, for me at least, there's still the basic acknowledgement that this project is being designed to accommodate an infrastructure project, a new road and interchange that I cannot support, and so I would not be voting in favor of.
02:35:02
this easement.
02:35:03
But I do appreciate all the work that went into improving it.
02:35:06
And we'll now, unless there's any other comments, call for a vote.
02:35:14
We'll call for a vote on the amended easement.
02:35:20
And the easement passes.
SPEAKER_17
02:35:22
Thank you very much.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:35:28
Next we have a report
02:35:30
McIntyre Road Interchange Design.
02:35:35
Ms. Tucker.
SPEAKER_14
02:35:42
Good evening.
02:35:45
We'd like to provide council with an update on the Route 250 Bypass Interchange Project.
02:35:50
It is only an update and I hope to answer all of your questions this evening.
02:35:56
The design public hearing is scheduled for Thursday, October 29th at City Space.
02:36:02
We'll hold the public information meeting from 5 until 7 p.m. and a formal podium style public hearing from 7 to 9 p.m. or until comments are heard.
02:36:16
At this public hearing, we'll present material that addresses the direction received from council, such as reducing the bridge height and width, moving the bike-ped trail to the west side of McIntire Road, and moving the ramps closer to the 250 bypass.
02:36:35
All of those features make for a smaller footprint and less impact to the environment.
02:36:41
In addition, we've met with the Birdwood Hillcrest neighborhood to discuss their concerns related to this project.
02:36:48
Last year they voiced concern about closing one of their two access points.
02:36:53
We're proposing that both Birdwood and Hillcrest remain open.
02:36:57
Birdwood as a right in only and Hillcrest as a right in right out only.
02:37:03
You can see the details on the smaller handout and the larger picture behind you.
02:37:11
In addition to the two access points, we're providing bike and pedestrian connections to and from the neighborhood, the park and McIntire Road, and we believe the neighborhood seems agreeable to these changes.
02:37:24
A summary of the hearing and public comments received through the November 9th deadline will be submitted to you, Council, at your November 16th meeting for approval.
02:37:36
And this approval, by way of a Council resolution, is a required step in order to obtain the Federal Highway Authorization to proceed to the right-of-way phase for the interchange project.
02:37:50
We're designing the interchange to minimize impacts to the surrounding historic properties.
02:37:56
Some right-of-way may need to be acquired and some property may be acquired through fair market offers and negotiations.
02:38:05
Other property acquisition may require condemnation.
02:38:09
Conservative right-of-way impacts will be shown at the design public hearing and will continue to refine the design to minimize right-of-way needs.
02:38:19
We've notified all 14 of the impacted owners and have already met with the only potential full displacement property owner.
02:38:28
Condemnation proceedings would likely occur in mid-2010.
02:38:34
We do have plans, a full set of rather detailed plans available for public view in our office at the main library branch and the local VDOT office and the district VDOT office.
02:38:50
We do have profiles of the roadway, the cross sections, the bridge.
02:39:06
We also anticipate construction of the interchange if it proceeds according to schedule to occur in early 2011.
02:39:20
I'll just pause to see if you have any questions regarding our upcoming public hearing.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:39:25
Can you address the concern that Mr. Salinas raised earlier about VDOT apparently saying that the submitted plan shows an at-grade intersection even though the city has said very clearly that we will not approve an at-grade intersection?
SPEAKER_14
02:39:46
VDOT has clarified their project limits in a request by the Army Corps of Engineers issuance of the permit necessary for beginning that project.
02:40:01
The project was discussed as being truncated
02:40:07
Basically where it would touch the interchange project.
02:40:11
And when the Army Corps asked for a full and complete project, VDOT then submitted the rest of those project plans which are for an at-grade intersection.
02:40:22
Now the agreement
02:40:24
that the city and VDOT and the county have is that that at-grade intersection will not be built, that the temporary construction easement was not conveyed for the building of that at-grade intersection, and the interchange is being proposed by the city.
02:40:46
So only at such time, and the Corps understands this, but only at such time
02:40:51
Would the interchange not move forward?
02:40:53
Would they then go back to the remainder of their full project term and I and complete their project?
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:41:04
How are we allowing them to submit something, maybe I'm just not getting it, but how are we allowing them to submit something that's reflecting something that we've said we don't approve?
02:41:21
At what point does the city just correct the record?
SPEAKER_14
02:41:24
Well, all of the parties involved in coordinating these projects
02:41:32
understand the coordination point of being 775 feet north of the 250 bypass so we're clear and we meaning city staff tasked with developing the interchange plans are clear where our boundary meets McIntyre Road extended and the purpose for that coordination is not to have to
02:42:00
build the full McIntire Road extended project only to tear up the last 775 feet.
02:42:09
Should we then move forward with the interchange?
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:42:14
That's not the real purpose.
02:42:15
I mean, the real purpose, I mean, maybe I shouldn't say, isn't I'm sure what the real purpose is because we don't want to link the projects and therefore federalize this road.
SPEAKER_14
02:42:27
Well, I'm aware of that argument.
02:42:29
However, with respect to the interchange project, and I'm not really fully versed in answering for McIntire Road extended project, but with respect to the interchange project, we have full purpose and need involving safety, enhanced pedestrian
02:42:51
and bicycle and transportation amenities and a purpose and need independent of the McIntyre Road extended project for which a, well for all intents and purposes it would be a T intersection but grade separated.
02:43:14
If there were no McIntyre Road extended, the interchange could still be a safety enhancement
02:43:22
that would improve the accident rate at this, that currently exists at this intersection that's three times the statewide average.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:43:30
I fully agree, we've just never shown that.
02:43:33
I remember asking, I asked personally to see designs that showed how a grade separate interchange could work without McIntyre extended and we never saw that in any of the designs that we...
SPEAKER_14
02:43:46
We could show a line to the, it would involve everything that you now see minus the roadway immediately to the north of the ramps on the northwest side, which would still be necessary to accommodate all the turning movements.
02:44:05
And the reason that we include McIntyre Road extended in our interchange project is that it is in the
02:44:12
statewide transportation plan, transportation improvement plan, the MPO's long-range plan, and we have to consider all of those projects in the context of designing the interchange.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:44:28
Thank you.
02:44:29
Other questions, comments?
Julian Taliaferro
Vice Mayor, City Council
02:44:31
I was able to come in with a couple questions.
02:44:35
I did have the opportunity to attend the Bellwood meeting, and I would certainly agree that
02:44:41
Most people are receptive and appreciate the work that you all have done to answer some of their concerns and it appeared to me that in general most people are supportive of this approved design.
02:44:59
In way of a question,
02:45:02
I'm guessing and I also was reading also that with the dog would have known where the dog would have to be relocated.
02:45:12
Is that the first open?
SPEAKER_14
02:45:14
It is not being relocated.
Julian Taliaferro
Vice Mayor, City Council
02:45:16
Okay.
02:45:17
And then also as far as the egress from Charlottesville Albemarle Rescue Squad, they are just being moved and relocated, correct?
SPEAKER_14
02:45:28
that is proposed for relocation closer to.
Julian Taliaferro
Vice Mayor, City Council
02:45:31
It should be safer and better, aren't they?
SPEAKER_14
02:45:33
Yes.
Julian Taliaferro
Vice Mayor, City Council
02:45:34
And coming out right at the intersection.
SPEAKER_14
02:45:35
We believe so.
Julian Taliaferro
Vice Mayor, City Council
02:45:36
Okay, I would think so too.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:45:38
Thank you.
02:45:43
Other questions?
SPEAKER_10
02:45:45
Yes.
02:45:46
When do some of this programs come back to city council for decision or action?
SPEAKER_14
02:45:57
We have an open comment period through November 9th, so once we summarize those comments into the overall public hearing transcript, we anticipate coming before council at your November 16th meeting.
SPEAKER_10
02:46:15
Thank you.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:46:22
Are there questions, comments?
02:46:25
I'm still not convinced.
02:46:26
I got the clarity I was looking for in terms of the issue of the at-grade intersection versus the grade separate interchange.
02:46:35
I'm not exactly sure of the best way to proceed in that regard other than I just think we need to correct the record.
02:46:42
That's all.
02:46:42
I mean, we need to make it clear to all the parties officially that the city, and reiterate, the city's well-established position, which is that
02:46:52
This is a project that requires a great, separate interchange.
02:46:57
I just don't think we can allow VDOT to portray it otherwise.
SPEAKER_14
02:47:04
And may I ask what form that clarity would take?
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:47:09
I'm not sure what the best opportunity to relay that.
SPEAKER_10
02:47:14
Well, I think you're trying to make a point that Cindy has said that a war interchange is true.
02:47:23
But if that doesn't happen, then we are going to change.
02:47:27
We've worried about what is the best thing to do, but there is all the work to do.
SPEAKER_14
02:47:38
Well, VDOT, it's probably not wise to speak for VDOT, but I feel that those involved in both projects are clear on
02:47:52
the task at hand.
02:47:58
We're also clear that the temporary construction easement that was granted for building of McIntyre Road extended explicitly says that it is not to be used for an at-grade intersection.
02:48:12
So if council chooses not to move forward with an interchange, then we
02:48:20
or someone would be back before council looking for what permissions are necessary to grant easements or permissions to complete that connection to the bypass.
02:48:35
So that does put it back before council if the interchange is not built.
02:48:46
I know all of these permissions end up in varying
02:48:49
Letters and Resolutions and they all interconnect and I'm happy to try and create that paper trail and highlight for some assurance.
02:49:01
We've certainly done that and I don't have that here before me but if that
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:49:08
I think creating a document or compiling a paper trail which makes it explicit to VDOT and other key parties here that the city still stands by its position.
02:49:28
One option is, assuming we don't build the interchange, one option is to build an at-grade intersection, the other option is not to do the project.
02:49:38
That's sort of the no-build scenario.
02:49:42
And I'm not suggesting tonight that we go there, but I'm just saying that the default position isn't necessarily an accurate intersection.
SPEAKER_14
02:49:51
It's the question whether or not there's another opportunity to
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:49:55
I don't want to go there tonight, but I think the point you just raised about whether it's just documenting the paper trail or just making it explicit in writing what the city's position is for all to understand, that would satisfy my concern.
SPEAKER_14
02:50:14
Okay, we should have all of those pieces.
02:50:17
Thank you.
02:50:21
Respectfully urge you all to attend our public hearing and October 29th it begins at 5 p.m. and 5 until 7 p.m. We have an informational meeting at city space and from 7 until 9 p.m. We have podium style comments taken from the public
02:50:46
and you'll receive a full transcript of all written, court transcribed and publicly given comments between now and November 9th.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:50:59
Thank you, Ms. Tucker.
02:51:04
Okay, next on our agenda is a report on water supply issues from Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority, Mr. Frederick.
SPEAKER_48
02:51:18
Thank you Mr. Mayor and Council.
02:51:22
The staff of the city approached me just a few weeks ago and suggested it would be a good idea for you to have the opportunity for me to appear before you on a periodic basis.
02:51:36
You're suggested maybe Corley, but it could be some other arrangement.
02:51:40
And just provide for you an update on some of the things of interest, or that I think might be of interest to you, pertaining to what the Riverbound Water and Sewer Authority is doing and accomplishing.
02:51:51
We're quite busy in accomplishing a great many things at the present time.
02:51:55
I made some notes to start the discussion, sticking pretty much to the script that, or the ideas that the city staff passed on to me that focus on the water studies.
02:52:07
But if you have questions on other topics of interest, or if you have ideas and suggestions as to how we can use this time in the future, I'm very open.
02:52:16
This really is your time and your opportunity to catch up on some things that you'd like to know from us.
02:52:22
So we'll extend that invitation to you.
02:52:25
There were six things that I've identified.
02:52:31
that from meetings that you had with three other boards last November and a follow-up meeting in March where there was some interest in doing some additional studies and getting some answers to a few more questions of interest to you pertaining to water supply.
02:52:50
This fell into six categories and I'm prepared to update you on each of those six tonight, just a status report of where they are, not focusing on a particular decision necessarily tonight.
02:53:00
The first one relates to the dam and as you're aware we had some issues with the consultant that we had previously hired which led up to a decision that it was best for us to go separate paths.
02:53:15
We have now hired a new designer.
02:53:17
That firm is Snobel Engineering.
02:53:20
They have national exposure and reputation in dam building and they're quite good at that feat.
02:53:28
But what's interesting is they are a Virginia based company and they have an office right here in Charlottesville so those are some extra pluses.
02:53:36
We've completed negotiating the contracts and those contracts were actually signed today.
02:53:40
and we're moving forward now.
02:53:43
The focus of the work is doing additional geotechnical work, geophysical work to improve the information that we have about the geology, what's underground that we can't see and it's hidden from us because that's what's most important to deciding what's a cost-effective foundation and just how far can we go to
02:54:06
build something that reduces costs and yet is very effective and very safe.
02:54:12
Looking at geology, boring holes in the ground can be quite expensive so you have to be very selective about what you're asking and selective about what information you want because in this type of business, wanting to know everything about every possibility can get extremely, extremely expensive.
