Meeting Transcripts
  • City of Charlottesville
  • City Council Retreat Day 1, 9am-5pm 8/15/2025
  • Auto-scroll

City Council Retreat Day 1, 9am-5pm   8/15/2025

Attachments
  • AGENDA_City Council Retreat Workshop (PDF)
  • MINS_20250815-16Aug15-16Retreat-APPROVED
  • The National Community Survey Presentation Charlottesville 2025
    • Sam Sanders
    • 00:00:01
      Alright, if I can get everybody to take a seat please, we're going to go ahead and get started.
    • 00:00:11
      All right, so good morning.
    • 00:00:13
      Good morning.
    • 00:00:14
      Good morning.
    • 00:00:15
      Good morning.
    • Sam Sanders
    • 00:00:15
      Good morning.
    • 00:00:16
      Good morning.
    • 00:00:16
      All right, come on.
    • 00:00:18
      The public's watching.
    • Sam Sanders
    • 00:00:19
      I just want to welcome you all to the Wolvac area.
    • 00:00:21
      I've been here before and done things.
    • 00:00:23
      But welcome to your council retreat.
    • 00:00:26
      Mayor, I'll turn it over to you to convene with yourselves, and we'll get started.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 00:00:30
      Yes, I'll call the shout-outs for the city council.
    • 00:00:34
      Special meeting for retreat to order.
    • 00:00:37
      We have a roll.
    • 00:00:38
      Everyone is here and counted for, Madam Clerk.
    • 00:00:41
      So we're good to go.
    • 00:00:43
      Thank you, sir.
    • Sam Sanders
    • 00:00:45
      So today is August 15th.
    • 00:00:48
      I've been thinking about this day for a long time so I'm so glad that it's here and I can't wait for August 17th when I move it all.
    • 00:00:56
      But just again wanted to thank you for patience and your cooperation and coordination for getting to this day.
    • 00:01:02
      I think this is an important moment for council and being able to talk about priorities and strategizing together.
    • 00:01:10
      It's important for us to do that as we move into a transition as we start the new year and I think it's just a good opportunity for us to just check in and see that we're on the same page and where we may not be, we can try to get back to the same page.
    • 00:01:24
      Our peanut gallery in the back made up of staff members from various positions that are here.
    • 00:01:30
      One won't even see what y'all talk about, help if they can.
    • 00:01:33
      but also just interested in seeing how we're doing some of the conversations that we're doing right now and moving the city organization forward.
    • 00:01:42
      I engaged an individual who we'll be working with to help me work in the city manager's office and he came in about four months ago, I think it was, and he's been helping us to focus on us, the team that is the city manager's office team, top of the organization, working with council,
    • 00:02:01
      It has been quite a ride.
    • 00:02:03
      It has been extremely informative.
    • 00:02:04
      It has been challenging.
    • 00:02:18
      And it has been all the things that I probably could not have thought of at one time is what I found in the experience that we've been able to have.
    • 00:02:26
      And what I also did was ask him, can you come and bring that to council and let them feel what that is and work with us to help us set ourselves on a path that we can deliver more of what it is that we're trying to deliver in service to our larger community.
    • 00:02:41
      So he agreed to do that.
    • 00:02:43
      And the goal will be that we continue to find ways to integrate them into conversations that we have with staff so that then it gets down through the workforce and we are implementing with this larger vision of human centered first because that's what he's going to talk about a lot.
    • 00:02:57
      Human centered is about the people.
    • 00:02:59
      Process is important.
    • 00:03:00
      It comes, and y'all know that's not me.
    • 00:03:01
      I'm on process all the time.
    • 00:03:04
      People first, and then you get into the process world.
    • 00:03:07
      So I'm going to invite Josh to join us.
    • 00:03:09
      Josh is the head of the Spill Team.
    • 00:03:12
      He is a ball of energy, as you can see, and he is here to help us.
    • 00:03:19
      And he's helping us by challenging us to think and to consider and not today to decide or tomorrow to decide.
    • 00:03:29
      but to help inform the decision and how you even make the decision.
    • 00:03:33
      So I think it's going to be important for us to appreciate what comes to light through this conversation.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:03:40
      How y'all doing?
    • 00:03:41
      Great.
    • 00:03:41
      Good?
    • 00:03:41
      All right.
    • 00:03:42
      I'm excited to hear you.
    • 00:03:43
      Thank you for that, Sam.
    • 00:03:44
      I was like, was it heartwarming?
    • 00:03:46
      Was it big?
    • 00:03:46
      I don't really know which one it was.
    • 00:03:48
      It was probably a good mixture of both.
    • 00:03:49
      But I'm Josh Bell.
    • 00:03:50
      I'm part of the Spill Team.
    • 00:03:52
      I kind of want to talk about a little bit of who we are, and that is going to play a big part in how we function, actually.
    • 00:03:57
      So who we are and what we do should go hand in hand at all times.
    • 00:04:02
      So as a group of designers, we're a group of speakers, strategists, facilitators, and workshop designers.
    • 00:04:07
      It is a lot going into designing your experience for the next day and a half.
    • 00:04:11
      Raise your hand if you're a part of that.
    • 00:04:14
      It is a lot of work to design the space, the conversation, the content, everything matters.
    • 00:04:20
      But design sometimes can be an over-sexy youth word.
    • 00:04:23
      I kind of hate that it's sometimes untouchable.
    • 00:04:26
      It literally speaks to create something.
    • 00:04:28
      That's it.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:04:29
      Like to create the strategies, to create the conversation, to create the tools that we'll use today.
    • 00:04:35
      So that's kind of what we do.
    • 00:04:37
      What's Human Centered Design?
    • 00:04:38
      It is people first and process second.
    • 00:04:40
      The best way I can explain it is a little bit of shifting the way that we think and you can either create a process and stuff people into it.
    • 00:04:48
      or you can learn enough about people who create a process around them.
    • 00:04:51
      One is faster, one is easier, but those people most likely at the end of the day say, I don't feel like this was created.
    • 00:04:58
      It wasn't tailored in any particular way.
    • 00:05:00
      That is a good creative process, but most likely just stuff people into it.
    • 00:05:04
      And we got compliance versus commitment.
    • 00:05:07
      I think we're wanting commitment.
    • 00:05:08
      I think we can all agree to that.
    • 00:05:10
      So here's a process to actually create commitment.
    • 00:05:12
      Just like mom's favorite recipe, she has the actual process for doing that favorite recipe.
    • 00:05:17
      If we shortcut it, it does not taste like mom's, no matter how far we move on.
    • 00:05:20
      This is a process for you.
    • 00:05:22
      So you're probably like, what does that even mean?
    • 00:05:24
      Let me ask you, if I usually introduce you this way, if I were to say that I do something for you, what comes to mind?
    • 00:05:31
      If I do it for you, like, if I do it for you, what comes to mind?
    • 00:05:35
      Look what I do for you.
    • 00:05:37
      It's a favor.
    • 00:05:38
      Favor, okay.
    • 00:05:39
      Thank you.
    • 00:05:39
      Thank you, okay.
    • 00:05:40
      What comes to mind?
    • 00:05:41
      A gift.
    • 00:05:41
      A gift, they look like a gift for you, absolutely.
    • 00:05:44
      What else, what comes to mind?
    • 00:05:46
      I need something for you.
    • 00:05:46
      It could be obligation.
    • 00:05:48
      Okay, okay, absolutely.
    • 00:05:51
      Obligation, thank you, a gift.
    • 00:05:53
      Those are great words, kind of like, you were in my mind, you were in my heart, you were maybe referenced, all very good intentions.
    • 00:06:00
      Like, look what I did for you.
    • 00:06:02
      Like, look what I did for you.
    • 00:06:02
      Look what I did for you.
    • 00:06:04
      I thought about you.
    • 00:06:05
      Look what I did for you.
    • 00:06:07
      Man, that's super gone.
    • 00:06:08
      Thank you.
    • 00:06:09
      I think you said thank you, right?
    • 00:06:10
      All right, let me ask you another question.
    • 00:06:12
      If I go with you, what words come to mind?
    • SPEAKER_17
    • 00:06:15
      Partner.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:06:16
      Partner?
    • 00:06:17
      Together.
    • 00:06:18
      Together?
    • 00:06:19
      Cooperation.
    • 00:06:20
      Cooperation?
    • 00:06:21
      Friendship.
    • 00:06:22
      Friendship?
    • 00:06:23
      What else?
    • 00:06:23
      What else comes to mind?
    • 00:06:25
      Anyone else?
    • 00:06:27
      What do you think?
    • 00:06:27
      I'm always running the panel.
    • 00:06:28
      What do you think?
    • 00:06:29
      If I come, if I do it with you, if we do it with each other, what words come to mind?
    • 00:06:33
      Well, I mean, I think
    • 00:06:35
      What others said, together, joint effort?
    • 00:06:37
      Yeah, joint effort.
    • 00:06:38
      Yeah, absolutely.
    • 00:06:40
      You're alongside in collaboration, shared, contributing to your partner.
    • 00:06:44
      Those are completely different words, right?
    • 00:06:46
      I mean, they're your words.
    • 00:06:47
      Your words are absolutely completely different.
    • 00:06:50
      You didn't use these words to describe before.
    • 00:06:53
      You were there.
    • 00:06:53
      You were involved.
    • 00:06:54
      You were part of the actual process.
    • 00:06:57
      Are we at least clear on the difference between doing something for someone and doing something with someone?
    • 00:07:01
      Yeah.
    • 00:07:02
      Right?
    • 00:07:02
      Per your words, right?
    • 00:07:05
      It basically means bring the people in the room.
    • 00:07:06
      That's kind of why you're here.
    • 00:07:08
      And also believing that one size does not fit all.
    • 00:07:11
      It has to be done with individual.
    • 00:07:13
      If I change the people you do it with, we have to learn about them.
    • 00:07:16
      One size does not fit all, right?
    • 00:07:19
      So if the value and influence of the right people in the right room ensure me in the right way, and the right people is something I want to really double stamp on, it is you just can't bring people in the room to bring people in the room.
    • 00:07:28
      That doesn't really work.
    • 00:07:30
      What are you trying to achieve?
    • 00:07:31
      Why am I trying to achieve it?
    • 00:07:32
      Where are we trying to go?
    • 00:07:34
      Then you select your people that do that.
    • 00:07:36
      What the right people mean with the right knowledge, skills, and abilities.
    • 00:07:40
      If you've seen anything so far, it's kind of why you're in the room.
    • 00:07:43
      Like, you're the right people for today.
    • 00:07:46
      Human-centered design also makes sure that what we create doesn't collect dust.
    • 00:07:50
      Why?
    • 00:07:50
      Because you contributed.
    • 00:07:51
      You were a part of it.
    • 00:07:52
      We did it alongside.
    • 00:07:53
      So accountability looks a little different because if something doesn't happen, I was like, hey, we built that.
    • 00:07:58
      I think already you heard me tell you there were your words that you used with versus for.
    • 00:08:03
      That's already accountability.
    • 00:08:05
      You describe it this way.
    • 00:08:07
      Here are your words.
    • 00:08:09
      So accountability looks different when we look at things sitting on the shelf or not.
    • 00:08:13
      So wick comes with a deep level of pressure as well because you're like, I do have to contribute.
    • 00:08:17
      I do need to be a part of it.
    • 00:08:19
      I actually am part of the building of the actual thing.
    • 00:08:23
      So with, that's what it means.
    • 00:08:25
      But you have to be good at navigating, facilitating, cultivating people's experiences.
    • 00:08:28
      It's all you learn, think, and do.
    • 00:08:30
      That's actually how you're skilled at with.
    • 00:08:33
      But human-centered design is a way of thinking, value, working, that challenge is doing for someone versus with them.
    • 00:08:39
      You get any completely different words than what that meant, right?
    • 00:08:42
      But I want to break it down for you for a moment.
    • 00:08:44
      If I moved
    • 00:08:46
      your ability to have a deep understanding.
    • 00:08:47
      This is a little bit of the process of human centered design.
    • 00:08:49
      Let's just say I put a challenge in front of you and I put something for you to solve and I removed your ability to have a deep understanding.
    • 00:08:55
      And so I was like, explore some ideas and materialize and bring them to life.
    • 00:08:59
      But I removed your ability to have a deep understanding.
    • 00:09:01
      What would be the outcome?
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 00:09:04
      Floundering.
    • 00:09:04
      Yeah, it wouldn't be sustainable.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:09:06
      It wouldn't be sustainable, floundering.
    • 00:09:08
      I removed your ability to have a deep understanding.
    • 00:09:10
      Not enough, but a deep understanding.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:09:12
      Cold.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:09:13
      Cold?
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:09:13
      Yeah.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:09:14
      We're exploring ideas, we're bringing to life.
    • 00:09:15
      Exploring ideas, bringing to life.
    • 00:09:17
      Let's play with something else.
    • 00:09:18
      What if I removed your ability to explore multiple ideas?
    • 00:09:21
      So you got your deep understanding and you just land on an idea and you bring that to life.
    • 00:09:25
      And I removed your ability to explore multiple perspectives, multiple ideas, creative solutions.
    • 00:09:30
      So, got a deep understanding, let me land on my idea and bring it to life.
    • 00:09:34
      What would the outcome be?
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 00:09:35
      I'm right.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:09:36
      I'm right bias, right?
    • 00:09:37
      Naturally.
    • 00:09:37
      I would agree.
    • 00:09:38
      Yeah.
    • 00:09:39
      Yeah.
    • 00:09:39
      First thing we thought of.
    • 00:09:40
      First idea.
    • 00:09:40
      Yep.
    • 00:09:41
      What else?
    • 00:09:41
      What would you say?
    • SPEAKER_13
    • 00:09:42
      Leaving people out.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:09:43
      Leaving people out.
    • 00:09:44
      Right.
    • 00:09:44
      Yeah.
    • 00:09:45
      Who's not here?
    • 00:09:46
      Right.
    • 00:09:46
      Asking the question.
    • 00:09:47
      Yeah.
    • 00:09:47
      What else?
    • 00:09:48
      How about your ability to kind of explore multiple ideas?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:09:51
      What would you say?
    • 00:09:53
      You might get something that didn't work.
    • 00:09:56
      Yeah.
    • 00:09:57
      If you've not gone through the process of thinking about it and you're just focusing just on
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:10:02
      Let's play with another idea.
    • 00:10:06
      You have deep understanding and you've been able to explore multiple creative solutions, multiple creative ideas, but we're not really materializing anything.
    • 00:10:13
      We're not really bringing anything to life.
    • 00:10:16
      What's the outcome?
    • 00:10:17
      Great understanding and deep multiple perspectives and multiple creative ideas, but we've not implemented or materialized.
    • 00:10:22
      So we're round and around and around.
    • 00:10:24
      We're in a loop, okay?
    • SPEAKER_17
    • 00:10:25
      Lack of action.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:10:26
      Lack of action, yeah, yeah, yeah.
    • SPEAKER_17
    • 00:10:28
      Budget constraints.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:10:29
      Budget constraints, you're about to name everything, right?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:10:32
      The Belmont Bridge.
    • 00:10:33
      Okay, all right.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:10:35
      So we have examples apparently, okay, okay.
    • 00:10:38
      But at the end of the day, they play a big part.
    • 00:10:40
      What I have a deep understanding about allows me to explore multiple ideas.
    • 00:10:43
      Those ideas allow me to materialize something, and what I materialize is checked to and against what I understand.
    • 00:10:49
      That's a cycle.
    • 00:10:51
      Cool?
    • 00:10:51
      It kind of looks like this is a deeper level of it, but I'm going to ask you all to just hang out with me in the space of
    • 00:10:59
      Confusion.
    • 00:10:59
      No, I'm kidding.
    • 00:11:01
      But I actually want you to hang out with me in the space up here.
    • 00:11:03
      Just understand, explore, materialize.
    • 00:11:05
      For the next day and a half, that's where we're going to live.
    • 00:11:07
      We're going to live in exploring, understanding, materializing.
    • 00:11:10
      OK?
    • 00:11:11
      And I'm going to un-plutter it.
    • 00:11:13
      It's not about what we build, create, or solve.
    • 00:11:14
      Human-centered design will stress on how, which increases sustainability.
    • 00:11:18
      And you just explained to me why it's important to have a deep understanding.
    • 00:11:21
      Then explore multiple ideas.
    • 00:11:23
      You just explained how we should go about solving a problem.
    • 00:11:26
      And if we didn't go about it that way, you explained,
    • 00:11:28
      also some potential hiccups and some actual projects and examples that you have.
    • 00:11:33
      So just hang out here in these three with me for the next day and a half.
    • 00:11:36
      Cool?
    • 00:11:37
      With me?
    • 00:11:38
      Yep.
    • 00:11:38
      Yep.
    • 00:11:38
      Cool.
    • 00:11:39
      So how are we doing?
    • 00:11:40
      It looks like this.
    • 00:11:42
      How we implement, what is this?
    • 00:11:44
      Anybody know what this is?
    • 00:11:45
      Workshop.
    • 00:11:46
      It's a workshop.
    • 00:11:46
      What happens in a workshop?
    • 00:11:49
      Anybody have a dad, uncle, aunt, mom, whatever had a workshop?
    • 00:11:52
      Anybody?
    • 00:11:52
      Yeah, okay.
    • 00:11:53
      What happens inside the workshop?
    • 00:11:54
      It's sort of like the curse words where you hear someone yelling, like, doing something.
    • 00:11:58
      What happens?
    • 00:11:58
      You hit your thumb sometimes.
    • 00:12:00
      Yeah.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 00:12:01
      Problem solving.
    • 00:12:02
      Problem solving?
    • 00:12:03
      Repair.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:12:04
      Repair?
    • 00:12:04
      Hurt yourself sometimes?
    • 00:12:06
      Breaking stuff?
    • 00:12:07
      Yeah.
    • 00:12:08
      Ideas?
    • 00:12:09
      Thoughts?
    • 00:12:10
      Creativity, sometimes dad wants to go away or mom wants to go away into the workshop.
    • 00:12:15
      A workshop is how we strategize.
    • 00:12:16
      All the things you just mentioned is how we're going to actually strategize.
    • 00:12:21
      And so we're gonna learn, think, and do all at the same time in that space.
    • 00:12:24
      That's what happens in the workshop space.
    • 00:12:26
      There's learning, thinking, and doing.
    • 00:12:28
      It kinda looks like this.
    • 00:12:29
      Actually looks like this.
    • 00:12:30
      You might see some of your hometown heroes in here.
    • 00:12:32
      You might see some people you recognize.
    • SPEAKER_03
    • 00:12:36
      But this is what it visually looks like.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:12:44
      There's some cool people we've been able to work with throughout the years.
    • 00:12:45
      We've been in this community for well over 11 years.
    • 00:12:48
      And so we've been able to work with some pretty cool people locally, internationally, and be able to do some fun stuff, host some really, really great conversations in this community, specifically with leadership.
    • 00:12:59
      But it's been a good time.
    • 00:13:00
      You might even see some people that, you know, kind of go Christmas there, right?
    • 00:13:04
      It's a baby picture.
    • 00:13:06
      Chris, I think I saw you, you know, 15 years ago.
    • 00:13:10
      But, yeah, we've been able to do a really good work.
    • 00:13:13
      This impact, this conversation we've already started having has been pretty fun.
    • 00:13:17
      It's usually, at the end, it's going to be a good time.
    • 00:13:19
      There's smiles at times, I promise.
    • 00:13:21
      I will even do this pose for you when we're done, I promise.
    • 00:13:26
      But I am asking this, while we're in the room together, we're going to shift the way that we think about some things.
    • 00:13:29
      Hopefully, in this conversation alone, you've already experienced that a little bit.
    • 00:13:33
      that you're like, man, I can see where this is going.
    • 00:13:36
      And Sam, does the window unlock because I want to bail?
    • 00:13:39
      Or I see where this is going and this is probably going to do this in our time.
    • 00:13:44
      Anytime we work with a group, there's usually a challenge, a question that we ask.
    • 00:13:48
      And so what would it look like if the city council used human-centered design to better inform and direct the city manager's office towards strategic impact?
    • 00:13:54
      This is the question I hope to solve by the end of our time together.
    • 00:13:58
      Cool?
    • 00:13:59
      With me?
    • 00:13:59
      Yeah.
    • 00:14:00
      Isn't that a big question?
    • 00:14:00
      Everybody's like, that's a big question, dude.
    • 00:14:02
      Like, I don't even know.
    • 00:14:03
      That's a huge question.
    • 00:14:04
      But this is what we're going after for the next day and a half.
    • 00:14:08
      With me?
    • SPEAKER_03
    • 00:14:08
      Yes.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:14:09
      Cool?
    • 00:14:10
      I have this up on the wall.
    • 00:14:12
      So we will be able to stare at it and remember why we're here.
    • 00:14:19
      So we're going to stare at this pre-designed question about the next day and a half just so we can remember what we're solving for.
    • 00:14:25
      So by the chance you find yourself detouring, getting off track a little bit, this is our North Star.
    • 00:14:29
      We are going to solve for this question.
    • 00:14:32
      At the end of the day, it's about direction setting to help inform decision making.
    • 00:14:36
      I want to kind of explain what that is and so thank you for hanging out with me because we're setting the tone for the next like day and a half and then we're going to rock and roll.
    • 00:14:43
      So direction is around you understanding where it is.
    • 00:14:46
      You're going to hear a lot of its.
    • 00:14:47
      You're going to hear about budget.
    • 00:14:48
      You're going to hear about the community.
    • 00:14:50
      You're going to hear about strategic priorities.
    • 00:14:52
      I'd like to know where it is.
    • 00:14:54
      It is all about current place and the status of those things.
    • 00:14:58
      I really, really, really highly encourage, I think I ask them to tell you three things.
    • 00:15:02
      Comfortable shoes and a sweater and paper and pen.
    • 00:15:05
      Like, take notes.
    • 00:15:06
      Take notes, capture your notes, categorize your notes.
    • 00:15:09
      It's gonna be really important.
    • 00:15:10
      I promise you, as you understand where it is, we're gonna use that on day two, okay?
    • 00:15:16
      Remember everything's connected, understand, explore, materialize, it's all actually connected.
    • 00:15:20
      What you understand will be used, I promise.
    • 00:15:22
      So take notes.
    • 00:15:23
      And you're also going to get to explore what is and what could be within those categories as well.
    • 00:15:29
      So we're going to understand where it is and then we're going to explore what is and what could be.
    • 00:15:35
      Cool?
    • 00:15:36
      And that is about opportunity and possibility.
    • 00:15:39
      All right, here's what we're going to get into today.
    • 00:15:41
      First, it's a jam-packed day.
    • 00:15:43
      I promise you, it's a pretty high-intensity day.
    • 00:15:45
      You're going to understand where it is.
    • 00:15:46
      Chief priorities, community survey, financial budget.
    • 00:15:49
      We're going to do a reflection and design exercise, so I'm going to actually reflect on that information, which is why it's important to capture notes.
    • 00:15:56
      We're going to have lunch about 12.15ish.
    • 00:15:58
      We're going to talk about some top priorities as well.
    • 00:16:00
      We're going to have another reflection exercise.
    • 00:16:02
      And then we're out about 440-ish.
    • 00:16:04
      Is that okay?
    • 00:16:13
      Yep.
    • 00:16:13
      Make sense?
    • 00:16:13
      That's what we're going to accomplish.
    • 00:16:15
      While still pursuing this beautiful North Star here.
    • 00:16:18
      All right, so the way we're going to use human-centered design to accomplish this is we're going to understand where it is, day one.
    • 00:16:25
      Remember, we are heading, this is what we're going for, direction setting, right?
    • 00:16:28
      That's kind of like to inform and to direct.
    • 00:16:32
      Directions that we're going to try to materialize.
    • 00:16:33
      We're going to start with day one around understanding where it is.
    • 00:16:37
      And then, what is and what could be to help with direction setting.
    • 00:16:42
      Make sense?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:16:44
      Yes.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:16:45
      Cool?
    • 00:16:46
      All right.
    • 00:16:47
      So I want to talk about bookends for a second.
    • 00:16:49
      If you're a dog person, you have these bookends.
    • 00:16:50
      If you're a cat person, you probably have these bookends.
    • 00:16:53
      But I want to talk about bookends for a moment.
    • 00:16:55
      The direction to help inform decision making is around where we're going.
    • 00:17:00
      This is the actual direction setting as a whole.
    • 00:17:02
      It's where we're going, getting there, and how we know.
    • 00:17:05
      We surround focus, strategy, execution, and measuring.
    • 00:17:08
      So, why I said bookends is because it isn't.
    • 00:17:12
      These might be bookends, but it is important to understand this.
    • 00:17:14
      These are the bookends to that whole process.
    • 00:17:17
      Where we're going and how we know.
    • 00:17:19
      Measuring.
    • 00:17:20
      Strategy and execution is a CMO's job.
    • 00:17:22
      Their goal is to figure out how.
    • 00:17:24
      How we're going to make this happen, the strategy, that's where you see all those other conversations.
    • 00:17:29
      But direction setting, you were the North Star.
    • 00:17:31
      You set the direction where we're headed and how we know we got there.
    • 00:17:35
      With that direction, we hand that off past the baton to the individuals responsible for strategy and execution.
    • 00:17:43
      So you are direction setting.
    • 00:17:45
      With me?
    • 00:17:46
      Cool?
    • 00:17:47
      Awesome.
    • 00:17:49
      All right.
    • 00:17:49
      And that's why we're going to hand all this in between stuff to the CMO's office.
    • 00:17:54
      Unless you all want that, let me know.
    • 00:17:56
      We've got strategy documents we can hand you, but I think for the most part, I see most of you all just like, hand me the book hands for us, please, and we will do the strategy and the execution.
    • 00:18:05
      Where are we going, council, and how do we know we got there?
    • 00:18:09
      Cool?
    • 00:18:10
      Awesome.
    • 00:18:11
      Alright, direction said uniform decision making.
    • 00:18:13
      As long as we agree, we're on the same page, we're good to go.
    • 00:18:15
      We're gonna see this a million times.
    • 00:18:16
      We'll use the ground rules for workshopping.
    • 00:18:20
      Ask you, what is the purpose of a retreat?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:18:24
      What is the purpose of a retreat?
    • 00:18:27
      To get away from the hurly-burly day life.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:18:30
      Yes.
    • 00:18:31
      Do we get like snaps or poetry?
    • 00:18:33
      Snaps are the best thing.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:18:34
      This is a no-snap zone.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:18:36
      Yeah, to get away.
    • 00:18:37
      I was like, there was a breath in there, like, to get away.
    • 00:18:41
      Retreat is supposed to be commish, supposed to be some planning and some strategy that kind of go in it.
    • 00:18:47
      So I want to kind of talk about some of the benefits.
    • 00:18:49
      So you get to basically retreat from the demands and chaos of the everyday, absolutely.
    • 00:18:55
      Virtual high five for that.
    • 00:18:56
      Especially if you plan to plan and strategize.
    • 00:18:59
      I think it's really impossible to do that in the middle of chaos.
    • 00:19:03
      to think clearly, to set direction.
    • 00:19:05
      I think that's super impossible.
    • 00:19:07
      If I played a lot of noise right now and I tried to talk to you and give you instruction, you would say, I can't hear you.
    • 00:19:14
      Can't hear what?
    • 00:19:14
      I can't hear instruction.
    • 00:19:16
      I can't hear direction.
    • 00:19:17
      I can't think about what you're saying, Josh, so I can't even absorb it.
    • 00:19:20
      Why?
    • 00:19:20
      Because it's noisy.
    • 00:19:23
      There's a lot going on.
    • 00:19:24
      So this retreat is to, yes, get away, and to be able to affirm the demands and chaos of our beginning.
    • 00:19:30
      Retreat is a place where direction and decisions are made.
    • 00:19:33
      See what I did there?
    • 00:19:33
      See what I did there, where direction and decisions are made?
    • 00:19:38
      It's to assist in closing the gaps between who we are and who we want to be, the ability to sit and think of those things, who we are and where we want to be.
    • 00:19:45
      Let's go retreat and think about that and plan around that and strategize around that.
    • 00:19:50
      Retreat should be a first response and not a last resort.
    • 00:19:53
      When there is chaos and when there is something big, you should be able to say, hold on a second.
    • 00:19:59
      I need to go think, plan, get into the calm where I can hear, and strategize.
    • 00:20:05
      It should be a first response and not a last resort.
    • 00:20:10
      And a retreat, a successful retreat, needs both hope and discipline to be focused.
    • 00:20:14
      So, hope, where we're going, and focus, let's get there, let's focus on that.
    • 00:20:19
      So, where it is, is around current placement status, I wanna remind you of that.
    • 00:20:24
      I wanna talk to you really quick about some of the ground rules.
    • 00:20:27
      When we start talking about where it is, you're gonna hear a lot of historic things, you're gonna hear a lot of past tense, you're gonna hear a lot of things that have occurred, or where something is.
    • 00:20:34
      I want you to know that if you hear that, and it's not the easiest thing,
    • 00:20:37
      This is called the rubber band effect.
    • 00:20:39
      A rubber band, you know, you pull it back to shoot it further faster.
    • 00:20:42
      So if by any chance you were pulled back to remember something or you were pulled back to experience something, the purpose of that, reason for that in any presentation today or even tomorrow is to shoot you further faster.
    • 00:20:55
      Okay?
    • 00:20:56
      We're not pulling something back to stay there.
    • 00:20:57
      That's called being stuck in a moment.
    • 00:20:59
      We are pulling something back so you can be encouraged to shoot further faster.
    • 00:21:04
      Cool?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:21:05
      This is going to be huge, huge, especially in day one.
    • 00:21:08
      Understand, listen, take notes.
    • 00:21:10
      Please, please, please take notes.
    • 00:21:13
      I don't know.
    • 00:21:13
      I'm going to hear you say that a lot, probably.
    • 00:21:16
      Write notes.
    • 00:21:16
      Not these types of notes.
    • 00:21:17
      This is like, call me, slide across the thing.
    • 00:21:20
      But you ever took notes before and you ever took notes and you went back and looked at it and you're like, what about right there?
    • 00:21:24
      What in the world?
    • 00:21:24
      So please take organized notes.
    • 00:21:26
      Please take notes in a way that you can reflect on them and know what you have.
    • 00:21:30
      Literally, I'm giving you heads up.
    • 00:21:31
      I'm going to ask you to reflect on your notes.
    • 00:21:34
      to pull out some answers.
    • 00:21:36
      Hold loosely what you know.
    • 00:21:38
      I think what you said at the very beginning that if I don't get it out to you to explore, then I land on the first thing, me.
    • 00:21:45
      Hold loosely what you know.
    • 00:21:46
      Hold it, but hold it loosely.
    • 00:21:49
      We are going to share out, at times, there are moments where we're going to hear each other.
    • 00:21:52
      And that's going to require a level of respect, this type of respect, the only person that sang it the best.
    • 00:21:56
      But we're going to talk about respect in the room in a sense of when we're hearing each other as well, and sharing out.
    • 00:22:02
      What could be is obviously day two, and that's where we're going to workshop.
    • 00:22:06
      That's where it's going to look like this.
    • 00:22:08
      In day two, you're also going to see a lot of working together alone.
    • 00:22:11
      What that means is collectively that we're independent but not independent of one another.
    • 00:22:15
      There are going to be moments where we're actually doing some independent work.
    • 00:22:18
      That independent work, I promise you, is connected to the whole.
    • 00:22:21
      Human-centered design does not live here.
    • 00:22:23
      It was in a circle.
    • 00:22:24
      It was understand, explore, materialize, and keep going.
    • 00:22:26
      So if I ask you to do something, please, please understand it is connected to something else.
    • 00:22:30
      That's why I came here to take notes, because it is connected to a bunch of other things as well.
    • 00:22:36
      OK?
    • 00:22:37
      We're going to idea dump.
    • 00:22:38
      I'm going to ask you to do that.
    • 00:22:40
      We're going to ask you to go with some ideas.
    • 00:22:42
      Any overthinkers?
    • 00:22:43
      Anyone openly admit that they're an overthinker?
    • 00:22:45
      Right, okay, so you hear like the tapping, like that's like someone kind of overthinking a little bit, just like, you got this, you got this.
    • 00:22:52
      So encourage the overthinkers.
    • 00:22:55
      We're going to go deep and wide as well.
    • 00:22:57
      There's an ability to think and participate in a process that allows you to go deep in thought and also cover a lot of ground as well.
    • 00:23:03
      So we're going to go deep and wide.
    • 00:23:05
      We are going to decide quickly.
    • 00:23:07
      There's a visual timer and I'm going to have that going on.
    • 00:23:10
      There's something to be said around visual time.
    • 00:23:13
      It's saying I have that much time to show up.
    • 00:23:16
      with my idea, my strategy, whatever it may be.
    • 00:23:18
      So we're going to decide quickly.
    • 00:23:20
      I'm going to ask you to stick those ideas.
    • 00:23:22
      Tomorrow we're going to move around the room.
    • 00:23:24
      I'm going to ask you to put them in certain places.
    • 00:23:26
      Anyone nervous?
    • 00:23:29
      I don't think we should be nervous because you I think are the right people to be in the room.
    • 00:23:35
      I think you have the right knowledge, skills, and abilities to do this work with me and with each other.
    • 00:23:42
      So I wouldn't be nervous.
    • 00:23:43
      You're the right people.
    • 00:23:44
      We're going to finish strong.
    • 00:23:45
      I promise you all.
    • 00:23:46
      Here's my participation and expectations.
    • 00:23:49
      One, my promise to you and my ask of you.
    • 00:23:51
      I am going to give you everything I have in a day and a half.
    • 00:23:54
      To the point where you're like, dude, you gave it, you laid it all out on the board, all out on the wooden floor.
    • 00:23:59
      I'm going to give you everything I have in a day and a half, just to save you.
    • 00:24:03
      That's it.
    • 00:24:06
      I'm going to give you everything that I have in just to save you.
    • 00:24:10
      Show up.
    • 00:24:11
      Show it for me.
    • 00:24:12
      Show it for you.
    • 00:24:13
      I'm gonna show it for me and I'm gonna absolutely show it for you.
    • 00:24:16
      I think I was thinking about you before you all entered the room.
    • 00:24:18
      I had a lot of outlets dedicated to thinking about you before you came in the room.
    • 00:24:22
      I'm going to give you everything that I have.
    • 00:24:25
      Okay?
    • 00:24:25
      Tech on the table.
    • 00:24:26
      I think you're taking notes and that's your way, so super cool.
    • 00:24:29
      But keep your devices out, only if you have this laptop.
    • 00:24:33
      If you have this laptop, keep it out.