02:54:29
They have to be very strategic.
02:54:32
Our consultant, we asked him some questions when we were negotiating.
02:54:37
One of the questions we asked him is, if you do these additional investigations for a foundation that's to be located about the same place where, just below the lower dam, similar in concept to what Gannett Fleming came up with in terms of location of the dam, but you do a good job of defining what the foundation needs to be.
02:54:59
defining if technologies like grouting can be done instead of deep, deep excavations of rock and save some money.
02:55:10
If you do that work and then you come up with a preliminary design cost estimate, which is a better cost estimate for what the dam would cost given the new foundation conditions, could you then also, if we told you, okay, one-time dredging would provide
02:55:25
X amount of storage, can you take these curves that we already have and define what would be the new height of the dam that took into account an option like that and could you give us at least a ballpark idea of cost for a lower height dam and they said yes ballpark but if you want the same level of detail
02:55:45
as the preliminary design estimates will take a little bit of work and a little bit more money.
02:55:50
But ballpark, yes, they could do that.
02:55:52
So they answered that affirmatively.
02:55:54
The next question we ask them is what do you think of the idea of including the existing dam or raising the existing dam?
02:56:04
There was a pause.
02:56:05
There was a little bit of consideration as to how to answer the question.
02:56:10
And what they told us is that without doing geotechnical work on the old dam itself and understanding the structure, they would be reluctant to try to offer, without a significant study, offer reuse of the existing dam because they have some concerns raised in their mind as to what the integrity of that structure would be, particularly without the earthen embankment behind it.
02:56:34
They also pointed to the idea that doing any work to that existing dam means getting to the concrete to build up upon it which means taking the earth away at least temporarily and even excavating at the base backside of the dam down to the foundation levels and they were very uncomfortable with that based on what they now know about that dam
02:56:58
unless the reservoir were completely drained.
02:57:03
And we've got some other concerns that it would require some effort to identify what kind of, if any, restrictions might be needed on demand during a period of time when the reservoir were completely drained in the event that the drought, similar to 2002, were to happen to occur at the time that a dam were completely drained.
02:57:26
Needless to say, Schnabel feels like it would probably cost more money to try to build upon the existing dam than it would cost to build a new dam.
02:57:37
That's their judgment.
02:57:38
That's not based on a lot of detailed investigations.
02:57:42
but I think if you really wanted the answer to a question like that we could go back to them and they could give us a fee for what they think it would cost to answer that question.
02:57:52
I don't think it would be non-substantial.
02:57:54
I think the cost would be fairly substantial to do that.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
02:57:57
Can you give us your best guess as to why Gannett Fleming said that it would cost a fraction, why they said it would cost a fraction of what it would cost to build a new dam simply to repair the existing dam and now
02:58:12
Schnabel is saying it might actually cost more.
SPEAKER_48
02:58:15
Actually, what's interesting, a study was done, I'm not that familiar with the details of the study because it occurred before I was here.
02:58:24
It was in the 2002-2003 timeframe.
02:58:27
There was a study of the Ragged Mountain Dam.
02:58:29
Of course, labor and materials and things were a lot cheaper in 2003 than they are now, even with the recession.
02:58:38
But they did a study at a time when the community was not looking at Ragged Mountain Dam as a future source of water but was looking more toward the Four Foot Crest at South Fork and some other things.
02:58:49
And they came up with a construction only estimate for several alternatives.
02:58:55
There's one that's been quoted in the community that was their lowest cost alternative.
02:58:59
It was $2.9 million in construction only costs, not total project costs, which in itself is not an apples to apples comparison.
02:59:09
After I came on board and learned about the study, I had some questions.
02:59:13
In fact, I had some questions again at Fleming, even as late as 2008 timeframe when they were still working for us at that time.
02:59:20
And I asked, could that work be done that they identified as an alternative under that $2.9 million?
02:59:27
Could that be done without draining the reservoir, by keeping the reservoir full?
02:59:30
And they said, we don't know.
02:59:32
They said, we'd be scared of that without doing some additional investigations.
02:59:36
and frankly I got into a pretty candid conversation with the person who wrote that report because I was not happy at all that a company would publish a report that the public would rely upon and then five years later tell me that they really couldn't determine without additional investigations if that alternative was feasible without draining the reservoir.
02:59:59
That was, I won't go into the details of that conversation I had but I was pretty upset with that comment.
03:00:05
because that's basically very different from the 2003 report.
03:00:10
I hope that helps you a little bit.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:00:12
Well, it doesn't actually address my question.
03:00:14
My question is really more the cost.
03:00:16
I mean, I understand your concern and I appreciate your concern about the feasibility.
03:00:19
That's sort of in my mind a separate question, but I'm really looking at the cost of simply repairing the existing dam, which has been quoted in the
03:00:29
several million dollar range maybe let's say 10-15 million dollar range at its highest versus the projected cost of building a new dam which originally we thought was going to be I forget what the original number is but it's since been inflated and it's tens of millions of dollars why is it their estimate of the cost right why is it that their estimate showed that the one was substantially cheaper than the other and now Chernobyl is coming back and saying the one might actually be more expensive than the other
03:00:58
How is that discrepancy?
03:01:00
How do you explain that discrepancy?
SPEAKER_48
03:01:03
The only way I can explain it is you've got two different companies looking at the same issue and coming to separate conclusions.
03:01:09
They're both experts in their field.
David Brown
Member, City Council
03:01:13
I just have a question because I want to make sure I'm following the same question.
03:01:17
Are we referring to just repairing them or making it taller?
SPEAKER_48
03:01:23
Well, the question is not always in the context of making it taller, not simply repairing the dam.
David Brown
Member, City Council
03:01:31
I'm not repairing it.
03:01:33
Your question was just to repair it since there's discussion that it needs to be fixed if nothing else happens.
03:01:40
Is that part of the answer?
03:01:41
I don't know.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:01:42
No, it's a very good question, and I think I want to make sure we are comparing apples to apples here.
03:01:47
You're right, because the original GAN was, do you recall if the original, I believe GAN, I know, in fact I know for a fact that GAN funding did give an estimate on what it would take to enlarge it 13 feet.
03:02:00
And I believe it was about $15 million to enlarge it, to repair it and enlarge it 15 feet.
03:02:06
versus Billing and Udham, which they suggested would be tens of millions of dollars, and then we know it's going to be tens of millions of more dollars.
03:02:12
So, and that's what I'm trying to get at is that discrepancy.
03:02:16
So you've got 15 million versus 16 million.
SPEAKER_48
03:02:19
I want us to be careful about what we say we know because we're placing our, what we say we know on somebody else's estimate.
03:02:26
Right, right, and I'm just asking you guys- The panel has extensively questioned the estimates, again, that he came up with.
SPEAKER_06
03:02:31
Sure.
SPEAKER_48
03:02:33
I don't have a full and complete answer.
03:02:35
The best thing to do would be to get, if you could get the firm to come up here and explain their own answers, because it is their own expert conclusions.
03:02:43
I was troubled by some of the differences I heard in the personnel at Gannon.
03:02:47
I was talking to them in 2008 about the report they wrote in 2003.
03:02:51
Some of that troubled me.
03:02:53
They did update an estimate just to fix the dam in, I'm not sure if it was 2007 or 2008 dollars, but more current dollars.
03:03:02
and took into account their best guess on what efforts might be necessary in order to keep the reservoir in service and they came up with a figure that, I'm doing this off the top of my head, was in the $9 to $10 range for the same work that they had earlier quoted for $2.9 million in construction costs.
03:03:20
Now the later figure I'm talking about was total project cost because we've asked all of our consultants, let's don't confuse people, let's be consistent how we report things.
03:03:32
In the past that wasn't always true.
03:03:38
Anyway, the idea of raising the existing dam can be studied if you want to.
03:03:42
We'd have to go back to the consultant and they're going to, Snobel is going to ask for additional geotechnical investigations if you want to do that.
03:03:51
There would be some fairly substantial costs, but I'll leave that for you to consider or ponder.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:03:58
When you say fairly substantial, in your head, what are you thinking, ballpark range?
03:04:02
Are we talking 50,000, 500,000, 5 million?
SPEAKER_48
03:04:06
Probably less, I'd say less than a half a million dollars, but probably more than 50.
03:04:14
Along that line, if there are other questions or alternatives or options, and as we have continued, this process has been going on for quite some time and people have opportunities to think of more and more questions that perhaps weren't asked in public, earlier public meetings.
03:04:33
One of the things, sometimes questions can be asked that we can very easily answer.
03:04:38
Sometimes questions are asked that cost a great deal of money to answer.
03:04:42
Especially the ones that cost a great deal of money to answer.
03:04:45
It's very important if we're going to move toward decisions and future action that we try to identify what those questions are up front, like now.
03:04:54
Ed Schnabel is beginning their work rather than to expose, bring those questions to our attention for the first time say next spring when a new cost estimate is presented.
03:05:04
Because one of the things we're trying to do is ask ourselves what are the right questions to ask, not what all the possible questions to ask because we're trying to look after our money as well as getting an effective job done.
03:05:20
Does anybody have any questions about the Raggie Mountain Dam from their design and cost estimate at this point?
03:05:29
If you do, later we can come back.
03:05:31
I'll move on.
03:05:34
One of the other items that the floorboards asked us to look at was the relationship between the size of the South Fork to Ragged Mountain proposed pipeline and the storage required in all of the reservoirs.
03:05:50
That was modeled by Hydrologics and they did a very simple report that was a cost effective study.
03:05:56
What they concluded was that the pipe size could to a great extent impact the amount of time it takes to refill
03:06:04
the reservoirs when they're depleted after a drought but they don't help you reduce the amount of stories that you need to endure the drought and to a large extent that's because when we were doing the studies for the water supply
03:06:20
We were bound by, as you know, the condition of least environmentally damaging practical alternative.
03:06:26
And one of many things that are on the list of things you do to determine that was to find what's the right operating sequence to minimize the amount of storage.
03:06:35
And the sequence that was derived was
03:06:38
Early in a drought, maximize the use of the North Fork River and the South Fork Reservoir and preserve Ragged Mountain to last because it has the smallest watershed area to recover.
03:06:50
So if you're preserving Ragged Mountain to last, then it's going to remain full early in a drought.
03:06:56
And then as a drought gets in greater intensity and all dams stop spilling, at that point your storage is fixed.
03:07:03
So moving water around more effectively between reservoirs is not increasing your storage.
03:07:09
It's just getting it from one place to another quicker.
03:07:13
And it's the total storage that is the determining factor as to whether you'll get through the drought or not, along with your water conservation and restrictions.
03:07:24
So that was the completion, as best I understand, that completes that particular study in terms of the question that was asked.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:07:33
Can I just ask a question?
03:07:34
Sure.
03:07:35
As you know, it's based on the projections of conservation in terms of what we need to manage a drought.
03:07:44
I'm assuming that modeling was based on the projections that are reflected in the current water supply permit and plan in terms of a 5% smaller per capita consumption of water.
SPEAKER_48
03:08:01
Actually, hydrologic, she's a little bit different method.
03:08:04
Again, it's funny because the regulations of the Commonwealth of Virginia talk about defining safe yield and we were defining safe yield in a way the regulators understood because we were submitting a permit application and we're playing by their rules.
03:08:21
And safe yield was defined as the volume of water that you could consistently withdraw on a day-to-day basis on an average
03:08:31
while enduring the drought of record.
03:08:35
So Gannett Fleming defined it that way.
03:08:37
In the demand, they defined in the demand projections 5% overall.
03:08:42
And they admitted they were being on the conservative side.
03:08:46
If you're going to err, better to err on having a little bit more than enough and not having enough and inducing a public health crisis, which they saw as the other alternative.
03:08:55
Hydrologics has a model that is used for a different purpose and we actually used it to develop our drought.
03:09:03
Drought Response and Contingency Plan, which is a separate document that we have completed that allows you to target under restricted mandatory provisions what kind of conservation that you could get at various stages of a drought and invoking and also it helps you determine when to invoke the certain triggers.
03:09:26
And the criteria used in that modeling was based on
03:09:33
Under the voluntary or the first stage, the assumption was that there would be very limited conservation.
03:09:41
Hopefully there actually would be some conservation, but that was the assumption made.
03:09:46
Under the next phase, which was the drought warning, 5% and under the drought emergency, 20%.
03:09:53
And they actually did model the 0, 5, and 20.
03:09:57
in their calculations because that's their model set up to do that.
03:10:00
Gannett Fleming's model was set to define the state rules for safe yield not to develop a drought response program.
03:10:11
So hydrologics did in their model show 20% conservation during a drought emergency declaration and they also told us what triggers to look for as to when to invoke that emergency.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:10:23
Is that 20% over
SPEAKER_48
03:10:25
Over what benchmark, 20% less than... 20% less than whatever is determined to be the average, projected to be the average foot.
03:10:35
Average flow in any one year when you're doing a 50-year program can be very tricky.
03:10:39
It's kind of like, say, someone in their early 20s planning for retirement and sitting down with a financial advisor and saying exactly what's the return on the stock market going to be 10 years from now.
03:10:52
No one can, no one honestly can answer that question with the exact certainty.
03:10:57
You can only draw upon historic experience and statisticians will tell you if you're trying to make a long term projection you want to use long term historic records not short term trends and that's the best that the people that do trend analysis, that's the best they can do because we have a limited crystal ball as far as what our future provides.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:11:23
I don't mean to keep harping on this point, but I agree that you don't want to be pollyannish about our ability to reduce water consumption.
03:11:33
You don't want to be naive, but I think we can realistically, I believe we can realistically say and plan for lower water consumption than is currently envisioned in the current plan, and if that's the case, then
03:11:52
and I hope we're testing that.
03:11:54
I'm not the expert here, but this is why we're doing the conservation study and looking at these technologies.
03:12:02
And if that's the case, then certainly that would impact the projected average flow, is that correct?
03:12:15
If my assumption is correct, and I'm not here to say it is correct, if my assumption proves to be, or strong indications are that it's correct that we can realistically reduce consumption more than we envisioned in the plan, then that will reduce the average flow.
03:12:34
Is that correct?
SPEAKER_48
03:12:35
if the assumptions hold that flow, that demand in the future will forever stay below what was projected by Gannett Fleming then the 50 year need would be smaller and a plan that they did for 50 years might last a longer period than that in reality.
David Brown
Member, City Council
03:12:55
Maybe another question related to that is you were here I think and heard the public comment about how our
03:13:05
actual water use is well below the projections.
03:13:11
Do you have any comment on that or does that give you pause in terms of the accuracy of the longer range projections?
SPEAKER_48
03:13:24
I think the best way to answer the question is to put it into appropriate context.
03:13:31
I would be hesitant and reluctant to be critical of the demand projections again if Lemmy did.
03:13:37
They did them in 2003 right after a drought.
03:13:41
managed in other organizations, other droughts and seen a slow, seen a two or three year lag period after a severe drought where demand stays down and then seeing demand climb again.
03:13:55
It has stayed down here longer and more persistent than my experience in the other community.
03:14:03
It's clear that there was a decline between 2001 and 2003 that was fairly sharp.
03:14:11
During that time, Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority, I think, was one of the examples.
03:14:16
In 2001, all of the processed water for the wastewater treatment plant was coming from drinking water.
03:14:22
In 2002, during the drought, Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority had the foresight to make a change and started using treated
03:14:29
wastewater effluent for process makeup water saved a significant volume of water per day.
03:14:35
Perhaps other businesses, industry, offices in the community saw the same opportunity to make one-time changes and made those reductions and maybe that contributed to that.
03:14:46
And if that's true, then the effect could, there could be a lingering effect that's permanent.
03:14:52
The thing I'd be careful about and I think could be dangerous is another comment that I heard in that earlier discussion was that demand will continue to go down.
03:15:03
I'd be very cautious about making such a statement.
03:15:08
If that's not true and we don't plan for our future, we may end up with a public health crisis on our hands and that's a potential consequence of that.
03:15:23
Okay, another of the third of the studies was a water conservation study and it was agreed that the retail agencies, the city public utilities and the Albemarle County Service Authority were in the best position to do that since they control retail policies for their customers and that of course has been completed and I think a presentation has been made to you on that subject.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:15:48
We did get a report out but we also asked a number of questions and I thought we were going to get a follow-up.
03:15:58
I wouldn't say it's completed yet.
03:16:01
It's still a work in progress.
SPEAKER_48
03:16:03
Okay.
03:16:05
I'll change that.
03:16:09
The fourth item was a conceptual review of the assumptions behind the conceptual design of the South Fork to Ragged Mountain Pipeline.
03:16:20
The four boards interestingly put a restriction on that, that it be limited to $25,000 and we have accomplished that.
03:16:28
We have a contract with Wiley Wilson out of Lynchburg to conduct that review.
03:16:33
The actual figure of the contract was $24,000 and some change, so we saved a few more dollars there.
03:16:40
That study is expected to be finished in December.
03:16:43
As was suggested by the four boards, it will be a review of the conceptual design.
03:16:48
It will not be a routing study or some of the other details that I've heard that really could not be accomplished for $25,000.
03:16:57
But it will be a good review, but it will also, as the four boards indicated, it will remain along the
03:17:04
lines of the approved water plan, and I think it's what we were asked to do.
03:17:08
That was part of the instructions.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:17:11
Can you clarify, I mean, because one of the conceptual issues was the proposed route, and I understand we didn't ask them to come up with a whole new alignment necessarily, but the idea was we want to test the feasibility of the proposed route based on
03:17:33
what we now know about the western bypass based on potential alternatives and again we know with $25,000 we're not going to get a whole lot of detail but at least it tests the basic concept.
03:17:45
Is that still?
SPEAKER_48
03:17:47
They will go around the field and they will look at the routes that were mapped during the water supply study.
03:17:55
and they will make some comments on those.
03:17:59
For $25,000 you can't engage into a lot of detail.
03:18:02
When I say not a routing study, it's not a study to make the final decision on the exact location of the pipeline.
03:18:09
But they will review the information that GANET funding provided regarding potential routes.
03:18:17
I do like to continue to emphasize just so people understand where Rivanna is in this process.
03:18:23
We obtained a permit from the agencies that does allow us to make adjustments to the route that Gannett Fleming looked at on a preliminary basis on the purpose of determining stream and wetland impacts.
03:18:38
The caveats are that we don't create more wetland or stream impacts, which is fairly simple to do when you can adjust a pipeline under pressure.
03:18:48
and also if we adjust the route into areas where there has not been a cultural and historic resources study that we would extend the study to make sure we're not damaging cultural and historic resources by making alterations.
03:19:00
But it did allow for alterations.
03:19:03
As you know, part of that route was
03:19:06
premised on the idea that if VDOT plans to build a road in the right-of-way that they've acquired, it would be very, very low level of impact on adjacent properties to have a pipeline adjacent to the road buried.
03:19:19
It's done frequently and all the time.
03:19:21
But we have been careful to say if VDOT makes the decision to sell the right-of-way back and not build any roadway in the corridor that they've got now,
03:19:31
it really does not make sense at all to try to stick hard-headedly to that same alignment and say the pipeline's got to be built exactly here.
03:19:40
In fact, it is incumbent upon us in that case to make adjustments.
03:19:44
And those adjustments we think can be made without being significant.
03:19:49
Pipelines are built all over the world underground in terrain much more difficult than ours.
03:19:57
It's important to understand in the end in terms of cost how much rock is impacted
03:20:02
and those require geotechnical investigations which is beyond this $25,000 study.
03:20:08
But some reasonable assumptions can be made and rock is not as significant a risk with a water pipeline that can be buried only 3 feet below ground as opposed to say a sewer pipeline that has to be 15-20 feet in the ground.
03:20:23
That's where the higher risks of rock impacting your costs are located.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:20:30
Will they also evaluate the projected cost of land acquisition?
03:20:37
There's been some...
03:20:37
Yes, they will.
SPEAKER_48
03:20:39
Okay.
03:20:39
Yes.
03:20:43
I expect some adjustments there because, again, Fleming assumed low-cost in a VDOT corridor, and we're now asking the consultant that's reviewing that not to make that assumption, so I actually expect those costs will go up.
03:20:58
but everything's based on the assumptions you provide.
03:21:06
Number five, these are in no particular order.
03:21:09
The dredging feasibility study is the next item on your agenda tonight so I won't spend time talking about that at the moment.
03:21:15
The sixth item was just a statement of the pros and cons of three pipelines, those three being one is the South Fork to Ragged Mountain, one is Sugar Hollow to Ragged Mountain,
03:21:27
and the third one was the James River pipeline under Ragged Mountain.
03:21:31
We will do that as a staff.
03:21:34
We'll do it through a brainstorming exercise.
03:21:37
We may involve city and the service authority staff as well, just to be sure we get enough ideas from multiple people.
03:21:43
But our thinking is it's best to go ahead and finish the conceptual review of the pipeline and take into account the recommendations or results of that study.
03:21:52
In doing the pros and cons, so I expect that will be something we'll complete very early in 2010.
03:21:58
The Dredging Feasibility Study we hope to complete next spring, but we need to discuss some decisions that you need to make.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:22:07
And I think it would be very helpful as we're looking at the pros and cons also to compare our best estimate on costs.
03:22:17
And I know about a year ago I raised the issue with you and Mr. O'Connell about trying to get a better estimate of what it would cost if we were to replace the Sugar Hollow pipeline,
03:22:29
I personally am not convinced that we need to do or want to do, but I think it's fair to the public to give a best estimate on what it would cost to replace that line, both the construction costs and the easement costs, just the ballpark estimate versus the costs and the pros and cons of the other pipeline.
03:22:51
Is that going to be reflected in this analysis as well?
SPEAKER_48
03:22:56
What we can do very easily that I think will give people a perhaps ballpark idea on comparison is identify what the lengths of each of those three pipelines are and you can compare lengths.
03:23:11
To get into some sort of an opinion of, engineering opinion of what each would cost, you really need to study each pipeline and that's not something
03:23:21
that I think is consistent with the staff just doing pros and cons without spending consulting resources.
03:23:29
But you get some idea just by knowing the lengths of each of the three pipelines.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:23:38
I continue to believe that, not only is it something we probably should, but frankly for those of us who support the new pipeline, I think it will actually help our case, help us to make a case for the new pipeline by giving, trying to get as accurate a cost as we can on the various alternatives.
03:23:58
And I realize, I'm not asking for a $500,000 engineering study, but I've got to believe there are some, you know,
03:24:06
There's got to be some way to get a ballpark estimate of what it would cost.
03:24:11
And the other issue is the easements.
03:24:14
We've been told that we would have to go back and renew all those hundred plus easements for the Sugar Hollow Pipeline.
03:24:24
And there's some question about whether or not
03:24:26
Virginia law would allow us to simply renew them administratively.
03:24:30
I don't know what the procedure would be, but I think that we need some clarity on that point as well.
03:24:34
And again, I think that will help build the case for the new pipeline personally.
David Brown
Member, City Council
03:24:37
Well, you know, having heard people accuse Mr. Frederick very wrongly, in my opinion, of misrepresentation, accuse Mr. O'Connell of misrepresenting things, I could imagine there might be some reluctance to offer ballpark
03:24:51
kind of seat of the pants estimates.
03:24:53
I think that if we want information on a good estimate of what it would cost to replace that I think we probably need to expect that Rivanna will do some significant work to give us a solid explanation or else I think it would be a piece of information that will just be
03:25:12
I'd be interested, I agree with your point.
03:25:22
that if we're going to compare, if one of the issues is we say, well, you know, we're going to have to replace that line.
03:25:29
If we don't build this pipeline, that line needs to be replaced.
03:25:31
I think having some factual estimate, so I guess I would ask what would it take to get, you know, what degree of accuracy could you get and what would be the steps to get there and how much kind of would it cost?
03:25:44
Maybe that's a better question rather than asking for a ballpark estimate.
SPEAKER_48
03:25:50
If you're interested in a fairly low level of expenditure, and all that's relative, I'm talking about maybe like a five figure type number, less than $100,000.
03:26:06
You could engage your consultant to do a conceptual design and cost estimate for the update.
03:26:12
And there's already been some work done, but it was done in 2004.
03:26:17
Data doesn't really work well in today's construction market, but take that data and review it and update it to current costs.
03:26:24
But we need to hire a consultant to do that, and it's a little bit beyond the original idea of staff just doing pros and cons without engaging a consultant.
03:26:32
But we can pursue that if that's what you want to do.
David Brown
Member, City Council
03:26:37
I'd like to have you get back with us at some point with some ideas on how much could we spend and what would we get for spending it.
03:26:47
You need the resources and you're doing that whether it's internally done or whether it's done through a consultant.
03:26:52
I agree it could be very useful information both for people who think the South Fork pipeline is a good idea and for people who think it's a bad idea.
03:27:02
I think having accurate information on the alternative is important.
Jim Tolbert
Director of Neighborhood Development Services
03:27:08
We'll look into that.
SPEAKER_48
03:27:15
That completes my summary of the six items.
03:27:18
I'm opening the door up to more questions on this topic or other topics of your interest.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:27:24
Can you address the issue, the I-64 amendment was separated out essentially.
03:27:32
What is the process of the timeline for
03:27:38
Exploring the costs and feasibility of that piece of the Ragmount project.
SPEAKER_48
03:27:44
A request for proposals is on the street now with a due date of October 15th.
03:27:48
Just for the embankment.
03:27:49
For the firms to submit proposals.
03:27:52
And then we'll begin a deliberate process toward making a selection of a consultant.
03:27:58
Right now we have, we keep a
03:28:00
a calendar several months ahead what we anticipate board actions might need to be.
03:28:06
Right now we have that tentatively scheduled for November board action which will be around Thanksgiving.