    • 00:24:34
      I wanna see it and we all wanna take pictures with you and with it.
    • 00:24:37
      It's an ancient artifact.
    • 00:24:38
      And from a phone perspective, use your phone only if you have this phone because I also want to, like, document you and post you and say, like, this person has this phone still working.
    • 00:24:46
      But just be respectful with it.
    • 00:24:47
      We're going to have breaks where you can actually take breaks, restrooms here, be able to go out and take a phone call, email, things like that.
    • 00:24:54
      I'm going to actually try to honor that break as well and preserve your brain power.
    • 00:24:58
      But at the end of the day, I'm actually going to lean in.
    • 00:24:59
      What is this, by the way?
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:25:00
      Trust fall.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:25:01
      Trust fall, absolutely.
    • 00:25:02
      This guy, hopefully he's got the strength to be able to do that.
    • 00:25:05
      I'm gonna be this guy, okay?
    • 00:25:07
      I'm gonna be the person that uses all creativity and strategy and my hope is that you lean in and you trust fall with me, okay?
    • 00:25:14
      That's the only way this will work, absolutely.
    • 00:25:17
      So he's gonna be a superhero at the end of all this.
    • 00:25:20
      But lean in, basically, and be curious, be aware, and be attentive.
    • 00:25:24
      I'm actually gonna do those things in the room with me today.
    • 00:25:26
      Cool?
    • 00:25:28
      All right, when you get breaks, I'm going to ask you to be present when you're present, and I'm going to ask you to take a break when it's time to take a break.
    • 00:25:34
      We, everyone in the camera as well, will say we're taking a break and then go work.
    • 00:25:38
      It's not taking a break.
    • 00:25:40
      Taking a break is being able to put your brain on pause.
    • 00:25:42
      Retreating, so to speak.
    • 00:25:44
      You're going to want to retreat from the retreat at a moment.
    • 00:25:46
      Take your break.
    • 00:25:48
      on your break.
    • 00:25:48
      Don't put your brain to work here and then go out and take a break and put your brain to work there.
    • 00:25:52
      Breathe, walk, sit, relax, enjoy, laugh with someone as well, okay?
    • 00:25:56
      Try to at least, please.
    • 00:25:58
      And just a reminder, this is what we're gonna be working through.
    • 00:26:04
      All right, where it is.
    • 00:26:05
      First thing you're going to hear about where it is is around the strategic priority refresher.
    • 00:26:09
      You're going to hear from Sam.
    • 00:26:10
      He's going to walk through.
    • 00:26:11
      So please, if you're taking notes or you're taking a header of anything, say, I'm about to hear where the strategic priorities are, or at least a refresher on them, and then take some notes underneath that.
    • 00:26:22
      Each item on the table, I'll tell you what to do with, so we'll have an experience with those.
    • 00:26:26
      But from a note perspective, please categorize your notes.
    • 00:26:29
      This section of where it is is around the strategic priority refresher.
    • 00:26:32
      Got some notes.
    • 00:26:33
      This section, where we're around the community survey, take some notes.
    • 00:26:38
      This section, where we're around the financial update, categorize it.
    • 00:26:41
      Take some notes.
    • 00:26:42
      It's really, really important for you to know where your notes are.
    • 00:26:45
      I'm going to ask you to look at those.
    • 00:26:47
      Cool?
    • 00:26:48
      All right, Sam, after you, sir.
    • Sam Sanders
    • 00:26:53
      So throughout the moment, you say, I told you, it's going to be a lot.
    • 00:26:58
      A lot going on.
    • 00:27:01
      Myself, James, and Ashley will be participating through this retreat.
    • 00:27:05
      And Josh put me in a very tight spot and said, sit down and be quiet.
    • 00:27:08
      So I'm practicing too.
    • 00:27:11
      My section is just to remind you of what are the strategic priorities that you set.
    • 00:27:16
      You have nine priorities and a commitment.
    • 00:27:19
      And I'm going to remind you of what those are.
    • 00:27:22
      And I chose to do it in a way that I'm just giving you your words back.
    • 00:27:26
      So that's the refresher part of it.
    • 00:27:28
      The goal is to just take you back to where you were in 2023 when we had you approve the strategic framework.
    • 00:27:36
      All of that I'm going to throw back at you, but I've done it in what I consider to be a creative way, and I did not leave you out because I know you weren't here when that was done.
    • 00:27:51
      So just to remind you, the council's vision is to be a place where everyone thrives.
    • 00:27:54
      We are saying that.
    • 00:27:55
      Often we are saying it everywhere.
    • 00:27:57
      We're putting it up in the building so that people can gravitate to it, that they can appreciate it because you set up that as a vision for the city organization and for the city of Charlottesville.
    • 00:28:08
      Here are your nine strategic outcome areas with your commitment.
    • 00:28:11
      Just to remind you of what you said were important things that you wanted to make sure that when we put a budget together, we don't lose sight of this.
    • 00:28:18
      When we're working on projects, we don't lose sight of this.
    • 00:28:22
      When we're thinking about what is it that will help us understand if this city organization is doing its job, it's in the frame of working through these strategic outcome areas.
    • 00:28:31
      That is what the conversation internally has been about.
    • 00:28:34
      That is what I have tried to make sure that I stress and impress upon the team, the leadership team at the top to hear.
    • 00:28:39
      This is where we focus because this is what council has asked us to focus on.
    • 00:28:44
      These are the things that we need to do to help our community.
    • 00:28:49
      So I'm going to give you quotes.
    • 00:28:52
      from you to me.
    • 00:28:54
      I decided not to do a whole lot of work.
    • 00:28:56
      I just went back into my notes.
    • 00:28:58
      When in fact, Josh says take notes, notes are important.
    • 00:29:01
      I found notes.
    • 00:29:02
      Because when we were doing the work of strategic outcome areas, I made sure that I found in each of the conversations where we asked you, what is your priority on that subject?
    • 00:29:14
      over and over and over.
    • 00:29:15
      You might be able to remember some of those moments where I was asking you that.
    • 00:29:18
      I kept all of it.
    • 00:29:19
      I didn't know why I was keeping all of it until he gave me this assignment.
    • 00:29:23
      So I'm just going to run through these.
    • 00:29:25
      I'm not going to read all of them to you, but they're going to pop up on the screen just so that you can see.
    • 00:29:28
      This is what you said is why these became the strategic outcome areas.
    • 00:29:33
      And Natalie, I Googled through your campaign
    • 00:29:36
      As you were speaking to the public as to why they should elect you, and I matched you into some of these so that you could be reflected in this just the same.
    • 00:29:46
      Cool, thank you.
    • 00:29:46
      So, you went into the archive.
    • 00:29:48
      I went into the archive and brought it out, so hopefully you don't regret what you said.
    • 00:29:55
      So, climate action, value innovative positions on climate.
    • 00:29:58
      I think we know that you all appreciate innovative positions because we're having conversations like that.
    • 00:30:02
      Common impacts on the city and the region.
    • 00:30:04
      I love the region word because we have to remember that it's bigger than us.
    • 00:30:07
      We're just a small piece in this big overall system.
    • 00:30:11
      Economic prosperity.
    • 00:30:13
      Chances for people who are from here to stay here.
    • 00:30:15
      We hear this a lot from our community at large.
    • 00:30:18
      You hear it every time you go knock on the door, I'm sure.
    • 00:30:22
      It's hard.
    • 00:30:23
      That's why I reflect on the idea as to why we make economic prosperity.
    • 00:30:27
      And everyone wants better than they have had.
    • 00:30:31
      Organizational excellence, I have swallowed these two words and I have probably made everyone tired of those two words because I use it all the time.
    • 00:30:39
      I love these two words.
    • 00:30:41
      So those two words, not only is it now my Northern Star for inside the city manager's office, we're trying to help the team appreciate why you chose that.
    • 00:30:50
      I know you chose it because you want this to be a strong organization capable of meeting the needs of citizens of this community.
    • 00:30:57
      That's what organizational excellence means.
    • 00:30:59
      We fix things, we make it better.
    • 00:31:02
      That's everybody's expectation.
    • 00:31:04
      It's hard.
    • 00:31:05
      What I also like about it is that we fix things.
    • 00:31:08
      It doesn't say we fix everything.
    • 00:31:10
      We can't be everything to everyone, so we have to remember that, and that's all part of prioritizing.
    • 00:31:15
      And we all know that this is a community worth living.
    • 00:31:18
      I think we have done a lot to show that, and I think that's what we have to remember.
    • 00:31:22
      But I also know that this is here.
    • 00:31:24
      Because some of you are on this council because you were worried about this.
    • 00:31:27
      And in the worry about that, you decided to join and help reset that.
    • 00:31:31
      And I've been speaking to you as much as I can about how we're doing that.
    • 00:31:34
      And I have another presentation for you on Monday to demonstrate how we are.
    • 00:31:39
      Partnerships.
    • 00:31:40
      We should talk even when you disagree.
    • 00:31:43
      You don't get anywhere if you don't talk it through.
    • 00:31:46
      Even if you're fighting about it, you're still getting it out because you're expressing whatever you feel.
    • 00:31:50
      Hopefully, things work out.
    • 00:31:52
      We should be willing to give a hand up.
    • 00:31:53
      I think that comes out loud and clear in the choices that we make and what we want to prioritize and talk about.
    • 00:32:00
      Public safety.
    • 00:32:02
      Modern government supports in every way.
    • 00:32:05
      I think what we're trying to say here is we don't do policing like everywhere else.
    • 00:32:10
      We want to be modern in our approach.
    • 00:32:12
      We put people first.
    • 00:32:14
      That's why we do community walks.
    • 00:32:16
      That's why we're changing how we approach various things.
    • 00:32:18
      Is it perfect?
    • 00:32:19
      No.
    • 00:32:19
      What is?
    • 00:32:20
      We're trying to get there.
    • 00:32:21
      And we're doing things differently.
    • 00:32:23
      And we have tournaments around.
    • 00:32:25
      It's just a reminder that's working.
    • 00:32:26
      So when you say public safety, we start there.
    • 00:32:29
      But it's bigger than that.
    • 00:32:31
      For me, it's really here.
    • 00:32:34
      2017 is no longer the barometer.
    • 00:32:35
      We were better than that then and can be better than that for good.
    • 00:32:40
      It's a moment, something that happened.
    • 00:32:42
      It doesn't have to be who we are, but there are a lot of people who still talk like this as who we are.
    • 00:32:47
      It's incumbent upon all of us to change that.
    • 00:32:49
      I think that's why public safety is there, because there was a big conversation about it.
    • 00:32:54
      Recreation, arts, and culture.
    • 00:32:56
      We want to be welcoming, not exclusionary, but we want to be what the magazines actually say we are.
    • 00:33:02
      We're winning awards left and right.
    • 00:33:04
      Chris Angle loves giving me the list of what we just got right in Nashville.
    • 00:33:08
      What I hear in that statement is that, yeah, we want to actually live that out in every way that we can.
    • 00:33:15
      We met a set of criteria to get selected for that, but aren't we really that all the time?
    • 00:33:19
      I think that's really why recreation arts and culture matters.
    • 00:33:24
      Housing consumes the conversation.
    • 00:33:26
      There's a lot going on there.
    • 00:33:27
      These are the things that you said about housing.
    • 00:33:31
      I actually didn't limit to just three.
    • 00:33:33
      I had to put five on there because it was a lot.
    • 00:33:35
      But a home and a place that all residents will love and cherish.
    • 00:33:39
      We know that's what we're striving to make possible.
    • 00:33:42
      But we must maintain focus on those who are struggling, which is why we're not just simply producing housing but also preserving housing opportunities.
    • 00:33:50
      And a variety of housing choice.
    • 00:33:52
      Because what we know about people is they don't want the same thing, and they don't need the same thing.
    • 00:33:57
      But the goal of the government is to provide as much as we can, whether directly or through partnerships.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 00:34:02
      I recognize some of those.
    • 00:34:05
      Good.
    • Sam Sanders
    • 00:34:06
      Transportation.
    • 00:34:07
      I hope everybody does.
    • 00:34:08
      We can be innovative.
    • 00:34:09
      Yes, we can, and we are.
    • 00:34:11
      See if it was on the journey.
    • 00:34:12
      That's an understatement.
    • 00:34:14
      But that's transportation in that more strategic visionary way.
    • 00:34:21
      Connecting sidewalks, protecting bike lanes, improving bus frequency will bring Charlottesville into a more just and sustainable future.
    • 00:34:27
      It's not focused on one thing.
    • 00:34:29
      It's focused on multiple things.
    • 00:34:32
      And that then also becomes, and how do you do all of it?
    • 00:34:36
      How much can you do?
    • 00:34:39
      Education via vegan choices.
    • 00:34:41
      One of the opportunities for high school age and beyond is preparing them for what comes after.
    • 00:34:46
      So we've got to make sure that we take care of them when they're in the school and that includes the building in which they learn.
    • 00:34:54
      Today, your top tier is housing, transportation and education.
    • 00:34:58
      Our focus today, in this conversation today and tomorrow is housing, transportation and education.
    • 00:35:04
      But I just walked you through a list.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:35:06
      Sam, is that top tier in these three things?
    • 00:35:16
      So that is what is shaking out to be your top three.
    • Sam Sanders
    • 00:35:22
      Because that is what you spend the most money on, that is what we're talking the most about, and that is what has just risen to the top.
    • 00:35:32
      So we're going to focus there because these three right now appear to be driving everything else.
    • 00:35:39
      You're going to hear a lot more about those a little later as well.
    • 00:35:42
      One thing I want to make sure of is that you appreciate that, that it is landing with you the way it lands with us.
    • 00:35:47
      This is what it feels like on our side, that it's these three topics.
    • 00:35:51
      And what we're wanting to remind you is that there are nine on the list plus the commitments, so therefore there are 10 things to invest, strategize, and work on, but these three are where we are.
    • 00:36:04
      Your commitment to justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion right now is under attack.
    • 00:36:12
      This gets us noticed by the individuals in Washington D.C.
    • 00:36:16
      today.
    • 00:36:18
      The question is do we care to stay noticed or do we just want to focus on the work?
    • 00:36:23
      So my challenge in this particular moment is to ask you
    • 00:36:29
      Does this say those four words, or does it say more than those four words?
    • 00:36:34
      That's the question I have on this.
    • 00:36:36
      Senator, that everyone can and this government should see this at all times.
    • 00:36:40
      No one is disposable.
    • 00:36:41
      Harmony among your residents.
    • 00:36:43
      We always do better, but we all do better.
    • 00:36:46
      Those are your words.
    • 00:36:47
      Things that you said as to why you set the commitment.
    • 00:36:50
      What I'm asking is, I'm telling you, this is what I hear.
    • 00:36:55
      This is what we've been working on.
    • 00:36:56
      This is what you've been accepting at this point as to what a commitment really is for the City of Charlottesville.
    • 00:37:04
      So that I'm asking you, could we just live with the idea of a commitment to community prosperity and then we can take the lens of what the feds and others are looking at, put that aside, because that's about words.
    • 00:37:15
      This is about action.
    • 00:37:17
      Can we live with these actions?
    • 00:37:18
      Can we live with this focus?
    • 00:37:20
      Can we live with this as a true series of commitments that we will spend our time and energy on?
    • 00:37:26
      So that's the question.
    • 00:37:28
      I'm not asking for a decision today.
    • 00:37:29
      I'm going to talk to you a little bit about it on Monday and show you what it actually looks like, because I'm assuming that you agree with me.
    • 00:37:36
      We don't need to play in being targeted.
    • 00:37:38
      We got work to do.
    • 00:37:39
      We got people's lives to shape and change, and we don't need to lose the resources
    • 00:37:44
      Just because we're going to stick with justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion as the conversation is about the work, what are we going to do?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:37:53
      And that's really what I want to ask.
    • 00:37:56
      Can I ask a question?
    • 00:37:57
      Yes.
    • 00:37:58
      So accessibility, that's not the strict sense of wheelchairs and so on.
    • 00:38:03
      No.
    • 00:38:04
      I wonder if a different word might be access.
    • 00:38:07
      Yeah.
    • 00:38:07
      To prevent that.
    • 00:38:09
      Yeah.
    • 00:38:13
      I think we don't have to go too far down this road.
    • 00:38:19
      I would be interested, again we don't have to do it today or tomorrow even, I'd be interested in a conversation with you that actually one-on-one, two-on-one, whatever.
    • 00:38:34
      I completely agree we don't need to get distracted with words and those words were picked at some point because they had meaning right now that's become a target and a lot of that's just silly and I agree with this notion that you have here I just would like a little more time to sit with things that were the intent that went behind those ideas particularly after 2017 right
    • 00:39:01
      And I think that what you've got here... You want to see what's under each of these.
    • 00:39:04
      I do.
    • 00:39:05
      And it may not be one-to-one, but I think you know what I'm saying.
    • Sam Sanders
    • 00:39:09
      Yep, I do.
    • 00:39:10
      Again, my presentation Monday night is my work plan for 2026.
    • 00:39:12
      I'm working on this retreat with him because he gave me the assignment.
    • 00:39:15
      I'm already working on living this out because I know you're going to have questions.
    • 00:39:18
      So I'm going to show you more of what that looks like.
    • 00:39:22
      Sure.
    • 00:39:22
      Absolutely.
    • 00:39:28
      So let's work.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:39:29
      I told you every time you see this workshop, I think I'm going to ask you to work.
    • 00:39:34
      So hopefully you've taken some notes.
    • 00:39:36
      Again, I'm just going to reiterate there will be moments about today, and I promise two days' notes, I'm going to ask you to bring them into tomorrow as well.
    • 00:39:43
      But do me a favor.
    • 00:39:44
      In front of you, you have a bit of a note card.
    • 00:39:46
      You have something like this.
    • 00:39:48
      Grab one of those.
    • 00:39:50
      My favorite pen.
    • 00:39:51
      And what I'd like you to do is, this is basically, it's called the ERV interview, and it's around a self-interview around understand, respect, and value.
    • 00:40:00
      What I'd like you to do in the middle of that, where you see that box, write strategic refresher, like strategic priority refresher, just in the middle of that small little box.
    • 00:40:10
      Write strategic plan refresher, or strategic priority refresher, I'm sorry.
    • 00:40:20
      OK, I want to give you a few minutes to look at your notes that you wrote and reflect on what you just heard.
    • 00:40:27
      And I want you to ask yourself these three questions.
    • 00:40:29
      And I want to write one thing.
    • 00:40:30
      Write one thing in each of those.
    • 00:40:31
      Like, what do I understand about what I just heard?
    • 00:40:34
      Overall, high level.
    • 00:40:36
      What do I respect about what I just heard?
    • 00:40:40
      And what do I value about what I just heard?
    • 00:40:43
      I'm going to ask you this, like where it is.
    • 00:40:44
      You just kind of heard high level strategic priority refresher.
    • 00:40:48
      Look back at your notes and write in one of the, just turn them, turn them.
    • 00:40:52
      Beautiful card.
    • 00:40:53
      But write one thing that I understand about what I just heard.
    • 00:40:57
      One thing that I respect about what I just heard.
    • 00:41:00
      And one thing I value.
    • 00:41:02
      Respect doesn't have to be agree with.
    • 00:41:03
      It's a level of respect and value about what I just heard.
    • 00:41:07
      Contribution, impact.
    • 00:41:09
      Go ahead and write that.
    • 00:41:10
      Put your notes in and write one thing in each section.
    • SPEAKER_03
    • 00:41:52
      In about three more minutes.
    • SPEAKER_02
    • 00:42:35
      Alright, another minute and a half.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:42:39
      Do I understand about what I just heard?
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 00:42:45
      Respect and value.
    • 00:42:49
      Guarding the strategic priority of our chair.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:43:05
      All right, let's talk about it.
    • 00:43:08
      I want to ask, regarding understanding, I'm kind of working my way around the room, why don't you start us off.
    • 00:43:14
      What is something about understanding about what you just heard?
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 00:43:18
      So something that's really clear in those comments that we gave Sam and we said is that the history of this community plays a lot on
    • 00:43:30
      What we do and where we spend our money, the history, not just from 2017 and 2020, but particularly, you know, with Vinegar Hill, it plays a big role in everything that we do and decisions that we make here.
    • 00:43:46
      That's what something to me is.
    • 00:43:48
      Something you understand?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:43:56
      I guess my thing that came to mind was that we do have a good plan.
    • 00:44:00
      It was a good plan two years ago.
    • 00:44:03
      It's time for it to be updated, which is what we hear, but I just wanted to emphasize that it has been a good plan, it is a good plan, and also understanding that we've made a lot of progress along it.
    • 00:44:17
      That's in conversations with people last spring, and it was like, what are y'all doing?
    • 00:44:22
      Well, we've done a lot.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:44:25
      Yeah, so to have those conversations and see this up here, you've been able to connect some of the... Correct.
    • 00:44:29
      Yeah, I love that.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 00:44:30
      Lloyd, something you understand about what you just heard?
    • 00:44:35
      All of our problems involve money, which means trade-offs, and we have to take time to get that right.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:44:42
      Yeah, okay, that's a deep understanding.
    • 00:44:44
      Yeah, absolutely.
    • 00:44:45
      Something you understand about what you just heard?
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 00:44:48
      One of the messages that I received from the presentation is 9 or 10 things is too many things, but there is a lot of overlap.
    • 00:44:56
      So even though there's 9 or 10 things, they're not mutually exclusive and therefore can be consolidated.
    • Michael Payne
    • 00:45:08
      Well, what I wrote down was just very high level, just clearly understanding the intent of the past strategic plan and kind of the purpose of it.
    • 00:45:18
      What Juan said made me think something else, that these priorities look different to different people in the community, especially depending on how much money you have.
    • 00:45:29
      I think that's a big point.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:45:31
      That's great.
    • 00:45:33
      What about respect?
    • 00:45:34
      Something that you respect about what you just heard.
    • 00:45:36
      It's different in understanding.
    • 00:45:37
      Understanding is like information and knowledge and respect may not have to be a group when you pay homage to that thing because you understand it's important.
    • 00:45:45
      Want, something that you
    • 00:45:47
      Respect about what you just heard.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 00:45:49
      So what I heard is that, you know, from those comments is that council, we value everyone.
    • 00:45:55
      You know, we talked about this is a place where everyone thrives.
    • 00:45:58
      But what I heard from our comments is we particularly want to value those who are most vulnerable in our community.
    • 00:46:07
      Yeah.
    • 00:46:07
      We saw that.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:46:08
      And respect that we, that as a council, we want to do it.
    • 00:46:11
      Yeah.
    • 00:46:12
      Some of your respect about what you just heard.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:46:13
      The work that's gone into
    • 00:46:15
      I've been executing against that over the course of the last couple of years and also the fact that we've been given updates every quarter by the city manager tracking that with respect.
    • 00:46:29
      A lot of that with respect to work.
    • SPEAKER_02
    • 00:46:32
      What's something with respect?
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 00:46:34
      The interconnectedness of what we're trying to do in our future problem areas.
    • 00:46:38
      So it's a little similar to what you were saying that so many things are actually like connected
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:46:43
      which is great, they're not isolated in there as well, yeah, absolutely.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 00:46:48
      The hearts and minds are in the right place.
    • 00:46:50
      People generally want others to have what they need which covers a lot of different levels and like Michael was saying about the spectrum of what those needs look like are different for different people with different backgrounds or amounts of resources and so we all generally are
    • 00:47:09
      Looking out for others, which can't necessarily be said for other political parties.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:47:17
      What I also hear in that is that the characters, right?
    • 00:47:21
      I hear you pointing out the character and the desire for people to have what they want lives amongst everyone.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 00:47:27
      And what that looks like is still different for all of us, but we're all generally going in the same direction.
    • 00:47:33
      Love it.
    • 00:47:34
      Love it.
    • Michael Payne
    • 00:47:37
      Well, both from the plan and its implementation, since it was developed a few years ago, it's just very clear that for the staff and in the document that there's a clear level of care for the community and care about trying to positively impact people's lives.
    • 00:47:58
      That's one of the things I took away is just the intent is clear that, you know, there's not a difference to the community.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:48:07
      All right, last one.
    • 00:48:08
      What is something, the strategic part of your refresher, what is something you value?
    • 00:48:12
      Something after hearing it and reflecting on it, what's something you value about what you just heard?
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 00:48:18
      So what I got is that we as a council and as a community really value people and the environment and the second part is something that I really had to come closer to when I ran for council that
    • 00:48:35
      For some people in the community, the environment is not as strong, it's not as a high priority, but others it's really strong, the climate and the environment.
    • 00:48:45
      But anyway, I saw people and the environment.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:48:50
      Yeah.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:48:50
      Some people in the environment love it.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:48:52
      I just had people.
    • 00:48:54
      People?
    • 00:48:54
      Yeah.
    • 00:48:55
      You saw that through and saw it in the quotes and in the refresher and then you saw people all the way through it, yeah.
    • 00:49:01
      Lloyd?
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 00:49:01
      What I would like to add, and it actually has nothing to do with what Sam said, but he was speaking to you.
    • 00:49:08
      It was the insight that jumped out.
    • 00:49:11
      That what I value about this particular group, but I mean the counselors and city central staff, and for that matter basically everybody that I have met and have some sense of,
    • 00:49:24
      is that I think we all have trust in each other's good faith.
    • 00:49:31
      Which makes it so much easier to get to decisions.
    • 00:49:35
      That has not always been the case on campus.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:49:41
      I've been around for more than 11 years.
    • 00:49:43
      I would agree to all of that.
    • 00:49:45
      Absolutely.
    • 00:49:45
      Seen some things.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 00:49:47
      So two of my biggest issues are transportation and housing.
    • 00:49:55
      Those are crucial drivers of this conversation.
    • 00:49:58
      And so I'm happy to see that they are of value to the conversation and the list and everybody else.
    • 00:50:06
      Because that is kind of, I would argue that those two are at the basis of kind of everything else.
    • 00:50:15
      So having them be prioritized in our conversation is, I think, I value that.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:50:23
      We're going to have some hard conversations by the way.
    • 00:50:24
      We're going to dive in together.
    • 00:50:25
      We're going to roll our sleeves up and live in that value with them.
    • 00:50:28
      Because the thing why something is valuable is because it's important and it's important content.
    • 00:50:32
      It's got a lot of potential impact and things like that as well.
    • 00:50:35
      So I love that.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 00:50:36
      They're the load-bearing features of this community.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:50:41
      Something you value after hearing Sam's presentation?
    • Michael Payne
    • 00:50:45
      I would say that all this can lead to actual policy changes that positively impact people's lives.
    • 00:50:52
      It's not just words on paper, it's driving change.
    • 00:50:57
      And then also being able to
    • 00:51:00
      Measure the impact on people's lives because intent isn't enough.
    • 00:51:05
      Just because the city thinks it's doing the right thing doesn't mean that it turns out it actually harmed people.
    • 00:51:12
      So how do we measure that impact?
    • 00:51:13
      And I think there's a reflection in organizational excellence and other things as well in the implementation of trying to actually measure and not just accept that our intent is good enough.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:51:22
      I often say intention and execution are two different things.
    • 00:51:25
      So I would agree with you on that.
    • 00:51:26
      Absolutely.
    • 00:51:27
      Awesome.
    • 00:51:28
      Look, thank you all for reflecting and sharing on that.
    • 00:51:30
      I want you to take a break.
    • 00:51:32
      So remember, honor your break.
    • 00:51:33
      And then when we get into what is, we're going to talk about the community survey next.
    • 00:51:38
      So please, go ahead and take a break.
    • 00:51:40
      We're going to probably land on about 10 minutes.
    • 00:51:42
      Take a 10-minute break, and I'll see you back in 10 minutes.
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 00:51:48
      Hello everyone.
    • 00:51:50
      Thank you all for coming back, enjoying your break, taking a break.
    • 00:51:54
      I was very excited to see people talking and not scrolling, so good job.
    • 00:51:59
      I am very pleased to be able to present to you all, as additional information during this time of your reflection and thought process, the latest administration of the National Community Survey.
    • 00:52:14
      We have with us Grace Arneson from POLCO, who is the organization that administers the survey.
    • 00:52:20
      The city has done this survey for several years, so I'm also very excited.
    • 00:52:24
      She's going to show you data that builds upon itself.
    • 00:52:27
      So we've got some really good longitudinal data.
    • 00:52:30
      I want to encourage you all to please take notes.
    • 00:52:35
      You will be able to also ask questions as well.
    • 00:52:38
      Everyone should have a copy in front of them for you to mark up, scribble, dog ear as we go through.
    • 00:52:45
      And there also is a larger document as well that we will be making available not only to the public, but to you all as well.
    • 00:52:55
      But Grace, if we can just test you coming off mute to make sure that everyone can hear you.
    • 00:53:02
      Yes, test.
    • 00:53:03
      How's the volume?
    • 00:53:04
      That works wonderfully.
    • 00:53:05
      So Grace, the floor is yours.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 00:53:09
      Thank you so much, Ashley.
    • 00:53:11
      Hi, everyone.
    • 00:53:12
      My name is Grace.
    • 00:53:13
      I've been a project manager here at Polko for about four years now, and I've worked with hundreds of jurisdictions across the US.
    • 00:53:21
      So I'm happy to be here to present the findings of the Charlottesville National Community Survey.
    • 00:53:28
      And before I want to begin, I do want to thank Ashley Marshall.
    • 00:53:32
      She was our primary contact throughout the survey process, and she provided really thoughtful feedback every step of the way and helped to organize this presentation.
    • 00:53:42
      So thank you so much, Ashley.
    • 00:53:44
      As she mentioned, this presentation will be about 25 minutes long with 15 minutes at the end for questions.
    • 00:53:55
      All right, so before we dive into your results, I'd like to share a little bit about POLCO.
    • 00:54:00
      POLCO is an online community engagement platform providing local governments with resident and employee feedback.
    • 00:54:07
      The acquired data can be used for budgeting, strategic planning, and empowering resident voices.
    • 00:54:12
      So you may have heard of NRC or Nashville Research Center.
    • 00:54:17
      Hulco merged with them back in 2019 and NRC has been around since 1994.
    • 00:54:23
      They're best known for developing the NCS survey along with the National Employee Survey, the Community Assessment for Older Agiles among others.
    • 00:54:34
      We also partner closely with ICMA and NLC along with many other local government and academic leaders.
    • 00:54:45
      So before we dive into results, I want to emphasize that there are a variety of ways that these can be used.
    • 00:54:52
      So most commonly, the folks we work with use their survey data to monitor trends, which Ashley mentioned, you have amazing trend data to look at here.
    • 00:55:02
      This monitors trends in resident opinion and informs budgeting and strategic plans.
    • 00:55:08
      Our results also allow you to benchmark your community's specific characteristics against all of the communities in our benchmark database, which I'll cover in just a few slides here.
    • 00:55:20
      So we hope that these findings will spark ideas of where you may want to explore further.
    • 00:55:28
      So a little bit about the NCS instrument.
    • 00:55:32
      It is a standardized five page survey that measures resident opinion about community and local government.
    • 00:55:39
      It focuses on these 10 facets of livability shown here.
    • 00:55:44
      These are all related to overall quality of life and they often align with municipal departments as well.
    • 00:55:52
      so that it's easier for staff to find results most relevant to their work.
    • 00:55:58
      So you'll see these here.
    • 00:56:00
      We have a few additional questions in addition to these 10 facets, including demographic questions and a couple of participation questions like have you voted, have you campaigned, have you carpooled.
    • 00:56:14
      So the survey primarily focuses on these 10 facets here.
    • 00:56:21
      And with that, we'll dive into Charlottesville's specific results.
    • 00:56:25
      This is where I really want to spend a lot of time.
    • 00:56:28
      So we're covering the methodology here.
    • 00:56:31
      And this was Charlottesville's sixth time conducting the NCS with the previous survey iteration in 2022.
    • 00:56:38
      So you'll see throughout the report some trend data.
    • 00:56:43
      That trend data is all referencing between 2022 and 2025.
    • 00:56:49
      You can look back in the full report at those old trends, but today we'll primarily be focusing on the most recent trend.
    • 00:56:57
      So to sample, we
    • 00:57:02
      We purchased a household list based on updated USPS listings from Charlottesville zip codes and from that list we used city provided GIS files to remove any addresses that were not within Charlottesville and then from the remaining list 3,000 addresses were selected to receive survey invites.
    • 00:57:24
      So during the survey administration, mailings began about April 15th, and the survey remained open for six weeks.
    • 00:57:33
      So that first mailing was a postcard.
    • 00:57:36
      This included instructions to take the survey, a QR code, and a link to the survey, and it also let folks know that a paper survey was on the way.
    • 00:57:47
      So the second mailing was a survey packet.
    • 00:57:50
      This contained a cover letter, postage, paper chart, envelope, and paper survey so that everyone had the chance to apply via paper.
    • 00:58:00
      Both mailings did include a web link to complete the survey online, so that was an option as well.
    • 00:58:06
      And the survey was available in English and Spanish, and all of those letters and postcards had bilingual instructions.
    • 00:58:15
      So from our process, we received 386 completed surveys for a 14% response rate and margin of error of plus or minus 5%.
    • 00:58:28
      Responses were also weighted to map Charlottesville's demographic makeup, and that was based on data from the census and ACS's data.
    • 00:58:39
      We also, during our data collection period, conducted an open participation survey.
    • 00:58:44
      So this was a link that Charlottesville shared.
    • 00:58:48
      It was open from May 13th to 17th.
    • 00:58:50
      And this was an opportunity for all community members to participate, even those who haven't received an invite.
    • 00:58:59
      So 664 responses were received there.
    • 00:59:02
      However, this presentation and the report are based on the 386 random sample responses since those were gathered using scientific methods.
    • 00:59:13
      So open participation results are provided to you in the full report if that interests you, but will be focused on the random sample today.
    • 00:59:24
      So I mentioned our benchmark database earlier, and one of the big advantages of participating in our community surveys is the opportunity to compare ratings given by your residents to those from communities across the nation.
    • 00:59:38
      So our benchmark database is the largest of its kind.
    • 00:59:42
      It currently has over 500 communities, and that represents over 50 million voices.
    • 00:59:50
      We were one of the first to develop this benchmark database and we're very proud of it and you'll see these benchmark ratings throughout your report and this presentation.
    • 01:00:03
      So overview of survey results, we will dive into some general results and then go into a look at some areas where it might dig a little bit deeper.
    • 01:00:14
      So to start off here, in the survey we have two questions asked directly about those 10 facets of community livability that I mentioned earlier.
    • 01:00:26
      So the first asks residents to rate their quality in each, and you can see the resulting comparison to the national benchmark and the shading on this chart.