03:28:14
Coming up with a cost estimate for that particular piece is going to probably be more challenging than any of the other work that we're doing from a scheduling standpoint because part of what the expert panel suggested to us
03:28:29
is that probably a bigger piece of the I-64 work is going to be to come up with pragmatic solutions and then over time be able to convince the officials at the Virginia Department of Transportation to think more out of the box.
03:28:47
That could take some time.
03:28:50
We kind of anticipate that initially in those discussions with VDOT they're going to want to fall back on their books and their standards and sometimes those standards, I think as they're done with all with best intentions, but sometimes standards can lead to higher costs than are necessary.
03:29:07
And that may be a slow and deliberate process and may be more difficult to try to get to a, like a spring deadline, because that's just going to depend on negotiations.
03:29:17
I don't want to create any false expectations on that.
03:29:20
It might take some time.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:29:22
Well, I appreciate the complexities of the issues you're dealing with there, but I think it's one of those pieces of this project that's sort of been a big question mark, and I'm not sure that we're going to be able to make
03:29:39
A truly informed choice when at the time all these studies are completed and we're ready to move forward with a plan, if that's still a question mark.
03:29:52
And I realize you're dealing with VDOT and they don't always proceed as quickly or as efficiently as we might like, but I hope we can answer as many of those questions as possible
SPEAKER_48
03:30:07
Basically all I can do on that, and I will do, is offer you my best efforts in number one.
03:30:14
And number two, to keep you informed as well as keep Board of Supervisors informed on where it is so that if maybe y'all can help with that process a little bit, that might be possible too.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:30:28
And I have one last question.
03:30:29
I don't know if this is for you or Mr. O'Connell or Ms. Mueller, but where are we now in terms of the cost share allocation?
03:30:37
a piece of this city versus county.
SPEAKER_48
03:30:41
I'm going to let either one of you follow Ms. Mueller's answer.
Gary O'Connell
City Manager
03:30:44
Until we know what the costs are.
03:30:46
I'm just saying the formula.
03:30:48
There have been discussions between the two staffs about some models for cost allocation, but until we get what the costs are and the different pieces of it and know how much of it is maintenance and how much of it is for new supply, we can't really give any solid numbers.
03:31:05
But that's one of the items that's on the list.
03:31:09
I actually got a draft here of all the different things Tom talked about, so that's another one.
03:31:14
There's also the issue of what role for city council and all the different boards in the approval process, and we're trying to figure out all those pieces of it.
03:31:25
I think a part of what we're trying to do tonight is just make sure we understand what information council sees by next spring.
03:31:32
What do we need to have?
Julian Taliaferro
Vice Mayor, City Council
03:31:35
to refresh my memory, but I thought the cost allocation, there was a percentage breakdown between city and county, and there's been a figure thrown around?
Gary O'Connell
City Manager
03:31:45
There's some pieces of it that have been discussed, but none of it's concrete.
Julian Taliaferro
Vice Mayor, City Council
03:31:51
And could you elaborate on, I guess, I don't remember the percentage.
03:31:58
The effect of the maintenance, etc.
03:32:01
on it.
Gary O'Connell
City Manager
03:32:03
I understood you decided maintenance, for instance, could have an effect on the cost formula.
SPEAKER_39
03:32:17
From a conceptual standpoint, we had to look at each project individually, and for the portion of that project, be it 100 percent or less than 100 percent, that was maintenance, that would be split based on the split that we used for water, you know, actual water consumption, the current consumption, and that changes every year.
03:32:43
For those that were totally or at least partially for new supply at that point the city makes its decision how much of the new supply do we want to buy and that will be factored into it.
03:33:01
If we choose to buy no new supply then everything related to additional water supply would go to the Albemarle County Service Authority.
Julian Taliaferro
Vice Mayor, City Council
03:33:14
And the cost.
SPEAKER_39
03:33:15
And the cost.
Julian Taliaferro
Vice Mayor, City Council
03:33:17
And then, I mean, do we have a choice later on of upping that or reducing it or?
03:33:25
We probably have to buy into it.
SPEAKER_39
03:33:26
We have to buy into it.
03:33:27
That's why when I originally talked to you in closed session, I threw out a potential number.
03:33:34
And that's maybe what you were thinking of.
03:33:37
But again, until we know what we're building and the sequence in which we're building,
03:33:44
It's very difficult for us to bring that to you.
03:33:48
But I think once those decisions are made, that we can bring the percentages to you fairly quickly.
03:33:53
Because I don't see any major disagreements between the city and the county.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:34:00
And I forgot, I have one other question, Mr. Froder.
03:34:03
How confident are you in the current numbers, the current projections of costs to upgrade the treatment plants and other related infrastructure?
SPEAKER_48
03:34:15
Costs related to treatment plants vary from upgrades that were scheduled in about 10 years to even upgrades that were scheduled 40 years out.
03:34:26
It was a very good attempt to try to identify 50-year needs related to water supply and identify a variety of different projects that were needed.
03:34:41
So they're conceptual ballpark estimates.
03:34:45
They're not detailed design estimates.
03:34:47
And generally in this business for financial planning purposes you try to project certain things well ahead of time, but you recognize that you're not going to design them until you get close to the time when they're going to be improved.
03:35:02
To design a treatment plant today that's going to be built 20 years from now, the technology will be obsolete.
03:35:07
By the time you've got to build it, you'll be throwing away your money.
03:35:10
So I don't suggest we spend effort trying to get detailed estimates.
03:35:15
But they're at the conceptual level.
03:35:16
They know better than that.
03:35:18
And they're based on the market economy at the time those estimates were prepared, which, as you know, is going to be very different later.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:35:27
Any other questions for Mr. Frederick?
03:35:31
Thank you very much.
SPEAKER_48
03:35:35
Most Edwards has asked for a time out.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:35:40
10 minute intermission will reconvene at 10 till.
03:36:06
Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love
03:36:42
D.J.
SPEAKER_21
03:37:37
I want the face of old that's put anywhere I turn to think it's a new beginning He never finds a finish, I walk to the horizon And there I find another, it all seems so surprising And there I find that I know
03:37:58
You go there, you go forever, you go there and it's hard when it's safe to go to anywhere it is The moon up on the ocean is swept around in motion You will not ever know it The reason for it's blowing in motion on the ocean The moon still keeps on moving away Still keep on waving and I still keep on going
03:38:28
You go there, you go forever, I go there always for any stay you want to go, anywhere with you I wonder if the stars sign, I wonder if that is to be mine Can you really let the light shine?
03:38:55
Can you for me to follow?
03:38:56
I look up to them and it's the brightest night in the world, the spark of installation
03:39:00
Aah!
SPEAKER_21
03:39:30
The shells upon the warm sands are taken from their own lives The echo of their story, but all I hear are no sounds As fellow birds are leaving and fellow waves are leaving But should I feel believing that I am
03:39:56
Oh, there are so many stairs you can't really lose To leave the trail of old time and let it make it your life It was there and you still find your way back to the moment I took the turn and turned to begin a new beginning Still looking for the answer I can't
03:40:22
It's either this or that way It's one way or the other It should be one direction It could be our perfection The turn I had just taken The turn that I was making I might be just beginning I might be near the end
03:40:51
D.C.
SPEAKER_21
03:41:49
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19.
03:42:56
Yo, yo, yo, yo, yo, yo
03:43:43
Safra Bento, mayo, mayo, Don't need any of any to you Safra Bento, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh
03:44:13
O' Craig O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O' O'
03:44:47
Ben Bernadette, Leo G. O'Toole, Satyendra Huja, we never have in-depth Leo G. O'Toole,
03:45:41
All right, we're going to call the meeting back to order.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:45:58
The next item on our agenda is the report on Dredging Study Alternatives.
03:46:05
Ms. Mueller, Mr. Frederick.
SPEAKER_39
03:46:09
Thank you.
03:46:11
Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, UNV Albemarle County Service Authority directed Marvanna to engage an engineering firm to conduct a dredging feasibility study.
03:46:25
Marvanna did use a broad-based selection committee and the form of HDR was selected.
03:46:32
Marvanna did some preliminary, they asked them for
03:46:35
They scheduled and did some preliminary negotiations on that schedule.
03:46:41
HDR came back with some potential options, and while all of them are contained in this report, one of them, the performance-based dredging option, HDR did not recommend that we pursue, so I did not put that in the report.
03:46:58
selection choices also.
03:47:02
They also believe, and the Rivanna staff does concur, that a four-day analysis, while certainly good information that the community may want to have, is not necessary to determine dredging feasibility.
03:47:16
So you will notice in the options that we have dropped that.
03:47:23
Option one provides all of the services that were originally requested in the scope of services which you all approved prior to going out.
03:47:36
Option two provides those
03:47:38
completion of those services typical of most dredging feasibility studies and eliminates some of those tests not typically performed.
03:47:50
And then option three is kind of between one and two and it addresses all of the requested tasks in the original scope of services but reduces the level of analysis and the subsequent detail.
03:48:05
So really your decision tonight is to indicate to us, are there one of these three options that you believe will give you the information that you need?
03:48:21
And if so, I've broken out the, I've done two things, I've given you this sheet with the little X's on it that tells you what's in, which of the tasks are in
03:48:31
each of the options and also this time we do have the real costs for you and these are broken out based on those services which the Albemarle County Services Authority desired to pay for and we broke those out again based on our current water use which is 54% city and 46% Albemarle County Service Authority.
03:49:00
the only one and then there are some that are 100% city.
03:49:05
The summary report, each one of those was different because it was based on how many elements were actually in the report.
03:49:15
As you look through this, some of the things which some of the lower cost alternatives did do, there's some question about the number of public meetings
03:49:28
that are in there and also the number of sites that would actually be evaluated for disposal of the dredging material.
03:49:44
With that said,
03:49:46
I'm here to answer specific questions that you may have.
03:49:51
Mr. Frederick is here to answer the technical, what's in all of the elements.
Gary O'Connell
City Manager
03:49:58
Why don't you focus people on this and just quickly go through it because it's the simplest way to see it.
SPEAKER_39
03:50:06
The original scope has all of the phases.
Gary O'Connell
City Manager
03:50:09
This is that chart that's in there.
SPEAKER_39
03:50:11
This is the chart with the exits.
03:50:16
The original scope has everything that you asked for.
03:50:21
The next line, original scope, next forebay, the only thing it eliminates is task 10, which is the forebay evaluation.
03:50:33
the standard feasibility assessment.
03:50:36
And if you read through the HDR report, what they felt this was, there's been a lot of talk in the community about, you know, a dredging feasibility study would be this.
03:50:46
And they said, normally, if someone were to come to us and ask for a dredging feasibility study, these are the types of elements that would be included.
03:50:58
And here they have
03:51:00
eliminated task five, which I said again, a public meeting, and there's fewer alternatives in task seven.
03:51:13
Again, less detail than what was in the original scope, and again, the Fermi analysis,
03:51:28
No detailed, beneficial use study, less detailed, more conceptual land site analysis and more, we keep using this word tonight, ballpark cost estimates.
03:51:40
The modified scope puts the public reservoir characterization, public meeting back in and puts the, limits the alternative analysis to two sites instead of four.
03:51:59
and then the reservoir characterization we're not recommending.
03:52:04
I think the trade-off, and if you look at the memorandum that Mr. Frederick wrote to the Rivanna board, probably characterizes it the best, but
03:52:17
What we really need to know is what's your comfort level going to be?
03:52:22
If we do everything in the original scope, you will have lots of detail and lots of information.
03:52:31
In the other scopes, options two and three,
03:52:34
They rely more on the experience judgment of the consultants and less on the more expensive hard data analysis.
03:52:45
And experience judgment can be very effective if you're comfortable with that.
03:52:52
Or if you're going to want to come back and say, I don't want the judgment, I want hard data.
SPEAKER_10
03:53:00
The cost is $325.
03:53:02
Is it the city cost?
03:53:03
Yes, sir.
SPEAKER_39
03:53:04
You'll see it's the city share cost.
03:53:06
All of those numbers are city share.
SPEAKER_10
03:53:08
City share cost.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:53:10
Can you explain what the beneficial use study is?
SPEAKER_48
03:53:27
Beneficial use is where they're taking the conclusions on the settlement sampling and determining what markets are available in our community for maybe selling it as topsoil if it meets certain characteristics for other types of beneficial uses.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:53:49
I'm just not clear on why that costs $25,000 to determine.
SPEAKER_48
03:53:56
The consultant would use, his experience would use contacts with people in the community who are in the business of, for example, sand and gravel business or people who are in agricultural business.
03:54:10
It's mostly a desktop analysis but it involves a number of phone surveys and things of that nature with people in the community to make it local and real.
SPEAKER_10
03:54:33
I think we really need to think about the very options here to look at and also I think that the standard feasibility assessment will be sufficient for my desires at least to figure out what will be the basic information we need to begin with.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:55:05
I tend to agree.
03:55:06
I'm not convinced that we need to pay somebody $25,000 to tell us what our local market is.
03:55:21
I think once we have the information on what's in the sediment, we can get a request.