    • 01:00:35
      So you'll notice here, education, arts, and culture is highest in quality and higher than the national benchmark, followed closely by natural environment, arts and recreation, and health and wellness.
    • 01:00:51
      Some notable lower scores, safety and community design did fall below that national benchmark and mobility was the lowest in quality.
    • 01:01:05
      We also asked about those same facets of mobility, but we asked a question centered on how important did residents think it is for the community to focus on these certain facets over the coming two years.
    • 01:01:20
      So, as you can tell, importance is, you know, importance to residents.
    • 01:01:26
      So, we have higher ratings here.
    • 01:01:29
      Everything for the most part is similar to the benchmark with the exception of utilities.
    • 01:01:35
      Economy being the most important topic for residents, followed closely by mobility, natural environment, safety,
    • 01:01:44
      and at Community Design, the lower score was health and wellness here.
    • 01:01:51
      This data is very helpful, but it's even more helpful when you put it together with those quality assessments, which is this gap chart, and this is included in your report.
    • 01:02:03
      So this is comparing the quality and importance of those overall factors a little bit.
    • 01:02:10
      So this chart is one of many ways to interpret your data and can be used to help you determine focus areas or areas where you might allocate some additional resources.
    • 01:02:23
      And the largest gaps here were mobility with that 39% quality and 82% importance, followed by community design, economy, and lastly safety.
    • Michael Payne
    • 01:02:37
      Could you just provide maybe examples of what community design means?
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 01:02:44
      Yeah, absolutely.
    • 01:02:46
      So community design is the overall design of the community.
    • 01:02:50
      So looking at new development, growth, residential areas, I don't believe it's in the presentation, but it is in the report.
    • 01:03:05
      And I can dive into that a bit deeper towards the end.
    • 01:03:09
      I can pull up that report and show you what the community design section looks like.
    • 01:03:15
      But mainly, yes, just development, overall design of the neighborhoods, of the commercial areas, and also preservation of the historical elements of the community as well, with a few others in there.
    • 01:03:34
      So compared to the national benchmarks of the 123 survey items for which residents provided ratings, four received ratings that were higher than the national benchmark.
    • 01:03:46
      97 were similar to the benchmark, and 22 received lower ratings.
    • 01:03:52
      So these ratings are considered similar if they're within 10 points of the national average and higher or lower if they are more than 10 points different from the average.
    • 01:04:09
      However, trend data adds some additional context here.
    • 01:04:14
      So when comparing Charlottesville's NCS results in 2022 to the 2025 results, 23 received ratings that were higher than the 2022 results, 86 were similar to those results, and 14 received over-readings.
    • 01:04:34
      Moving now into the highlights of our five games, I just want to point out here that these are things that we as survey researchers found interesting, but there is a lot of additional data in the full report that we will cover today.
    • 01:04:47
      So we'll focus on a few key areas we found to be most noteworthy, but please do if you have a chance read through that full report because there is much more robust data in there.
    • 01:05:01
      So our first key finding here, most residents experience a high quality of life in Charlottesville.
    • 01:05:08
      So about 7 in 7 residents gave excellent or good readings to Charlottesville as a place to live, the overall image or reputation of the city, and the overall quality of life in the city.
    • 01:05:21
      In addition, 7 in 10 residents indicated that they planned to remain in Charlottesville for the next five years and would recommend living in Charlottesville to someone who asked.
    • 01:05:39
      All right.
    • 01:05:40
      Readings for Charlottesville local government also increased since 2022.
    • 01:05:48
      So we asked residents about the local government performance in Charlottesville and results across all ratings were similar to the national benchmark.
    • 01:05:57
      But as you see here, we had many notable improvements since 2022.
    • 01:06:02
      Actually, all of the ratings on this slide were statistically significant increases from 2022 results.
    • 01:06:11
      So in looking here, about 56% of residents rated the city treating residents with respect as excellent or good, followed by 51% for the city's efforts to welcome residents, and 49% for being honest.
    • 01:06:30
      Just under half positively rated the general performance in the best interest of the community at about 48%, communication about issues, transparency, and overall confidence in local governments.
    • 01:06:45
      The lowest rating was for treating all residents fairly, yet this too has increased since 2022.
    • 01:06:56
      Safety also continues to be rated positively, maintaining strong levels of satisfaction.
    • 01:07:05
      So in terms of community safety, about 88% of residents indicated that they feel safe in their neighborhood during the day, and 86% feel safe from flood, fire, or other natural disaster.
    • 01:07:19
      Just over 8 to 10, about 82%, report feeling safe in the downtown or commercial area during the day.
    • 01:07:27
      And perceptions of safety dropped a little bit when it comes to crime.
    • 01:07:32
      So about 64% feel safe from property crime and 63% feel safe from violent crime.
    • 01:07:39
      Safety from violent crime was rated lower than the national benchmark here.
    • 01:07:49
      So scores for safety services tended to be a bit more positive, and a few items did increase since 2022.
    • 01:07:57
      So fire services received the highest rating, with almost all residents 95%, rating them as excellent or good, followed closely by ambulance and emergency medical services at 90%.
    • 01:08:11
      Fire prevention and education also scored well with 82% satisfaction.
    • 01:08:16
      And although a little bit lower than other safety services, police services and crime prevention both saw an increase since 2022 results.
    • 01:08:28
      Police services experienced a nine point increase and crime prevention experienced an eight point increase here.
    • 01:08:40
      Affordability remains a concern for many residents in the city.
    • 01:08:47
      So the economy has a lot to cover, so hang in there with me.
    • 01:08:51
      But when we asked about the local economy, about 84% of respondents rated the city positively as a place to visit, and 72% were satisfied with the overall quality of businesses and service establishments.
    • 01:09:08
      It's worth noting here that the overall quality of business and service establishments did decrease slightly since 2022 results.
    • 01:09:17
      Greetings for Charlottesville as a place to work.
    • 01:09:20
      The variety of service and business establishments and the vibrancy of the downtown and commercial areas are also in line with the national averages here.
    • 01:09:32
      We had a few items fall below the national average including the availability of affordable quality at child care and preschool, the availability of affordable quality housing, cost of living, and we also asked a question on the survey, what impact do you think the economy will have on your family over the next six months?
    • 01:09:53
      Only 8% felt that that would be very or somewhat positive.
    • 01:10:04
      However, these downward trends are certainly not unique to Charlottesville.
    • 01:10:08
      We've been seeing this across many, many reports.
    • 01:10:11
      And so we wanted to include this national unique year for context.
    • 01:10:15
      And the data used to create this chart comes from our national benchmark database.
    • 01:10:20
      As you can see here, some items like the availability of affordable quality housing, which is our pink line here, that has been declining for some time, but others like the cost of living, the availability of affordable quality food and childcare, those have shown large declines in the post-pandemic economy, especially as we've been navigating very high inflationary times.
    • 01:10:48
      combined with increasing interest rates and relatively lower consumer sentiment about the overall health of the economy.
    • 01:10:58
      So although we do see deep lines in some of these ratings related to the past survey effort of 2022, many of them relate to these broader national trends.
    • 01:11:08
      And this isn't to say that the city should or shouldn't do something to address these issues, but hopefully this helps to place them in a broader context by taking into account the other jurisdictions we've worked with over the past decade.
    • 01:11:27
      Our fifth key finding here, residents identify mobility as an important area of focus.
    • 01:11:35
      So mobility was rated the second most important facet by residents.
    • 01:11:40
      If you remember one of the first slides, we asked residents, how important is it for the city to focus on these over the next two years?
    • 01:11:48
      And mobility was the second most important there.
    • 01:11:52
      So that was the
    • 01:11:56
      I believe biggest or second biggest gap as well in our quality and importance chart.
    • 01:12:02
      But looking here at the results, the highest rated aspect related to mobility was ease of walking at 55% excellent or good, followed by ease of travel by car.
    • 01:12:16
      So ease of travel by car, ease of public parking, and ease of travel by bicycle
    • 01:12:21
      were falling below the national benchmark this year, and ease of travel by car experienced a statistically significant decline since 2022.
    • 01:12:31
      The ease of travel by public transportation was also a little bit lower here, so we had 27% rate that as excellent or good, and that was on par with 2022 results.
    • 01:12:49
      Traffic flow on major streets was similar to the benchmark at 31%, which doesn't surprise me too much.
    • 01:12:56
      As you can imagine, we have a lot of strong feelings about traffic, so I'm not too surprised to see that that is a relatively lower rating, but yet still on par with that national benchmark.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 01:13:08
      So I just had a clarification from the previous slide.
    • 01:13:12
      The second, ease of travel by car, I just want to make sure I understand, 51%, what does that mean again?
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 01:13:21
      Yes, so 51% rated the ease of travel by car as excellent or good.
    • 01:13:31
      And the fact that it's a decline shows that it used to be more people thought it was excellent.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 01:13:37
      Most of the fact that it's a decline is a good thing.
    • 01:13:41
      Okay.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 01:13:45
      In terms of mobility services, some didn't see improvement since the last survey iteration in 2022.
    • 01:13:53
      So again, this is percent excellent or good here.
    • 01:13:59
      You'll see that 61% rated street cleaning as excellent or good, followed closely by street lighting at 59%.
    • 01:14:08
      Silver removal at 56% and both of those experienced statistically significant increases since 2022.
    • 01:14:17
      Traffic enforcement fallen closely at 48% positive and about 41% appreciated the requests for transit services.
    • 01:14:27
      This was also increasing significantly since 2022.
    • 01:14:31
      So all categories here did perform on par with the national benchmark and we had quite a few improvements which is a contrast against the overall mobility.
    • 01:14:44
      It's obvious that the mobility services are doing their best to correct some of these potential focus areas.
    • 01:14:55
      So last and not least, educational and digital opportunities are being highly valued in Charlottesville.
    • 01:15:05
      So, in terms of education, arts, and culture, we asked residents to rate each of these items on a scale of excellent goods and airport, and we have 88% appreciating the public library services.
    • 01:15:19
      This was the highest rated item in this facet, and that was Albemarle with the National Benchmark.
    • 01:15:26
      Community support for the arts policy will be at 80%, along with opportunities to attend cultural arts and music festivals.
    • 01:15:35
      Both of those items will require the national benchmark here.
    • 01:15:40
      Opportunities to attend special events and festivals and adult educational opportunities along with K-12 education were a little bit lower but still relatively high comparison to all of the ratings throughout the report and all of these were on par with the national benchmark as well.
    • 01:16:00
      We didn't have any trends to note here so these were also stable with 2022 results giving you consistent satisfaction.
    • 01:16:13
      So additional special topics, in addition to these theater guides by Page Survey Instrument, we have a little bit of space left to include some custom questions that were unique to Charlottesville.
    • 01:16:26
      So this is our question here.
    • 01:16:28
      I know it might be a little bit hard to read, but we'll have it more clearly on the next slide.
    • 01:16:35
      So for this custom question, we asked residents whether the city's current service level should be increased, kept the same, or decreased for various services.
    • 01:16:46
      And looking at this chart here, it has a ton of data for your review, but about 60% would like to see increased efforts in both bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and traffic system improvements.
    • 01:17:02
      Well, about 34% and 37% respectively support maintaining current service levels in those areas.
    • 01:17:10
      So just looking at those first two items there, you'll see traffic system improvements, about 60% wanted to increase.
    • 01:17:18
      Well, about 37% said that we could keep the immediate current service and only 3% there said that they would decrease the service.
    • 01:17:30
      So looking forward here to street and sidewalk repair.
    • 01:17:35
      Just over half of residents support increasing levels of street and sidewalk maintenance and repairs, about 51%.
    • 01:17:43
      And a nearly equal share would like to maintain the current levels.
    • 01:17:48
      So about 48% were happy with the current level.
    • 01:17:53
      Communication about city programs, services, and activities also received also more investment with about 50% favoring an increase and 45% preferring to keep service levels the same.
    • 01:18:08
      So each of the remaining items here, once we move past the communication about city program services and activities, had fewer than 50% of respondents saying that services should be increased.
    • 01:18:25
      However, for a vast majority of these, over 50% did want to maintain the current service level with only downtown parking management, police patrol and investigative services, and support for non-profits seeing double-digit totals for those hoping to decrease the service levels.
    • 01:18:46
      Of the items here, which could be compared to the 2022 survey, three saw statistically significant increases with more residents saying that the service should remain the same or be increased in 2025.
    • 01:19:01
      And those who are communicating with residents about the city programs, services, and activities, that saw a seven point increase in terms of either increase in the service or keeping the same service.
    • 01:19:14
      Providing competitive grant funding to local non-profits saw a walking 17% increase in terms of increasing or keeping taxes the same and police control and investigative services saw a 10.2% increase there.
    • 01:19:35
      So a quick summary of conclusions here.
    • 01:19:37
      Most residents experience a high quality of life.
    • 01:19:40
      The local government ratings increased since 2022.
    • 01:19:45
      Safety continues to be rated positively, maintaining strong levels of satisfaction.
    • 01:19:51
      Affordability remains a concern for many residents in the city.
    • 01:19:56
      Residents identify mobility as an important area of focus, and educational and cultural opportunities remain highly valued in Charlotte.
    • 01:20:07
      With that, I know that was a lot of information at once, so I'd like to thank you all for your time and open up the room for questions.
    • 01:20:16
      I will just scoot back to this summary of conclusions so we can have a quick view here, but happy to hop around to any other slides if there are any other questions.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 01:20:32
      Grace, I have one question I had about your methodology.
    • 01:20:36
      You had said on the page, talking about the 386 total responses received, 664 responses to the open participation survey, which you said, if I interpreted you correctly, that you did not factor in those responses into the data we saw right at the end there.
    • 01:20:58
      What was either the purpose or the value of that open participation survey if you weren't going to use it?
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 01:21:07
      Yeah, great question.
    • 01:21:08
      Well, it does provide some interesting context.
    • 01:21:11
      So a lot of jurisdictions will look at their open participation and random sample results side by side, and they'll see, okay, so we have 664 residents respond to the open participation survey.
    • 01:21:26
      Those are likely very engaged and local residents, and you're able to see, are they feeling
    • 01:21:33
      So that is one way.
    • 01:21:35
      Another benefit of this is we have the opportunity to reach out to people who have signed up on POLCO to conduct additional outreach.
    • 01:21:43
      So during future open participation surveys,
    • 01:21:58
      We can invite those who have participated in the past and provided their email address to participate in those growing your online panel for future surveys.
    • 01:22:08
      So there are a couple of benefits.
    • 01:22:10
      And the third, I think I left the best for last.
    • 01:22:14
      It's just giving the opportunity to everyone in the community to participate.
    • 01:22:19
      We've had feedback that, you know, I get a mail invite, but I'd still like to give my feedback, give someone the opportunity to provide that and communicate with the city.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 01:22:30
      Are there any different lessons that one might glean from those 600 and some responses different from the statistics generated by the 386 responses?
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 01:22:43
      Sorry, couldn't quite hear you there.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 01:22:45
      Okay, I'm just wondering, is there anything that
    • 01:22:49
      Any conclusions that you gleaned or any trends that you gleaned from the 664 open participation responses that either couldn't be discerned from the 386 or might have been different from the 386?
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 01:23:06
      You know, I haven't looked into that personally, but we certainly could.
    • 01:23:12
      Let me follow up on that and compare those open participation and random sample results.
    • 01:23:20
      And we'll follow up with Ashley to circle back and answer that question.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 01:23:26
      I'm not asking you to try to pull out something that isn't a valid conclusion.
    • 01:23:36
      For example, if it turns out that the 664 responses are largely the same as the 386, okay, that's fine.
    • 01:23:46
      If we know that we have very different results out of the 664,
    • 01:23:52
      than we had out of the 386, there might be something worthwhile noting there.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 01:23:58
      Yeah, absolutely.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 01:24:00
      I agree.
    • 01:24:01
      Natalie?
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 01:24:02
      Thank you for asking that.
    • 01:24:05
      That was one of my questions as well.
    • 01:24:07
      You mentioned having the surveys.
    • SPEAKER_14
    • 01:24:09
      I'm sorry.
    • 01:24:10
      I can't quite hear you.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 01:24:13
      Yeah, no, I just said that Lloyd's question was one of my questions as well.
    • 01:24:19
      But also, you mentioned having the survey sent out in English and Spanish.
    • 01:24:26
      Charlottesville is known for having a very diverse language population.
    • 01:24:30
      And I'm wondering if, is there a way to get more languages out there, or is that nationwide the only two languages that you have available?
    • 01:24:43
      No, our list of languages is ever growing.
    • 01:24:47
      So I think last time I checked we were at either 15 or 20 languages.
    • 01:24:52
      So those are programmed on Polko.
    • 01:24:55
      So we can do the online survey in many languages.
    • 01:24:58
      We can also provide a paper survey in a different language as well.
    • 01:25:04
      That gets pretty expensive because the printing costs are high.
    • 01:25:10
      So I would recommend doing those online translations
    • 01:25:13
      Thanks for watching!
    • 01:25:14
      One thing that's worth mentioning, too, is a lot of folks who don't speak English primarily at home, they use an extension on their browser to translate that, and Polko is compatible with that Google Chrome extension.
    • 01:25:32
      We're not able to track that on our side, but we have a really strong suspicion that a lot of folks are using that to translate the survey and respond in their own language.
    • 01:25:45
      Yeah, I'm more concerned about them knowing, if you get a postcard in the mail, that doesn't have that automatic translate feature to know that that's what the postcard is asking them to do.
    • SPEAKER_13
    • 01:25:57
      Absolutely.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 01:25:57
      So I don't know what the problem solver that is, but it's something to keep in mind, especially for Charlottesville, is we might be missing some data there.
    • 01:26:07
      There are some options too outside of translating the survey online.
    • 01:26:12
      We could even just include a note in different languages that the survey is compatible with that translation feature as well.
    • 01:26:20
      So I've seen that done in the past, but I think we can definitely include additional languages in the future.
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 01:26:28
      And Grace, I was going to share part of the reason why we've selected for the second year in a row to make sure it was available in Spanish.
    • 01:26:35
      is previously it was not presented even as bilingual.
    • 01:26:39
      And so this helped me to get trends and all of my data shows that while we do have a large variety of languages, if I am looking at the prevalence of a foreign language at this point, it still was Spanish.
    • 01:26:52
      I think that that is a wonderful opportunity for us to expand into that, but I also wanted the city manager to be able to have two years of us even introducing it in Spanish
    • 01:27:04
      to see if that made a difference at all.
    • 01:27:07
      Because again, previously, we did not introduce this as being compatible or having any other language in the statistically significant survey.
    • 01:27:17
      In the open survey, we did know that people can use that Google Translate button if they so desire to be able to engage, but that's some reflection and recommendations we can make for the next administration.
    • 01:27:29
      But it was honestly a bit of a test to see where we are and then
    • 01:27:34
      Thinking of that expense for the printed copy, looking at our most prevalent language, which still is Spanish.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 01:27:40
      OK, thanks.
    • 01:27:41
      And then my last note is, on this page here, the number one point, most residents experience high quality blood in Charlottesville, was the question about the respondents, or was it about how you perceive people in the community?
    • 01:27:57
      Like, are they answering on behalf of themselves?
    • SPEAKER_15
    • 01:28:00
      Yes.
    • 01:28:01
      So it's about their own experience in the community.
    • 01:28:04
      OK.
    • 01:28:05
      I can scroll back to that slide here.
    • 01:28:08
      I believe the question is included.
    • 01:28:18
      Oh, it is not.
    • 01:28:19
      But I can also re-stop my share here.
    • 01:28:28
      So in the report of results here, it would
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 01:28:54
      So Michael, did you have any questions or comments?
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 01:29:00
      Well the reason why, if I could, the reason why I ask that is because I would rephrase that to say most respondents experience a high quality of life in Charlottesville and that's something that changes the
    • 01:29:13
      kind of value of that bullet point I think it becomes a little more accurate because we know there are people who have challenges and those are probably going to be the hardest people to get to respond and so residence feels like it encompasses more than might actually be
    • 01:29:30
      represented even if it is statistically significant.
    • 01:29:33
      And then in line with that, the seven out of ten respondents who said they would remain for the next five years and recommend it, one of the follow-ups, I don't know if this is captured in the study, but one of my questions was how long have they lived here already?
    • 01:29:48
      And does it capture long-term residents or short-term residents and how does that change, did that change their responses?
    • SPEAKER_17
    • 01:29:55
      Yeah, so if you can actually dig into that in the report too, Ashley, do I have time for a two-minute demo there?
    • 01:30:03
      I don't think.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 01:30:04
      How much time do we have?
    • 01:30:07
      Yeah, I wanted to get everyone's questions because we have to move on, so I don't think we have time.
    • 01:30:12
      But we get follow up on that with you.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 01:30:14
      Yeah, I will follow up on that with you.
    • 01:30:17
      There is a way to compare length of residency against the answers supplied.
    • 01:30:22
      So basically all of the demographic questions we ask, we're able to break down the questions by those categories.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 01:30:32
      Any other questions, Natalie, or comments?
    • Michael Payne
    • 01:30:35
      Not right now, please.
    • 01:30:37
      I'll try to be quick.
    • 01:30:39
      Similar to other questions, I'm sure the people who actually respond to this survey are very different from the self-selected.
    • 01:30:46
      Either they're more engaged with local government already, maybe they're just psychologically even different.
    • 01:30:52
      Does your weighting address that bias of who is more likely to even respond to a survey they get in the mail?
    • SPEAKER_17
    • 01:31:01
      Yes, so our reading, we actually wait both surveys.
    • 01:31:06
      So we wait both the random sample and the open participation survey to make sure that that is self-representative of the population.
    • 01:31:15
      And we tend to see older women who respond at a higher rate.
    • 01:31:23
      But I guess you just can't wait if even across all demographics people are self-selecting
    • Michael Payne
    • 01:31:48
      There's a correlation between self-selecting and responding.
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 01:31:51
      If I can help, they weigh all of it, looking at multiple demographics from age, Hispanic origin, housing, tenure, housing type, race and Hispanic origin, sex and sex and age in various groups.
    • 01:32:02
      And so I have that larger data for you.
    • 01:32:04
      But remember, this is more of a snapshot.
    • 01:32:07
      I love that you all want to be walking.
    • 01:32:09
      Let's do it.
    • Michael Payne
    • 01:32:10
      I love it.
    • 01:32:11
      No, I mean it's definitely useful data for sure still.
    • 01:32:16
      And then just quick thoughts.
    • 01:32:18
      One, it jumps out to me that our parks are maybe the only area of government that it seems like people like to praise rather than just criticize and that kind of jumped out in the responses.
    • 01:32:30
      Not shocking, but that we're 20 points lower than national average for availability of affordable housing, cost of living, affordable childcare jumped out.
    • 01:32:39
      We're substantially lower than national average.
    • 01:32:42
      And then the lack of access to affordable childcare jumped out at me because so much of our population growth has been driven by older residents.
    • 01:32:52
      Our school population over the past 20 years only increased by 17 students.
    • 01:32:57
      So what can we do to make it more feasible for people to actually start families in Charlottesville with something that jumped out as well?
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 01:33:06
      Brian?
    • 01:33:11
      No.
    • 01:33:14
      I just had a couple of comments.
    • 01:33:15
      Is the 14%, is that within, is that okay that responded?
    • 01:33:21
      Is that like, you know, about what we expect?
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 01:33:26
      Yeah, that is a great response today.
    • 01:33:28
      I actually just ran the 2025 average response rate yesterday and it's only at 11% on average, so you are certainly above average there.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 01:33:40
      And do we know, and I assume that when you mail the
    • 01:33:47
      The paper surveyed that it included a self-esteem envelope to send it back.
    • 01:33:55
      And my last question is, do we know of the people that responded, the demographic breakdown of them?
    • 01:34:06
      Roughly how many African Americans responded?
    • 01:34:09
      How many of our new Afghanistan community do we know, just generally speaking, what that is?
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 01:34:15
      Yes, sir.
    • 01:34:16
      We do have that information.
    • 01:34:18
      If you have it at your fingertips, I'm trying to find it, but I also will share that part of the reason why we look at the Statistically Significant Survey is we are also able to weigh how they deploy those 3,000 original invitations.
    • 01:34:37
      So we look at communities that maybe have lower responses, maybe it's socio-economic or various other options that we can find that in census data and they can push a few more surveys to that group to give more people an opportunity to answer
    • 01:34:53
      then in a section of a community where they are very apt to answer questions and like love filling out the Nielsen survey, right?
    • 01:35:00
      So that's another way that they can weigh to try and get the best responses from our totality of community than just people who like to fill in bubbles.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 01:35:08
      Okay, I got it.
    • 01:35:09
      So it was factored in.
    • 01:35:11
      Yes, sir.
    • 01:35:11
      Good.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:35:12
      So we're going to get a second to reflect together, but is there any more questions, actual questions?
    • 01:35:20
      Thank you all for your time and my email is on the last slide there.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 01:35:26
      If you have any questions, please send it my way.
    • 01:35:30
      But I look forward to hearing how you all utilize these results and thank you so much for your time today.
    • 01:35:40
      We actually have Jason's email.
    • 01:35:44
      Oh, my email is on the new version, so I can get it to you.
    • SPEAKER_17
    • 01:35:52
      It's grace.poco.us.
    • 01:35:54
      So just replace Jason Neumeier with Grace.
    • 01:35:58
      Thanks.
    • 01:35:59
      Thank you so much for putting that up.
    • 01:36:01
      I appreciate it.
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 01:36:03
      Thank you.
    • 01:36:04
      All right.
    • 01:36:05
      Hang tight with me for two seconds, Ruth.
    • 01:36:09
      You got it.
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 01:36:14
      The group.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:36:35
      All right, do me a favor, grab your other herb if you could.
    • 01:36:39
      I'd like you to grab one inside the middle of that if you can write community survey, that would be great.
    • 01:36:46
      And then take five minutes from everything you just heard, if you understand what you respect and what you value.
    • SPEAKER_04
    • 01:37:04
      We're a community survey in the middle of that, we understand, we respect, and we're behind.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:38:01
      Everything you just heard, high level.
    • 01:38:04
      I don't understand.
    • SPEAKER_02
    • 01:38:07
      What do you expect?
    • 01:38:12
      What is they value?
    • 01:38:36
      Alright, just about another minute.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:39:17
      All right.
    • 01:39:17
      Well, would you start us off?
    • 01:39:20
      This time, what we need to do is go through it all.
    • 01:39:22
      Tell us, like, you know, after hearing what I just heard, here's where I understand, here's where I respect, and here's where I value.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 01:39:29
      Yes, so what I understand is that I believe that we're headed in the right direction as a council, as a city, but we still have a lot of work to do.
    • 01:39:37
      What I respect is I respect council and staff for their service because what we saw was a lot of that was, whether it's the police, the library, whatever, was the efforts of staff working.
    • 01:39:55
      And what
    • 01:39:57
      What I value is that our efforts for increasing mobility, that is having an impact on residents and our commitment and our love of library and books in this community is phenomenal.
    • 01:40:16
      There's a lot of bookstores and libraries here in this community, so that's our... I appreciate that.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:40:24
      Brian, what do you understand respect and value?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:40:28
      I don't mean this in any way to be discouraging or anything like that, but just it generally reaffirms my skepticism of surveys.
    • 01:40:41
      Not that I don't
    • 01:40:52
      This is a strong word.
    • 01:40:54
      I know enough math and I've seen enough people at their front door, but I feel like surveys, particularly when she was going through all the various numbers, it gives you a sense of precision that doesn't reflect reality.
    • 01:41:10
      And even if 400 people in the city somehow turns out to be
    • 01:41:17
      Statistically representative of the whole city.
    • 01:41:20
      I mean, I just find that hard to believe.
    • 01:41:25
      Not that... On the other hand, I think the train data, though, is valuable.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:41:31
      I'm sorry, it's a tool, right?
    • 01:41:32
      The idea is how we design and create that tool to better try and... Yeah, I think it's a whole theory.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:41:37
      I mean, I get it.
    • 01:41:38
      I took statistics in college a long, long time ago, but... The thing that I respect was just...
    • 01:41:47
      I guess is the time and attention to detail that went into it and I respected it from a professional perspective.
    • 01:41:54
      There's a world of surveys and I'm sure they know even though they've struggled with political artistications lately.
    • 01:42:02
      The thing that I value frankly is what we actually hear from our residents.
    • 01:42:08
      Again I wonder, I've always wondered
    • 01:42:11
      When I knocked on doors versus what people fuss at us with over email or whatever, Heather Hill always talked about the difference between the signal and the noise.
    • 01:42:23
      What are we hearing about that's actually representing something real in the community versus people who are just annoyed?
    • SPEAKER_03
    • 01:42:33
      Lloyd, understand respect and value about that community center.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 01:42:37
      For the first thing I took away from the various poll results, even recognizing the difficulties with trying to draw too many broad conclusions out of what is still essentially meager data, that I was glad to see that the respondents and city government are largely aligned in our perceptions of what the problem areas are.
    • 01:43:00
      I note that some of the work that we have been doing seems to have been working and appreciated by the respondents and finally I was gratified to see that the respondents think that government is doing better than it has been.
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 01:43:21
      What do you understand respect and value?
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 01:43:25
      I understand that a lot of weight is being put on 386 people.
    • 01:43:30
      I respect that the survey tries to get at important questions.
    • 01:43:34
      It's a tall order to try and assess the community.
    • 01:43:38
      But yeah, in the context of designing surveys, this seems like it was covering the bases as intended and well.
    • 01:43:46
      And then even though it's a small sample and I can't pick and choose the responses I like and give them more weight, I acknowledge that.
    • 01:43:54
      I still am gratified to see that the bug pet infrastructure demands are going up and ease of travel is going down.
    • 01:44:00
      Both of those are good signs.
    • 01:44:01
      Ease of car travel is going down.
    • 01:44:02
      Both of those are good signs.
    • Michael Payne
    • 01:44:06
      Well, I agree with others.
    • 01:44:08
      Broader point, like I feel like community engagement is really hard for the city.
    • 01:44:12
      It reminds me of like the Cherry Avenue small area plan where when it started the city expected people to come to us and it didn't work at all and we had to go to people, knock on their door, meet them where they're at.
    • 01:44:25
      So it just made me think of that.
    • 01:44:26
      But from the responses, I understand it was not surprising that Charlottesville is very hard to afford and particularly hard for people to afford to start a family in.
    • 01:44:37
      What do I respect?
    • 01:44:38
      That trust in local government and the functioning of local government reached a very, very low point, you know, sometime after 2017.
    • 01:44:45
      And I think
    • 01:44:48
      A lot of rebuilding is happening and there's an increase in trust, but that takes a lot of time.
    • 01:44:54
      It takes time for the narrative to change and to rebuild.
    • 01:44:58
      What do I value?
    • 01:45:00
      That what was in the survey that people cared most about, the city is taking very substantial action on.
    • 01:45:08
      Some of that will take a while to materialize or maybe people don't know everything that's happening, but all of it is
    • 01:45:16
      Met with very significant investments and staff changes to try to implement these things.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:45:22
      Thank you for that.
    • 01:45:23
      I appreciate you all sharing.
    • 01:45:26
      What I'm attempting to do is build you a toolbox of understanding as well as we go through this information because, again, I'm sure you'll hear me say it and probably get tired by saying it.
    • 01:45:33
      I'm going to ask you to reflect on your notes for tomorrow.
    • 01:45:37
      So please continue to just take your thoughts and beautiful insights and the things you write down and just kind of hold it.
    • 01:45:43
      I'm going to ask you to leave it here as well because we are tomorrow.
    • 01:45:46
      I'm going to actually dip into that toolbox you built today.
    • 01:45:49
      So thank you.
    • 01:45:50
      Do me a favor.
    • 01:45:51
      If you don't want to take a break, take a five minute break.
    • 01:45:53
      I want to get a little bit of us some time back.
    • 01:45:55
      But do me a favor.
    • 01:45:56
      Take a five minute break.
    • 01:45:57
      Try to take a real break.
    • 01:45:58
      Grab someone to drink.
    • 01:46:00
      Well, it's obviously not too hot.
    • 01:46:01
      Breathe for a second.
    • 01:46:02
      We'll see you back in five minutes.
    • 01:46:04
      And we're going to talk about the financial conditions.
    • 01:46:06
      Again, where it is.
    • 01:46:08
      So far, where it is regarding strategic priorities, where it is regarding community, and then we will look at where it is regarding the financial condition and economic context.
    • 01:46:17
      Cool?
    • 01:46:18
      All right, take five minutes.
    • 01:46:19
      Go.
    • Sam Sanders
    • 01:46:19
      All right, so we are back.
    • 01:46:26
      And Josh focused on the idea that we were talking about where it is.
    • 01:46:30
      So we started with your priority areas, why you selected the priority areas.
    • 01:46:36
      I went through what you have said about them, why you picked them.
    • 01:46:41
      And now you've heard a little bit about how some members of the community is actually reflecting on them.
    • 01:46:47
      Hopefully helping you see that you're on the right targets, might not be hitting all the targets, might be missing some of the targets.
    • 01:46:56
      That's kind of the point of what the survey is supposed to do.
    • 01:46:59
      You let it inform and then you move on from it and get back to work.
    • 01:47:04
      So in order for us to do that, we had to always check in on the money side, and if my friend Chrissy Hannah was here, who is on the beach right now, and Joe and herself are stressed out that we're having a conversation about money without her, if Chrissy were here, she would be sitting up in her chair now and watching all of you as you start to talk about spending the money.
    • 01:47:23
      So what we decided we would do is make sure that we gave you a financial checkup,
    • 01:47:27
      And Vianne Leung is with PFM.
    • 01:47:30
      They're our financial advisor.
    • 01:47:32
      Vianne has been instrumental in helping us get through collective bargaining.
    • 01:47:35
      Y'all don't always get to see the sauce we're making and the behind-the-scenes stuff.
    • 01:47:39
      There was a moment when I was on a cliff ready to jump, and it was Vianne who said, I got you.
    • 01:47:44
      We'll figure this out.
    • 01:47:45
      We've done it before.
    • 01:47:46
      And Christy and I both took a sigh of relief and said, OK, Vianne, let's go.
    • 01:47:50
      So we were able to get through that process and come to appreciate how she has done analysis work.
    • 01:47:56
      She pitched this to us and after seeing the proposal we absolutely wanted to make sure that we provided this kind of context for what is our financial picture look like today and give her a chance to be able to answer any questions that come up.
    • SPEAKER_14
    • 01:48:11
      Well, good morning, everyone.
    • 01:48:12
      Thank you for inviting me and being here.
    • 01:48:14
      It's a pleasure.
    • 01:48:16
      So, as saying with views, I am part of PFM, Public Financial Management.