03:55:29
I actually agree with Mr. Fenwick here that we can make it work for us then at that point we don't need to pay to find out what the market is we can have the market come to us and so I would actually eliminate that piece of it and also I'm not convinced we need I mean this is a technical study here we're asking them to come and give us information I'm not I never envisioned this as a process that would involve
03:55:59
a lot of public meetings that we're paying a lot of money for.
03:56:02
We want technical information and we're going to have our own public meetings to review all this information.
03:56:11
I don't know that we need to pay them to have their own public meetings.
03:56:14
So I would remove, my preference would be to go with the standard feasibility assessment, remove the beneficial reuse alternatives evaluation and remove the judging analysis public meeting which would save us
03:56:27
If I'm reading this correctly, about $45,000, which gets us down to what we originally expected to pay for this study.
Gary O'Connell
City Manager
03:56:51
and without the program analysis.
SPEAKER_39
03:56:53
Okay, standard feasibility for task five is out.
03:57:01
So what you'd be removing is eight, which is about $25,000.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:57:05
No, I'm talking about removing task eight.
03:57:08
Out of standard feasibility, remove number task nine and task eight.
Gary O'Connell
City Manager
03:57:13
Oh, well, you're going to get nine out too.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:57:17
Right.
03:57:17
Which is $42,000.
03:57:18
$42,000.
03:57:20
No, it's a little more than that.
03:57:24
Almost $44,000.
SPEAKER_39
03:57:30
Tom, I think it's fair to say that should the council get this set of data, there's nothing to say they couldn't go back and ask the consultant to go another level on any one item, if that was their desire.
SPEAKER_48
03:57:44
Tom?
03:57:46
Timing.
03:57:47
Would you be an issue?
03:57:48
Certainly if you're not happy with the results, you can go back.
03:57:57
I think the thing is that it's been my experience in my career generally that when you have an issue that is heavily contested by public interest groups, interest groups on various camps, I'm not picking either one,
03:58:19
but they're going to like what they hear if it supports their conclusions and they're going to criticize judgments when it doesn't fit their conclusions.
03:58:27
When you step back and take a lower level study and rely more on judgment and less analysis, the risk you need to be aware of is that that can, particularly if you're going to eliminate public meetings because
03:58:43
Frankly, we can hold a public meeting without the consultant, but what's going to happen is people are going to ask a lot of technical questions that the consultant should have been there to answer and we're not going to know the answer unless they want to get back to you and then we'll have to negotiate additional scope and fee and services from the consultant to get the answers to the questions.
03:59:02
It's going to take a lot more staff's time.
03:59:04
It's going to take more time total.
03:59:08
I certainly don't think anybody in this room wants to eliminate public comment and just say we won't have any.
03:59:15
I feel like if you're going to invite public comment, you need to make the consultant a part of it or it's going to be very tedious and difficult to try to pull this off.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
03:59:25
I don't understand how it costs $19,000 to have a public meeting when we could do one for the cost of soda and chips.
SPEAKER_48
03:59:35
I mean, if all you're there to, if what you don't, you don't want a presentation from the consultant.
03:59:41
You don't want them to present their information, their findings upon which people can comment on.
03:59:46
You just want to come in and just say, okay, we're just here to listen to people.
03:59:49
We're not here to answer questions.
03:59:51
We're just here to listen.
03:59:52
Yeah, you can do it for the cost of soda and chips.
03:59:55
But if you want to share information with the public, share the findings of the consultant, it's often done in a PowerPoint presentation.
04:00:02
People like visuals.
04:00:04
that takes time and preparation.
04:00:06
It's not going to be done for the cost of soda and chips.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:00:09
Well, I just think we just need to make sure that whatever report they present, I mean we're paying for a summary, we're paying $7,000 for a summary report and we just hope that whatever report they present is in an easy to understand form that we can make widely available and we'll hopefully answer any, you know,
04:00:30
trying to get out ahead of whatever questions are likely to come up.
SPEAKER_48
04:00:35
The report that's proposed is a, certainly it doesn't need to be written in highly technical language, but it's a pretty comprehensive report of findings, so there's going to be a lot of technical data in it.
04:00:48
There will be an executive summary, but I've been in this community now long enough to know people are going to ask a lot of questions, people are going to be very irritated if they can't get answers.
04:01:01
All factors concerned when you're looking at everybody's time and effort and energy.
04:01:06
The most reliable way to get that information is to involve the consultants in your public meeting and involve them in preparing information ahead of time.
04:01:13
These figures that are in here are not untypical of what we see for other presentations and perhaps it's the
04:01:23
a bit, maybe a learning experience for the public to really understand when you have a technical subject and you have a public meeting what it costs to put it on.
David Brown
Member, City Council
04:01:34
Can I just offer a comment or question, I don't know which one it is, but I sort of
04:01:43
least enthusiastic counselor about us doing this study for the reason that if dredging doesn't give you enough water, it doesn't matter how much it costs.
04:01:58
And so a lot of the cost issues which are involved in a lot of this are cost-related issues.
04:02:04
So probably based on that, the question I'm most interested in knowing is how much
04:02:12
volume can be obtained by dredging that reservoir.
04:02:17
And it's probably, I would assume, it's unlikely that it can be completely restored in a pristine fashion towards the original contours and shape.
04:02:25
So it's probably some percentage, some high percentage, I would guess, of its original.
04:02:30
So a part of me thinks, before we answer anything else, can't we just answer how much is there
04:02:38
and how much can you get from it and how does that fit in contributing in a big way to the
04:02:44
to the water supply plan because if it turns out that a fair amount of it is difficult to dredge, and that seems like an important part before you go spending a lot of money on places to take, how to deal with the spoil and what the market is for it, you need to know the degree to which this could be a meaningful part of the water supply plan.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:03:09
It's interesting because I've made a similar kind of argument about another piece of this which is why are we looking at
04:03:17
you know, all these other pieces if we don't know that we have a disposal site that would work for the volume of fill.
04:03:24
So I think you can probably, you can go different directions and come to the same conclusion.
04:03:28
So I think most of this is looking at, I mean I think we can probably roughly ascertain how much fill we could get out but then we still don't know how much that's going to cost to get it out and more importantly how much it's going to cost to dispose it.
04:03:44
So I think
04:03:45
We've been asked to get some better information on all of it and I think I'm confident that this study will get us where we need to go.
04:03:52
I want to go back to this public meeting piece because one of the things that we talked about when we started this whole process was we had some citizen members that we appointed to the interview committee and we asked that they continue to be involved
04:04:06
in throughout this study and Mr. O'Connor assured us that you all could find a way.
04:04:11
To me that's one way to make sure that those questions are being asked along the way because they're very capable and smart people and they're plugged into the groups that you're talking about that are likely to ask a lot of questions at the end.
04:04:21
Well let's make sure we're asking them along the way so that it's a better study and we don't have to spend $19,000 for an expensive public meeting at the end.
04:04:33
Is that...
SPEAKER_10
04:04:36
I sort of agree on this very thing that I would like to say this morning that you need some sort of security to be able to answer questions and I have seen when I went to meeting with myself that as a consultant sometimes it's hard to get all the questions answered and you raise more questions to make more people unhappy than happy
04:05:06
So, even though I was so worried, I would still think it would be in the reverse.
04:05:12
But it was worth $15,000.
04:05:14
This is in frustration.
04:05:23
I don't know if it's going to work.
04:05:25
But I just said, if you're going to do it, you better know.
04:05:29
He went from horse to mouse.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:05:31
Well, let me ask for other counselors.
04:05:33
First of all, do you agree in general that this standard feasibility assessment is the path that you want to take?
04:05:41
And if so, are you comfortable with, or how do you feel about dropping either the Dredging Analysis Public Meaning and or the Beneficial Reuse Alternatives Evaluations?
04:05:57
Dr. Brown?
David Brown
Member, City Council
04:05:58
I'm okay with it.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:06:00
Ms. Edwards?
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
04:06:01
So you're okay with dropping 8 and 9?
David Brown
Member, City Council
04:06:06
I'm okay with dropping number 8.
04:06:10
So what about number 9?
04:06:12
I kind of agree.
04:06:13
I think we need to have some type of form in which a consultant is available to clarify what's written.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:06:22
Is that right?
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
04:06:28
and I agree that we need the public meeting.
04:06:32
But if we drop number eight, there's just going to be no way of finding out that information.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:06:37
No, I just think we don't need to pay somebody for that information.
04:06:40
I think we can...
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
04:06:42
So I just wonder who will do it.
David Brown
Member, City Council
04:06:47
I feel like I'm Mr. Freddie Salute.
04:06:50
I think Mr. Fenwick is going to do it.
SPEAKER_10
04:06:55
Even when his staff calls Mr. Cole.
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
04:07:03
It's funny, you're dropping the task when you say it's not going to get done.
David Brown
Member, City Council
04:07:08
I agree with the mayor on this.
04:07:09
I think that they find there's a fair amount of gravel that's capturable.
04:07:16
I think gravel companies will tell us whether they actually need more and whether this is the type they would use.
04:07:19
I think we can get that information locally and get a sense of that.
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
04:07:26
When I start asking questions about gravel, remember this movie?
04:07:34
But I'm okay with it.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:07:36
But you want to keep the public meeting.
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
04:07:37
I do want to keep the public meeting.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:07:39
You want to keep the public meeting, are you okay dropping Mr. Taliaferro?
04:07:44
I'm willing and in favor of keeping the public meeting.
04:07:46
You are or not?
04:07:47
I'm not.
04:07:47
I'm not either, but I think I voted.
Julian Taliaferro
Vice Mayor, City Council
04:07:51
You know, once again,
04:07:54
and I think Dr. Brown probably said it, you know, what additional work do we get with the study is what I'd like to know and then what is the ongoing cost of maintaining that over the next 50 years or so is what I'd like to know, but anyway.
SPEAKER_10
04:08:14
The modification could be that if you, in person or spatial level,
04:08:18
and many others.
04:08:21
Thank you very much.
SPEAKER_48
04:08:33
The original scope talked about two public meetings.
04:08:38
One is to characterize a reservoir, which is what the volume would be and what the sediment composition would be and present that information and also seek public comment on the upcoming study of alternatives of what to do with the material once you remove it from the reservoir and then perform that work and then hold a final public meeting to present all the information.
SPEAKER_10
04:09:00
I'm just going to read them first and go as you asked for.
04:09:06
That's what they meant.
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
04:09:09
That sounds reasonable.
04:09:11
We can have them serve the chips instead of them.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:09:15
Alright, so it sounds like there's support for the standard feasibility assessment minus task eight.
SPEAKER_10
04:09:23
and Production Resources and Transportation.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:09:26
That's already reflected in there, yeah.
04:09:28
The standard feasibility assessment only has one public meeting factor down.
04:09:32
So we'll keep one public meeting on dredging analysis, but at least that will bring the city's cost down to about $300,000, if I mean that correctly.
04:09:45
Which is a little more than you expected, but it's certainly a lot less than we told Mike Kostas.
04:09:52
Thank you very much.
04:09:54
Okay, next item, a report from the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission on their 2010, on our 2010 legislative program.
SPEAKER_08
04:10:26
serious rare, Henry Council
04:10:29
You have before you for your review and approval this evening the draft 2010 regional legislative program.
04:10:37
Probably it's very familiar to you in terms of content as well as its format.
04:10:41
It contains a list, a short list of high priority action items as well as a section of ongoing policy statements and ongoing concerns.
04:10:51
The action items are very broad and general statements.
04:10:53
They've been established priorities for the region for a number of years.
04:10:57
and this year I realized only slightly I think that it's going to be a largely defensive session for local governments.
04:11:06
It seems like we're always on the defensive but perhaps more so heading into the 2010 session.
04:11:11
Just very briefly, the priority items, action items that you have before you, local and state funding.
04:11:17
Obviously at the top of the list are some statements there requesting the state to honor its funding obligations to localities and I think particularly in light of the budget challenges that both the state and the localities face.
04:11:30
with the state resist cost shifting, that they provide flexibility for localities to meet requirements or ease back on requirements again in the tight budget times.
04:11:41
Public education funding, I think there's going to be a lot of attention focused on that this coming session.
04:11:45
This is the re-benchmarking year, the updating.
04:11:48
of public education costs, standards of quality costs for the state and localities and we certainly want to see them fully fund their share of those costs without making any policy changes to the funding formula.
04:12:00
Land use and growth management is the next priority.
04:12:03
This position has been very consistent over the years in requesting that the state not preempt or circumvent the existing authorities that we already have in this area while
04:12:13
also asking for some additional land use tools.
04:12:16
Transportation funding, we certainly are aware of the dire strait of our six-year program and the need to have some dedicated revenues for all transportation modes infused into that.
04:12:28
and then finally the Comprehensive Services Act, another long time position.
04:12:33
The statements there really trying to urge a better partnership and balance of responsibilities between the state and localities in the CSA area.
04:12:42
Again, after the action items, there's the areas of ongoing concern, language in there that is proposed to be added as underlined, language proposed to be pleaded as stricken.
04:12:52
and that's what I have for you this evening, Mr. Mayor.
04:12:55
I'm happy to take any suggestions or comments that you may have about the program and then ask for your approval.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:13:02
Thank you, Mr. Bell.
04:13:03
Any questions or comments?
SPEAKER_10
04:13:04
I have a question.
04:13:07
Yes, sir.
04:13:08
Should the transportation report be referred to the district area for funding for that again?
SPEAKER_08
04:13:13
Yes, I included
04:13:16
If you look down into the last paragraph of that position, I basically include the same language that was in the position last year, took out the part about the enabling legislation for the authority, but asked that we have enabling authority for those funding mechanisms.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:13:37
Other questions or comments from this report?
04:13:41
Thank you very much.
04:13:42
Good work.
04:13:43
And I guess we need to bring this to a vote.
04:13:45
Is that correct?
04:13:46
Yes.
04:13:47
Is there a motion to approve this TJPDC legislative program?
04:13:51
I also move.
04:13:53
Second.
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
04:13:53
Second.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:13:54
Any further discussion?
04:13:55
Please indicate your vote.
04:13:58
Thank you very much.
04:13:59
Thank you as usual.
04:14:03
While we're talking about the legislative program, we will now have, I believe, Mr. Harris come forward, Mr. Rich Harris from our city attorney's office to discuss the city's 2010 legislative program.
04:14:15
Mr. Harris.
SPEAKER_20
04:14:16
Good evening, Mr. Mayor, Councillors, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Brown.
04:14:20
I have a few more handouts to give out here.
04:14:22
There have been some additions to the items since it was prepared.
04:14:32
I'll try to be as brief as Mr. Blunt was.
04:14:36
Before you now we have the proposed 2010 legislative program for the city of Charlottesville.
04:14:42
What's before you is four requests, two policy positions, and I will be adding in two, perhaps three more requests that have come in since you got this package.
04:14:51
The first one
04:14:53
is followed upon a council resolution.
04:14:55
They recently adopted a resolution at the urging of Equality Virginia, which is an organization promoting the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people.
04:15:03
This resolution is identical to the one that was adopted by other localities throughout Virginia seeking legislation guaranteeing freedom from discrimination from our public employees.
04:15:13
The resolution that you passed back in September is what would be forwarded to Richmond should you approve that.
04:15:18
That's included in your packet.
04:15:19
The second item
04:15:22
This is one item in three different parts.
04:15:25
This relates to environmental concerns
04:15:30
Last year, as you know, the legislature passed a bill allowing localities to provide loans to encourage people to invest in, let's say, big ticket environmental items, solar panels, things of that nature.
04:15:41
There are many angles that can be taken as far as encouraging environmentally friendly bill measures.
04:15:46
To this end, Mayor Norris asked our environmental administrator, Crystal Rittervold, to come up with some suggestions for ideas that could be brought to the legislature for possible action.
04:15:55
It boils down to three that are before you now.
04:15:58
One is regarding the Uniform Statewide Building Code.
04:16:01
Right now, by state code, we have to follow that to the letter.
04:16:04
It cannot go any further than it.
04:16:06
Ms. Redivoltz suggested that we add the legislature to give localities additional power beyond the USBC as regarding energy efficiency standards.
04:16:17
Her thought behind this is that localities know the concerns better than the state does.
04:16:23
Being Charlottesville, we are very environmentally friendly and conscious.
04:16:26
We would like to have the authority to go further than we can right now.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:16:31
If I can preempt you, because apart from this Riedewald suggestion, I was also approached by a couple of folks I ran into in a coffee shop last week who informed me that
04:16:45
There's an effort to create a green building code for the Commonwealth of Virginia which addresses not just energy efficiency standards but also water conservation, indoor air quality, environmental impact, etc.
04:17:01
And this is actually an industry build.
04:17:04
The building industry is working on this build, which I'm very pleased to see.
04:17:08
In fact, some of our builders here, I'm guessing, would probably be among the first to take advantage of that code.
04:17:14
They do good work in that regard anyway.
04:17:19
And I didn't mean in forwarding you that, Bill, to duplicate what Ms. Ritterball is suggesting here.
04:17:25
Can you comment on, is there?
SPEAKER_20
04:17:27
Actually, I was going to get to that at the end as one of the additions, but I'll skip to it.
04:17:30
Each of you have a copy of that bill before you now.
04:17:32
What I was going to suggest is to take that language of the idea of it and put it in as a possible, in the alternative, two crystals first point here.
04:17:41
That's more of a broad-based idea to try to get more
04:17:43
local power as far as environmental concerns.
04:17:47
Before just talking about getting additional local power for the USBC as it concerns environmental concerns, this would go further.
04:17:54
I think it could go in any compass crystals if you want to do that.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:17:58
Yeah, I would just as soon swap them out.
04:17:59
I don't think we need both.
04:18:01
I mean, particularly if the industry is already working on one and... Just put the italic section in and look at the first one.
04:18:11
Right, right.
SPEAKER_20
04:18:12
Okay, I can make that change.
04:18:15
Okay, thank you.
04:18:15
The second point that was in there already, the first one's gone up or changed.
04:18:19
The second one is following on that first one.
04:18:23
Crystal's idea was to require energy audits of buildings when they are sold or even rented.
04:18:29
This would be to make buyers and sellers, if nothing else, at least to motivate them to make this a consideration when transferring land.
04:18:38
Right now there are a few cities, about three or four throughout the country, where an environmental audit is necessary to figure out what an energy star rating of a building is.
04:18:48
That's something she's thinking could be of some use, at least just to get it on the table for people to think about.
04:18:53
There might be some pushback from builders, sellers, buyers, and real estate agents, but the environmental idea is what is driving us here.
04:19:02
The third final one that Mr. Redbolt came up with is actually following upon one of the positions from David Blunt's program as well as Albemarle County which is seeking authority for the city and other localities to make donations to non-profit organizations that will facilitate energy efficiency or renewable energy practices.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:19:19
Do we not have that filled in now?
04:19:23
Maybe we're out of compliance, but we already...
SPEAKER_20
04:19:26
There's no explicit enabling legislation for that.
04:19:31
That's why we're looking to make that explicit.
04:19:35
I wanted to follow up on this.
04:19:37
I know Paul Westbrook spoke earlier today from Old Energy.
04:19:40
He had looked at this and it was based upon this idea that he thought about the suggestion he brought up.
04:19:46
I don't think any action was taken on it yet, but he had asked for request of authorization for monies to build renewable energy systems in municipal buildings.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:19:56
I think it was more a budget bill than an authorization kind of bill, just seeking money for a specific project, which I fully agree with.
SPEAKER_20
04:20:05
And that's what we can add in later on if you want to.
04:20:07
I know it just came up tonight.
04:20:10
Moving on from Ms. Rittervall's suggestions after Mayor's suggestions, Mayor Norris has also recognized an issue with the state elections law.
04:20:20
Currently, the timing structure for campaign seasons is not particularly well suited for local elections.
04:20:25
Candidates for council and other constitutional officers in May elections have a two-month campaign season, whereas those running in November have a five-month campaign season.
04:20:35
this is a request essentially to standardize the campaign time for local elections I've looked into this from what you've told me and the benefit here is it's less costly for involved and it keeps people more interested over a two month span as opposed to a five month span I totally agree with that idea
04:20:57
and some of the language that would be necessary has been appended to this which would go forward to Richmond if you want to go ahead with that.
04:21:03
Finally, the last request is one that we've had in the past few years has not been acted upon at Richmond.
04:21:10
It's a request to amend the state code in order to allow the restoration of voting rights to non-violent felons after the completion of their sentences.
04:21:17
It has not been acted on.
04:21:18
I add in again at the request of the mayor, you can act on it as you wish, of course.
04:21:24
Moving on to the policy positions, there are two of them.
04:21:27
The first is supporting what we just heard from David Blunt.
04:21:30
That's already done.
04:21:32
Second, in addition to that, there has been support for the legislative program for the Virginia Municipal League.
04:21:38
With your packet, I've given you the 2009 one because the 2010 draft program was not available.
04:21:43
I was able to get it today.
04:21:45
That's what passed out to you today.
04:21:51
I also handed you those two editions, which I think we've gone over already.
04:21:56
The second policy position is one that's been advanced by our Commission of Revenue, Lee Richards.
04:22:00
This is a response to the results of a study conducted pursuant to a legislative direction last year where the Department of Taxation looked into additional incentives or punishments that could be implemented with regards to businesses reporting retail, sales, and use taxes.
04:22:15
Mr. Richards' understanding of this, well he believes that the scheme in place is adequate, which has been laid out in your information there, and fair election would cause a pretty swift and disproportionate financial harm to some localities, even Charlottesville.
04:22:30
The issue is that some localities have already butted money that has come in, and it could be quickly just taken away.
04:22:36
So he thinks that the incentives and partnerships in place are enough, there should be no changes.
04:22:43
That's what we have in the package before you.
04:22:45
The additions, we've already spoken about the green building code, so you've got that and we can put that into it.
04:22:52
The other one comes from Jason Pearson, the chairman of our city's planning commission.
04:22:57
There are some material, he put together a proposal, a pretty similar comprehensive proposal, that's in front of you now.
04:23:05
The issue that he references is that when trees are designated to be saved on any site plans that come before the Planning Commission and eventually before Council, the Zone Administrator can issue a site plan violation if a tree is destroyed.
04:23:17
In extreme circumstance, he could issue a stop-work order.
04:23:21
What that would do to a developer is cost them money because it takes time on a project.
04:23:26
The other situation is if a tree is supposed to be preserved in order to stay within the tree canopy, then all they could do is ask for a site plan amendment.
04:23:36
There is no punitive measures available.
04:23:40
What Mr. Pearson suggested is seeking the authority to create a tree fund, the purpose of which would be to require payment into it in the event that a developer damages or destroys trees.
04:23:51
We've got the proposal before you.
04:23:53
What I want to say is that there's a suggestion for a valuation model.
04:23:56
It's a relatively interesting concept of how it would be valued about the value of the tree and the service that it provides.
04:24:05
I'd recommend that if you want to go ahead with this, just seek the authority to establish the funds and maybe the enforcement mechanisms and it will be the valuation up for debate at this point.
04:24:16
Those are all the items I've got for you right now.
04:24:19
You've got the new ones added on as well.
04:24:21
If you want to adopt what's before you and either two or three of the newer ones, you can make the resolution.
04:24:30
I can certainly draft language appropriate for it afterwards.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:24:33
Mr. Harris, on the TREE Fund, would that only apply to developments that we're seeking a special use permit, or is this just for any development?
SPEAKER_20
04:24:45
The way I read it looks to be is for any development.
David Brown
Member, City Council
04:24:48
We have a site plan.
04:24:50
That plan shows a tree being preserved.
SPEAKER_10
04:24:55
I have a question on the energy order.
04:24:59
This former order is a modern results.
04:25:05
What is the point of having an energy order?
SPEAKER_20
04:25:09
Adjusting the order, you mean?
04:25:11
I tend to agree, I like the idea behind it, but... Other localities that I looked at briefly, there could be set offs in payment, it eventually becomes, well I'm saying there might be some opposition to this type of action, but it really does, it becomes a foreign issue.
SPEAKER_10
04:25:34
If you waive the requirement every time of some property, do you ask for IDR or is this a major requirement?
SPEAKER_20
04:25:41
It could become onerous, I agree.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:25:46
Particularly if you're talking about requiring it every single time you re-rent a property.
SPEAKER_20
04:25:50
Well, in that situation, if you have a rental property, there would be an owner done on the property that may last for a number of months or years and it could just be handed over like a car factor buying a car.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:26:01
I think that's, in my opinion, that's something that should be left voluntary and certainly I think any savvy home builder
04:26:09
is going to be doing those kinds of audits to show how efficient their homes are.
04:26:14
I imagine many of them are already doing audits or at least doing evaluations to help market their buildings.
SPEAKER_10
04:26:24
The second point I'd like to make is that I suppose the idea is that I agree with you that let's leave the revolution out of it.
SPEAKER_20
04:26:34
I can take the language that Jason put together and put it in there without the valuation issue.
David Brown
Member, City Council
04:26:40
I actually think the opposite which is you know looking at the success we've had with affordable housing it's all been based on being able to work with the parties who might oppose the bill and come to agreement that everybody can get behind and I think in order to
04:27:04
for this one to be successful, we need to do the same kind of thing.
04:27:06
We need to sit down with the home builders and say, look, all we want is something so that if a tree is inadvertently hurt, there's some compensation.
04:27:16
We don't want it to be onerous.
04:27:17
We want it to be meaningful.
04:27:18
So we need to keep someone from intentionally taking down a tree and putting an onerous on someone.
04:27:24
And I think we could do that, but I think we need to have some specifics
04:27:30
I think the home builders are very unlikely to support a bill that's vague in terms of exactly what would the consequences be.
04:27:43
I'd like to see if we move forward with this.
04:27:45
I actually think it's a very good idea.