    • 01:48:21
      It's not clear what we do.
    • 01:48:22
      That's who we are.
    • 01:48:24
      And I've been working at PFM for 12 years, and I started my career actually working on the city government side.
    • 01:48:29
      I was a budget analyst.
    • 01:48:30
      This was my first job, but then came over to the government.
    • 01:48:34
      I'm consulting today.
    • 01:48:35
      So what I'm going to do today is a three-part presentation.
    • 01:48:39
      One is step back a little bit and say, okay, where are we economically in the current economic context?
    • 01:48:45
      I know that we see the news every day, more data is coming out every day.
    • 01:48:49
      But step back a little bit and say where we are economically.
    • 01:48:52
      But then kind of hold it a little bit in terms of what that step means for Charlottesville.
    • 01:48:56
      on the revenue side and on the expenditure side, and then wrap up with the next steps in terms of how you take that information in and help you with the rest of your decision-making process for the rest of the day and tomorrow.
    • 01:49:08
      So with this, let me start with the first section, which is the economic context.
    • 01:49:13
      I know this is a little small, but hang in there with me.
    • 01:49:16
      So when we talk about, when we look at the headlines and look at the recession from this, you know, there are a lot of numbers out there, a lot of data that we look at, and one of the figures that I have always looked at, at least one of the data points, is the leading economic indicator released by the Congress Board.
    • 01:49:32
      So when we talk about the economy and what does that mean, oftentimes they're what they call the leading economic indicators,
    • 01:49:39
      which are kind of all these data points that tell us is a recession going to come.
    • 01:49:43
      And a bunch of data points, you know, I think nine or 10.
    • 01:49:46
      And so what the conference group does, where they do economic forecasts every quarter, is that they combine all these data points into one single leading economic indicator.
    • 01:49:54
      For me, it kind of consolidates a little bit.
    • 01:49:57
      And so what we see here is the blue line there is a leading economic index, essentially telling you what the data points are.
    • 01:50:03
      That includes stuff like the stock market, interest rates,
    • 01:50:07
      building permits, new orders, those kind of leading economic indicators.
    • 01:50:11
      And that is a blue line.
    • 01:50:13
      The black line up there is a coincident economic indicator and those include things like personal income, employment, right?
    • 01:50:20
      Those are kind of like the, you know, if a recession happens, that black line is going to come down.
    • 01:50:25
      So if you look at kind of the past couple of recessions here, which is a gray-shaded area, you see the blue line usually comes before the black line.
    • 01:50:33
      So what the blue line does is that it essentially is a leading economic indicator, right?
    • 01:50:37
      It should tell you at least when something's coming.
    • 01:50:40
      And if you look at today, here, right here, you can see kind of those disclosure points, which is why we don't know whether or not we're in a recession right now.
    • 01:50:48
      That has not been any announcement.
    • 01:50:50
      But you can see the blue line, the leading economic indicator coming down.
    • 01:50:55
      And if you look at this chart, I'm not an economist, but if you look at this chart here, the red line is essentially what they've calculated as a recession signal.
    • 01:51:04
      What that tells us is that even though, as of today, I think our star portfolio is still doing okay, there's just that much economic uncertainty today.
    • 01:51:12
      And what is interesting about this is that you have to remember that this shaded gray area was decided later on.
    • 01:51:23
      We don't know if we're in a recession as of today.
    • 01:51:25
      One, we just don't know it yet.
    • 01:51:28
      That is a tricky thing about the economic situation right now.
    • 01:51:31
      All that is to say, and I think we all know here, that there's a lot of recession risks as of today and more to become.
    • 01:51:38
      When we talk about recession, you google that word.
    • 01:51:42
      The top is usually the GDP falls from two successive quarters, although the actual definition of that is a little bit more nuanced than that.
    • 01:51:49
      If you remember COVID, the recession was only two months.
    • 01:51:53
      Clearly, a recession can be a shorter than two successive quarters.
    • 01:51:57
      But essentially, a recession is a job of GDP.
    • 01:52:00
      And as of today, we are in a very unusual territory.
    • 01:52:05
      Why do I say that?
    • 01:52:07
      I remember giving this presentation back before COVID.
    • 01:52:11
      If you look at the 2008 recession, that was the longest, deepest recession that we have ever had.
    • 01:52:16
      And then the next recession here is the deepest, the shortest recession we have.
    • 01:52:21
      So whenever clients ask me, well, if I were to model a recession scenario, what would that look like?
    • 01:52:26
      Well, it's really hard to model that right now because there's no normal.
    • 01:52:30
      The last recession was the COVID recession, which is unprecedented, and the one before that was a great recession, and really, so the last normal chronic cold recession was back in the early 2000s, and that is kind of why it's so hard to predict right now.
    • 01:52:45
      But, you know, if you look at Charlottesville, and I look back at the numbers back in the last two recessions,
    • 01:52:50
      You were actually doing pretty well.
    • 01:52:52
      We'll talk a little bit about your strengths and your risks of your profile.
    • 01:52:55
      But you actually did pretty well in both of these researches, in part because you established a downturn reserve back in 2008.
    • 01:53:03
      And because you made certain decisions like collecting your capital spending in the COVID era, you did pretty well the last two recessions.
    • 01:53:11
      But those you did really well in part because of the planning and the thoughtfulness and the actions that were taken back then.
    • 01:53:18
      We want to make sure that you
    • 01:53:20
      are well positioned for the next one.
    • 01:53:24
      This is a lot of numbers, so let me walk you through this.
    • 01:53:26
      But remember when I said that we're in an unusual territory, you know, this is the historic recessions showing the expansion duration and the contraction duration.
    • 01:53:37
      So if you look at this 18 month onto the way to the right column, that was the longest recession that the U.S.
    • 01:53:45
      had.
    • 01:53:45
      That was a great recession.
    • 01:53:46
      That was the longest recession that the U.S.
    • 01:53:49
      had ever.
    • 01:53:50
      And then after that came the longest expansion period of 128 months.
    • 01:53:56
      And again, I said, you know, I remember it was a similar situation back then, saying like, whoa, this is the longest expansion period, why researchers are not driven just by time, just know that you have to be prepared.
    • 01:54:08
      And of course, the next day COVID hit.
    • 01:54:10
      and that became the shortest contraction ever.
    • 01:54:13
      So anyway, nerds like me probably like this chart but this is just again to reiterate the point that we are in a very unusual time right now.
    • 01:54:21
      You know, there's no roadmap, there's no kind of status quo, there's nothing unusual about what we're experiencing right now.
    • 01:54:30
      I made an earlier point that we don't know if we're in a recession today and I just kind of want to comment on that point a little bit.
    • 01:54:36
      Well, this is the next slide.
    • 01:54:38
      So this is fascinating.
    • 01:54:40
      This was, this chart is the survey professional forecasters released by the Philadelphia Federal Reserve and they essentially, you know, surveyed different economists and said, well what do you think GDP will grow next year?
    • 01:54:53
      How much do you think GDP will grow?
    • 01:54:54
      And at the time that they surveyed them, you can see this bell curve, at the time when they surveyed them, most of them were thinking between two to three percent in 2009.
    • 01:55:04
      Now this survey was released in February of 2008.
    • 01:55:07
      And guess what?
    • 01:55:08
      At that time and point,
    • 01:55:10
      When the economists responded to this survey, we were already in the 2008 recession.
    • 01:55:16
      And that's how when they were saying it would be plus 2.8%, the actual number was negative 2.6%.
    • 01:55:23
      And again, I found this fascinating because even the economists didn't know, right, that they were already in the recession.
    • 01:55:31
      Simple story here, this is the last three recession timeline.
    • 01:55:34
      If you hold that, you know what I just talked about, right?
    • 01:55:37
      In December 2007, we entered a recession.
    • 01:55:40
      February of 2008, they were still projected almost 3% in GDP, but that year, we had a negative 2.6%.
    • 01:55:48
      Now the period is important to note that like the National Bureau of Economic Research, they announce this late because they want enough data.
    • 01:55:56
      They say there is a recession.
    • 01:55:58
      So sometimes a recession could have ended before they announced that there was one.
    • 01:56:03
      and that was the COVID one.
    • 01:56:05
      The COVID recession was only two months long and they actually announced it in June when the recession ended to try to pay for it.
    • 01:56:13
      Similar thing happened in the early 2000 recession.
    • 01:56:17
      The U.S.
    • 01:56:17
      ended the recession in March 2001.
    • 01:56:18
      They actually announced it much later than November.
    • 01:56:22
      So that's why I said earlier that we could be in one right now but we just don't know about it.
    • 01:56:26
      That's
    • 01:56:27
      highlights the importance of planning and that what you're doing today is that we all need to anticipate where we are economically before the data is actually out.
    • 01:56:39
      Okay, so what does that mean for Charlottesville?
    • 01:56:42
      Obviously the economic activity, the economic context that we're in has a lot of impact on the revenue side of things.
    • 01:56:48
      So I'm going to step back a little bit and say, okay, you know, I just gave you an overview of the economic context.
    • 01:56:53
      What does that mean for Charlottesville on the revenue side of the financial equation?
    • 01:57:00
      This is a fascinating chart.
    • 01:57:03
      This is not you.
    • 01:57:04
      This is the National Cities.
    • 01:57:06
      This is a release into 2022 by the National League of Cities showing all their sort of national cities.
    • 01:57:13
      And I want to show this slide because I keep on saying we're unprecedented times from an economic perspective, but also from a local government financial perspective.
    • 01:57:25
      The orange line here is expenditures and the blue line here is the revenue and what you see here is, I haven't seen this before, is this diversion of the line where the expenditure goes up and the revenue goes down.
    • 01:57:43
      Now what is that difference?
    • 01:57:46
      Much of that is import-driven by the ARPA money, the COVID Cares Act money, all of that, right?
    • 01:57:52
      That is what is import-driven before we wind up.
    • 01:57:55
      And what we're seeing is that nationally across cities, the revenues are coming down.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 01:58:03
      Yes?
    • 01:58:03
      Can I ask just a picky question?
    • 01:58:05
      Is this the expenditures and revenues of national government, state government, local government, all of them?
    • SPEAKER_14
    • 01:58:15
      It's all cities across the city.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 01:58:17
      All cities?
    • SPEAKER_14
    • 01:58:18
      Yeah, only cities.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 01:58:20
      Okay, thank you.
    • SPEAKER_14
    • 01:58:23
      So this is something I just haven't seen before.
    • 01:58:25
      I mean, look at the chart before, right?
    • 01:58:26
      You have seen the line diverging, kind of not lining up, but this is something that happened to me as a person.
    • 01:58:32
      When was the last time, you know, local governments got the kind of money that we got from our red chairs and all that stuff, right?
    • 01:58:38
      So this is truly a positive benefit.
    • 01:58:41
      And I say when I look at this, you know, if all cities and counties, if you're not paying attention today, you really need to start right now.
    • 01:58:49
      This is not good.
    • 01:58:51
      Okay, that was national cities.
    • 01:58:55
      Like I said, let's look at Virginia.
    • 01:58:58
      So this is all Virginia.
    • 01:59:00
      Counties is blue.
    • 01:59:02
      City is yellow and all is white.
    • 01:59:04
      What you're seeing, this is the local revenue average year over year growth from a percentage perspective.
    • 01:59:10
      What you're seeing is, you know, it was going up and down, up and down, and of course COVID hit.
    • 01:59:16
      And look at what happened after COVID.
    • 01:59:19
      It really shot up from a percentage growth perspective.
    • 01:59:23
      But then in FY 2024, across all of the governments, the revenue growth was slowing down.
    • 01:59:26
      And I want to be clear, this is revenue growth.
    • 01:59:32
      So revenue was still growing, but it was growing at a lower rate in FY 2024 across all Virginia counties and cities alike.
    • 01:59:42
      And I think you see some of that during the FY 2026 budget process, where you see a lot more jurisdictions, even in Virginia jurisdictions, increasing tax rates, making tax rate adjustments, in part because the growth is slowing down again across all Virginia cities.
    • 02:00:01
      Let's talk about Charlottesville now.
    • 02:00:03
      You have all the kind of national landscape.
    • 02:00:05
      We're talking about Virginia.
    • 02:00:06
      Let's hone in on the city itself.
    • 02:00:09
      You also experienced some of that, right?
    • 02:00:11
      We've previously included Charlottesville in there.
    • 02:00:14
      What you see here, and this is back, you know, all the way back to 2016, so this is a decade-long flood.
    • 02:00:19
      And what you see here is, you know, from F1 2016 to kind of COVID, your revenue was growing moderately at about 4% each year.
    • 02:00:29
      And then the post-COVID era, like the 2020-2023, those revenue growth was growing by 10%.
    • 02:00:36
      And you see that revenue growth moderating the last two years to between 9% and 6%.
    • 02:00:42
      So that chart that will come down tells us that we'll also experience that.
    • 02:00:46
      Again, it's not negative growth, it's not positive growth, but the growth has come down significantly.
    • 02:00:54
      You know, this is the typical kind of your general fun pie chart and I want to show it now because, you know, all of you know this but this to me really highlights Charlottesville's strengths and risks.
    • 02:01:06
      So, if you look at your revenue makeup, right?
    • 02:01:09
      Half of that is your property has including a small size of personal property, but half of that is your property has another about 20% is a combination of meals, sales, and other taxes, and the rest is what I would call other, which includes what I would call fees, charges, and so on.
    • 02:01:27
      Slice.
    • 02:01:28
      This 50% property tax is your biggest strength.
    • 02:01:32
      Property taxes generally viewed as the most stabilized, non-volatile revenue.
    • 02:01:39
      And the fact that you have 50% of your revenue that comes from this very stable source, even in economic recession, that is your biggest strength.
    • 02:01:49
      You also have diversity, right?
    • 02:01:51
      This whole thing is not all just property, because we also have diversity, and that's good.
    • 02:01:56
      Revenue diversity is a good thing, and you have some diversity here that represents about 20%.
    • 02:02:01
      But when you think about Charlottesville and that whole revenue, you know, the way I think about it is almost three-quarters is from taxes, and the rest is from the other.
    • 02:02:08
      And we'll talk a little bit about how these tax bases are behaving, because that, at the end of the day, drives it all to the top.
    • 02:02:17
      So I said that the half of your tax base is good, it's a real estate tax base that's non-volatile, it's one of your most stable stores of revenue and this shows you the taxes and the values.
    • 02:02:28
      Now remember the earlier revenue line, you know, slow growth, and then high growth, and then longer growth, same thing.
    • 02:02:36
      You know, if you look at the three, kind of back in 2007, 2017, that was growing about 3.4%, and then the growth was a little bit steeper, it grew back from 7%, and then it's a 10% growth.
    • 02:02:48
      See, that was definitely almost exactly the same as your revenue growth.
    • 02:02:52
      And then what we're seeing is that the growth is starting longer.
    • 02:02:56
      The good news here is it didn't drop, right?
    • 02:03:00
      It never dropped over the last however many years this has shown.
    • 02:03:05
      What I'm scared of is what if this growth starts coming back down to what you sort of experience back in the days at a 30% level.
    • 02:03:14
      If this growth starts slowing down and leveling, that has a significant meaning because remember this is half your normal revenue.
    • 02:03:22
      So that's the strength of your risk is that your strength is at half this your property tax is by growing very robustly, but what if it comes down?
    • 02:03:33
      Let's talk a little bit about your other kind of non-primary tax revenue.
    • 02:03:38
      And this is good news and bad news as well.
    • 02:03:40
      Remember I said that it's a good thing that you have a diversified revenue portfolio.
    • 02:03:45
      But of course, the flip side of the coin, the double-edged sword here, is that these revenues are economically low.
    • 02:03:52
      and they don't grow very much.
    • 02:03:55
      So these are your meals hash, your sales hash, your log impacts.
    • 02:03:58
      These just don't grow very much and you can see it flattening already.
    • 02:04:02
      The final 25 numbers are still not out yet, but you can see that little bump.
    • 02:04:07
      So that is your risk portfolio right there.
    • 02:04:11
      I want to step back a little bit and spend a couple of slides just talking about your tax rates and your competitive
    • 02:04:19
      So Charlottesville, right, when we look at the city, we have to think about the regional competition from a tax base and tax rate perspective.
    • 02:04:29
      So this is comparing the city of Wilkin County in terms of, let's look at this part pretty quickly first.
    • 02:04:35
      This is a pre-cabinet, Zest Valley, and then of course your tax base.
    • 02:04:39
      And it's a little bit, on a per-cabinet basis, a little bit bigger than the county, but not that much.
    • 02:04:44
      You can see it's just kind of a hair in Wilkin County.
    • 02:04:47
      But of course your tax rate is higher.
    • 02:04:49
      And that is always going to be the case.
    • 02:04:51
      Any city that we look at, it's always going to be the tax base is a weaker, the tax rate is higher just because of the major cities.
    • 02:04:59
      So you're not out of the norm here, but just know that.
    • 02:05:02
      You're always competing against that kind of surrounding county.
    • 02:05:06
      You're always competing against that competitiveness nature of the city versus county competition there.
    • 02:05:13
      Another perspective on tax rate is I prepared your tax rate to live in rural Virginia.
    • 02:05:20
      This is the, you know, instead of kind of showing you all the places of different tax rates, this is the weighted average of all of Northern Virginia.
    • 02:05:27
      What you can see is that your median household income is about half of the Northern Virginia jurisdictions.
    • 02:05:34
      Yes, there's a typo here.
    • Michael Payne
    • 02:05:37
      No, no.
    • 02:05:39
      I'm assuming that median household income is not taking out the student population?
    • SPEAKER_14
    • 02:05:44
      Correct, yeah.
    • 02:05:45
      And this is a general, general, I don't even, like, I just pulled the numbers and then it says it's zero.
    • 02:05:51
      Yes, correct, yeah.
    • 02:05:53
      And I understand that student population was certainly a scaleless number.
    • 02:05:57
      But this would also include places like Loughborough County, which has 170,000 median household income.
    • 02:06:03
      So this is including all of the rural Virginia counties, which generally has a much higher, wealthier demographic profile.
    • 02:06:12
      But you can see that Charlottesville's median household income, let's say, is about half of that.
    • 02:06:18
      But its tax rate is, if you look at the real property tax rate, it's a hair lower.
    • 02:06:24
      It is lower, but a hair lower at 4.1%.
    • 02:06:27
      personal property tax, and this is like the vehicle tax rates, that's a little bit higher, almost 1%.
    • 02:06:33
      And your meals tax rate is a bit more than double, actually, than the Northern Virginia.
    • 02:06:40
      So why do I show this slide?
    • 02:06:42
      I'm saying, you know, oftentimes, if your revenue comes down, you always need to adjust, maybe look at the tax rates to bring more revenue, and given the expenditure side of the equation here.
    • 02:06:55
      But there is some room, not to say you don't have any room, but the room is limited in order to keep your competitiveness, especially in relation to Albemarle County.
    • 02:07:06
      Even to Northern Virginia jurisdictions, you have limited room to increase your tax rates while remaining competitive, and that's probably where the whole privatization conversation comes in, is that you don't have a lot of room on the rate side in order to increase your revenues.
    • 02:07:25
      There's another way to look at tax burden, you know, we just talk about tax rates.
    • 02:07:30
      But the Virginia Company, local government of the CFG, they also released data on revenue efforts, and it's probably a more precise way to look at kind of burden.
    • 02:07:39
      Because the revenue effort figure, what that does is it basically shows you how much juice you can squeeze out of the orange.
    • 02:07:46
      Because what it does is it looks a little bit at your kind of base as well.
    • 02:07:51
      capacity, how much can you get from your tax base, right?
    • 02:07:54
      If your median household income is higher, there's more juice to be squeezed.
    • 02:07:58
      If your median household income is lower, there's just less juice to be squeezed out of it.
    • 02:08:02
      So it shows you the revenue effort, and they kind of do this computation.
    • 02:08:06
      And what you see is, among Virginia cities, the revenue effort on average is 1.27%.
    • 02:08:12
      and shows us a hair higher at 1.35.
    • 02:08:15
      And you can see, again, compared to the Northern Virginia cities that we're talking about, you're higher there.
    • 02:08:21
      And that kind of, you know, basically illustrates the point that, again, you may have some room on the race side to play with that, but there's not that much room if you want to remain competitive.
    • 02:08:32
      Just a couple more benchmarking issues.
    • 02:08:34
      I do think that as a whole Charlottesville is positioned well.
    • 02:08:38
      Why do I say that?
    • 02:08:39
      Your fiscal commission on local government, they do this competition and basically release this figure called fiscal stress index.
    • 02:08:50
      And what it does is basically saying, you know, they're going to look at median household income, revenue capacity, kind of the base, and the revenue effort, which is the tax burden.
    • 02:08:58
      They will at least three factors and say, what is the fiscal stress at that?
    • 02:09:02
      So if you want to imagine, you know, a place that has very low median household income and very high revenue efforts, that is going to have a lot of fiscal stress, right?
    • 02:09:12
      That's what we think of about, think of about, you know, the kind of population declining cities, low tax base, but has a high tax rate.
    • 02:09:20
      that's what this is essentially measuring.
    • 02:09:22
      And what it shows is that, you know, I'm not surprised that the Charlottesville fiscal stress is higher than Albemarle County.
    • 02:09:27
      Again, that's not surprising.
    • 02:09:29
      And if I flip to the next chart, you will see here Charlottesville is actually pretty good.
    • 02:09:34
      Why did I say that?
    • 02:09:34
      So what I'm showing here is green is low fiscal stress and then red is high fiscal stress.
    • 02:09:40
      Charlottesville is right here.
    • 02:09:41
      And I say it's pretty good because if you, you know, you can't see this, it's way too small.
    • 02:09:46
      But if you look at this side of it, it's really all counties.
    • 02:09:49
      on Northern Virginia.
    • 02:09:51
      If you think Virginia cities are not the Northern Virginia, they're all kind of down here.
    • 02:09:57
      So if you're looking at your population, it is pretty good.
    • 02:10:00
      You can see that Richmond is definitely lower.
    • 02:10:01
      Paris and Paris is lower.
    • 02:10:02
      A lot of places are lower than yours.
    • 02:10:04
      So you are, from a kind of broad perspective, and you push your pathos to compare yourself with.
    • 02:10:10
      You do it pretty well even though you're still considered above average fiscal stress.
    • 02:10:14
      Again, because much of the yellow and the green, most of them are counties, most of them are northern Virginia.
    • 02:10:22
      So again, all I'm saying is, you know, Charlottesville, as a city, you have the identity, you have the student population, you have the high property rates.
    • 02:10:32
      and all those things.
    • 02:10:34
      But charitable speaking, you've been able to manage it.
    • 02:10:36
      And that's what I'm trying to do.
    • 02:10:38
      Let you know at this point that you have been able to manage it to this point.
    • 02:10:41
      And the next step is going to be when revenue comes down, what actions do you take to make sure that you remain competitive compared to your neighbors and compared to the region as a whole?
    • 02:10:54
      One more thing here.
    • 02:10:55
      I feel like because of the ARPA money, because of the post-COVID,
    • 02:11:00
      Strong revenue growth.
    • 02:11:02
      I feel like a lot of places haven't been focused on the underlying trend.
    • 02:11:05
      Population at the end of the day is the true economic drive.
    • 02:11:09
      Places with declining population have usually a higher fiscal stress rate.
    • 02:11:14
      Your tax base is not there.
    • 02:11:16
      And just one thing to note here on the population side, depending on what source you use, your population trend is basically flat.
    • 02:11:24
      and so just something to remind yourself of as you think about kind of the economic engine at the end of the day is your population and it is flat right now and to continue to manage it so that you don't start to see that line declining.
    • 02:11:41
      So that's on the revenue side.
    • 02:11:42
      Let me now talk about the expenditure side too.
    • 02:11:48
      On the expenditure side, you know, when I think about Charlottesville, I have a bit of, kind of, three slices.
    • 02:11:53
      The first slice is personal costs, and that would include, you know, salaries, benefits, pension.
    • 02:11:58
      The second slice is a school's contribution, and the third slice is kind of all of them.
    • 02:12:03
      So if you think about, kind of, a bank represent area, right, your revenue is mostly taxed, two-thirds of that is tax revenue, two-thirds of that is personal expense.
    • 02:12:13
      That's how we think about it.
    • 02:12:14
      And if you look at the schools just for the second year, as you know, the school's contribution has been increasing at a higher rate in the last two years for a smaller degree of return.
    • 02:12:25
      I think when it comes to schools, and a lot of Virginia clientesses' question is, like, how are we going to sustain that?
    • 02:12:31
      And it'd be very special to be able to recommend a picture that we're talking about.
    • 02:12:36
      One thing I did want to show is, this is from the one that we were
    • 02:12:40
      numbers is that your enrollment rate is actually projected to come down a little bit.
    • 02:12:46
      And I, you know, I would advance with you.
    • 02:12:48
      But I would say here is I think it's important to consider the return on investments.
    • 02:12:54
      It's important to consider kind of, you know, what does enrollment trends mean for your contribution.
    • 02:13:01
      And I know that your contribution has been increasing in part because of the ESL population and the author.
    • 02:13:06
      So this is one trend to know, and again, this is because this is one third of the pie.
    • 02:13:12
      It's a big drive for people not spending.
    • 02:13:27
      Personal costs, let's see, all were kind of one third of the pie here.
    • 02:13:30
      And I'm gonna ask you to not focus on so much on kind of the words there.
    • 02:13:36
      But what I'm trying to highlight here is this is a budget number.
    • 02:13:40
      And what you see here is FY20 actuals of 2025, but right there was a significant increase.
    • 02:13:44
      And I know that your actual numbers is not gonna be the 80 for one time.
    • 02:13:48
      I believe you have a base of savings and all those things that should bring the number down.
    • 02:13:52
      But coincidentally, your FY26 budget actually is the exact same number.
    • 02:13:58
      What I'm trying to tell you is that it's just that much less room, less budgetary buffer in your FRC-6 budget.
    • 02:14:10
      Because FRC-5 budget, this might be able to hit probably somewhere around here because of vacancy savings.
    • 02:14:15
      I don't think you're going to have that much savings in that part.
    • 02:14:21
      So again, on the personal cost front, as Sam said, I've been working a lot on the collective bargaining front.
    • 02:14:28
      There's a lot of good investments there, but over time you do have to manage that role in the personal cost, and I want to talk a little bit about this just because it's that important.
    • 02:14:39
      You know, this is a 20-year difference.
    • 02:14:41
      This is across the states.
    • 02:14:42
      This is released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    • 02:14:45
      You know, across the U.S.
    • 02:14:46
      what you see is that the compensation portfolio has changed significantly.
    • 02:14:51
      If you look back 20 years ago, wages and salaries represent about 70% of the total personnel cost.
    • 02:14:58
      The remaining 30% is on benefits.
    • 02:15:00
      Look at it today, the wage and salary number has dropped to close to 60%, because these slices have grown at a much higher rate over the last four years, and these are essentially taking over the compensation portfolio.
    • 02:15:14
      So when you talk about personal costs, it's important to not just think about salaries, but think about how these other slices have really driven overall personnel costs well over time.
    • 02:15:24
      And this has been reflected in your budget as well.
    • 02:15:26
      I mean, this is your health care fund,
    • 02:15:29
      The red number just means the deficit.
    • 02:15:31
      Your funds still have a positive balance impact.
    • 02:15:34
      It has a good 30% reserve in there.
    • 02:15:37
      But just know that because of the reserve, you have been able to, on your project, compare on the load of it, and eventually it's going to happen.
    • 02:15:46
      You're in a good shape right now.
    • 02:15:47
      It's still 30%.
    • 02:15:49
      It's in good shape, but eventually what you're going to see is that it will have that much of a pressure on the general fund side eventually you'll start defunding it, at least leveling it, if not going back.
    • 02:16:03
      On the pension side, that's even more than a prime rate.
    • 02:16:06
      If you look at the last 10 years, your pension contribution has doubled from almost $7 million to almost $14 million.
    • 02:16:13
      Your pension contributions have doubled as a percentage of payroll has gone from 20 to 30 percent.
    • 02:16:22
      And yet, as you know, you're still not fully funded, you're still in the 70% range, and I understand the goal is to get 80%, and you should never let up that goal.
    • 02:16:31
      Getting to that 80% goal is a good thing.
    • 02:16:34
      It's a good thing because when you don't fully fund your pension, what happens is that you have to pay it back over time.
    • 02:16:42
      I mean this is a pretty staggering chart in the sense that 80% of your pension contribution is to pay off your unfunded liability and only this will shrink over time as you get your funded level higher so that you don't have to pay back your unfunded liability but that's a consequence of not having a fully funded liability
    • 02:17:04
      And that's okay.
    • 02:17:04
      80% is a good goal to have.
    • 02:17:05
      You can still get there.
    • 02:17:07
      But just know that, you know, when you think about personal costs as a salary, so let's say, you know, increased salaries by, let's say, 5%, just hypothetically.
    • 02:17:16
      Your health care cost is probably going by about 7%.
    • 02:17:19
      That's kind of the national expense here.
    • 02:17:21
      And your pension cost is going by, what, 13% a year, based on the double cost.
    • 02:17:26
      So you can see how these costs back up, and that explains this particular chart here.
    • 02:17:31
      The different growth rates of these higher benefits cost is really what drove the change of this chart all this time.
    • 02:17:40
      Again, this is not you only, this is national trends.
    • 02:17:42
      This is what local government has to struggle with, right?
    • 02:17:46
      If a big piece of that pie is a person of cause, that's what they can do.
    • 02:17:54
      The last piece of expenditures I want to talk about is debt service.
    • 02:17:57
      You know, from a debt perspective, you haven't maintained it at about 5-6% of full and general fund spending, and that's a good thing.
    • 02:18:03
      But just know that every new infrastructure that you put in is another thing to maintain, and that will be reflected in these kind of debt sort of spending at the end of the day.
    • 02:18:14
      So kind of, you know, thinking about it all, you know, if I think about your, again, three parts of your pie, the personal costs, right, growing, even if you maintain your head kind of flat, that's what it grows significantly because of the pension, because of the healthcare.
    • 02:18:26
      The school's contribution, like I said, that's been going pretty at about eight and a half percent, and that's something you would have to manage, and the rest of the pie is the other, and a big piece of that is your debt service, your capital investments,
    • 02:18:38
      So even at a status quo kind of perspective, you still have to fund all of those growing costs all the time.
    • 02:18:45
      And you know, in the last couple years, you had the benefit of the ARPA dollars, you know, back in 2020 and 2020, you had the CARES Act $1 million.
    • 02:18:53
      And we also have a year-end surplus numbers that you were able to take and dedicate it to.
    • 02:18:58
      I think because of the revenue trend that we just talked about, the revenue growth coming down, the year-end surplus number is going to go away at some point, and at some point you will have to think about how to manage the inherent balance between revenues and expenditures.
    • 02:19:18
      If you can think back to the property tax chart, if that
    • 02:19:23
      Instead of value, it's only growing over a long-term frame between 5 and 7 percent, but yet your pension is growing by 15 percent, your healthcare is growing by 8 percent.
    • 02:19:34
      You can see that inherent imbalance there, and that is the struggle of local government these days.
    • 02:19:39
      It's not you, like I said, in your well-positioned, I think, but that's just the reality of the struggle of local government.
    • 02:19:47
      So with that, you know, I talked a lot about these themes, but I want to highlight this one last bullet point here is that as we think about this current, going back to the first part of this presentation, as we think about the recession that is maybe here, that may be coming, sort of rolling back the growth, it's slowing down across the border, across all Virginia cities and counties, you know, as you think about these kind of growing costs from the different highs of the expenditure pie chart,
    • 02:20:13
      I do think the next five years, not just you again, across all local communities, will be about conservation and privatization.
    • 02:20:21
      Unfortunately, that market dollar is not coming back, right?
    • 02:20:25
      Unfortunately, the revenue growth is slowing down, and unfortunately, the pension costs
    • 02:20:30
      We didn't even talk about collective bargaining where those contracts will be in place.
    • 02:20:38
      You will be committed to provide those wage increases under those agreements regardless of your economic conditions.
    • 02:20:45
      So the next couple of years will be about conservation and prioritization.
    • 02:20:49
      And I sometimes joke that local government is kind of like the Amazon Prime Day.
    • 02:20:56
      You want to buy everything, but all of us can't buy everything.
    • 02:20:59
      And so we have to find a way to prioritize our resources accordingly, again, given the economic condition and given the framework that we are in right now.
    • 02:21:10
      So how do I move forward from that?
    • 02:21:13
      What I just said to you over the last half a minute, the rating agencies are sustained.
    • 02:21:19
      You are, by the way, a AAA community.
    • 02:21:22
      You are selling your bonds next week, August 19th.
    • 02:21:24
      I have the date marked on my calendar.
    • 02:21:27
      You are strong from the rating agency's perspective.
    • 02:21:30
      You have a AAA credit rating, but some of the risks I highlighted here, they are also quite significant.
    • 02:21:36
      You know, they are credited to you, as I am today, for your strong budgetary practices, for the way you have approached government finances, but they also highlight some of the risks, underlying risks that you also need to pay attention to.
    • 02:21:49
      So again, some of these themes are highlighted in the rating agency, also highlighted in their comments and their reports.
    • 02:21:57
      You know, if I step back, and I hope I didn't scare you for the last hour, if I step back, there's a lot of strength there.
    • 02:22:03
      Think about the revenue pie you just showed earlier.
    • 02:22:06
      Property taxes, the most stable revenue source you can have, is half of your revenue picture.
    • 02:22:13
      You know, Annette, when I think about in this country as of today, you know, one of the reasons Virginia cities, counties, and the Commonwealth as a whole is actually relatively okay today versus Maryland and DC is in part because Virginia is not funded by income tax.
    • 02:22:31
      If you look at Maryland's jurisdictions, a lot of the revenues are funded by income tax.
    • 02:22:36
      DC's budget is also a big portion of that is income tax.
    • 02:22:40
      And that's much more volatile in this DNA.
    • 02:22:42
      So from a Virginia perspective, you're in a good place, or as good as it can be, given this economic condition, because of your revenue makeup.
    • 02:22:53
      This is also why, by the way, credit rating agencies have inferred the Commonwealth rating, but they have downgraded DC.
    • 02:23:02
      So, you know, you do have a lot of strength there, but you do also have some of the underlying risks, right?
    • 02:23:07
      I wouldn't be surprised, for instance, if we are in the event of accepting their meals, tax sales, and then watching traffic coming down.
    • 02:23:14
      I wouldn't be surprised if your population continue to flood no more time, and that will be a challenging risk to manage.
    • 02:23:20
      You know, I wouldn't be surprised if, say, you would have trouble with the capital improvement plan, because you have so much to maintain as a city government.