04:27:47
I'd like to see if we could move forward modeled on how we've successfully done some affordable housing initiatives where we actually have something where when we take the bill as committee we don't have someone strongly objecting to it because they've actually worked with us to come up with something that's just fair.
04:28:02
I don't know how that fits into the scheme of things, but that's the direction I would like to see us head if we want to do this.
04:28:09
I think it's a good idea.
SPEAKER_20
04:28:10
Mr. Pearson's put together a proposal.
04:28:12
Is that something you'd be thinking about putting together?
David Brown
Member, City Council
04:28:14
Yeah, but what I would be thinking about is having us, you know, the mayor, Mr. Pearson, or myself, or some combination, sit down with some people from the home building community and say, you know, we've got this idea.
04:28:24
We want to make sure it's something that you can, you feel is fair and that you could at least not oppose and even better support.
SPEAKER_20
04:28:34
Is this something you'd want to move forward with this year?
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:28:37
I think we could improve the concept of legislation to protect trees tonight and then work, as Dr. Brown suggested, to flesh out the language before we submit it to our delegation or to the General Assembly, the drafters.
David Brown
Member, City Council
04:28:57
Moving on to another topic here.
04:28:59
I kind of agree with the mayor on the non-profit language.
04:29:05
I'm not really sure what it does, if it actually, does it fix a problem?
04:29:11
and if it doesn't, I'm not sure if we need to include that.
SPEAKER_24
04:29:16
I think that may be coming out of discussions about the formation of LEAP and the grant from the Southeast Energy.
David Brown
Member, City Council
04:29:27
In that case, keep it in.
SPEAKER_24
04:29:30
Just to respond to an earlier point, I think we've certainly done audits, and I believe for low-income families.
04:29:42
There's legislation in Virginia which says we can spend money for purposes which are authorized under the Community Development Block Grant.
04:29:53
and those regulations, the CBBG regulations specifically mentioned funding energy audits for low and moderate income people.
04:30:02
So I think this would be a little bit brawler.
04:30:05
It wouldn't be limited in terms of the recipients.
David Brown
Member, City Council
04:30:11
I have to say, I kind of agree.
04:30:12
I think the audit thing for sales of houses is a bigger step than we need to take at this point.
04:30:21
I want to talk about the
04:30:24
Election Law.
04:30:26
The question I have is, you know, we're relatively new to having our municipal elections in the fall.
04:30:33
Other localities have done it for a while.
04:30:35
Are there other localities who either have or have sought to change this?
04:30:41
Not that I'm aware of.
04:30:43
because it strikes me as being one of these things where there might be some strength in numbers if we had other localities who were interested in doing this.
04:30:51
I kind of agree.
04:30:52
I think especially for local offices, it would be nice if someone could decide, you know, September 1st that, you know, they actually would like to run for city council.
04:31:00
You know, I mean, I think it's such an early deadline.
04:31:03
A lot of people aren't able to.
04:31:04
So, I agree with the concept.
04:31:06
It would be great to see if we could get some other people to agree with us.
SPEAKER_20
04:31:10
if nothing else, putting us onto the program, I actually get some people behind it.
David Brown
Member, City Council
04:31:23
I guess the final one is, I don't understand the policy position about the local retail sales and use tax.
04:31:33
Is there, it says in the staff report that there was a
04:31:39
The Virginia Department of Taxation was instructed to provide a report.
04:31:43
Did they provide that report?
04:31:44
Does that report make recommendations?
04:31:46
Has the report come forward?
SPEAKER_20
04:31:48
It doesn't actually make recommendations.
04:31:50
It talks about what possibilities there are in order to encourage proper retail sales tax reporting.
04:31:57
It doesn't say whether it should or should not be done.
04:31:59
The report was simply, these are options that can be invented.
04:32:02
Mr. Richards reviewed this and
04:32:04
His main concern is that all sales tabs are not reported properly.
04:32:09
For instance, Charlottesville addresses in the county.
04:32:13
For many, many years, taxes have been going probably to the rural localities.
04:32:19
What some of these situations would make a wholesale shift very quickly, which could affect the localities significantly.
04:32:25
There could be a lot of money that's missing that was already budgeted for because localities don't realize the money's about to no longer come in.
04:32:33
All right.
04:32:35
Okay.
David Brown
Member, City Council
04:33:03
I guess I would prefer to see us, if we see bills introduced during the session that do this, we can oppose them.
04:33:18
I'm not easy with the policy position because I don't exactly understand the scope of this issue not having seen the report.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:33:31
In terms of council members' responses to the proposal from Mr. Risbord of asking for funding for municipal renewable energy projects, is that something we want to include?
SPEAKER_10
04:33:46
Is it legislative or budget allocation?
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:33:49
It's a budget item, but we can include it in this package.
04:33:55
Anybody opposed to that?
David Brown
Member, City Council
04:33:57
Can you explain, just repeat what we would have in our, what would it say in our policy?
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:34:02
We would seek funding for municipal, from the state for municipal renewable energy projects.
04:34:10
I mean, Mr. Risberg was suggesting it would be allocated on a per capita basis, but I think we don't need to get into too detailed, but just
SPEAKER_20
04:34:18
When he spoke to me, he put it as a request to award local government funding to build a renewable energy source, renewable energy systems on our municipal buildings.
04:34:28
He was talking about per capita, so there could be monies going to every municipality for whatever municipal buildings they have.
04:34:37
It's somewhat broad based on the other.
04:34:40
It's probably a pretty bad year to be asking for it.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:34:43
It might be one of those items though that, you know, one of our legislators decides to champion in the budget process and we get some money for.
04:34:52
Who knows?
04:34:52
I mean, on a pilot basis, maybe Charlottesville gets to be the pilot.
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
04:34:57
because what Libby said that was appealing was to improve our energy culture.
04:35:03
We also talked about job training and workforce opportunities, so that part was really appealing as well.
SPEAKER_20
04:35:07
The thing is the reasoning was that rather than to provide job training, it's more give real jobs and we'll train them more.
04:35:13
Right.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:35:14
Right.
04:35:16
Right.
04:35:17
Okay, so if I can summarize then, item one is good to go.
04:35:23
Item 2, we're going to swap out the first bullet with this uniform Green Building Code proposal.
04:35:35
The second bullet, we're going to remove.
04:35:37
The third bullet, we'll keep in.
04:35:42
Item 3, we'll keep as is and we'll seek allies from other localities that might be interested in helping us to push that item on an elections law.
04:35:52
Item 4 we'll keep as is, policy positions we'll keep number 1 as is, we'll remove number 2, which is keep an eye, ask libraries to keep an eye on that one.
04:36:02
We'll include a request for funding for municipal renewable energy projects and we will add the tree flood.
04:36:15
Shrifam, but we'll work to flesh that out in partnership with the building community and others before we submit any actual text.
04:36:26
Does that sound like where everybody is?
SPEAKER_20
04:36:31
I'll speak with Jason Pearson as far as getting people together to talk about the Shrifam.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:36:38
It's been moved to say second?
SPEAKER_20
04:36:39
Second.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:36:40
Any further discussion?
04:36:41
If not, please indicate your vote.
04:36:44
Mr. Huja?
04:36:46
Thank you very much, Ms. Norris.
04:36:48
Thank you.
04:36:49
Appreciate all your work on this.
04:36:53
Okay, last item on our regular business agenda is the first of two meetings in ordinance reasoning, seven parcels located on the corner of Cherry Avenue and Ridge Street to plan unit development, otherwise known as William Taylor Plaza.
04:37:08
Ms. Waldman?
SPEAKER_36
04:37:12
Good evening members of City Council.
04:37:14
This is a rezoning request for seven parcels on the corner of Cherry Avenue and Rich Street to be rezoned from R2, R3 and Cherry Avenue corridor to a planned unit development.
04:37:26
The applicant is proposing to have a maximum of 50 residential units and a total building square footage of 100,000 square feet.
04:37:33
This item was heard on the August and September Planning Commission as a public hearing item.
04:37:41
There was a number of issues discussed, namely traffic concerns of this development on 5th Street.
04:37:49
The applicant in response to these concerns has
04:37:54
Redrafted their proffers and thereby the traffic engineer believes that the traffic impact has been mitigated.
04:38:01
The Planning Commission also has recommended that all of the proposed proffers be accepted and that those mitigate the impacts of this development.
04:38:12
As an aside, they wanted to communicate a number of concerns to City Council regarding this development.
04:38:18
One is that the majority of the funds from the two lots sold by the city in relation to this project be used for purposes of affordable housing.
04:38:26
I think there was an end or statement regarding
04:38:31
the money used for affordable housing or the park, and they wanted the majority to be used for affordable housing.
04:38:38
Two, ensuring that the entire development be reviewed by the Board of Architectural Review.
04:38:44
Three, that pedestrian safety, they were concerned about pedestrian safety at the intersection of Sherry Addison and Ridge Street.
04:38:50
And four, that the commercial uses not be placed on Ridge Street.
04:38:54
They did recommend approval with a number of changes to the proper statement.
04:38:59
Those three are listed in your memo.
04:39:02
All of those changes have been incorporated into the final development plan and the final proper statement.
04:39:08
The applicant is here if you have any questions for them, but if you have any questions for me.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:39:13
What song would council action take on these four considerations that you just spelled out?
04:39:20
Are you looking for us to amend the
04:39:24
PUD, or how would you like us to address those?
SPEAKER_36
04:39:27
I'm not sure how the planning commission, I believe they just wanted to raise those concerns and perhaps have you discuss those with the applicant and see if they would like to, one, was this for your consideration, I believe in the future, other things, perhaps raise those questions with the applicant.
04:39:45
I'm not really sure, they just wanted those communicated to you all.
SPEAKER_10
04:39:51
These can be, it's in the first form we have to decide ourselves.
04:39:55
I won't speak on the conditions of the structure of the work.
SPEAKER_36
04:39:59
That's why I was asking if that's something that we would want to... Well, it's a reason, so the applicant would have to offer those, they would have to offer them as proffers, you can't...
David Brown
Member, City Council
04:40:09
It's not a special form.
04:40:12
Number three is not very specific.
SPEAKER_36
04:40:17
Well, the...
04:40:20
The plan of the development proposal, it doesn't, although the structures on Ridge Street are residential in nature.
04:40:28
That's just as specific as they got, their discussion was about pedestrian safety on
04:40:39
at the intersection of Tray Avenue and Ridge Street.
04:40:42
They were discussing the median as a way of supporting pedestrian safety.
04:40:49
That was not included in the development plan, but one of the proffers by the developer was to be in negotiation with the city in regards to other street scape improvements, and the developer would work with the city to pay up to 50% of those improvements.
04:41:05
that could or could not include a median and so I think the Planning Commission would rather that be explicit, a median be explicitly included.
04:41:15
The issue with that is that the location of the median, there's utilities under there and so that sort of design would be, we need to be engineered a little bit more than the developer at this point was able to do.
04:41:30
So that was unresolved.
04:41:33
That's my interpretation of what they mean.
04:41:35
They wanted to see a median there.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:41:38
I'm just asking if the applicant has any comments to make about any of those four considerations.
SPEAKER_23
04:41:48
Sure.
04:41:48
Good evening.
04:41:49
I'm Charlie Armstrong with Southern Development.
04:41:54
As far as the four recommendations that the Planning Commission had, number one about
04:42:01
The majority of the funds being used for affordable housing as opposed to Taunsler Park, I believe that the proper statement we made gives city council that discretion and that is fine with us.
04:42:13
And showing that the project is reviewed by the BAR in its entirety, not just the area with the historic district, the background for that is that the parcels along Ridge Street are in the historic district and automatically reviewed by the BAR.
04:42:28
The ones on Cherry Avenue are not necessarily.
04:42:30
However, we have always been submitting the project to the BAR.
04:42:33
I believe we've been before them three times now with this project.
04:42:36
We've been submitting it as a whole, and they've been reviewing it as a whole, and we've been addressing their comments as a whole.
04:42:42
Pedestrian safety at the intersection of Cherry Avenue and Ridge Street.
04:42:45
One of the main things we have done to address this item is proffered $5,000 toward the new kind of countdown pedestrian timers that the city's installing everywhere.
04:42:57
and the traffic engineer has told us that that will be sufficient to more than install those timers apparently.
04:43:04
I think they're only $200 a piece to retrofit them is what she said.
04:43:07
I hope I'm remembering that right, but in any case, it was more than enough money.
04:43:13
And with regards to the median there, we would like to see that median.
04:43:17
I think it adds to the project.
04:43:18
We think it adds to the streetscape there.
04:43:22
We've been informed that there's a gas line directly underneath where it would go.
04:43:26
Until Fine Engineering, we can't promise that.
04:43:30
And then as far as the commercial uses on Ridge Street, it's not intended to be a commercial area, but I wouldn't want to preclude some sort of small commercial use there, like a law office, a one-man shop or something like that, I think is appropriate in a mixed-use development.
04:43:47
It's the scale of it that we're really trying to focus on and let the uses kind of mix as the vision is for the project.