    • 02:23:28
      But you have a lot of strengths, and the key here is to play to your strengths.
    • 02:23:31
      So what are the next steps here?
    • 02:23:35
      Some of that is already in motion.
    • 02:23:42
      I think it's important to number one, stress test your general fund, meaning what is the best case scenario and can you weather it?
    • 02:23:49
      And that analysis already shows that I think because of the strong budgetary
    • 02:23:53
      practices because of your fund balance, your rating industry, and acknowledge that you are in a good position to weather the storm that is coming.
    • 02:24:02
      But the second piece here, and I think it's a micro today and tomorrow, is to establish spending parameters.
    • 02:24:08
      Like I said, on the school side, for instance, understanding what enrollment projections mean for your future contributions.
    • 02:24:15
      For your personal costs, a lot of work is done on the collective bargaining side, but understand how benefits spending, for instance, is driving your overall picture.
    • 02:24:23
      On the debt service side, understanding how much you're investing in just maintaining your existing infrastructure, and how much is actually added to it, and what is that trade-off there.
    • 02:24:32
      And I think prioritization is probably one word that I'll bring throughout this presentation and today and tomorrow is how do you prioritize your resources given that the rest of you have slowed down significantly?
    • 02:24:47
      How do you prioritize the resources while achieving your strategic goals?
    • 02:24:51
      And look, I get it.
    • 02:24:53
      You would not be here today
    • 02:24:55
      if you didn't want to invest in the strategic priorities.
    • 02:24:58
      No one wants to join city government because they want to balance the budget.
    • 02:25:01
      That's not for anyone.
    • 02:25:02
      That is the most incestuous thing ever, right?
    • 02:25:05
      No one wants to be part of government because they want to balance the budget.
    • 02:25:08
      But part of the role, part of my role is to make sure that you have the resources when you need it and that you can maintain that kind of triple labor, that kind of budgetary straw, budgetary practices that I've been talking about.
    • 02:25:24
      So with that, let me pause.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 02:25:27
      I know I'll throw a lot at you.
    • SPEAKER_14
    • 02:25:32
      Wow.
    • SPEAKER_10
    • 02:25:38
      Yeah.
    • 02:25:39
      There you go.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 02:25:41
      Wow.
    • 02:25:41
      So we got about 15 minutes for questions, and this was a lot of information.
    • 02:25:45
      So Mike, I'll start with you.
    • 02:25:47
      If we can just take a couple of minutes to ask questions so we can make sure everyone gets in.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 02:25:55
      We will reflect in a little bit.
    • 02:25:59
      This is Q&A.
    • Michael Payne
    • 02:26:05
      I guess my questions are just related around UVA, and if we take that into account, how this analysis changes.
    • 02:26:12
      I'd be curious, you take out the student population, what our median income would be and how that would change where we are.
    • 02:26:20
      That Harrisonburg was so low, I wonder if that relates to them also being a university town.
    • 02:26:27
      yeah just be curious like what exactly UVA's impact is and all this because it makes us pretty unique that it's our largest employer
    • SPEAKER_14
    • 02:26:37
      Yeah, I mean, I don't have any answer to that necessarily.
    • 02:26:40
      I think about, you're probably right, it does impact even household income and all of those factors.
    • 02:26:45
      The tax exam property is also probably another factor here, right?
    • 02:26:49
      I was in New York earlier this week and I was walking around Central Park and was thinking, what if all this is taxable?
    • 02:26:56
      What does that do to the tax face?
    • 02:26:58
      But the fact is, it certainly has some of the negative factors, but also it's part of the strengths as well, right?
    • 02:27:04
      This is in part why you have your regional attraction.
    • 02:27:07
      Some of your sales tax, meals tax, lodging tax also comes with that.
    • 02:27:14
      Just like anything really, it's a double-edged sword and you just have to manage it.
    • 02:27:21
      I don't have the answers, but I do acknowledge and agree.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 02:27:30
      You said the five-year fiscal plan would focus on conservation prioritization if everything stays status quo.
    • 02:27:39
      And then you said that there's limited room to raise tax rates to increase revenues.
    • 02:27:46
      But how would those things be affected if we increased supply?
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 02:27:52
      Then there's housing supply.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 02:27:56
      Housing supply.
    • 02:27:58
      That would redistribute that, correct?
    • SPEAKER_14
    • 02:28:00
      Yeah, so by increasing housing supply, you would aim to increase your taxable base, your taxable assessed values.
    • 02:28:11
      And, you know, there are places that have a lot of green land that when they build houses, I'm thinking of like, you know, Brown and County, for instance, right?
    • 02:28:21
      Like when they build a lot of housing, that was significant.
    • 02:28:24
      I think that the bottom line that we haven't done the analysis on that, we certainly can.
    • 02:28:29
      The bottom line is how much would that increase?
    • 02:28:31
      Do it in taxable ways.
    • 02:28:32
      How much of that is taxable?
    • 02:28:34
      How much of that and how would that from the needle in the taxable sense of what it looks like?
    • 02:28:40
      and I haven't done the analysis on that but I think, you know, part of it is also like, you know, your tax base has been growing by 5-7% in the last few years so in order to, you know, grow it, you're looking to grow it beyond the 7%, you have to grow it beyond the base that is already growing so you're looking at, okay, can that actually add 3% to my tax base
    • 02:29:06
      Okay, thank you.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 02:29:34
      Sort of continuing on some of these other notions.
    • 02:29:37
      I guess one of the things that I've always been trying to puzzle out is, like Michael raised the question about the effect of university students, we know that there are plans underway to house a couple thousand more university students in apartments right around the university, which will be in the city, perhaps drawing from people
    • 02:30:02
      University students who are living in the county, but those students aren't contributing.
    • 02:30:10
      On the one hand, they're not typically costing us more beds or more desks in schools, but they're also not contributing the same amount of taxable value as if it's a family moving into a half a million dollar home that's new.
    • 02:30:28
      How do we figure out
    • 02:30:31
      What's actually likely to happen with that kind of influx?
    • 02:30:39
      Is there a way or do we just sort of say, well, we'll just have to see what happens?
    • SPEAKER_13
    • 02:30:44
      There's certainly a way.
    • 02:30:45
      I mean, if you really want to know the answer, there's certainly, we do this too, because when we do our studies, we figure out, okay, if you build a new apartment building here, what is the economic effect of that?
    • 02:30:55
      And how much actually is the economic effect, and how much of that actually affects what we cover for revenue, because they're not exactly the same thing.
    • 02:31:02
      So there's a way to figure it out.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 02:31:05
      Is it worth worrying about?
    • SPEAKER_14
    • 02:31:07
      That's what I was trying to do.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 02:31:08
      That's not what I was trying to say.
    • SPEAKER_14
    • 02:31:09
      How much does it, I think the key here, and then to your question, how much does it remove the needle?
    • 02:31:15
      I think that's the key here, and you know, as part of listening to these technologies and all the projects that are coming online, those are great news.
    • 02:31:27
      You just have to make sure that is above you.
    • 02:31:31
      And if they are not above and beyond, that is not extremely obvious.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 02:31:34
      I'm looking at one of the weaknesses that you pointed out is that our population seems to be at least stable and perhaps declining depending on whether you're looking at Wilton Cooper or looking at other sources.
    • 02:31:48
      And if the answer is that, well, it's actually likely to increase in the next couple of years, but in a way that doesn't actually help us much, in a way that doesn't actually move the needle, what have we accomplished?
    • 02:32:00
      So anyway, that's sort of the long term issue that I guess we're going to have to wait and see.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 02:32:06
      I think we do have a really good data point there, which is when the permanent buildings were built on West Main, school enrollment went up a trailblazer because families were able to move into the houses that were previously occupied by students.
    • 02:32:18
      So I don't know how many students live in the county that it would affect, but there's definitely a lot of students who live in the city that space would then shift.
    • Michael Payne
    • 02:32:26
      I would just add, to me the question of studying the student apartments feels like a huge thing because Weldon Cooper did a presentation in June to the Regional Housing Partnership and not that they're, they could be wrong but they said they looked at that study again and found that
    • 02:32:44
      Students in single-family homes in Charlottesville no longer exist like they did.
    • 02:32:48
      So they said they didn't predict that new student apartments would open up, homes that lead to an increase in school enrollment.
    • 02:32:54
      Obviously, our school enrollment has been flat over 20 years.
    • 02:32:58
      So I am curious just what is the effect.
    • 02:33:01
      Because maybe it's positive, because we don't have to pay for the school costs of students.
    • 02:33:06
      So maybe it's even better from a revenue perspective.
    • 02:33:09
      I don't know.
    • 02:33:10
      But it seems like we're so driven by that student
    • 02:33:13
      Yeah, just a couple things.
    • 02:33:15
      It would be nice if we could actually have the population
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 02:33:37
      Grass, like we all agree on what those numbers are.
    • 02:33:40
      I've been on house for four years.
    • 02:33:42
      It's kind of hard for me to believe that the population is going down, given the fact that Price House has continued to go up.
    • 02:33:53
      But the second thing I would say is, if you think about schools, every year we go through this process and they're not
    • 02:34:04
      Criticizing, they're all doing their job to represent the kids.
    • 02:34:09
      They're kind of funny.
    • 02:34:11
      They'll bring us what they call the needs-based budget as opposed to, I don't know, whatever the kind of budget they might have.
    • 02:34:19
      but every year it's a significant lift and a lot of it is just because of the nature of the history of the city, the refugee home and that's expensive.
    • 02:34:32
      And then the final thing I'll mention is just the CIP
    • 02:34:36
      The schools, I'm assuming you include the school buildings, the CIP, as opposed to the schools proper.
    • 02:34:44
      From my perspective, the city has not invested in building stock like it should have over the course of the last 50 years.
    • 02:34:53
      And so we're playing catch-up, which is part of what some of these spikes are.
    • 02:35:02
      So Natalie kind of got to this.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 02:35:05
      My comment was like,
    • 02:35:18
      You know in the new zoning ordinance that we have and I know that you know we're trying to settle on that now but that cause for increased population with new housing and so I guess we would have to kind of just do a study to see with that increase stock
    • 02:35:40
      what impact that would have on maybe some of your numbers.
    • 02:35:44
      And something that you said that you said that new infrastructure means that we have to maintain it.
    • 02:35:50
      I'm thinking of a thing like
    • 02:35:54
      Charlotte Buford Middle School, which is now Charlotte.
    • 02:35:57
      And so with the older building, it's a lot of maintenance with that.
    • 02:36:01
      I know we have to maintain a new building, but things like that, we make those type of trade-offs.
    • 02:36:08
      Is it about the same?
    • 02:36:17
      So, and my other question was, I know that the city schools are VRS and local government were self-insured for retirement.
    • 02:36:32
      So, if we were with VRS, would that mean anything different, you know, with the bigger pool?
    • SPEAKER_14
    • 02:36:42
      I can't infinitively answer that without doing probably a few areas to do the analysis.
    • 02:36:48
      But, you know, Virginia cities, there are places that have switched from BRS.
    • 02:36:53
      There are places that switched from BRS.
    • 02:36:56
      The key that drives ultimately the pension fund is to benefit people, right?
    • 02:37:02
      So switching plans may, I don't know what changes are, but ultimately the savings that you, and you're looking for ultimately a pension savings, you're looking at better levels.
    • 02:37:13
      You're looking at, you know, there are a couple of levels you play with.
    • 02:37:15
      You're conjugating more now, right, like you're making more positive contributions, but the goal that you're reducing up on the liability, right, that's one way you're trying to manage your contribution.
    • 02:37:23
      But another level to play is the level of benefits.
    • 02:37:27
      And so, I don't think, again, I'm not an actuary, but I would say switching plans doesn't necessarily change the matter.
    • 02:37:40
      It may have some changes because of the way things were funded, but ultimately, if you're looking at it, you would have to look at it better.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 02:37:52
      Okay.
    • SPEAKER_14
    • 02:37:58
      Before we dive in, I'm in between you and lunch right now.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 02:38:11
      What I'm trying to do, at the very beginning when we started talking, we talked about, you participated in a little bit of exercise of, without a deep understanding and all we did was explore ideas and materialize, we would have blank outcome.
    • 02:38:22
      So the purpose of some of our reflective exercises, the purpose of you being able to do a Q&A and get some information is because I'm asking, I'm putting you in a position to get a deep understanding, because I will ask you to tap into that understanding tomorrow as we get to explore.
    • 02:38:38
      So thank you for asking the questions.
    • 02:38:39
      Thank you for participating in this kind of reflective exercise with me.
    • 02:38:43
      Because what I'm trying to do is get you that understanding toolbox.
    • 02:38:46
      So you're like, you know, we sat through a lot of presentations, a lot of information, been taking notes, reflecting on it.
    • 02:38:52
      I think I've got a good understanding.
    • 02:38:54
      And I'm like, awesome.
    • 02:38:55
      Tomorrow we're going to explore some things based off that understanding.
    • 02:38:58
      So, with that being said, can we do the ERP interview one more time?
    • 02:39:02
      In the middle of it, can you write, I think what we're calling is a financial update for the most part.
    • 02:39:13
      So in the middle of that, please write financial update.
    • 02:39:15
      And then go ahead and high level, this is your ability to not dabble.
    • 02:39:18
      So we use your ability to reflect on just the status.
    • 02:39:21
      And remember, it's about the current status and where it is.
    • 02:39:25
      What do I understand about the financial update?
    • 02:39:27
      What do I respect about the financial update?
    • 02:39:31
      What do I value as just what's presented around where it is?
    • 02:40:20
      A few more minutes.
    • SPEAKER_02
    • 02:40:41
      You reflect on your notes.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 02:40:47
      It's kind of what you heard.
    • 02:40:50
      regarding the financial update, do you now understand what I suspect and what I value?
    • 02:41:07
      So what I understand is that there's not a lot of room for the city as far as financial growth.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 02:41:25
      the max of our options.
    • 02:41:28
      So what I respect is the city's financial leadership.
    • 02:41:33
      I see all of the different things that they have to factor in to kind of get us where we are when we even talk about a half percent, a quarter percent or whatever.
    • 02:41:44
      It's a lot to consider, and what I value is the city's AAA bond rating, those things.
    • 02:41:53
      I know it's hard to maintain that, but I know that also it saves us a lot of money when we have to.
    • 02:41:58
      Is it August 19th?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 02:42:00
      Yes, August 19th.
    • 02:42:03
      Okay, yeah, absolutely, thank you.
    • 02:42:05
      Brian, what do you understand, respect, and value about the current financial update and stats where we are?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 02:42:12
      Yeah, we're in a relatively good position compared to other people, but the risks lie ahead.
    • 02:42:17
      Okay.
    • 02:42:19
      That's your understanding, right?
    • 02:42:20
      Correct.
    • 02:42:20
      Got it, yeah, okay.
    • 02:42:21
      Thank you.
    • 02:42:22
      I respect, like Juan said, our staff and their attention to our money, dollars and nickels.
    • 02:42:29
      Value, I see the importance of prioritization.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 02:42:36
      So, my understanding is a narrow financial path on which we are walking.
    • 02:42:43
      I respect the fact that there are lots of smart people who are working on this even though they may not agree with one another.
    • 02:42:50
      And finally, I value the willingness to nevertheless dive in and get nerdy.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 02:43:03
      I understand that we're doing okay, but things are precarious and the status quo will not sustain us, so change is inevitable.
    • 02:43:13
      The parts we can control are generally well managed, very much respect our team there.
    • 02:43:18
      And then I value our AAA bond rating.
    • 02:43:21
      I know that's very, very crucial.
    • 02:43:24
      Yeah, it's a good value.
    • Michael Payne
    • 02:43:28
      So I understand our revenue picture is to me fairly strong.
    • 02:43:34
      There probably is relatively limited room to increase.
    • 02:43:39
      Some of our tax rates, we have a stable primary employer in UVA, and we can't understand our budget without taking into account UVA on multiple dynamics.
    • 02:43:52
      I respect that there is a lot of uncertainty, federal government funding, even population growth.
    • 02:44:00
      It's certainly absolutely possible new zoning increases population.
    • 02:44:03
      What if the market just doesn't respond that way?
    • 02:44:07
      Population growth is primarily students.
    • 02:44:09
      Is that good, bad, and different uncertainty?
    • 02:44:17
      Could we get options for new revenue sources with sales tax or a tax for regional transportation?
    • 02:44:25
      What do I value that Seville, Charlottesville spends
    • 02:44:31
      a lot more on priorities that most communities don't like the amount we spend on affordable housing or social services is substantially higher than most localities and that's part of our budget picture because we've made a conscious choice to invest in priorities that other communities don't.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 02:44:48
      Thank you for sharing that.
    • 02:44:51
      I appreciate that.
    • 02:44:53
      Is lunch coming to us?
    • 02:44:57
      Okay, all right, so in about nine-ish minutes, let me give you kind of the rundown a little bit of how that's going to work.
    • 02:45:07
      So you all can, there's the courtyard, there is the actual other large room there, there's also the coffee shop.
    • 02:45:13
      Take your lunch, go wherever it is that you want to.
    • 02:45:15
      We're going to take about a 30-minute lunch, about a half hour.
    • 02:45:19
      All right, so we're going to get back to it.
    • Sam Sanders
    • 02:45:44
      Still staying in the frame of where it is, this next section of what we're going to do is we took you very high level.
    • 02:45:51
      That's what this morning's conversation was about, the community surveys, what our people say about everything.
    • 02:45:57
      your strategic priority areas, so reminding you what you've been thinking about, what you've said in the past several years, and then giving you the financial outlook, so that's kind of bringing it down a layer, kind of making it a little challenging, a little tough, seeing what some of the realities may be.
    • 02:46:14
      And now we're going to dive in.
    • 02:46:16
      So we're diving in, but we're only diving in to your top three priorities, and that's being housing, transportation, and education.
    • 02:46:24
      And the reason we're labeling them as top priorities is because we talk about them a lot.
    • 02:46:30
      We spend a lot of money in these categories already.
    • 02:46:33
      And we recognize that there's a lot of opportunity to spend in each of these categories with how we frame what we're talking about or allow ourselves to do something about it.
    • 02:46:44
      So the rest of what we're going to be doing is spending all of our energy here on these three topics.
    • 02:46:51
      And the reason for that is because there's stuff to figure out, decide, think about, and consider in each one of these, that if we can figure some of that out, it helps us figure out how to pull the levers on top of things.
    • 02:47:06
      So that's exactly why we're choosing to not bring you down low, but we're not asking you to make a decision.
    • 02:47:11
      So we're going to keep reminding you, don't go in the weeds.
    • 02:47:14
      We're just showing you that there are weeds ahead.
    • 02:47:16
      And then we'll get to that, because that's what the budget process really is all about.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 02:47:21
      Thank you.
    • 02:47:22
      And in addition to kind of communicating that the reason why they're priorities is they take a brunt of your time, resources, conversation, money, people, all those things.
    • 02:47:30
      But they also are top priorities for other reasons.
    • 02:47:34
      Inside of each of them, they each have tensions, trade-offs, and opportunities inside of them.
    • 02:47:38
      in each of these opportunities, as long as you run the resources, run the time, run the conversation inside of them while they're talking, because they also hold tensions, they also hold trade-offs, and they also hold opportunities.
    • 02:47:50
      So I want to talk about these definitions, but I'm going to highlight some areas that are important.
    • 02:47:56
      So regarding tensions, what I want us to focus on, because I'm going to ask you to listen with this lens a little bit.
    • 02:48:02
      Tensions being forced between two or more needs, values, or priorities that can exist at the same time.
    • 02:48:08
      What I'm going to ask you is that you agree with me that that's what we're going to call tensions.
    • 02:48:15
      For trade-offs, conscious decisions to prioritize one option, value, or outcome over another.
    • 02:48:19
      What is the exchange for a trade-off?
    • 02:48:21
      That's what a trade-off is.
    • 02:48:24
      That's what a tension is.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 02:48:26
      And for opportunities, potential pathway, insight, or moments that emerges.
    • 02:48:31
      That's what an opportunity is.
    • 02:48:34
      So, I want to kind of put these in this context, because again, this is the lens at which I'm going to ask you to kind of listen to the next upcoming presentations with.
    • 02:48:43
      But, I want to kind of put it in this order.
    • 02:48:46
      Most of the time, whenever we hear something, we immediately jump into here.
    • 02:48:51
      Kind of like going to a store before we understand, right?
    • 02:48:54
      But, it is good to understand the tensions.
    • 02:48:57
      understand the trails.
    • 02:48:58
      If we don't have information, this understanding, how do we ever think about the proper opportunities that emerge?
    • 02:49:05
      It can only emerge from tensions and trails.
    • 02:49:07
      Obviously, it's not going to emerge like it is of itself.
    • 02:49:09
      There is something going on inside of it that will produce an opportunity that I would first need to understand blank and blank.
    • 02:49:17
      So my hope is that you can hear and listen with the ears of, what are the tensions that I just heard?
    • 02:49:23
      What are the trade-offs in what I'm kind of hearing?
    • 02:49:25
      And then from those two things, what potentially is an opportunity?
    • 02:49:29
      With me so far?
    • 02:49:31
      Cool?
    • 02:49:32
      Awesome.
    • 02:49:33
      So, where it is, what's in the way or could be in the way?
    • 02:49:37
      So this is kind of where we shift a little bit.
    • 02:49:39
      We are still in the understanding phase.
    • 02:49:41
      This is around taking in information and sitting with it.
    • 02:49:46
      We will get to exploring, creating, ideating, all that stuff a little later.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 02:49:49
      But you're going to know where it is, what's in the way, or what could be in the way, all regarding those strategic priorities.
    • 02:49:58
      Okay?
    • 02:49:58
      Make sense?
    • 02:49:59
      So by the time you're done listening, you'll have known where it is, what's in the way of that strategic priority, or what could be in the way of housing, education, and transit.
    • 02:50:11
      With me?
    • 02:50:12
      Awesome.
    • 02:50:13
      Cool.
    • 02:50:14
      So I'm about to hand it over to James.
    • 02:50:16
      The top strategic priority number one is where it is and what's in the way.
    • 02:50:19
      And you're going to get to hear from James and Ashley.
    • 02:50:21
      James is going to touch on where it is, current opportunity status, and Ashley will touch on what's in the way or what could be in the way.
    • 02:50:28
      So please feel free to also take notes.
    • 02:50:30
      Shave your notes.
    • 02:50:31
      Build your toolbox.
    • 02:50:32
      And Ashley will tap into that tomorrow.
    • 02:50:34
      OK?
    • 02:50:34
      With that being said, James, after you, sir.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 02:50:41
      Good afternoon everybody.
    • 02:50:43
      Good afternoon.
    • 02:50:45
      So, where it is, we're talking about housing.
    • 02:50:52
      A reminder of the strategic priority area as it was defined by you, these are your words.
    • 02:50:57
      Charlottesville defines access to livable housing as a human right and works to ensure housing choices and mobility are provided for all who seek the implementation of the Affordable Housing Plan.
    • 02:51:09
      So on that note, at this point, we are coming down one more level, as Sam said, but we're still going to be pretty high level.
    • 02:51:15
      As you guys know, if we actually got deep into the weeds of housing, we could do this for the rest of our time together today and tomorrow.
    • 02:51:23
      But keeping it with where we are, just a refresher on the affordable housing plan.
    • 02:51:29
      It's a really important and simple document for the city that kicked off our Segal Clansing Together process.
    • 02:51:36
      March 2021, we adopted the informal housing plan of the city of Trost to be able to achieve a local housing market that is healthy, high quality, affordable, and above all, equitable.
    • 02:51:46
      We have guiding principles of racial equity, regional collaboration, and a comprehensive approach, and most significantly, our major initiatives.
    • 02:51:56
      $10 million end ruling,
    • 02:51:58
      over 10 years on affordable housing, building inclusive governments, and adopting progressive and inclusive zoning reform.
    • 02:52:07
      But I'll remember those.
    • 02:52:10
      And the affordable financing plan overall had a lot of different recommendations on it related to funding and staffing, tenants' rights, there was a lot of stuff even beyond those three high priority objectives.
    • 02:52:27
      and significantly we had income targeting.
    • 02:52:29
      What were we trying to get to?
    • 02:52:31
      We were trying to ensure that 50% of our spending would be directed towards 30% of AMI, 30% at 60% of AMI, and then 20% 80% of AMI.
    • 02:52:42
      So even at this point, we were trying to focus on the most affordable level of housing.
    • 02:52:53
      So where did we end up so far in this process?
    • 02:52:57
      We are clearly hitting our 10 million annually towards affordable housing.
    • 02:53:03
      How many inclusive governments were making progress in that space?
    • 02:53:06
      The Housing Advisory Committee in particular has been thinking about that, talking about that, where we can go from there.
    • 02:53:14
      And then of course, we made significant progress with the adoption of zoning ordinance back in the end of 2023.
    • 02:53:23
      But even at the point where we were adopting this plan, there were a couple of things that the Affordable Housing Plan noted.
    • 02:53:30
      One of these kinds of things, as already noted, that we were making a level of investment in affordable housing above and beyond what you typically see for a city of our size.
    • 02:53:41
      We are, as we often say, punching above our weight loss.
    • 02:53:44
      We are doing a lot more in any of the communities.
    • 02:53:47
      So this was the original breakdown of the spending that we were spending.
    • 02:53:53
      $7 billion per year on direct housing investment, $2 million per year on tax relief and accessibility programs, and $1 million on administrative capacity.
    • 02:54:02
      Staffing that would get us to our ability to maintain this program.
    • 02:54:08
      Now, the other key point about this that I'm stretching for at this point, this map.
    • 02:54:19
      Well, I'll come back.
    • 02:54:25
      So where, oh, as soon as I see this, just let me remember where I was going.
    • 02:54:30
      See how that opportunity arose in the middle of that action?
    • 02:54:33
      You saw that?
    • 02:54:35
      The other thing that was recognized even as we were adopting this plan right at the very beginning was a recognition that already the commitments the city had made with NCIB was meeting our first five years towards this target.
    • 02:54:56
      The first five years of $7 billion per year was already accounted for in our CIP.
    • 02:55:02
      It's an important point because the plan was kind of previewing the idea that we were going to be wrestling with tensions and trade-offs around this spending going forward.
    • 02:55:16
      So in the first FY22 to FY25 time period, on average, these are average numbers, and I'd ask you, this is casting you back a bit to the update we got from our housing team.
    • 02:55:30
      Antoine Williams made a presentation back in the spring around the status of our implementation of the Affordable Housing Plan.
    • 02:55:39
      Casting you back to that, these are derived from his presentation.
    • 02:55:45
      Right now, we are at 9.1 on our investments, 2.4 on tax relief, of course a reflection of that need.
    • 02:55:53
      It's been higher than we might have anticipated when we worked on the plan, and significantly at about $300,000 on building that administrative capacity, the staffing support, and additional things that we need to advance this planning process.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 02:56:09
      Is that okay?
    • 02:56:11
      Like, are we missing out things because their admin capacity is not what we intended, or are we doing bad?
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 02:56:16
      Looking ahead, looking at the commitments that we've now gotten to, similar to when we adopted the Affordable Housing Plan initially, we can look ahead at what we put in our CFP and see, then again,
    • 02:56:30
      We've met this, we've exceeded this objective on the direct housing investment.
    • 02:56:36
      As I'm projecting forward, I didn't try and guess what this need would actually arrive at, so I just kind of went back to what the affordable housing plan called for, and went back to again what the affordable housing plan called for.
    • 02:56:48
      And this to arrive at a total annual cost of, again, estimated an average of $13.57 million.
    • 02:56:58
      in our investments towards the affordable housing plan.
    • 02:57:02
      To your question, do we need additional staff support?
    • 02:57:05
      I think a lot of people would say yes, that there is work we need to be doing in the monitoring space, in the managing space, in particular on how we are collecting data about our progress here.
    • 02:57:20
      If you kind of think back to the bookends that we were talking about, that Josh was talking about early on,
    • 02:57:26
      around setting direction and then measuring progress.
    • 02:57:30
      There's more that we need in terms of figuring out how we measure, there's more we need in order to support our ability to measure progress in this space.
    • 02:57:40
      So we've seen the numbers, but then we also look at our pipeline of units coming on board.
    • 02:57:46
      We've got
    • 02:57:48
      and think back to the targets the Affordable Housing Plan set, we are readily hitting our targets on the 80% of AMI.
    • 02:57:57
      We are exceeding our target in terms of the 30 to 60% of AMI, but in the most affordable category, we are still not quite hitting the goals that we established in the Affordable Housing Plan as we look at how the pipeline of affordable units is working so far.
    • 02:58:22
      And then, just coming back to the adoption of zoning ordinance, I think one of the big things we've learned, and we talked about this, it's not really a new idea, but one of the big things we've learned is that zoning was not really the only thing we needed to invest.
    • 02:58:37
      As soon as we took away the barrier represented by zoning, what rose up were all the other barriers that were built into our regulatory environment, and so we have more work to do in this space.
    • 02:58:50
      We have to look at other development codes, other pieces of our ordinance that impact the development process and assess them against our objectives in the housing production arena because I think we've talked about a lot of where that needs to happen and that work is already happening and we need to continue to make changes to the development code itself.
    • 02:59:14
      We promised when we adopted it that we would continue to revisit that code but we didn't see it was written in stone
    • 02:59:20
      And that work is ongoing as well.
    • 02:59:28
      Three are impact areas.
    • 02:59:30
      There will be three impact areas for each one of these strategic priority areas that we're talking about.
    • 02:59:37
      First of these impact areas is on the issue of homelessness.
    • 02:59:41
      And we have our on-house individuals estimated well over 200.
    • 02:59:44
      I think our total budget is 245, 260 at this point.
    • 02:59:52
      Just in accounting of the costs that we have made commitments to relative to this issue, you know, these three million was Salvation Army, one million for Salvation Army's revenue offset, and then recurring costs into the low-grader shelter, the hops, and brown.
    • 03:00:19
      In terms of our impact in the production and preservation of affordable housing, one of those things, and this is where I was coming back to it, is ensuring that we have the ability to build a dashboard that really accurately tracks the status of affordable unit production, both a number of production but also where we are arriving in AMI numbers, understanding the timeline for when those units come online and those types of things,
    • 03:00:48
      and also understanding when they might actually come offline.
    • 03:00:51
      Right now, at least we are aware of two projects with a total of 360 units that are at risk of expiring an affordable building just in 2026 and up.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 03:01:01
      Which ones are those?
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 03:01:04
      One of them is Hearthstone, I believe is the name of it.
    • 03:01:06
      What's that?
    • 03:01:07
      Hearthstone.
    • 03:01:08
      Thank you.
    • 03:01:09
      And then there's another one, I'm not going to remember the name of it, but it's 160 units.
    • 03:01:15
      Hearthstone is 200 units, the other one is 160 units.
    • 03:01:18
      Both of them, the affordability provisions from when they were built in 1996 expired in 2020, so they're both 30-year.
    • 03:01:28
      Doesn't necessarily mean that the owner of those batteries is going to immediately rage back, but it's certainly a risk that exists for both of those.
    • 03:01:39
      but when we think of impacts of accessible housing for all.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 03:01:44
      So staff is working on a dashboard to track affordable units in production so
    • 03:01:56
      I'm not sure if I can answer this question if it was asked directly of me, but maybe you all can.
    • 03:02:03
      If someone says, last year you all, the city dedicated $7 million to affordable housing and $2 million for tax relief.
    • 03:02:15
      Could you, could we be able to say, yes, we got $160, are we able to now, it seems like we're doing a good job of tracking
    • 03:02:25
      What's planned and things, but do we know where the seven million dollars, what we got for it?
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 03:02:32
      Remember the production kind of lags behind the investment.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 03:02:44
      So one of the things that we're trying to do is actually build a pipeline that shows a direct relationship with those dollars coming into a project and where that project is on the timeline of approval, construction beginning, construction ending, and occupancy so that we can show that direct relationship between the city's dollars coming in and the production of units going forward
    • 03:03:13
      We also want to capture more than just what the city is currently funding, but also capture what else is happening in the marketplace.
    • 03:03:20
      Let's contribute towards housing goals.
    • 03:03:27
      So, I know it's so much for the federal regulatory reform we're about to do, and that is a reference to the fact that in terms of accessible housing for all of us, the idea that it's not just about the de-restricted, the subsidized affordable units that we're producing, but it's also about building out a housing market that meets the needs across the entire spectrum of our code.
    • 03:03:49
      of housing needs within the city at all income levels, the answer there is about our zoning ordinance, that our zoning ordinance is leading to a housing market that is responsive to the needs of our population, producing units of all types, meeting people at different stages of life, but we just know that there's more work that needs to happen in order to open up that old market responsive housing system.
    • 03:04:18
      And then going on and taking advantage of the fact that this new zoning ordinance creates an opportunity to build systems and programs that allow more people to get engaged in the housing production space.
    • 03:04:36
      There's a significant opportunity there for small scale builders to actually help us solve the problem.
    • 03:04:41
      for people to have new job opportunities contributing towards housing supply and recognizing that that market place of housing where we move away from, not move away from, but we supplement the existing system that is about large projects that are very much dependent on large scale market conditions and the state of the overall economy because that's where their financing comes in
    • 03:05:07
      That market production of large scale projects is going to go up and down as the market goes up and down.
    • 03:05:14
      It's the availability of dollars when the marketplace goes up and down.
    • 03:05:17
      Smaller scale builders
    • 03:05:19
      are going to be less, they're going to have a varied source of funding, but also less risk exposure.
    • 03:05:26
      If I'm doing two units, if I'm doing four units, if I'm doing 16 units, I've got less risk exposure.
    • 03:05:32
      I'm more likely to be able to continue and carry forward despite budget conditions.
    • 03:05:37
      And so the more we can build out that cohort of small scale builders, the more we can create a
    • 03:05:46
      housing production system that's meeting the needs of all city residents future and current.
    • 03:05:59
      The more we can build that out, the more our housing market can be less dependent on larger economic factors.
    • 03:06:06
      And part of making that happen is we're going to do this idea of actually pre-permitting buildings, making it easier to get those permits in place in the first place.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 03:06:19
      Yeah, just on that, I've heard that it's definitely gotten better, but I still hear of the red tape that's, you know, part of the changeover of staff, changeover of the zoning ordinance, but it's still preventing some people, developers, from building housing.
    • 03:06:44
      It's just, part of it is like, maybe they remember what it was,
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:06:50
      If you're right, you still stand up here to work on the process.
    • 03:06:55
      You want to open it up for a few minutes on where it is, housing in the three impact areas.
    • 03:07:00
      Any questions from James, because I want to share with you.