04:43:56
If you all have any other questions for me, I'll be happy to answer them or come back later when you do.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:44:02
Thank you, Mr. Armstrong.
04:44:03
Any questions for Mr. Armstrong?
SPEAKER_23
04:44:06
Thanks.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:44:09
So as it's currently envisioned, all the property on Road Street is residential?
SPEAKER_23
04:44:13
As currently envisioned, yes.
04:44:16
It's designed in a residential manner.
04:44:18
It doesn't really lend itself to commercial uses because it's not very visible.
04:44:22
It's not very cohesive for large commercial spaces.
04:44:27
That's not to say that you couldn't have somebody in one of these with a small scale commercial use and that would be something that we feel would be compatible.
04:44:35
They obviously wouldn't be able to hang big neon signs out in front without going to the AR.
04:44:39
So really the scale and the appearance from the street is what we're most focused on.
SPEAKER_10
04:44:43
This is a good project and we have tried to reach the concerns of the community because it was really representative
04:44:55
It will be a good addition to our cities.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:45:02
Mr. Bahn, did you have any more thoughts on how we might reflect any of these
SPEAKER_24
04:45:08
And number one also is I think is our calls consistent with the contract for the sale of those two properties.
04:45:23
I agree that number three is consistent.
04:45:26
lacking in specifics to be really meaningful.
04:45:32
It's difficult at this stage to impose these as conditions to the rezoning.
04:45:38
Conditions on the rezoning have to come in the form of proffers from the property owner and generally once it gets to this stage
04:45:48
to City Council, those aren't subject to being changed.
04:45:52
So we could not accept any new proffers tonight?
04:45:56
No, not without going back to the process.
04:45:59
I think the City Code is pretty clear.
04:46:04
It talks about modifications of the proffers and it specifically says prior to the meeting at which the City Council will consider rezoning applications.
04:46:15
So that time is passed.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:46:24
Any other questions or comments or a motion to move this forward to a second reading?
Holly Edwards
Member, City Council
04:46:31
I'll just make a comment.
04:46:34
Again, for the record state, I did oppose the selling of the city land for this development and I continue to oppose it.
SPEAKER_10
04:46:45
Anybody else?
04:46:46
I'd like to make a motion to move the second reading.
David Brown
Member, City Council
04:46:51
Would you second?
04:46:52
I'll second it with a comment.
04:46:52
I think they put a lot of good work into this and it's come a long way and I think it's a good thing.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:46:58
I agree.
04:46:59
Thank you very much.
04:46:59
So we'll now carry forward to our next meeting for a second meeting.
04:47:09
Thank you very much.
04:47:10
Okay, now moving on to other business.
04:47:14
One item which I mentioned at the outset, if I can find it.
04:47:18
I don't know if you all got copies of this letter.
04:47:22
Charles is a member of a group called Climate Communities which works on and brings local governments together to focus on issues of climate change and clean energy
04:47:51
and Climate Communities is asking their member localities in Virginia to sign on to a letter to Senators Webb and Warner.
04:48:01
I'm not going to read the entire letter.
04:48:03
It starts off by saying, Dear Senators Webb and Warner, as leaders of local governments throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia, we urge you to support a strong national clean energy and climate change policy.
04:48:16
More particularly, we ask you to ensure that local governments have the resources needed to address these critical issues.
04:48:21
And it goes on to talk about in this legislation that the Senate is in the process of
04:48:28
Discussing now that there be direct support for local clean energy solutions by allocating carbon trading ounces to the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants program, enhance local transportation efficiencies, and increase investment in transit and passenger rail systems, bikes, pedestrians, et cetera.
04:48:50
Facilitate between closed manufacturing plants for promotion of green jobs,
04:48:57
support local government adaptation planning to help local governments deal with the impacts of climate change and support local government green infrastructure efficiency and clean energy projects.
04:49:12
So I thought I'd bring it up.
04:49:15
I'd like to see you send this letter on behalf of the rest of the council.
04:49:18
Is there a second?
SPEAKER_21
04:49:19
Second.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:49:20
Any further discussion?
04:49:21
If not, indicate your vote.
04:49:24
Thank you very much, and I've asked Ms. Kochis to prepare a letter on her behalf and notify our friends at Climate Communities accordingly.
04:49:31
Any other business?
Gary O'Connell
City Manager
04:49:36
Yes, just a quickly confirmed schedule.
04:49:39
We're working on a work session for December 3rd.
04:49:42
Just a note on your calendar.
04:49:45
As the mayor said earlier, there's not a council meeting on October 19th, so the next meeting would be November 2nd.
04:49:51
and we wanted to confirm that we would have a second meeting in December, December 21st, recognizing one of you will not be here.
04:49:59
We need two readings on the year end of preparation and that would be the second reading, if that's okay with everybody else.
SPEAKER_10
04:50:10
Anybody else not going to be here on the 21st?
04:50:14
I'm counting you as the one that would not be here.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:50:19
Okay, we'll plan to have a meeting on the 21st of December.
04:50:23
Any other business?
04:50:25
If not, we'll reopen to matters by the public.
04:50:29
And when you come forward, please state your name and keep your comments to three minutes, Ms. Smith.
04:50:36
You get a gold star for perseverance tonight.
SPEAKER_35
04:50:39
Good evening, D.D.
04:50:42
Smith.
04:50:43
Thank you very much for your questions, particularly during the water issues session with Mr. Fredrick.
04:50:52
I found the discussions of I-64 particularly disturbing.
04:51:00
I don't know about you.
04:51:01
Something was said that kind of upset me and one was that discussions with VDOT might lead to higher costs than necessary.
04:51:09
Necessary for what?
04:51:11
For I-64 falling into our only reservoir?
04:51:15
You might recall that Gannett Fleming was released after, while they said they were willing to change their design, they weren't willing to assume the risks that a change in design would entail.
04:51:24
And so I had a bit of a here we go again moment at that point.
04:51:29
But of course I found the discussion of demand the most interesting and the most encouraging actually.
04:51:35
We are seven years out of the drought.
04:51:38
It is no longer an anomaly.
04:51:39
I would call that a trend.
04:51:42
It is, in fact, while use did rise a bit after the drought, we are now back down to as low as we were, almost as low, within .2% in the lowest point in the drought today.
04:51:55
That is despite the fact that we are 9%, our population in the urban area has increased 9%, hookups have increased 20%.
04:52:04
and still we are as low as we were during the drought.
04:52:07
So I hope that you will take that into consideration.
04:52:11
Thank you for calling for a new demand analysis.
04:52:13
Let's do remember that there is nothing more fundamental to our future water supply plan than the demand projections.
04:52:22
Nothing more fundamental.
04:52:24
And if we get that as long as it looks like we've got it, we are going to spend way, way too much money.
04:52:31
Thank you.
04:52:31
I appreciate your time.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:52:32
Thank you Ms. Smith.
04:52:33
Ms. Mooney?
SPEAKER_38
04:52:36
My name is Betty Mooney and I'm from Charlottesville and I do appreciate, I do apologize for getting so upset tonight in the audience but I was so shocked by what I heard.
04:52:45
I mean, I hope I don't cry because I'm very upset and I'm going to try not to.
04:52:53
But I spent a lot of my life on this.
04:52:56
I mean, a lot of people think I'm crazy because I spend so much time on this.
04:53:02
even on vacations.
04:53:04
I'm so shocked.
04:53:09
I need to transcribe those remarks to you Mr. Fredrick made tonight about replacing our dam and adding 13 feet being more expensive than a new dam.
04:53:21
And it's Schnabel who told him this.
04:53:24
This is so shocking to me.
04:53:26
I am preparing for a radio show with Brian Willichmo on WINA to talk about the water issue and I read a memo today that Mr. Frederick gave his council in 2005, fully standing behind Gana Fleming's report
04:53:44
on replacing and repairing that dam with updated cost estimates.
04:53:49
At that time, he said the new dam would cost $14 million.
04:53:53
And he said replacing and adding that would be $5 million.
04:53:56
I will give you this memo.
04:53:57
He stood behind all of the work they had done.
04:54:00
And tonight, he stands behind again.
04:54:02
All of a sudden, everything has changed.
04:54:04
And Schnabel, who has not even worked, studied the Ghana plumbing work, is now offering you an opinion that it's going to cost more.
04:54:14
I need to know that you will protect the citizens of Charlottesville from this man.
04:54:20
I feel very strong about that.
04:54:22
I have seen, and I know David Brown disagrees with me, I have seen him mislead you time and time again in memos and documents and meetings.
04:54:31
He will do anything I believe and say anything to build that new dam.
04:54:36
We're looking down the gun at possibly 200 to 300 million dollars.
04:54:40
You have got
04:54:42
You've got to look carefully at what he's saying and you've got to check it and think about it because it is not fair to the city of Charlottesville for him to do it again.
04:54:52
We've gone through it again with Fleming.
04:54:55
We've seen what they did with the dredging estimates.
04:54:57
We've seen where we are now.
04:54:59
Now to build that new dam, he's going to try to keep you from looking at replacing the dam we have and he will try to keep you from looking at dredging.
04:55:07
I believe this.
04:55:09
And I believe if after looking at what I give you and the transcription of what he said tonight, if you in your own mind think he's lying, I want him fired.
04:55:18
I have gotten to that point.
04:55:20
If you in your own mind look at both of these documents and there is huge discrepancies and I want you to see in writing what Schnabel said, I want to see that in writing.
04:55:32
And if he is lying to you on this, I want to see him fired.
04:55:35
I want a consequence.
04:55:37
We've had too much.
04:55:38
Thank you.
Dave Norris
Mayor, City Council
04:55:39
Thank you this morning.
04:55:40
Anybody else like to speak?
SPEAKER_25
04:55:48
Richard Bailey at 1825, local shade court, now try to be brief because I know you need to go home tonight.
04:55:54
First on demand analysis, the original was done by BHB and then it was updated by Flemming and they used the AWWA M50 manual to do it.
04:56:04
At the time they took data and put a curve through it and did a little curve reading program and came up with what they thought the demand would be.
04:56:11
The new M50 manual, which was revised this year, encourages you to look at where the water is used.
04:56:18
How much is residential, how much is commercial, how much of it is whatever.
04:56:22
and get a sense of what's really going on with the water supply, what the demand really is.
04:56:29
They revised the whole chapter and the new chapter is far more reliable than the old chapter.
04:56:35
The risk they point out is if you build a great big water system and it's overdone, then the utilization is very low and the utilization has to carry the expense of the big water system, which means that not only do you have to pay for the big water system, but you've got to pay for it with less water.
04:56:51
Second thing is on dredging.
04:56:53
It's not to be dredged all at one time.
04:56:55
You can dredge to keep ahead of demand.
04:56:57
Once you know what the demand is, you can say, here are the infills and here's what we need to do.
04:57:01
It might take 30 years to dredge it.
04:57:03
But the 30 years that you're dredging is going to cost a lot less than doing it all next year.
04:57:09
If you build a new river approved water plane and you put say pick a number 200 million dollars into it, it's going to cost you 8 to 10 million dollars of interest every year until you pay it off.
04:57:18
So there's 8 to 10 million dollars that you could spend on dredging and breakeven and not have to build the dam.
04:57:24
Third thing is the pipe comparison.
04:57:28
Mr. Frederick said you can get an idea about looking at the length.
04:57:32
Well, the things we know about these pipes, one's 18 inches, one's 36 inches, one has a settling pond, one doesn't have a settling pond, one's uphill, one's downhill,
04:57:41
One is very 15-20 feet deep and the other is existing.
04:57:45
One has a right of way, one doesn't have a right of way.
04:57:47
You don't need $100,000 which equates to essentially a man year of analysis to come up with a basic idea of what the difference in cost are.
04:57:56
We know things about these that are different.
04:57:59
They cannot be compared on length.
04:58:01
It just is apples and oranges.
04:58:04
I don't understand how he can say to city council, look at the length.
04:58:09
That's over the top.
04:58:12
The maintenance cost, you talked about the maintenance cost.
04:58:16
What does the city pay for the new dam?
04:58:18
Well, maintenance is the cost of operating Rivanna.
04:58:21
So if you've got a maintenance cost, it goes in terms of the operating cost, they come up with a rate and the rate's uniform across the urban served area.
04:58:31
I just don't understand how you can then say, well, city's going to write a check to Rivanna for maintenance, especially maintenance on a dam that's going to be removed.
04:58:40
That doesn't flush.
04:58:41
and the maintenance cost should be the maintenance cost, part of their operating cost and the city is leasing three dams to Rivanna and I heard this cost allocation thing is that now one of them is going to have more water behind it but they want a substantial millions of dollars to buy into the program they're not, they're going to build it for their additional use but they want a buy-in from the city while the city is leasing three dams for a dollar
04:59:11
I don't understand the philosophy change.
04:59:17
My grains of sand have expired.
04:59:19
I have a rule that we'll have to wait for another city council.
Julian Taliaferro
Vice Mayor, City Council
04:59:24
Anybody else like to speak?
04:59:43
Oh, oh