    • 03:07:05
      You've got to get in for a couple minutes regarding your Q&A and what you just shared.
    • 03:07:09
      Any questions?
    • 03:07:10
      Any questions to help you gain any information on what you just presented?
    • 03:07:14
      You can go back to any slide if you wanted or anything like that as well.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 03:07:18
      The numbers of housing that are just coming on board, is that
    • 03:07:25
      Does that include UVA beds?
    • 03:07:28
      That is just the pipeline of city-funded projects.
    • SPEAKER_13
    • 03:07:31
      Just what our dollars have touched, right?
    • 03:07:35
      Yes.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 03:07:36
      So like the bloom and the verb are a part of that.
    • 03:07:41
      It seemed like those would be good numbers to have, too.
    • 03:07:44
      Absolutely.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 03:07:45
      Ultimately, we needed to be tapping all of the into production, but that was particularly focused on our subsidized housing production at 80% of AMI and less.
    • 03:07:55
      So, those are all projects that the city has contributed in, and looking at where our city dollars contributed in, so where are we facilitating those different levels before building?
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 03:08:11
      Jacob, before June 30th when Judge Worrell's ruling changed the picture for the zoning ordinance, how were we doing in terms of getting proposals into the pipeline?
    • 03:08:29
      Were any of them getting close to getting approved?
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 03:08:33
      No, I think quite honestly, the number of units coming into the system was low.
    • 03:08:40
      So way out of our gate, we also instituted a pre-application meeting as a way to try and facilitate
    • 03:08:51
      All these projects coming in, and we were oversubscribed right off the bat.
    • 03:08:56
      Those were every Wednesday, and we had a strong interest.
    • 03:09:00
      Lots of garbage coming through the door.
    • 03:09:01
      But what quickly became apparent was the strength of other regulatory obstacles.
    • 03:09:07
      Like what sorts of obstacles?
    • 03:09:09
      Stormwater is a big one.
    • 03:09:11
      That's one of the primary ones.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 03:09:14
      Is that a council fix?
    • 03:09:16
      Is that something that you've got to fix?
    • 03:09:19
      Is it a state regulatory fix?
    • 03:09:21
      A little bit of all three of those.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 03:09:24
      So we have a higher standard for stormwater management in the city than what the state requires.
    • 03:09:32
      And that's not to say that's that thing, but it does incur additional costs, particularly on these smaller projects.
    • 03:09:41
      Some of the analysis we've done has shown that that department is one of the reasons the smaller scale objects have been opening up off the ground.
    • 03:09:50
      And that's where a lot of this activity, a lot of the interest is in these smaller projects, townhouses, colleges, those kinds of projects.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 03:09:57
      So ADU stuff, and so if you're building a backyard unit, do you really need a retention firm?
    • 03:10:03
      And is that going to kill the product?
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 03:10:06
      So when we're in a little bit of a hiatus right now with the overall zoning ordinance, is this an opportunity for us to fill that?
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 03:10:15
      We are, we are absolutely willing on that.
    • 03:10:17
      We want to see, so one of the issues
    • 03:10:19
      If you can cast back your rights to the priority projects that we discussed a while ago that Kelly Bratton has also brought forward.
    • 03:10:30
      One of those is a review of our environmental regulations across the board.
    • 03:10:35
      All of that plays into this conversation.
    • 03:10:42
      To steal from our future conversations and trade-offs and tensions between
    • 03:10:47
      with a high value on our environmental regulation and a high value in place on housing production.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:10:55
      Any other questions before we get into housing?
    • 03:10:58
      What is in the way?
    • 03:10:59
      What could be in the way?
    • Michael Payne
    • 03:11:03
      What, if any, in-house capacity exists to study some of these questions?
    • 03:11:08
      Because housing is obviously a very hyper-local market.
    • 03:11:13
      How is there a way to objectively evaluate
    • 03:11:16
      How much of a barrier is stormwater?
    • 03:11:18
      Or if the primary supply is large student apartments, how do we study the exact effects of that?
    • 03:11:25
      Is filtering occurring?
    • 03:11:26
      If so, where?
    • 03:11:27
      Because it's just going to be super, super local.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 03:11:31
      I mean, out of the capacity side, I'll say that one of the things we've been able to do is build out a longer planning team and that's where a lot of the work is happening at the beginning.
    • 03:11:39
      Like this new review of our environmental regulations, as well as the swallowing plan for the work at the page in West Hill.
    • 03:11:47
      That work is now focused and has dedicated some staff to work on it.
    • 03:11:52
      Housing is a tricky piece right now in terms of our ability to do housing studies in various ways.
    • Michael Payne
    • 03:12:00
      Just one other question is, understandably the focus is on regulatory constraints.
    • 03:12:07
      I've heard from developers and organizations like Strong Towns have really focused on this, that the missing middle that we really want the most, like triplexes, fourplexes, one of the biggest barriers is the financing beyond anything even regulatory, even the regulatory is a part of it.
    • 03:12:23
      Do you have a sense of how much ability to access financing is
    • 03:12:27
      That's a really interesting question and I don't have the answer to that question here at the City of Charlottesville.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 03:12:33
      But I'm familiar with exactly what you're talking about.
    • 03:12:45
      I can tell you actually that
    • 03:12:47
      We're moving towards this idea of pre-permanence, some of these small building types actually can help to unlock some of that financing, because it reduces risk, which makes dollars and money.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:13:01
      Cool, thank you.
    • 03:13:02
      Cool, so before we dive in, what is in the way or could be in the way when we're still talking housing, and it was really important to try
    • 03:13:15
      I promise it's for a reason.
    • 03:13:17
      So it's really good to remember those impact areas and especially regarding housing.
    • 03:13:24
      So we'll talk about housing, kind of you'll still hear those impact areas and a little more and what's in the way and what could be in the way.
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 03:13:32
      Kathy, ma'am.
    • 03:13:33
      Thank you.
    • 03:13:35
      You all were taking a little bit of my thunder, so some of the things you just said you're going to see.
    • 03:13:41
      But my role here is to... Great minds think alike.
    • 03:13:44
      I love that.
    • 03:13:46
      But my role here is to help you all think through some things that could be in the way of your goals and what is in the way now.
    • 03:13:55
      So when we think about, in housing specifically, we've got this impact area of homelessness.
    • 03:14:03
      So some things that are in the way right now.
    • 03:14:07
      We've talked about that investment in housing stock for 30% of AMI and under.
    • 03:14:14
      James just showed you how we're not hitting that target.
    • 03:14:17
      If we're thinking about our homeless population, they're not even necessarily going to be at 30% AMI.
    • 03:14:23
      They're going to be at 0%, 10%, maybe 20%, depending on if they're bringing in social security, disability, if they're able to work and not have an address.
    • 03:14:33
      By the way, it's extremely hard to get a job on a job application if you have no address.
    • 03:14:38
      We're thinking about the impacts of that lack of accessibility also of a low barrier shelter.
    • 03:14:46
      So we know that we have some accessibility through our Salvation Army program, but that's what we call high barrier.
    • 03:14:53
      You need to meet certain points of criteria in order to stay there.
    • 03:14:58
      But we are a community that at this point in time does not have a year-round
    • 03:15:02
      Low barrier shelter for adults.
    • 03:15:04
      We do not have a year-round low barrier shelter for families, and we do not have one that's a little more flexible.
    • 03:15:10
      Let's say you're an adult and you're a caregiver.
    • 03:15:12
      We separate by gender, for example.
    • 03:15:14
      So there are people where even if we had this shelter, maybe they couldn't avail themselves of it because they are a caregiver of an adult of a different gender.
    • 03:15:23
      and one person may have to go somewhere, one person may have to go another where, another place.
    • 03:15:28
      Another interesting point with those barriers can include companion animals as well.
    • 03:15:34
      And then we also know what's in the way is a fragmented service delivery with our agencies.
    • 03:15:40
      There's also a lack of accountability for those outcome achievements.
    • 03:15:43
      You all are investing in this work.
    • 03:15:46
      James showed you that slide.
    • 03:15:48
      However,
    • 03:15:50
      We as an organization, we as a community have often said you're doing well and we thank you for it.
    • 03:15:57
      But are you all getting, as Joshua just said, the return on investment for those dollars as well?
    • 03:16:04
      We're thinking about that return on investment by units, by preservation.
    • 03:16:07
      Are you all thinking about the return on investment and whether you're getting what you want out of your philanthropic dollars as well?
    • 03:16:15
      Now some things that could be in the way.
    • 03:16:18
      We've got that loss or reduction of federal and state homelessness funding streams.
    • 03:16:22
      You all have seen that on the news.
    • 03:16:24
      When we lose those peripheral safety net benefits, even with LIHTC, for example, being bolstered, that won't help necessarily your homeless individuals, right?
    • 03:16:35
      We've got a determination or we've got to think about that continuing
    • 03:16:40
      continuation or increases to the city's reoccurring investment in programs specifically to provide housing access to those who are currently unsheltered.
    • 03:16:51
      Again, you all made some major one-time investments in our Salvation Army.
    • 03:16:55
      We have some investments in some of our other surrounding programming.
    • 03:17:00
      But how do you all want to think about that?
    • 03:17:03
      And if it needs to go up, thinking about that loss of some other revenues that those nonprofits may face, is that something that would be the pleasure of the city to do?
    • 03:17:11
      And then we're also thinking about that rising demand due to economic and climate-driven displacement.
    • 03:17:16
      As Van shared with us, we might be in a recession.
    • 03:17:19
      It's possible.
    • 03:17:21
      And if we are, that certainly is going to have negative impacts on some of our most vulnerable community members.
    • 03:17:28
      I didn't think I could leave out social determinants of health, so I didn't.
    • 03:17:32
      And when we think about that area of homelessness for our social determinants of health, remember that housing stability is a determinant of health.
    • 03:17:38
      It is very hard to stay healthy if you do not have a home.
    • 03:17:43
      And those gaps can increase health care costs, it can increase worsening chronic conditions, and it can strain our emergency services.
    • 03:17:53
      When we think about that production and preservation of housing, again, it's the things that might be in the way right now.
    • 03:17:59
      There's limited developer interest.
    • 03:18:01
      It's really hard to make a project for 30% and under work financially.
    • 03:18:07
      A little easier for 30 to 50% AMI, a little bit more easier for that 51% to 80%, right?
    • 03:18:14
      But it's all still very different than saying, I'm going to build luxury condos, right?
    • 03:18:20
      We've got some aging affordable housing stock at risk of loss.
    • 03:18:23
      James shared that we have two projects right now that in 2026 could lose affordability.
    • 03:18:31
      And right now, again, as James shared, we don't really have a good way to collect and analyze that data to think about the efficacy of our investments in those available unit production and preservation.
    • 03:18:44
      Now, what could be in the way?
    • 03:18:46
      Construction costs.
    • 03:18:48
      Again, everything is rising.
    • 03:18:51
      and those are going to outpace some of those subsidies, outpace some of those, the investment that even we're providing.
    • 03:18:59
      We've got federal program changes again, which is going to impact some of that health tax credit competitiveness and again that expiration of affordability where existing units could be lost.
    • 03:19:12
      Adding that into our concept of those social determinants of health,
    • 03:19:15
      Affordable quality housing directly impacts economic mobility and opportunity, educational attainment possibilities, as well as people's physical health.
    • 03:19:28
      Now we're thinking about that third impact area.
    • 03:19:31
      So that affordability of housing for our whole community, right?
    • 03:19:36
      So what's in the way?
    • 03:19:38
      Rapid rent escalation in market rate units.
    • 03:19:42
      So we do have individuals
    • 03:19:45
      here who are not on what we consider low incomes.
    • 03:19:49
      That still doesn't mean that they can afford housing.
    • 03:19:52
      And those are individuals that are our teachers.
    • 03:19:54
      They are individuals that are our civil servants.
    • 03:19:57
      And they are really experiencing a bit of a squeeze right now and cannot live here.
    • 03:20:03
      There's a mismatch between wages and housing costs.
    • 03:20:06
      Very amazing work that this city, that as council, you all have supported.
    • 03:20:13
      in ensuring that we are paying a good, solid wage to our staff members, whether they are affiliated or not affiliated.
    • 03:20:22
      That doesn't always happen in all of our businesses here, right?
    • 03:20:27
      And so when we've got that mismatch, not everyone can afford housing, even if they do not fall under, for example, federal poverty line.
    • 03:20:35
      And then we've got that zoning reform legal challenge, which creates uncertainty.
    • 03:20:40
      If you're a developer, you maybe don't know what you want to do.
    • 03:20:43
      And so with that, that means it may slow down the production of new units, right?
    • 03:20:49
      And what could be in the way?
    • 03:20:50
      We've got population growth without proportional housing supply expansion.
    • 03:20:54
      We know we're floating on it in the same way, but people still need housing.
    • 03:20:59
      If you notice the line that was shown earlier today, it's not that our growth is flat.
    • 03:21:04
      We're not flat flat.
    • 03:21:05
      We are moving somewhat, right?
    • 03:21:07
      And those individuals still need housing and shelter.
    • 03:21:10
      And we also saw that daytime versus nighttime residency.
    • 03:21:14
      What if some of those daytime individuals actually would like to live here and can?
    • 03:21:19
      And then we also have that reduction in state and local rent relief programs.
    • 03:21:23
      I will tell you, our Pathways program has had to continuously change their criteria to make sure they have money to last throughout the year.
    • 03:21:31
      Your Home to Hope team, while we say they are not a housing program, they're a housing program.
    • 03:21:36
      Because they are doing unduplicated work.
    • 03:21:39
      And I recall from Sam's presentation, someone said that our focus on housing is so that regular folks can afford to live here.
    • 03:21:48
      That's what this slide is really focusing in on.
    • 03:21:51
      So when we think about those social determinants of health again, anytime we have those widening affordability gaps, we're increasing economic segregation, we're limiting workforce stability, and we're heightening health disparities because most individuals, we often talk about those who are on low incomes, but most individuals are about one paycheck from being unsheltered.
    • 03:22:14
      So we see these numbers of individuals who are on those certifiable lower income levels.
    • 03:22:20
      But those in human services, we also talk about money middle.
    • 03:22:23
      Those individuals who are in the money middle at any time are one toothache, one car repair, one something away from falling into homelessness and then coming to use our services.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:22:37
      Before we do that, we'll go back.
    • 03:22:41
      I want to give you actually for a few minutes, so feel free to ask any questions to help you get an understanding about what's in the way, what could be in the way regarding how it's going to impact areas.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 03:22:50
      Can you go back to the slide on your premises?
    • 03:22:55
      So, I offer this as a comment and an observation, not necessarily a question, I don't know if it's... I'll allow it.
    • 03:23:02
      Okay, I'll allow it.
    • 03:23:04
      From my own door knocking this past spring, one of the things that's in the way
    • 03:23:12
      One of the things that's in the way is lack of community consensus on where to put a low barrier shelter.
    • 03:23:20
      What was that second part?
    • 03:23:21
      I'm sorry.
    • 03:23:21
      It was lack of community consensus on where to put a low barrier shelter.
    • 03:23:26
      Lots and lots of good liberals criticizing or judging that are just as nimbyist when it comes to having all of the
    • 03:23:42
      Unfair as well as reasonable concerns about having a shelter near their children, near their school, near whatever.
    • 03:23:52
      That is real.
    • 03:23:53
      It's in Belmont, it's in Fifeville, it's Martha Jeff.
    • 03:24:00
      And so there's a real disconnect in our community between people that want to send a lot of emails because we're trying to clean up under the bridge because they're concerned about
    • 03:24:10
      I think it's something that the next council is going to have to get in front of and have hard conversations.
    • 03:24:21
      I had a quick question.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 03:24:43
      Many of the unhoused that we have in our community, they, I don't know the percentage, but they need mental health.
    • 03:24:56
      What is our capacity to support them?
    • 03:25:00
      Is it just Region 10?
    • 03:25:02
      I'm not sure of the answer to that.
    • 03:25:04
      Sure.
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 03:25:05
      So one of the things that, if I could maybe add a side impact area of all of these are the background supports.
    • 03:25:16
      Because everything you all have prioritized, as Council Member Ostrom noted at the beginning, are kind of all interwoven in to care for people.
    • 03:25:25
      Whether it's schools, whether it's housing, whether it's transportation.
    • 03:25:28
      So when you think about individuals who are unsheltered, medical need is paramount, period.
    • 03:25:34
      Just medical supports.
    • 03:25:36
      But there are some individuals who find themselves unsheltered that do need some mental health care.
    • 03:25:43
      In that realm, we do not have enough mental health care options and professionals that are accessible, by the way, not only to individuals who have fallen into homelessness,
    • 03:25:53
      But remember I said there's about one in four individuals can fall into homelessness at any time, right?
    • 03:25:59
      They also don't have access and that access could keep them in housing and prevent more individuals from falling into this impact area that you all are thinking about.
    • 03:26:10
      Region 10 does an excellent job with the amount of work they can do with it being quasi-state that gives limitations.
    • 03:26:18
      UVA has the clinics.
    • 03:26:20
      They still have limitations, but there is just a lack of mental health care professionals in the nation, but also professionals who want to do this work.
    • 03:26:29
      Because as a mental health professional, I also can, for example, go work for Better Health and listen to someone telephonically where I don't have to leave my home or perhaps put myself in a space where I'm uncomfortable.
    • 03:26:44
      They have options.
    • 03:26:45
      And so I would say that those wraparound supports, where I'm talking about that fragmented service delivery, that included access to physical health care and mental health care.
    • 03:26:56
      Because when we can wrap people with those supports, they stabilize better.
    • 03:27:00
      But universally, one of the ways that we can also stabilize people is get them into housing.
    • 03:27:05
      Because once you're into housing, getting into your medical appointments is a lot easier, or bringing someone to you.
    • 03:27:10
      Getting a job is a lot easier.
    • 03:27:13
      All of the things that we need you to do to stabilize is a whole lot easier if you have some sort of consistent shelter option.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 03:27:25
      I really appreciate the list that you all came up with.
    • 03:27:28
      But as Brian kind of indicated by wanting to add something to the list, there are things that we've noticed that could probably be added to the list.
    • 03:27:39
      So I don't know if we're doing that later, but on this slide, the Affordable Housing for the Full Community list, wherever that one lives, for some of the challenges that are in the way,
    • 03:27:55
      I wanted to add inclusionary zoning restrictions.
    • 03:27:58
      Those can make it difficult for larger scale projects to happen.
    • 03:28:02
      There's evidence when Portland implemented an inclusionary zoning law, basically cratered their market rate housing.
    • 03:28:08
      So that's something that we're going to need to consider.
    • 03:28:11
      And then I really also appreciate you pointing out the daytime, nighttime populations and that there's folks who want to live here.
    • 03:28:17
      When we had our joint meeting with the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, someone said, you know, UVA provides all these jobs and there's 20,000 people a day who commute into Charlottesville.
    • 03:28:29
      Isn't that great?
    • 03:28:30
      And I was like, not great.
    • 03:28:32
      That is 20,000 cars or parking spaces or things that we are
    • 03:28:37
      trading off for a better and different, more efficient land use policy.
    • 03:28:42
      And if you're commuting from Waynesboro, that's time you're not spending with your family or doing your hobby or whatever.
    • 03:28:48
      So the population growth without proportional housing and supply expansion, I mean that's kind of why, as you mentioned earlier,
    • 03:28:57
      We're not actually seeing a ton of growth in our population because prices are going up because we haven't built more.
    • 03:29:04
      So just thank you for highlighting that.
    • 03:29:06
      And then that becomes a increasing supply becomes part of a transportation solution as well.
    • 03:29:13
      So that's where it all ties together.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:29:16
      Thank you.
    • 03:29:21
      All right, let's work.
    • 03:29:22
      So on your, in front of you, you have a different stack of cards.
    • 03:29:26
      If you can grab those.
    • 03:29:28
      What I'd like you to do is write housing inside that center column.
    • 03:29:36
      And what I'd like you to do is we're going to basically use this to kind of evaluate some of the things you've heard and draw some deeper clarity.
    • 03:29:41
      So I'm going to ask you to take a moment and from everything you just heard regarding housing, from where it is and what's in the way, what could be in the way,
    • 03:29:49
      What's a tension?
    • 03:29:51
      What's a trade-off?
    • 03:29:53
      And then out of those two, when you look at those together, what could be an opportunity?
    • 03:29:56
      I think you might have mentioned an opportunity to add a particular area.
    • 03:30:01
      So from what you heard with housing, where it is, what's in the way, what could be in the way, as you reflect high level, what's a tension you heard?
    • 03:30:09
      What's a trade-off that you heard?
    • 03:30:12
      And then what could be an opportunity that arises out of those two?
    • SPEAKER_02
    • 03:30:41
      And if you took notes, we'll review your notes as well and see if we can extract anything out of those.
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 03:31:34
      The attention you heard, the trade-off that you heard, out of those two, what's an opportunity that you think could emerge?
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 03:31:51
      It's harder, you're getting closer.
    • 03:31:54
      It is.
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 03:31:54
      We're getting a little more specific now.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:32:08
      One big trade-off that jumped out to you as well.
    • 03:32:10
      When you look at those two next to each other, what's the opportunity that you believe could emerge?
    • 03:32:20
      I'm kind of going to go back to this.
    • 03:32:23
      When you start to think of opportunity, don't think of strategy, don't think of execution, don't think of the way.
    • 03:32:26
      Remember that when I ask you to think of something, it's to inform and direct.
    • 03:32:31
      So it's almost you being able to be like, I think an opportunity might just be that way.
    • 03:32:36
      We're not even on the journey yet, but you're just pointing that way.
    • 03:32:39
      That's information and directing.
    • SPEAKER_02
    • 03:32:45
      About another minute.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:33:12
      All right, sir, we'll kick this off.
    • 03:33:14
      Yes, yes.
    • 03:33:15
      Let's talk about it.
    • 03:33:16
      What is a, regarding housing, we've heard where it is and what's in the way, what could be in the way.
    • 03:33:22
      A lot of information you've taken in.
    • 03:33:24
      What is a, walk us through it.
    • 03:33:25
      What's a tension, what's a trade-off, and then out of those, what's an opportunity to add to that?
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 03:33:32
      Yeah, so, attention, I would say it's cost, it's the restrictions that, you know, we talked about maybe with the regulations that we might have,
    • 03:33:43
      And another tension is the gentrification, and this is particularly in a community of color, the African American community here, that feel like they have been overleaped.
    • 03:33:54
      with the new programs and things, particularly with the new residents here where, because maybe African Americans may have had bad credit because maybe they had a medical issue when they worked at UVA, I mean, and they went to UVA and had bad credit.
    • 03:34:10
      But anyway, it's real tension in the community of color.
    • 03:34:16
      And you know, I'm stuck on a trade-off.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:34:19
      So then it's happening,
    • 03:34:22
      When you heard the housing and the choice of the decision, is there anything you think has been prioritized over?
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 03:34:28
      I'm gonna need to come back to that, but I do have opportunities, and my opportunities is like more housing, and I have more diverse, more diverse in the sense of the type of housing that we have, but also that different types of housing makes our schools and our community more diverse, which I think just makes us a better and a stronger community, and so I need to come back to the trade-off.
    • 03:34:54
      That had me stopped, so.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:34:56
      It's all good, and that trade-off is around
    • 03:34:58
      I'm hearing this is happening, and because of that happening, this is not happening, right?
    • 03:35:05
      After you, sir, what tension, trade-off, and opportunity did you hear?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 03:35:07
      Yeah, I've hit on this earlier, and this is a really small part of the whole topic of housing, but I do think it's important.
    • 03:35:16
      People feeling, quote, safe in their neighborhoods, unquote, with the fact that we need to put a home shelter somewhere.
    • 03:35:26
      It's a tension?
    • 03:35:27
      It's a tension.
    • 03:35:28
      OK.
    • 03:35:29
      A trade-off.
    • 03:35:35
      I won't repeat everything I wrote here, but I think it's a trade-off to some degree about who in the city we're going to, quote, put out.
    • 03:35:47
      Whether it's the people in the downtown mall or if it's the people wherever.
    • 03:35:52
      I think that that's real.
    • 03:35:55
      I think the opportunity, and maybe this is Pollyanna-ish, Pollyanna-ish, is that it's an opportunity for the community to genuinely come together.
    • 03:36:05
      You know, maybe we split up these units.
    • 03:36:08
      Maybe we go with something smaller.
    • 03:36:11
      This is getting into strategy.
    • 03:36:13
      But maybe there are ways to address the need such that one part of the community doesn't feel completely put upon.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:36:21
      And I want you to know that.
    • 03:36:22
      Thank you for that.
    • 03:36:23
      And that's not strategy.
    • 03:36:24
      Those are great, high-level thoughts of my hair.
    • 03:36:26
      I want you later to go explore these.
    • 03:36:27
      Those are great ideas.
    • 03:36:28
      Thank you.
    • 03:36:29
      Thank you.
    • 03:36:29
      Thank you.
    • 03:36:30
      Lloyd, tension, the trade-off, and an opportunity that you
    • 03:36:34
      You heard and experienced in my hearing about the update of housing.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 03:36:37
      Well, I sort of chickened out on the tensions.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:36:40
      Don't do that, Lloyd!
    • 03:36:41
      I know it's after lunch, don't do that.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 03:36:44
      Well, I say it's everything.
    • 03:36:47
      The fundamental principle of economics is there's no such thing as a free lunch.
    • 03:36:51
      And when people come before us and say, well, this decision is a no brainer.
    • 03:36:58
      That just infuriates me because it wouldn't be in front of us if it was truly a no-brainer.
    • 03:37:04
      So I got off sidetracked by that rant, but anyway.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:37:08
      But I'm also hearing you say that the fact that this is a priority alone is just paying attention.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 03:37:13
      I mean, we've got all kinds of things that we have declared to be high priorities, and we've declared three different high priorities that we're discussing right now, and unless something very dramatic happens, we won't be able to fuck them up.
    • 03:37:29
      But in terms of a trade-off that we heard about,
    • 03:37:33
      Thank you for that, absolutely.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:37:49
      Tension that you've heard in the updated housing, a trade-off you've heard, and an opportunity that may have heard.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 03:37:54
      Yeah, I mean, the tension is between change and the status quo.
    • 03:38:00
      I mean, there's nimby attitudes, and that's not just for homelessness services, but to change in general.
    • 03:38:05
      I mean, we've got the lawsuit, we've got people who are afraid of height, we've got people who are afraid of
    • 03:38:11
      A lot of different things, and a lot of those problems are solved by more housing, so there's that kind of need to resolve that tension.
    • 03:38:20
      My trade-off was a little different than what people have said so far, which is
    • 03:38:27
      Having the political will to do something which may be useful but unpopular for a section of constituents, so trade-off on kind of the support that we have, maybe, is how to frame that within a trade-off mindset.
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 03:38:41
      It's an absolutely not acceptable deal.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 03:38:43
      Yeah, spending money, and then just spending money on this versus other things is the obvious trade-off.
    • 03:38:48
      There's always going to be an opportunity cost to everything that we do.
    • 03:38:54
      and then my opportunity that I'm suggesting is allowing an encouraging private investment which doesn't cost the city much or anything at the outset and then we gain real estate taxes against hilarious transportation benefits in the end.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:39:09
      Potentially you heard of the updated housing trade-off you heard and then I'll change the name.
    • Michael Payne
    • 03:39:16
      There were a lot of tensions though.
    • 03:39:18
      The one I wrote down is just that
    • 03:39:20
      Housing is very complex, and it's very hyper-local in terms of assessing the impact as well as what can happen.
    • 03:39:29
      So it came to mind, and I think some of these, for example, a seven-story apartment building with $3,000 a month rents, that impact looks very different on a piece of vacant land or in JPA versus we heard about Hearthwood losing 200 affordable units.
    • 03:39:47
      That development happening there has a very different impact than in JPA or on a vacant piece of land.
    • 03:39:53
      So how do we engage with the nuance of that?
    • 03:39:56
      Even though it's accomplishing a necessary goal of market rate supply, what does it look like if we encourage displacement of a mobile home park?
    • 03:40:05
      Does that benefit distribute to that income level?
    • 03:40:11
      And just, yeah, how do we engage with the complexity?
    • 03:40:15
      Trade-offs, money, it's extremely expensive.
    • 03:40:19
      Hundreds of thousands of dollars for 0-30% AMI units.
    • 03:40:21
      I think it's $100,000 in subsidy just to go from 60% AMI to 30% AMI to make the project financially feasible.
    • 03:40:30
      I think for a project to break even on the rent side, just land construction costs, you break even at around 70% AMI.
    • 03:40:38
      And obviously developers to get financing are going to need a profit not to break even.
    • 03:40:42
      So if we want to reach those deep AMI levels, there's no way around spending a lot of money and that would compete against other
    • 03:40:51
      budget priorities as construction costs go up.
    • 03:40:55
      Another trade-off is just how do we evaluate the trade-off of something like allowing a community benefits agreement like in Cherry Avenue where you can get to a lot of things a neighborhood cares about, but that necessarily will involve a discretionary decision point and we can't have that everywhere in the city, but where is it warranted?
    • 03:41:17
      Where do we want a community benefits agreement that is getting to
    • 03:41:22
      addressing, for example, the legacy of Vinegar Hill.
    • 03:41:26
      What would that look like?
    • 03:41:27
      I don't know.
    • 03:41:27
      And then opportunities.
    • 03:41:31
      I think there's a huge opportunity for us to really engage with a lot more of the complexity as we were so consumed by the zoning conversation.
    • 03:41:39
      Maybe we will again, the lawsuit.
    • 03:41:41
      But I was excited by revisiting
    • 03:41:45
      because I think that's an opportunity to really get into the weeds on some of these trade-offs.
    • 03:41:52
      I think there's also opportunities to study the impact of our investments and figure out, is a land trust model more effective than some of what we've been doing?
    • 03:41:59
      Is CRHA more effective than PHA?
    • 03:42:02
      What's the ROI of our different strategies?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:42:05
      But these are fast.
    • 03:42:06
      This is amazing.
    • 03:42:07
      I love this.
    • 03:42:07
      One, I just want to thank you for sitting in the tension, the trade-offs, and the opportunities, and us not going into like, let's do this thing yet.
    • 03:42:15
      So I appreciate that.
    • 03:42:17
      And we're going to tap into your writings a little later, so you're building your own toolbox.
    • 03:42:21
      So thank you for that.
    • 03:42:23
      I want you to take a break.
    • 03:42:24
      So take a 10-minute break.
    • 03:42:25
      Stretch, get warm.
    • 03:42:27
      And again, thank you for the cooling, by the way.
    • 03:42:29
      I'm keeping it cool.
    • 03:42:30
      If not, this will all come down.
    • 03:42:32
      It will all fall.
    • 03:42:33
      So I appreciate that.
    • 03:42:34
      Thank you so much for sitting in that exercise.
    • 03:42:37
      I know it's not easy to sit in tensions and trade-offs and tons of complexities.
    • 03:42:43
      But I admire your curse.
    • 03:42:45
      I do like it.
    • 03:42:46
      It's super cool.
    • 03:42:47
      So, all right.
    • 03:42:47
      Take 10 minutes, and we'll see you back.
    • 03:42:51
      So we've been talking about the top strategic priorities.
    • 03:42:54
      We're wanting to give you a deeper understanding on them.
    • 03:42:57
      You're going to hear the next one, which is around education.
    • 03:42:59
      And again, James, you're going to kind of represent where it is.
    • 03:43:03
      Ashley is going to come behind and talk about what is in the way or what could be in the way regarding the strategic priority of education.
    • 03:43:10
      And listen for, again, listen for the tensions, listen for the trade-offs, listen for the opportunities, and definitely take a year or two to those impact areas, because we're going to talk about them a little more tomorrow.
    • 03:43:19
      Cool?
    • 03:43:20
      Alright, and then none of that tea, coffee, what are you going to do?
    • 03:43:23
      I need you, I need you.
    • 03:43:24
      But no, James, take it away after you, sir.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 03:43:28
      Thank you.
    • 03:43:29
      So, what about that, education, there's a lot of slides in here.
    • 03:43:36
      Education reset, Charlottesville supports a broad and well integrated set of educational opportunities, including Charlottesville City Schools, other youth serving organizations, career technical education providers, and U of I Virginia Community College.
    • 03:43:50
      But we're going to be focusing in, really, in this conversation on CCS.
    • 03:43:56
      and just diving right in with the impact there is, just focusing on each of these financial operations and listening to the end of the presentation, I guess she and I were averaging different dollars because I think her dollar was higher, but we'll call it over
    • 03:44:18
      This five-year period, an average increase of approximately $5 million per year in new money.
    • 03:44:23
      I think in a shorter span of time, I think the average is 8.4.
    • 03:44:28
      The message is the same, whatever dollar figure you put in there is an increasing spend per year in new money for operating our school system.
    • 03:44:45
      And then, on the facility development and construction, don't have to cast back as far on this time, but this is our most recent presentation to you all.
    • 03:44:55
      Well, at first, kind of looking backwards, we, in this space, in recent years, we have funded the acquisition of CATEC, they're over 500,000 dollars, Charlottesville Middle School,
    • 03:45:08
      We just had a fantastic ribbon cutting on an amazing building.
    • 03:45:12
      The cost of that building is $91 million.
    • 03:45:16
      And we have, as our next ribbon cutting to look forward to, the Walker 3K School, anticipated now at $42 million.
    • 03:45:26
      Remember that was previously around $30 million, but we have
    • 03:45:31
      Set aside for that is 30, but as it was mentioned during that last presentation, that cost is, it now is scheduled at 42 million.
    • 03:45:42
      As we highlighted in that presentation the overall condition of our school facilities is good, right?
    • 03:45:49
      We have done a really amazing job over the last probably decade to two decades
    • 03:45:57
      in really upping the standards of our maintenance of these buildings, but they are old buildings, if I may.
    • 03:46:05
      As Dr. Gurley, I think, notably highlighted, the last, notably highlighted, yes, in his comments on the ribbon cutting the other day, the last ribbon cutting in Charlottesville was for Charlottesville High School in 1974, for a new school building.
    • 03:46:26
      And then we have been studying annually on our modernization program, $1.4 million.
    • 03:46:35
      Now, in the presentation we gave the other day, we talked about what I'm calling the state of good repair investments.
    • 03:46:43
      That's meeting the required capital maintenance, HVAC, rooms being big ticket items in there,
    • 03:46:49
      Addressing the bathrooms, hopefully in many cases upgrading over the type of bathrooms we're now seeing in Charlottesville High School, Charlottesville High School Addressing ceiling and flooring, those are the places where the inherent age of these buildings is most apparent Addressing and upgrading lighting, and we came at you with the cost of approximately $100 million for that
    • 03:47:13
      But you all were home where that conversation immediately went to, which was that number represents, as I said, state of good repair.
    • 03:47:21
      But if we're getting into the idea of modernization, if we're getting into the idea of, again, more similar to what we saw at Charlottesville Middle School yesterday, we're looking at larger numbers.
    • 03:47:36
      So these are just
    • 03:47:37
      estimates based on prior studies of the schools in terms of just the basic idea of increasing the square footage of each of these schools.
    • 03:47:46
      Now, we're not looking at that from a school population.
    • 03:47:49
      I think we made that clear.
    • 03:47:50
      We don't see a school population need to increase the size of these schools.
    • 03:47:54
      But when you think about the additional space that's necessary for breakout rooms, for special
    • 03:48:03
      Special needs type oriented classrooms for meeting the needs for gym space, for cafeteria space, for meeting space.
    • 03:48:14
      There is a sense that we need to be looking at expanding, or at least thinking about the idea of expanding footprints of these schools.
    • 03:48:21
      That number when you look at the elementary schools,
    • 03:48:23
      Very, very rough estimates.
    • 03:48:25
      Can't emphasize enough that these are rough estimates, but think of that in the 132 million dollar space, and the same thing when you play around Charlottesville High School, 176.
    • 03:48:37
      All of this is anticipating that we're still using our existing schools and not actually replacing the school.
    • 03:48:44
      All of these are anticipating that we are making use of spring space in order to do a full-blown modernization of the school all at once.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 03:48:52
      Is this in addition to the $100 million of the prior slide?
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 03:48:55
      No, this would not be in addition.
    • 03:48:57
      This is two pathways, if you will.
    • 03:49:02
      And then just as we think about that facilities maintenance, we have done a very good job of highlighting that there is a cost associated with ongoing maintenance of all of our assets.
    • 03:49:12
      I think we are ready to point out that the older assets sometimes cost us more to maintain over time.
    • 03:49:18
      But some of the things that we're working on are where the other places where city funds are going into our schools
    • 03:49:25
      We have contracts for buildings and grounds maintenance.
    • 03:49:30
      We have pupil transportation and increasingly our human services department is involved in youth programming in partnership with the schools.
    • 03:49:39
      So a lot of different places where we are working in partnership and of course there's a cost associated with all of those.
    • 03:49:46
      So I am, but I'm going to go right.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:49:51
      And Phil, you can go back to any slide, ask any questions, and simply point to anything.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 03:49:55
      And this was a lot about numbers and dollar figures.
    • Michael Payne
    • 03:50:00
      If we did finally get authorization for the sales tax for school construction, is that 10 million a year?
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 03:50:09
      I think it's estimated at about 14.
    • 03:50:13
      Yeah, and it's about $100 million in bond capacity.
    • Michael Payne
    • 03:50:20
      at present cost would cover most but not all of the modernization.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 03:50:24
      By these estimates.
    • Sam Sanders
    • 03:50:25
      Right.
    • 03:50:26
      I'm sure they'll go up.
    • 03:50:29
      And using the allocation that has been described as the type of sales tax allocation that you could devote to that.
    • 03:50:38
      But then there's the other tension of do you use some of that for something else, like transportation?
    • 03:50:42
      Because they're both in the same space.
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 03:50:49
      Do you have questions to absorb information and understanding?
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 03:50:53
      If we, in fact, got that extra cent, let's say we were getting $14 million from that, is there anything we're presently spending that we would not then have to spend?
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 03:51:05
      I think that's a very good question.
    • 03:51:07
      I think we would look at, without having somebody from our facilities development and maintenance team here next to me,
    • 03:51:18
      But what I think we would look at in that space is we have major investments planned for HVAC and ROOS in particular.
    • 03:51:27
      One of the things we might be able to trade off is if the timing is right, we don't do a roof replacement because we're getting ready to do a full-scale renovation of the school and learn about it at the same time.
    • 03:51:39
      So those are out there.
    • 03:51:40
      We might stop doing the $1.4 million every year, kind of surgical, inserted modernization projects, and instead it just goes straight to this approach instead.
    • 03:51:52
      So yeah, there's some dollars in that space.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 03:51:58
      Of the $91 million for the Charlottesville Middle, some of that was grant funded, right?
    • 03:52:06
      So, um, sorry Michael, I know that
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 03:52:18
      I'm just recalling my time on the school board when I was on the other side, that some of the questions, comments that we had as a school board member was like, you know, and Sam talked about this, that a lot of these things, they had not been done.
    • 03:52:41
      before.
    • 03:52:42
      So we're kind of paying for not doing some of the things maybe we should have been doing all along.
    • 03:52:46
      And where does Charlottesville kind of rank, or not necessarily rank, fall within as far as this type of commitment to
    • 03:52:58
      other localities.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 03:52:59
      How do we compare in terms of, you know, what I keep going to is the time frame that's gone by without a major investment in the schools.
    • 03:53:10
      The last major investment, I believe inside the middle school, was the performing arts center at the high school in 1983.
    • 03:53:20
      Before that, the last major investment was building up the high school in 74.
    • 03:53:24
      Isn't the length of time without
    • 03:53:27
      Well...
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 03:53:33
      No, I think that what we were looking at, and I'm trying to put myself on the school board six or seven years ago, is like where does Charlottesville rank as far as its financial commitment to the school district.
    • 03:53:49
      I'm just going to say Manassas, because Manassas City, they say that I think that we're going to give them 10%.
    • 03:53:56
      I'm just going to add a figure or something like that.
    • 03:54:01
      Of course, I don't need to know it now, but as we move forward and have these, probably what I'm hearing within the next five years, have these conversations with the schools and the profits and the community that we're going to have to list that, what she said, prioritization and
    • 03:54:18
      Conservation.
    • Michael Payne
    • 03:54:19
      Any other questions?
    • 03:54:24
      Obviously this was all focused on buildings.
    • 03:54:27
      Is it known future costs of the people of like new instruction tutors as well as collective bargaining?
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 03:54:37
      We don't know the specific cost of this market.
    • 03:54:39
      We don't know the specific cost of it.
    • Sam Sanders
    • 03:54:41
      Now when tomorrow you're going to talk about that exact part of the scenario, because you're headed into what's coming home.
    • 03:54:49
      Because that's a financial operational line item that we have as the tension trade-off discussion.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 03:54:57
      I feel like he's setting this up, man.
    • 03:54:59
      No, the amount of times I write that down.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 03:55:05
      Write that down.
    • 03:55:08
      No setup.
    • 03:55:09
      Thank you for writing that down.
    • 03:55:11
      All right, we're going to hear what's in the way and what could be in the way of our education goals switching apart.
    • 03:55:21
      Cool.
    • 03:55:22
      After you, ma'am.
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 03:55:23
      Hey, again.
    • 03:55:26
      For education, when we start thinking again about an impact area of what's in the way and what could be in the way for financial operations, we know that there is significant capital that is competing for limited CIP investments.
    • 03:55:39
      As I like to remind staff as well as members of the community, the city has five outlets.
    • 03:55:44
      How we cut up those apples are decision points, but we have five of them, and that is all we have.
    • 03:55:49
      I cannot conjure a magical apple for you, any one of us.
    • 03:55:54
      There are deferred funding for critical projects that we have all just talked about, as well as there's that impact of the result of that flexible nature of the school funding formula process.
    • 03:56:07
      We know we have a dollar amount, theoretically, because we say we're going to give X amount to the schools.
    • 03:56:13
      But then there is that additional amount that we give.
    • 03:56:18
      And if you all flipped in the end packet, she gave a very nice chart to show how that growth is changing as well.
    • 03:56:26
      So keep that chart in your mind when I'm talking about what's in the way with that kind of growth.
    • 03:56:31
      Because again, you all have five apples, so any additional heart of apples you give to one place, you can't give to another.
    • 03:56:37
      Paying attention to trade-off.
    • 03:56:39
      What could be in the way?
    • 03:56:41
      We know that there's going to be rising construction and maintenance costs that can exceed projections.
    • 03:56:46
      Unfortunately, as much as we would love to say that we in-house produce all of the widgets, nuts, and bolts that we will need to do all of this work, we don't.
    • 03:56:54
      So we are at the whims of the market like everyone else.
    • 03:56:58
      We know that there is a possibility that if we hit that economic downturn, we might have to see a reduced bond capacity or reduced revenue.
    • 03:57:07
      all of that is something that can come down the pipe as well as we know that there's going to be some changes that probably will come within state and federal funding allocations to the school system as a whole maybe perhaps mentioning a little bit of what council member Payne was just saying if there are less dollars that are invested for the general operations of the schools
    • 03:57:27
      The education, the tutors English as a second language supports, supports for those with neurodiversity and other learning disabilities.
    • 03:57:37
      Are we going to be asked to step into that space and then again, your thought battles.
    • 03:57:43
      Thinking of those social determinants of health, school funding stability can ensure equitable learning environments.
    • 03:57:49
      that promote long-term health and economic opportunity.
    • 03:57:52
      For example, I hope everyone here either has a lovely realization right now or has already had one.
    • 03:58:00
      Our littles, by the time they hit third grade, you stop learning to read and you read to learn.
    • 03:58:07
      So if you have not gotten a quality education from early learner through second grade,
    • 03:58:13
      In third grade, we stop teaching you how to read.
    • 03:58:15
      We expect that you know how to read and that is how you will learn for the rest of your time in any educational process.
    • 03:58:22
      So all of this matters with that economic opportunity because those youth that hit that moment of third grade and do not know how to read proficiently
    • 03:58:31
      have just limited their income or any capacity.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 03:58:34
      I think that also includes people at any age, if their families have the resources to choose a different school and they choose the public schools, that adds to everybody's educational experience.
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 03:58:49
      Yes, absolutely.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 03:58:50
      And that diversity of people.
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 03:58:51
      Correct.
    • 03:58:52
      Having that diversity within a classroom, getting those thoughts out as people raise their hand, always is going to be really great, whether you are a little learning or an adult learning.
    • 03:59:03
      So when we think about facility development and construction, what is in the way?
    • 03:59:07
      We have limited project management capacity here in large-scale projects.
    • 03:59:11
      So for example, when you're doing a large-scale modernization, light,
    • 03:59:14
      Asheville Middle School, that is taking some of our project management team off the deck for any other projects you all may want to see, whether they're within a school or within another facility.
    • 03:59:25
      We also have some coordinating challenges between wants and needs.
    • 03:59:28
      So if we start thinking about or thinking of facility development and construction, what is a need for a building or a facility, whether it's an upgrade or a redo or a full new build, and what is something that's just really lovely to have, right?
    • 03:59:43
      And then what could be in the way?
    • 03:59:46
      Project sequencing delays can affect modernization timelines, so choosing to do X may mean you cannot do Y and vice versa.
    • 03:59:56
      We're thinking about market volatility impacting that material availability and pricing.
    • 04:00:00
      Again, love to say we would make all our widgets, but we don't.
    • 04:00:04
      We've got some changes in accessibility of supportive funds for development and constructions with green lenses.
    • 04:00:09
      Before we could look at some of the work that had been done under some of the Inflation Act work with the Biden administration and say, well, maybe we can add this thing because we can apply for this funding.
    • 04:00:21
      That does not really exist anymore.
    • 04:00:24
      and also reconciling the desire for modern amenities and facilities that can be limited by physical plant and cost allocation.
    • 04:00:30
      So as we've talked about a lot, we have older buildings.
    • 04:00:33
      Even if we can modernize them, there may be limits to what we can do within that actual physical plant structure.
    • 04:00:40
      Thinking of our social determinants of health again, we know that modern and safe facilities can enhance
    • 04:00:47
      Student engagement, reduced absenteeism, and support mental well-being.
    • 04:00:51
      We have a school that has no windows.
    • 04:00:53
      Windows are amazing because humans are complicated houseplants.
    • 04:00:57
      We need sunlight and water.
    • 04:00:59
      University.
    • 04:01:02
      And then we've got our impact area for facilities maintenance.
    • 04:01:05
      So already in the way, as we talked about, we've got that aging infrastructure, which leads to increased maintenance backlog.
    • 04:01:13
      and we have some coordination challenges between Charlottesville City School and City Facilities slash Public Works and Parks and Recreation because those teams are providing the assistance for facilities and maintenance not just for our school system but for every city-owned building and in the case of parks, every piece of parkland and trail you see.
    • 04:01:31
      So if they're mowing a lawn for a school, they're not mowing a lawn in a park.
    • 04:01:35
      So keep that in mind.
    • 04:01:37
      What could be in the way?
    • 04:01:38
      We've got that, of course, deferred maintenance that is accelerating our asset deterioration.
    • 04:01:43
      Even though we have some of that maintenance in your CIP right now that's planned, anything can happen with a roof.
    • 04:01:49
      And if a roof is not set to go until 2028 and something happens to it in 2026, where do we go from there?
    • 04:01:58
      And then you've got competition for resources with new construction priorities.
    • 04:02:02
      Again, if we're thinking about that facility's maintenance, but we decide we want a new basketball court and just picking out something,
    • 04:02:09
      then we have to make that decision that we're going to dedicate and allocate the space, time, talent, and materials to the basketball court and maybe not to what was planned.
    • 04:02:18
      When we think of our social determinants of health again, we know that those well-maintained facilities can protect students and staff's health, they can reduce injury risks, and ensure equitable access to learning spaces.
    • 04:02:31
      And at the point of privilege, when we think about reducing injury risk, I want to give you all an actual visual picture
    • 04:02:39
      Our juvenile detention center, its largest area that caused the most medical costs is their gymnasium.
    • 04:02:49
      Because as the youth would play, it used to be a concrete floor.
    • 04:02:53
      And can you imagine getting checked in basketball to a concrete floor?
    • 04:02:58
      So that was where, if you looked at their line items, the most money they were spending on medical.
    • 04:03:04
      Recently,
    • 04:03:05
      through all the jurisdictions, we were able to replace that floor with a bouncible rubber floor that will reduce those injuries.
    • 04:03:13
      So not only are we protecting the health of those students, of those youth that are learning and growing there for the time they're there, but we also are reducing that injury risk.
    • 04:03:23
      So that's just a visible example if you all ever want to go see the new gym floor.
    • 04:03:28
      I know that Mr. Boland would be happy to show you all, but just wanted to give you a visual for that social determinant of how
    • SPEAKER_03
    • 04:03:38
      Cool.
    • 04:03:39
      You have action for Q&A.
    • 04:03:40
      Dive in, ask a question, gain some understanding.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 04:03:45
      So I did have a comment, you know.
    • 04:03:47
      Should I ask a question and you want to say something?
    • 04:03:50
      First thing I'm saying, well, it's actually a question, so.
    • 04:03:54
      It's a question now.
    • 04:03:56
      It's a question now.
    • 04:03:58
      Sure.
    • 04:03:58
      Just close it.
    • 04:04:01
      Just let your voice in the air.
    • 04:04:04
      So, but you mentioned the, you know,
    • 04:04:08
      maybe the economy downturn but a lot of times that's an opportunity to you know construction companies are like looking for work even to keep the workers
    • 04:04:22
      you know employed and the machines going and they a lot of times they you know I hear they just want to do it at cost just you know maybe make a little so it's in I know we have to a locality have to be in a position to do projects at that time so you know I don't know just it could be a time that maybe instead of 20 million they may we may get 15 or whatever but
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 04:04:45
      I did, but I will help out.
    • 04:04:52
      You're correct, but remember that we did have that presentation from the end where she kept enforcing that we're in those unprecedented times.
    • 04:05:00
      So even if right now we have it where the construction costs and maybe the labor for construction may go down,
    • 04:05:07
      That doesn't mean that the materials that perhaps have to come from someone else are going to go down.
    • 04:05:11
      Because even if those places might want to reduce their costs, there are now additional costs that they cannot mitigate.
    • 04:05:19
      So we may have less costs here, but more costs somewhere else.
    • 04:05:22
      Again, just bouncing back to the end presentation.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:05:25
      Any other questions around what's in the way or what could be in the way regarding education and some of these impact areas?
    • Michael Payne
    • 04:05:31
      What is a school?
    • 04:05:40
      I appreciate your questions.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:05:41
      We're at a moment of is this a pipe?
    • SPEAKER_17
    • 04:05:43
      I get it.
    • 04:05:44
      Schools can be lots of things, but one of the things we're talking about is even
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 04:05:55
      Green Space.
    • 04:05:55
      We know Green Space is a part of our schools.
    • 04:05:58
      It is a learning part.
    • 04:05:59
      We have had learning gardens, all of those things that take facilities, maintenance.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:06:04
      Let's dive in.
    • 04:06:07
      Let's go ahead.
    • 04:06:08
      And you all have another card in front of you.
    • 04:06:09
      Please grab that.
    • 04:06:12
      Do me a favor.
    • 04:06:12
      Write education on the inside of that.
    • 04:06:16
      And James kind of gave you some insights a little bit about where it is and actually gave a little bit of insights around what's in the way and potentially what could be in the way.
    • 04:06:24
      Right where you heard it, what tensions did you hear?
    • 04:06:27
      What trade-offs did you hear?
    • 04:06:30
      And what opportunity could emerge?
    • 04:07:33
      Alright, another couple of minutes.
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 04:08:39
      I want to see if it is actually textured.
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 04:08:41
      Feel free, it is.
    • SPEAKER_10
    • 04:08:44
      It is.
    • SPEAKER_03
    • 04:08:51
      Alright, about another minute.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:08:59
      Mr. Magill, will you start us off, kick us off?
    • 04:09:05
      Yes, yes, so... Alright, so we're running out of time.
    • 04:09:08
      Yes.
    • 04:09:08
      What is the tension you heard, some trade-offs that you heard and I was too, what's an opportunity that could emerge?
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 04:09:13
      Yeah, so the tensions are rising costs and just the school needs both on the kind of academic and capital side.
    • 04:09:23
      The trade-offs is, you know, delayed construction which will rise, I mean, increase the cost and the opportunities I have is for, you know, is for high-performing, well-attended schools.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 04:09:39
      Yeah, I had this tension, the investment slash reinvestment in capital stock versus spending money on operational and programmatic needs.
    • 04:09:50
      The trade-off is, is it better to have a modern facility or an older one that's yet to have better teaching?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:10:07
      The opportunity is basically for the community to have conversations about this.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 04:10:13
      As the thing I mentioned earlier, there's a lot of cognitive dissonance.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:10:29
      I think I might be biased in that sense, but I am naturally, I think, facilitating conversations to be able to do the deep work is really important, especially as the tensions and trade-offs and things, right?
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 04:10:41
      Lloyd, after you, sir.
    • 04:10:42
      Well, I tend to conflate the tensions and trade-offs.
    • 04:10:48
      Okay.
    • 04:10:49
      And in this particular instance, I start from the proposition that
    • 04:10:55
      We're going to do $15-20 million in renovations to schools and the tension and the trade-offs become what we sacrifice to make that happen.
    • 04:11:06
      Do you see anything regarding tension?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:11:09
      Is there anything, two things you can think of that just pull against each other?
    • 04:11:12
      Well, regarding that...
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 04:11:14
      You know, what Brian was saying about maybe we don't increase the capital investment, we spend more on better teachers or something.
    • 04:11:24
      I don't really see that as a viable trade-off.
    • 04:11:28
      I think the school buildings are what they are and maybe we don't need, frankly when I took the tour of Charlottesville Middle School yesterday, I sort of had the feeling that I wondered whether they could have done ten million dollars less.
    • 04:11:42
      And the pool is, it's
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:12:09
      And that's the idea.
    • 04:12:10
      There's no end goal to the pool.
    • 04:12:12
      It's just two things pulling against each other.
    • 04:12:14
      And the trade-off is something that I hear is being done, and something's not being done, as well.
    • 04:12:19
      But the two things are just repeating or pulling.
    • 04:12:22
      And the trade-off is something that's existing, though, because that's happening.
    • 04:12:25
      Something's not happening.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 04:12:28
      After you, ma'am.
    • 04:12:30
      So I mean, there's the obvious tension of constrained resources in both capital and materials.
    • 04:12:37
      The trade-offs are order of operations, reorganization of projects, and opportunity costs.
    • 04:12:43
      We're spending it on
    • 04:12:46
      Jackson Viola, well then Trailblazer is getting deferred or whatever but that's something that we can work out as we do triage.
    • 04:12:57
      And then the opportunities, you know this was something that was missed with the huge project that was just done at Charlottesville Middle but if we're going to do some huge projects at some elementary
    • 04:13:07
      Thank you, Sarah.
    • Michael Payne
    • 04:13:35
      Like others, people versus buildings is attention.
    • 04:13:41
      Another tension is school board and city council.
    • 04:13:44
      I don't say this as a negative thing, but school board doesn't control any revenue sources and doesn't have to make financial decisions, so their incentive is to always advocate for as much spending as possible, which, again, is their role.
    • 04:13:57
      But how do we set expectations for what we are able to do?
    • 04:14:02
      Is there a way to reach there?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:14:03
      If you could sum that up, I mean, that's great insight.
    • 04:14:06
      If you could sum that up,
    • 04:14:07
      It's the tension between the advocacy of the school and the responsibility of the council.
    • 04:14:14
      Is that what I'm hearing?
    • 04:14:16
      Yeah, I think so.
    • Michael Payne
    • 04:14:19
      Trade-offs, again, buildings versus staff.
    • 04:14:22
      I don't know if it's a trade-off, but enrollment.
    • 04:14:27
      It's possible it increases.
    • 04:14:29
      It's been flat for 20 years.
    • 04:14:30
      It's also possible it doesn't.
    • 04:14:32
      What's going to happen there?
    • 04:14:35
      Maybe it increases it a little.
    • 04:14:37
      Who knows?
    • 04:14:38
      I don't know.
    • 04:14:38
      I think there's uncertainty there.
    • 04:14:39
      Obviously it runs up against any other budget priorities.
    • 04:14:46
      Opportunities.
    • 04:14:46
      I think in Arlington there's an elementary school with a planetarium so we can do that.
    • 04:14:54
      But I think
    • 04:14:57
      The state sales tax is a big opportunity, as is I think kind of reaching maybe a new funding agreement with the schools that's setting out what the expectation is, and kind of laying it out clearer than it is now, because I don't think there's an alignment of expectations currently.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:15:15
      Those are great reflecting thoughts and insights, I appreciate it.
    • 04:15:19
      We'll give you a break, and then when you come back we're going to hear that third priority, and then we'll suggest about that.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 04:15:29
      Alright, well y'all ready to wrap it up.
    • 04:15:36
      Let's talk about the areas that are popular.
    • 04:15:40
      We are going to talk about transportation.
    • 04:15:43
      The strategic priority areas are also to provide a regional transportation system that increases mobility options and is reliable and affordable for all.
    • 04:15:52
      For purposes of today, we're going to focus on transit, specifically.
    • 04:15:58
      For this strategic opportunity, we had a goal that spoke to restoring transit services pre-COVID service levels.
    • 04:16:14
      So back in July, we went to one of your work sessions.
    • 04:16:19
      We dug into both the state of our transit service today, what improvements we've made, and some scenarios looking towards the future.
    • 04:16:31
      This is a reminder of the transportation system status, description of our 12 routes and trolley,
    • 04:16:39
      and the service that we offer.
    • 04:16:40
      I'm not going to read all of this, but it's there in case we need reference back to it.
    • 04:16:46
      The changes that we've made in FY25.
    • 04:16:47
      Route 11 is extended to the center of Albemarle, something they've been working towards for a while.
    • 04:16:55
      Routes 4 and 9 will improve to 30 minutes frequency between 6am and 7pm on weekdays.
    • 04:17:03
      It sticks a route to 30 minutes between 6am and 6pm, 8 days and Saturday, and then we've added the recovery time to every route because this is getting to one of our core issues on transit which is not just frequency but reliability, right?
    • 04:17:18
      This proper time ensures that our buses are able to stick to their schedule and reliably be there when somebody wants to be picked up and taken to their destination.
    • 04:17:31
      I'm not going to
    • 04:17:33
      Read every bit of this slide, but just noting, if we go back to FY 2018, we're close to 2 million riders.
    • 04:17:46
      We are now at about 1.4, but we saw obviously a significant drop off for COVID, and then we've been steadily increasing since then.
    • 04:18:01
      I love these charts.
    • 04:18:03
      I think this really captures a lot in one picture.
    • 04:18:07
      Food COVID frequencies, all I'm going to highlight on this is that we had weekday, Saturday, and Sunday service pre-COVID that a number of our routes went to 11.
    • 04:18:17
      Some of them even went to midnight.
    • 04:18:19
      Here's what we had in the main things to highlight.
    • 04:18:22
      The trolley was the primary with a 15 minute service.
    • 04:18:26
      But we have
    • 04:18:27
      Let's see if there's some red in here.
    • 04:18:29
      Those are the services that are coming in in an hour or more.
    • 04:18:35
      Refreshers say the blue is under 30 minutes service, the green is your 30 minute service, your yellow is your 60 minute service, and the red is anything over 60 minutes.
    • 04:18:46
      So obviously, getting rid of the red has been a major goal, really getting us to the point where the only colors that show up on here are the blue and green, which conveniently enough are CAT's colors.
    • 04:18:59
      You said blue is what, sorry?
    • 04:19:01
      Blue is under 30 minutes.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 04:19:03
      I was punching on a pencil and I heard 130 minutes.
    • 04:19:06
      Under 30's better.
    • SPEAKER_17
    • 04:19:08
      Under 30 is better.
    • 04:19:09
      Thank you.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 04:19:10
      I just want to hear it on 130 now also, like as you said, it's really bright.
    • 04:19:17
      So, yeah, get us down to blues and greens, right, because those are CAT's lot of colors.
    • 04:19:26
      So that's what we want.
    • 04:19:31
      All right.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 04:19:34
      I thought there was some significance to the company.
    • 04:19:39
      Current frequency is at 66 operators.
    • 04:19:42
      See, we've got the green and yellow, so we are on our way.
    • 04:19:46
      But there will still be a Sunday service, and much fewer of our lines extend to 11 together.
    • 04:19:57
      So then we talked with you all a lot about some different scenarios, what it could look like to reach some of these policy objectives that we've been talking about.
    • 04:20:10
      We talked about an 82 driver scenario and that costing about $17 million dollars.
    • 04:20:16
      That's the all-in cost.
    • 04:20:18
      So I'm not taking that up to this point.
    • 04:20:20
      Any federal, state, or county funding that is just straight up all-in costs $17 million.
    • 04:20:26
      To get up to 108 drivers, 108 is significant because that's returning us to the Sunday service, $22.5 million.
    • 04:20:34
      Quick question?
    • 04:20:36
      Is that additional or inclusive of what we are going to pay?
    • 04:20:42
      This is what would be inclusive of what we're already paying.
    • 04:20:47
      This is the all-in cost to provide that service with that money.
    • 04:20:58
      So then we have these service expansion models.
    • 04:21:01
      What I'm going to do is each one of these
    • 04:21:04
      prioritizes a different combination of policy objectives.
    • 04:21:09
      Sunday service, frequency of service, particularly this 15 minute rise and extending service into the 11 o'clock or even midnight range.
    • 04:21:19
      So each one of those kind of playing with those policy objectives scenario, one is the one that maximizes all of achieving those policy objectives and so we can achieve all of those policy objectives.
    • 04:21:33
      Four routes of 15 minutes,
    • 04:21:35
      all aligns extending to a minimum of 11 p.m.
    • 04:21:38
      and Sunday service, that gets you to kind of your highest dollar figure on your 28.2 million.
    • 04:21:48
      So when we think about our impact areas, so this is coming back to the impact areas that we're going to be talking about again.
    • 04:21:54
      Reliable service access.
    • 04:22:00
      Something, actually this was also on impact
    • 04:22:03
      So those are the scenarios.
    • 04:22:08
      But to get to those scenarios, the other thing we have to think about is our facility expansion.
    • 04:22:13
      So right now we have some conceptual plans that are looking at what kind of expansion we would need to do to meet the multitude of objectives we've identified for our transit service.
    • 04:22:23
      This adds it all up, but it's 97 million all in.
    • 04:22:27
      And yet that is not incorporating what would be federal cost share of this.
    • 04:22:34
      of that total.
    • 04:22:38
      And then again in the space of reliable service access, the cost of the buses, the rolling stock.
    • 04:22:45
      So the diesel vehicles cost it coming in around $560,000, the electric coming in at $12 million, hydrogen one and a half.
    • 04:22:54
      So if we take those scenarios that we were looking at previously, the 82 driver scenario, six more vehicles,
    • 04:23:03
      Those are your costs as you go down by the different bus types to get the six additional vehicles into the system.
    • 04:23:14
      The 108 driver scenario, 15 more vehicles, and those costs down the line.
    • 04:23:18
      I apologize if those aren't lining up.
    • 04:23:23
      And then the service expansion scenarios that we
    • 04:23:28
      We talked about before, depending on the standard, it supports you to 20 more vehicles.
    • 04:23:32
      These numbers reflect the 20 more vehicles option, just to give you a kind of a different scale of what those costs look like.
    • 04:23:43
      Again, this is total cost, not inclusive of backing out of the state or federal cost share.
    • 04:23:54
      So the early time generator we think about on our transit service is the climate impact reductions.
    • 04:24:00
      We have a zero emission transition plan, which calls for any of the purchase of diesel vehicles in 2027, transition to the fleet entirely or zero emission by 2040.
    • 04:24:13
      This of course requires full purchase of buses and the entirety of that previous facility upgrade.
    • 04:24:23
      in order to achieve these.
    • 04:24:24
      If I go back to the facility upgrade, you can clearly identify the portions of this cost that are solely about meeting those private objectives, but then there's additional costs built in to particularly the maintenance facility, which, for example, in order to be hydrogen plus ready, would have to have some retrofits associated with capturing, escaping hydrogen gas.
    • 04:24:49
      A number of the numbers on our tour
    • 04:24:52
      and that issue as being part of their facility.
    • 04:24:59
      And then lastly, in the impact areas, we think about regional system creation, our objective to see a regionally responsive transit system and we've made significant progress in that space with the establishment of CARDA in the last year.
    • 04:25:17
      We are working right now on a regional priorities plan to help us set up
    • 04:25:22
      for the next big question, which is the need to identify a revenue source to fund that new regional system.
    • 04:25:31
      So, any questions on this?
    • 04:25:33
      I understand this was a very high-level look at our transit compared to the presentation you all received from Garland and his team, but trying to have this highlight the issues that we all have talked about.
    • Michael Payne
    • 04:25:46
      When, because I think it does directly connect to all of this, when will we
    • 04:25:51
      reach an agreement on possible funding mechanism that would go to the General Assembly for CARTA.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 04:26:00
      Yeah, I asked that the last CARTA meeting.
    • 04:26:07
      I was just what I missed.
    • 04:26:13
      It won't be this year.
    • 04:26:15
      They're still talking about
    • 04:26:18
      Ben was the one speaking, Ben and Christine Jacobs.
    • 04:26:25
      They're still seeing us not just baby steps, I won't say that, but maybe training wheels or something to get basically, in their mind, a we need to do some more work to be able to before we can even go to center their needs or
    • 04:26:45
      Delegate callsetter, delegate offer to say this is what we want.
    • 04:26:50
      would like the General Assembly to do for us.
    • 04:26:54
      I was like, why can't we just come up with a piece of paper and say this is, you know, but I was told that that was, you know, something more than naive.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 04:27:05
      But they presented a chart of like this is what other groups have done, this is their funding sources, these are some models we're looking at, so the research is underway.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 04:27:17
      There's research happening, but also conversations happening between the city and the county to see what level of agreement we can get to bring back to our respective board and council for that conversation.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 04:27:33
      To me, a lot of that was hashed out during the governance study.
    • 04:27:38
      I can't remember if it wasn't decided.
    • 04:27:43
      I guess fair enough.
    • 04:27:47
      To me, it's the sort of thing you could get the people around the room and let's talk about what are our options.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 04:27:52
      There are continuing conversations.
    • 04:27:55
      Let's just answer the question.
    • 04:27:58
      I don't know.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 04:28:00
      It won't be this year.
    • 04:28:02
      At least the year.
    • 04:28:05
      It seems to me overly complicated.
    • 04:28:08
      But I'm not a professional in this line of work.
    • 04:28:12
      But it seems to me that you could get
    • 04:28:15
      The boards of supervisors and city councilors and relevant professionals have a joint meeting and say, we did all this governance work.
    • 04:28:23
      What is the will of the group?
    • 04:28:25
      And then move on.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 04:28:26
      This is an ongoing conversation about both revenue source, but also whether we just are making it straight up asking for funding in this year.
    • 04:28:38
      All I can offer at this point
    • 04:28:41
      And hopefully with them more receptive
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 04:29:09
      I have a question.
    • 04:29:16
      We got the presentation from Garland that had the menu options and I think we all had some questions about are those all of the menu options or are we being kind of
    • 04:29:26
      I just want to bring that up again, which is the FDA has standards for equity, but equity is different than equality.
    • 04:29:39
      The priority that we are hearing and have been hearing from the community for years
    • 04:29:47
      15 minutes in the 5 and 7, if you want to toss in 6 in there, that's fine too.
    • 04:29:52
      And how we could theoretically state the case for the FDA, okay we're doing 60 minutes as equitable as equal service, now we're going to find some equity with decreasing service times, or decreasing service times, decreasing frequency on these three lines.
    • 04:30:07
      And that's not a menu option that we've gotten.
    • 04:30:10
      and I just want to kind of emphasize again we would like to maybe see that.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 04:30:16
      So I haven't looked at it yet, but my understanding is we got this week that additional scenario, but I think to the point of kind of our conversation today where we are not dating that date at this point in time and
    • 04:30:36
      I think really at this point, we're at the point thinking about those bookends, right, where we started.
    • 04:30:44
      What's the pleasure in counsel?
    • 04:30:46
      What's the direction?
    • 04:30:50
      And we can build those scenarios based on where we hear the priorities.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 04:30:56
      Is this the time, or maybe this is a hard exercise to also discuss, because at some point we're going to need to
    • 04:31:05
      Re-evaluate.
    • 04:31:07
      Our interest in making a massive fuel shift investment when our federal funding is not going to be the way it probably was.
    • 04:31:16
      When we can get so much more frequency in number of buses for less money and all of that if we don't make that switch at this time.
    • 04:31:26
      Why are you taking my section?
    • SPEAKER_11
    • 04:31:29
      Okay, I'll break up again in a couple of minutes.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 04:31:35
      I got you.
    • 04:31:38
      How much certainty or uncertainty is there over the federal funding and state funding for new buses?
    • 04:31:46
      Is that something that is on the chopping block?
    • 04:31:48
      Is it something that is probably not on the chopping block?
    • 04:31:51
      Your favorite harbinger of doom is coming.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:32:03
      Ashley, what's in the way or what could be in the way?
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 04:32:10
      Alright, so when we think about transit we're going to talk again in our impact areas and we're thinking about that reliable service access.
    • 04:32:19
      So right now we already know that in the way our operator, mechanic, and supervisor shortages that can limit frequency and reliability.
    • 04:32:27
      We also know that there are underserved routes in high-need neighborhoods, so those are what we already know are in the way.
    • 04:32:35
      And what could be in the way is that threat of loss of federal transit funds.
    • 04:32:39
      To piggyback a little bit on what Councilmember Snook was just asking, every city and every
    • 04:32:46
      Community in the nation received a letter from the Secretary of Transportation that outlines some ways where you might possibly not get funding using the executive order focused in on diversity, equity, and inclusion.
    • 04:33:01
      They're really broad.
    • 04:33:02
      So there is a possibility that something that you do
    • 04:33:06
      It might trigger it.
    • 04:33:07
      It's a possibility that it may not.
    • 04:33:09
      It's a possibility that it's defensible.
    • 04:33:11
      It's a possibility that it may not.
    • 04:33:14
      That's what makes this what could be in the way instead of what is in the way because we don't know.
    • 04:33:19
      And we can't tell you when or if it will happen.
    • 04:33:22
      And we can't tell you what they may end up maybe identifying in a community that they believe is a legal DEI worker.
    • 04:33:31
      Or maybe they don't identify something.
    • 04:33:33
      So that's why it's in a could.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 04:33:35
      Could I ask, does it seem that the potential loss of funding is related to possible DEI issues as opposed to Doge issues, for example?
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 04:33:49
      It appears, from what I've seen, I'm only going to speak on the document that I've seen, which is that Secretary of Transportation document.
    • 04:33:57
      It was very much focused on enacting the pleasure of the president through his executive order and aligning funding to that executive order.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 04:34:09
      Around DEI.
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 04:34:10
      Correct, around DEI.
    • 04:34:14
      Could there be more forthcoming because we have had so many executive orders?
    • 04:34:18
      That is absolutely truthful, but the one that I have right now that I think is the strongest visual, tangible moment of you could lose funding is, for transit specifically, is in that Secretary of Transportation letter
    • 04:34:36
      We also know that Community in the Way is a fair-free funding clip after fiscal year 2026 without identified replacement.
    • 04:34:44
      Right now, this is grant funded, but we are out of the ability to apply for that grant.
    • 04:34:48
      So it is not that we lost the grant.
    • 04:34:50
      As a matter of fact, we've kept the grant for quite some time.
    • 04:34:53
      We just may not reapply for that funding source anymore.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 04:34:56
      Because we've done it so many years.
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 04:34:57
      Correct.
    • 04:34:58
      Yes.
    • 04:34:58
      Yes, we are timed out.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 04:35:00
      We're maxed out.
    • 04:35:00
      We are.
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 04:35:01
      It's not that we cannot.
    • 04:35:02
      It's that we may not.
    • 04:35:03
      Yes, ma'am.
    • 04:35:05
      We have continued staffing challenges that can delay service improvements, potentially, and potential costs for additional system optimization plans, scenarios, and the timing of those improvements, right?
    • 04:35:17
      That can all get in the way.
    • 04:35:19
      When we think about our social determinants of health, we know that that reliable transit service, that reliable transportation access gets people jobs, gets people healthcare, gets people education, and it reduces inequities in mobility.
    • 04:35:34
      When we think about those climate impact reductions, what is in the way is we do have some limited infrastructure to support fleet electrification, for example.
    • 04:35:44
      We have an aging diesel fleet that is contributing to emissions.
    • 04:35:48
      And we have a reduction in federal funding support for green infrastructure, which might have mitigated some cost of replacement repair.
    • 04:35:56
      What could be in the way is that there are high electric bus maintenance costs and downtime risks.
    • 04:36:03
      And there are requirements for the implementation of climate-focused transit alternatives.
    • 04:36:08
      So the cost of those bus replacements, as James just showed you, there's cost for facilities, expansion depending on what alternative fuel source is determined, and there are also other stagnant costs.
    • 04:36:20
      Do we need more mechanics?
    • 04:36:21
      Do our mechanics have to go to school?
    • 04:36:23
      Do we need more access to training, for example, and more supervisors?
    • 04:36:29
      We think about the social determinants of health under this one, we do know that cleaner transit reduces respiratory illness rates, especially in communities adjacent to high traffic corridors, which most often are communities that are identified as low-income or are communities of color.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 04:36:45
      So looking at this, when you say high electric bus maintenance costs, is that
    • 04:36:50
      Is it possible we don't know what there might be or we do know there are higher electric bus maintenance costs?
    • 04:36:57
      I've got an idea of electric buses.
    • 04:36:59
      Was there fewer maintenance costs?
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 04:37:02
      I think that what we need to keep in mind is the data that we have.
    • 04:37:06
      We do have data from other systems that do show that there are some electric bus maintenance issues.
    • 04:37:12
      Those are the buses that they have.
    • 04:37:14
      Technology is always reinventing itself, innovating itself.
    • 04:37:20
      I'm a person that has an electric car that I know is a test.
    • 04:37:23
      I'm driving a test car where after it's like, let's see if it works, right?
    • 04:37:27
      You're never going to make that car again, by the way.
    • 04:37:29
      I already know it.
    • 04:37:30
      It's in a test room.
    • 04:37:31
      They're working out the butt.
    • 04:37:33
      So what the evidence we have is that, yes, there are some transit systems that have experience
    • 04:37:40
      Higher electric bus maintenance and then downtime because if that bus goes down, you gotta get a new bus.
    • 04:37:46
      There's things, right?
    • 04:37:48
      Could this, wise, and that could be in the way as buses evolve, technology changes, this may very well reduce.
    • 04:37:57
      But right now, the evidence I have is to be able to tell you this could be in the way.
    • 04:38:05
      And then we've got our regional system creation.
    • 04:38:08
      So again, we know that what is currently in the way is that CARTA is in its early stages, the governance and funding structures are still being built, and we need to continue to secure alignment between the city and the county stakeholders.
    • 04:38:22
      What could be in the way is a slow rollout of regional service integration, and also there could be some political or funding disagreements with limited share in investment.
    • 04:38:32
      When we think of those social determinants, again, that regional mobility can expand access to employment,
    • 04:38:37
      to education and to essential services across jurisdictional bounds.
    • 04:38:42
      So we know that we do have individuals, again, go back to that image in your head, of daytime population and nighttime population.
    • 04:38:51
      So we know that there are individuals that are coming into our community from other places that maybe might ride transit if it was available to them.
    • 04:38:58
      Maybe perhaps we may have other opportunities for our own residents to go work in another locality in something that really matches their needs and helps them move up in economic mobility and opportunity if they can get there.
    • 04:39:14
      I'm at the point where you all can raise questions or statements in the form of questions.
    • Michael Payne
    • 04:39:24
      Where does UVA and their transit system fit into all this?
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 04:39:29
      They are not here, so our role is really to look at what we can tell you that you can control.
    • 04:39:38
      I wish I could tell you you can control that one, but I can't.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 04:39:40
      The goal is to pull them into CARTA at some point.
    • 04:39:43
      Let's look at them as an opportunity.
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 04:39:47
      But that would be in kind of the this part.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 04:39:49
      I think it's as slow as everything else is with them in particular getting changes.
    • 04:39:53
      Waiting on that is not crucial.
    • 04:39:57
      The biggest thing we can get from them is their ridership.
    • 04:40:02
      But I would not wait.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 04:40:06
      One of the things that they have the opportunity to do that we don't because they're not FDA funded is buy whatever bus they want.
    • 04:40:12
      All of our buses have to come from American-made manufacturers.
    • 04:40:15
      So they were able to buy smaller Turkish electric buses that are really useful and adorable.
    • 04:40:23
      also can fit under the railway bridge and make and extend their routes and services.
    • 04:40:29
      And if we were to access those as well, we could fully fund the purchase of them, but also we wouldn't be able to spend FTA dollars on the maintenance and mechanics needed to operate them.
    • 04:40:40
      So it's like they get to do that.
    • SPEAKER_13
    • 04:40:44
      We don't, I think they would probably be loathe to give that up if they became fully interested with our service.
    • Michael Payne
    • 04:40:49
      Yeah, I just, I know when we visited Champaign-Urbana,
    • 04:40:52
      Their university incorporated and their ridership doubled and it transformed their ability to do everything.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 04:41:00
      They have the K-12 education too as part of Champaign and Granite.
    • SPEAKER_12
    • 04:41:06
      I'm going to leave here just as prepared.
    • 04:41:08
      No one hate me.
    • 04:41:09
      I am a Hokie in Louisville, but Blacksburg Transit is Blacksburg Transit.
    • 04:41:13
      You get on that bus whether you are leaving Pritchard to try to go to class or you are, you know, leaving a workplace trying to go somewhere.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 04:41:21
      And that's also funded, that's their payment in lieu of taxes program is the university funds their transit network.
    • SPEAKER_02
    • 04:41:29
      Any other questions for Ashley?
    • 04:41:33
      Okay, let's work.
    • 04:41:36
      You have one more card for me.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:41:38
      I've got some twitches you may have heard of, some trade-offs you may have heard of, and together we'll put an opportunity for a just fun dinner.
    • SPEAKER_02
    • 04:43:50
      We're going to switch it up this time around.
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 04:44:07
      Will you kick us off?
    • 04:44:08
      Is that okay?
    • Michael Payne
    • 04:44:10
      Absolutely not.
    • 04:44:11
      Thank you.
    • 04:44:15
      Tensions, I mean obviously the big one is funding.
    • 04:44:21
      The Charlottesville-Albemarle-UVA coordination relationship I think is a tension.
    • 04:44:30
      I think there's tensions between different possible paths to increasing ridership or improving service.
    • 04:44:38
      Trade-offs, obviously it's expensive, so it competes against everything in the budget.
    • 04:44:46
      As others mentioned with the loss of Inflation Reduction Act and infrastructure law funding, is there a trade-off between zero emission bus plans and our practical ability to afford that if those funding opportunities are gone?
    • 04:45:04
      Opportunities, I would agree with Brian that partnership with UVA is probably not going to happen soon.
    • 04:45:11
      But it's still an opportunity.
    • 04:45:13
      CARTA funding through the General Assembly, which I would also agree we've seen the options.
    • 04:45:17
      We just have to figure out how to choose.
    • 04:45:19
      I think there's an opportunity to create a plan for our zero emission bus.
    • 04:45:25
      Because even if that funding's gone, is there a way for us to keep that plan on hold if funding does come back, rather than saying, we're just going to totally abandon this?
    • 04:45:34
      And I'll go a little off script, but obviously this is a big climate policy, so there's maybe an opportunity to have climate, like organizational excellence, diffuse all our priorities, especially climate resilience, and then
    • 04:45:50
      It's transportation related.
    • 04:45:52
      The downtown mall is an example of transportation infrastructure at the pedestrian level that went way beyond VDOT and was very intentional.
    • 04:45:58
      What would it look like if we did that on Preston Avenue or the parking lot off the downtown mall or West Main?
    • 04:46:04
      How can we think as innovative as we did with the downtown mall again?
    • SPEAKER_03
    • 04:46:10
      After you ma'am.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 04:46:14
      Alright.
    • 04:46:15
      So the tension that I wrote down was responding to the demands of users versus the capacity limitations and also being aware of the accuracy of the FTA regulations.
    • 04:46:26
      How are they being framed to us versus how are they actually requiring the implementation and making sure we're aware of that.
    • 04:46:35
      My trade-off is frequency and
    • 04:46:42
      and ability to easily get diesel buses versus green and wanting to be climate friendly but also acknowledging that at a certain point enough people are out of their cars to make even a diesel bus climate friendly.
    • 04:46:53
      having the patience to get to that tipping point, but also the amount that we need to have enough buses to get to that tipping point.
    • 04:47:03
      And then opportunity that I noted was to install 15 minute service on 567 in the trolley first to boost ridership numbers, which then increases our funding that we can use to spend on the other routes.
    • 04:47:17
      And then also on the kind of a larger
    • 04:47:21
      We're also simultaneously increasing our bike and pedestrian infrastructure.
    • 04:47:28
      If I can get across town in 12 minutes, I'm not going to wait 15 minutes for a bus.
    • 04:47:32
      And so if we see that kind of shift on a larger scale, how is that going to affect our bus routes and where the demand is?
    • 04:47:40
      And so then there's an opportunity to kind of tailor the bus routes on those with the highest need for buses, not just for getting around town.
    • 04:47:47
      Because you need a bus in a different scenario than you need your bike.
    • 04:47:53
      So how does that look if we get a big enough control shift there?
    • 04:47:57
      Awesome.
    • 04:47:57
      Very good.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 04:48:01
      Thank you.
    • SPEAKER_02
    • 04:48:02
      Lloyd, tension to trade-offs, I'm sorry.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 04:48:04
      So the first tension I noted is simply climate action versus the diesel bus bus advantage.
    • 04:48:12
      How are we going to shake that out?
    • 04:48:15
      In terms of trade-offs, that same trade-off, diesel versus hydrogen versus electric vehicles, but also the trade-off of, I don't think,
    • 04:48:27
      We could sustain with the voters both a tax increase, a sales tax increase for school construction and some other dedicated funding tax or part of.
    • 04:48:40
      It's going to turn out to be one or the other.
    • 04:48:42
      And then finally in terms of opportunities,
    • 04:48:47
      I look forward to trying to figure out what we can do to get UVA involved and I would also like to figure out what the opportunities would be for outlying counties such as Greene County and Louisa County that have a fair amount of traffic coming into Charlottesville for computer purposes.
    • 04:49:09
      Every time I drive up 29 North at 830 in the morning because I'm trying to get to the court of Greene County by 9, I see this torrent of vehicles coming south on 29 North and I see all these new parking complexes going up on 29 and I'm thinking, where are these people working?
    • 04:49:29
      How are they getting there?
    • 04:49:30
      I see how they're getting there.
    • 04:49:33
      They're on 29 South stuck in a private vehicle and that's an opportunity.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 04:49:41
      This reflects what others have said.
    • 04:49:43
      I would pose attention as ridership versus environment.
    • 04:49:50
      Maybe that's a false thing to just kind of want to bear the bare face of it.
    • 04:49:55
      Do we focus on having more riders pulling people off the road and on buses versus making
    • 04:50:08
      Frankly, massive investments in exquisite technology that is the greenest.
    • 04:50:14
      The trade-offs, maybe there's no trade-off in the environment.
    • 04:50:19
      If someone does the analysis to say that we pull off this many riders off the road at an average trip length of every how many miles with this much CO2, if someone did that calculation compared to what would be
    • 04:50:35
      removed from the buses being on hydrogen versus diesel, someone, a consultant, probably Miss Rivervall could do it, could tell us that, and that would be a piece of information that would, I think, make it very clear which one to prioritize.
    • Michael Payne
    • 04:50:53
      And that has been done, and I think it was roughly triple ridership from our historic high.
    • 04:50:59
      So you'd need to triple from our historic high.
    • 04:51:02
      I'd be interested.
    • 04:51:03
      Okay, yeah, fair enough.
    • 04:51:04
      To get to what?
    • 04:51:06
      Break even on the emissions when you look at the number of riders you need in a bus to pair with a car.
    • 04:51:15
      A tall order.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 04:51:17
      Okay, so that has been done.
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 04:51:22
      I like to see those numbers.
    • 04:51:32
      My tensions are, you know, the cost increase for the increase in frequency, the cost for battery electric buses and hydrogen buses.
    • 04:51:43
      The tradeoff I see is diesel, you know, that have more diesel buses,
    • 04:51:51
      and have more frequency than the high cost of the battery electric and hydrogen and more frequency in the high use routes.
    • 04:52:03
      I think Natalie mentioned those that I think that no matter what
    • 04:52:10
      how the bus is running that, you know, we know the routes that are high frequency, you know, make it every five minutes if we know people will use it instead of making a route that's not used as much every 30 minutes or 60 minutes.
    • 04:52:27
      And the opportunities would be less traffic and a more efficient service.
    • 04:52:32
      But I didn't know, Michael, that analysis had been done.
    • Michael Payne
    • 04:52:39
      It was during, when we were discussing the BEPs in depth, and it's based on... This last few years?
    • Juandiego Wade
    • 04:52:46
      Yeah, I'll share with you.
    • 04:52:48
      I just want to pay attention.
    • SPEAKER_02
    • 04:52:50
      Yeah, it sounds like that's an opportunity as well.
    • 04:52:52
      I'm going to pull that back over there and take a look at it.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:52:58
      Super reflective, thank you.
    • 04:52:59
      Here's what I'm going to do.
    • 04:53:01
      I'm going to ask you to take a five minute break.
    • 04:53:04
      There's no more absorbing information today, so that's like, amen to that, right?
    • 04:53:08
      There's no more, I'm not asking you to absorb anything.
    • 04:53:10
      I will ask you to do one more thing, but it's going to more be reflecting on some of the information you took down regarding education, okay?
    • 04:53:17
      But you will not have to absorb any more information for the rest of the day, and by the time we're done with that, I'm certainly going to get you out early.
    • 04:53:24
      So, a win all around, sounds like some good trade-offs, right?
    • 04:53:28
      So, good, take five minute break.
    • 04:53:30
      I'm going to ask you to come back.
    • 04:53:31
      I'm going to ask you to do some of the information you took down regarding education.
    • 04:53:34
      You're not going to absorb any of the information, and I will get you out of here early.
    • 04:53:39
      Enjoy.
    • 04:53:42
      Alright.
    • 04:53:45
      What I'm going to ask you to do is, remember at the very beginning?
    • 04:53:48
      I was like, write this down, write this down.
    • 04:53:51
      What I'm going to ask you to do is I want you to reflect on what you've heard about education.
    • 04:53:55
      And I want you to write down
    • 04:53:57
      Her, and I'm going to ask you this question, I'm going to ask you for three sections, her impact area.
    • 04:54:03
      So, education, one of the impact areas was financial operations, and you all heard where financial operations is, what's in the way, and what could be in the way.
    • 04:54:15
      What I want you to do is, regarding financial operations, if you could write down, and this is where we work together alone, so I'm going to ask you to review on your notes,
    • 04:54:24
      Reflect on your notes, and I'm going to ask you to write one answer down, okay?
    • 04:54:28
      It is one thought and one idea on a rectangle post-it that's in front of you with your Sharpie.
    • 04:54:35
      And I would like you to write down what is one tension that you heard regarding education, specifically around financial operations.
    • 04:54:46
      Going back, you all heard where it is, what's in the way, what could be in the way?
    • 04:54:56
      Education and the Impact Area of Financial Operations.
    • 04:55:02
      What is one tension that you heard?
    • 04:55:04
      If you get Sharpie, rectangle posted, do your best to bring those, please.
    • 04:55:10
      Do your best.
    • 04:55:12
      But it's regarding financial operations under the strategic priority of education.
    • 04:55:19
      What is one tension you heard?
    • 04:55:20
      And when you have it, just hold it up.
    • 04:55:51
      All right, awesome.
    • 04:55:53
      Great.
    • 04:55:55
      I'm going to ask you to think of, let me ask you real quick.
    • 04:55:59
      Do you all want to go left and right, or do you want to go down?
    • 04:56:02
      So do I talk about the trade-off of financial operations, or do we go into the tension of facility development and construction?
    • 04:56:11
      Would you like to go this way, or go down?
    • 04:56:14
      Down, speaking of the same category?
    • 04:56:16
      All right.
    • 04:56:17
      So financial education, financial operations, what was the trade-off that you heard regarding financial operations around financial operations and with the strategic priority of education?
    • 04:56:41
      You're doing some next hardware, allegedly, but also in a way where others can understand what you're saying.
    • 04:56:53
      One trade-off you heard regarding financial operations
    • Michael Payne
    • 04:57:24
      The one word I can never spell is bureaucracy.
    • 04:57:36
      Well, I have to use it in emails more than I think.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 04:57:41
      B-U-R-D-A-U-C-O-N-S-U-R-E.
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 04:57:44
      One more.
    • 04:57:45
      Two more?
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 04:57:47
      Two more?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:57:58
      We were just supposed to write a tradeoff?
    • SPEAKER_15
    • 04:58:01
      One tradeoff.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:58:13
      It's all good.
    • 04:58:15
      Don't you write it.
    • 04:58:16
      I'm getting you out of here soon.
    • SPEAKER_17
    • 04:58:18
      Yeah, losing track of tensions versus trade-offs.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:58:21
      And so feel free.
    • 04:58:22
      I have mine up here as well.
    • 04:58:23
      Feel free to also reference this while I'm going to have the definitions up here.
    • 04:58:28
      So feel free to take a look at that.
    • 04:58:30
      I have it up here as well.
    • 04:58:33
      Again, reflect on your notes as well, not only reflecting on the definition, but maybe something you wrote that sparked some interest.
    • 04:58:40
      Strategic priority education regarding the impact of our financial operations.
    • 04:58:46
      What was an opportunity?
    • 04:58:48
      What was an opportunity?
    • 04:58:53
      Actually, no.
    • SPEAKER_10
    • 04:58:56
      Don't write that yet.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 04:58:58
      Don't write that yet.
    • 04:58:59
      Don't write that yet.
    • 04:59:00
      I'm going to move you on to the next thing.
    • 04:59:02
      I have an idea.
    • 04:59:03
      So it's something that will make you do everything today.
    • 04:59:05
      Don't worry.
    • 04:59:07
      Regarding the Chief Department of Education, I want you to think about the tension you may have heard around facility development and construction.
    • 04:59:17
      Regarding the Chief Department of Education, there's a tension that you may have heard regarding facility development and construction.
    • 04:59:51
      I'm
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 05:00:21
      Regarding the strategic priority of education with the impact area of facilities management and construction, what was the trade-off that you heard?
    • 05:00:35
      Good for you again.
    • 05:00:36
      Review your notes.
    • 05:00:38
      Reflect.
    • 05:00:39
      Write.
    • 05:00:41
      That's one thought, one idea.
    • 05:00:43
      Regarding education,
    • 05:00:48
      The impact area of facility development and construction.
    • 05:00:52
      What is a trade-off that you heard?
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 05:01:12
      I don't remember what I put in.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 05:01:14
      As a trade-off?
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 05:01:17
      I don't remember the ones I've already sent up there, so I feel like I've written a couple of them twice.
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 05:01:28
      Yeah, that's okay.
    • 05:01:29
      This is our facility development.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 05:01:31
      And here's the trade-off facility.
    • 05:01:35
      This is kind of your target, your topic area right here.
    • 05:01:37
      Facilities development and construction.
    • 05:01:43
      Again, feel free to review your notes.
    • 05:01:47
      This is your trade-off regarding facility development and construction under the strategic priority of education.
    • 05:02:17
      Alright, we are in the third impact area of facilities maintenance regarding the strategic priority of education.
    • 05:02:32
      What was the tension?
    • 05:02:34
      A few notes?
    • 05:02:34
      A few of your notes?
    • 05:02:36
      A slight number of your notes?
    • 05:02:39
      And then write one thought or idea.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 05:02:46
      Regarding facilities maintenance, Regarding the impact area of facilities maintenance on the strategic priority of education.
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 05:03:18
      What is the tension that you've heard?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 05:03:58
      All right, let's prepare you for the next one.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 05:04:06
      Education, impact of service management.
    • 05:04:09
      What's a trade-off?
    • 05:04:12
      And those two definitions are still getting a little blurry at this point.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 05:04:16
      Feel free to look at this card.
    • 05:04:17
      Look at your notes also.
    • 05:04:19
      Do your notes reflect on them?
    • 05:04:23
      Do your definitions reflect on them?
    • 05:04:28
      It is education still in the impact area of facilities maintenance.
    • 05:04:35
      What is a trade-off that you heard when they wrote down regarding facilities maintenance?
    • 05:04:55
      And again, I really urge you to come reinvent the wheel.
    • 05:04:58
      You all took some amazing notes.
    • 05:05:00
      You broke down and absorbed some great information.
    • 05:05:03
      Just find your answers in there.
    • 05:05:32
      I want to try one more round of this, but I want to try with homelessness.
    • 05:05:49
      Regarding homelessness, one of the impact areas of homelessness, what was a tension
    • 05:06:00
      that you heard or wrote down.
    • 05:06:02
      I'm not going to shoot IY things up because I'm asking you to do it on the fly.
    • 05:06:07
      So, one thought.
    • 05:06:08
      Review and reflect on your notes.
    • 05:06:12
      The strategic priority of housing, the impact area of homelessness.
    • 05:06:17
      What was it tension that you heard in the room?
    • 05:06:21
      You're afraid of your notes.
    • 05:06:23
      You're not worried about the wheel.
    • 05:06:24
      We'll do that to you.
    • 05:06:25
      So, you took some great notes.
    • 05:06:34
      Should the priority of housing impact the area of homelessness?
    • 05:06:37
      What was the intention that you heard?
    • 05:07:04
      So those have to do with housing and then James and Ashley kind of what is and where it's going.
    • 05:07:13
      They kind of talked about these areas.
    • 05:07:33
      strategic priority of housing impact area of homelessness what was a trade-off you heard again review the card review the definitions to help do not put yourself to work where you don't have to what are the definitions again don't interact with that question here right in front of you
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 05:08:10
      Put the tray off your heart regarding homelessness.
    • 05:08:41
      We didn't talk about that.
    • 05:08:59
      Thank you.
    • 05:09:00
      A trade-off you heard regarding the impact of homelessness.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 05:09:07
      All right.
    • 05:09:11
      What is a tension that you've heard regarding the impact of affordability of housing for the full community?
    • 05:09:16
      I was one of James and Ashley kind of spoke to it.
    • 05:09:19
      James is like, here's where it is.
    • 05:09:20
      Ashley puts it away.
    • 05:09:22
      Regarding housing as our strategic priority, and one of our impact areas is affordability of housing for the full community.
    • 05:09:30
      What is a tension that you've heard?
    • 05:09:37
      A pull between competing needs, values, or priorities.
    • 05:09:40
      that co-exist and require thoughtful balance.
    • 05:09:44
      The tension that you heard regarding affordability of housing for the full community.
    • 05:10:24
      Yeah, I'll say whoever wrote that is a unique way to capture that information as well.
    • 05:10:28
      I've seen where he would just write the two things that are like pulling against one another, you know, as well.
    • 05:10:33
      Like it's these two.
    • 05:10:36
      So good, good.
    • 05:10:38
      Alright, the impact area of affordability of housing for full community.
    • 05:10:44
      What is a trade-off, you heard?
    • 05:10:46
      Trade-off being a choice to prioritize one thing over another knowing something is gained and something is given up.
    • 05:10:52
      It's a trade-off that you heard when we were discussing the affordability of housing for the full community.
    • 05:11:01
      It's a trade-off.
    • 05:11:18
      There's a choice to prioritize one thing over another knowing something is gained and something is given up.
    • 05:11:25
      There's a trade-off from her about the affordability of housing for the poor.
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 05:12:07
      Okay, last round.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 05:12:23
      The impact area regarding production and preservation of affordable housing.
    • 05:12:29
      This is regarding how strategic priority it will care about housing in general with the impact areas
    • 05:12:35
      Reduction and Preservation of Affordable Housing What is a tension that you heard in the room when we were talking about its current status?
    • 05:12:43
      Tension being a pull between competing needs, values, or priorities that coexist and require thoughtful balance.
    • 05:12:51
      A tension you heard when we were discussing the reduction and preservation of affordable housing.
    • 05:12:57
      If it's helpful, just write the two things you think are pulling at each other.
    • 05:13:01
      The two tensions.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 05:13:22
      This is the tension category?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 05:13:24
      Yes ma'am.
    • 05:13:25
      This is tension regarding production and preservation of affordable housing.
    • 05:13:53
      And these would have been illuminated during the where it is and what's in the way, what couldn't be.
    • 05:14:08
      Attention regarding production and preservation of affordable housing.
    • 05:14:15
      Alright.
    • 05:14:16
      Last category, still talking about the production and preservation of affordable housing.
    • 05:14:21
      What was the trade-off that you heard mentioned?
    • 05:14:24
      Trade-off being a choice to prioritize one thing over another, knowing something is gained and something is given up.
    • 05:14:30
      What is the trade-off that you heard when we were talking about the production and preservation of affordable housing?
    • 05:15:15
      This is the trade-off that you heard when we were talking about where it is, what's in the way, what could be in the way regarding production and preservation of affordable housing.
    • SPEAKER_19
    • 05:15:32
      Think of these thoughtful answers, thoughtful notes.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 05:15:43
      Perfect.
    • 05:15:43
      Okay.
    • 05:15:45
      Love it.
    • 05:15:47
      You all just got a huge jumpstart on tomorrow, so thank you for that.
    • 05:15:50
      I appreciate it.
    • 05:15:52
      Huge jumpstart.
    • 05:15:53
      Alright, Carly Young, two things.
    • 05:15:55
      One, thanks for that.
    • 05:15:58
      I want to rewind a little bit on what you all did today.
    • 05:16:02
      So I want to remind you, we're after this question, right?
    • 05:16:06
      What would it look like if the City Council used human-centered design to better inform and direct the City Manager's Office towards strategic impact?
    • 05:16:13
      These beautiful groups of humans are going to have to create some strategies to make this impact happen.
    • 05:16:18
      But there's some information, some direction, and some measuring that we need from them in order to do that.
    • 05:16:23
      Where are we going, and how do we know we got there to look at?
    • 05:16:26
      So we are in pursuit of this, and we are not answering today.
    • 05:16:29
      Probably what I know tomorrow.
    • 05:16:32
      But it's all about direction setting to help inform decision making.
    • 05:16:36
      You all are helping set direction where we're going and how we know we got there to inform strategic decisions as well.
    • 05:16:44
      So again, today is around where it is.
    • 05:16:48
      And here's what you did today.
    • 05:16:51
      So you are deeply intentional in receiving and internalizing where it is.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 05:16:56
      It being strategic priorities, which is what you say you care about.
    • 05:17:01
      So you're deeply intentional with receiving and internalizing information around our strategic priorities, what we said we care about.
    • 05:17:08
      Our community survey, how we know we're doing it well or not, the community will tell you.
    • 05:17:14
      You absorb that information as well.
    • 05:17:15
      You're deeply intentional with absorbing that information.
    • 05:17:19
      The financial budget, resources for the impact on what we care about.
    • 05:17:23
      You absorb that information.
    • 05:17:27
      You're also deeply intentional in perceiving and internalizing where it is, it being the top strategic priorities which are impacts that need immediate attention.
    • 05:17:37
      That's a lot.
    • 05:17:38
      But then you used and completed six different design exercises to do some things as well.
    • 05:17:45
      Three of them you used to synthesize your insights into understanding, respecting, and valuing, and to concisely share those observations with your peers.
    • 05:17:54
      Then you used another design exercise,
    • 05:17:57
      And it was to help identify tensions, trade-offs, and opportunities related to the top Jesus priorities that need immediate focus.
    • 05:18:07
      That's a lot.
    • 05:18:08
      You all did that.
    • 05:18:09
      You did it in about seven and a half hours, but you had breaks.
    • 05:18:11
      We've had lunch, and I'm letting you out early.
    • 05:18:13
      So you did it in like six and a half hours.
    • 05:18:17
      That's a lot in a little bit of time, right?
    • 05:18:19
      I would agree.
    • 05:18:20
      Do you agree with that?
    • 05:18:21
      Yeah.
    • 05:18:21
      Yeah, you all should celebrate yourselves.
    • 05:18:25
      Processing of information and maybe you're just too tired to clap your hands.
    • 05:18:29
      I will celebrate you.
    • 05:18:30
      That is a lot of information to deeply internalize, synthesize, and communicate out loud.
    • 05:18:35
      And you did it in like six and a half hours.
    • 05:18:38
      That's no joke.
    • 05:18:39
      It can be done.
    • 05:18:40
      Remember actually when we were going to go deep and wide quickly?
    • 05:18:43
      There was a lot of information and we covered a lot of ground in a short period of time.
    • 05:18:50
      Sounds like we went deep and wide.
    • 05:18:58
      We're all about exploring.
    • 05:18:59
      You captured a lot of understanding today.
    • 05:19:02
      So I was like, review on that, reflect on that, write that down.
    • 05:19:06
      Because I need you to understand where all of these things are so we can potentially explore what is and what could be.
    • 05:19:17
      To explore what could be in these areas and not have a deep understanding about them, remember we talked about that at the very beginning?
    • 05:19:23
      What would it look like to go explore a couple of ideas and not have a deep understanding?
    • 05:19:27
      Today you spend that time deeply understanding.
    • 05:19:30
      To help inform as we go and explore what potentially could be.
    • 05:19:34
      Cool?
    • 05:19:35
      With me?
    • 05:19:37
      Awesome.
    • 05:19:37
      Tomorrow is about opportunity and possibility.
    • 05:19:42
      Alright.
    • 05:19:43
      Lastly, remember we are going for direction setting.
    • 05:19:46
      Day one, where it is.
    • 05:19:47
      Day two, we'll be about exploring what is and what could be eventually helps us with you.
    • 05:19:54
      Day two of exploring is built on day one's understanding.
    • 05:20:07
      You built a toolbox, that was all your understanding, we're going to use that tomorrow.
    • 05:20:13
      So I will see you tomorrow, but before you go, Sam, close it out with any thoughts, charges to action.
    • 05:20:19
      Tell everybody to get a good night's rest and wear some comfortable shoes.
    • Sam Sanders
    • 05:20:23
      I did say that for the last night, so I'll say it again.
    • 05:20:25
      Definitely, I just want to react to the idea that we got through a lot of information.
    • 05:20:31
      I took a lot of notes, as I usually do whenever you all are talking.
    • 05:20:35
      So I'll maybe use that with you later on, and it will help frame where we go next.
    • 05:20:40
      So when we wrap up tomorrow, I'll talk to you a little bit more about that.
    • 05:20:43
      Thank you.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 05:20:48
      So can we leave this thing to you?
    • 05:20:50
      Please leave that, yeah, because I'm going to actually ask you to dig into your understanding toolbox again.
    • 05:20:54
      So please leave it to me.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 05:20:55
      Do we need to close the meeting?
    • 05:20:57
      Is there full closing?
    • 05:20:58
      We'll recess until tomorrow, yes.
    • SPEAKER_16
    • 05:21:01
      So move.
    • Lloyd Snook
    • 05:21:02
      We'll recess until tomorrow, yes.
    • 05:21:04
      Aye.