City Council Retreat / Special Meeting   1/26/2024

Thank you very much.

who blessed you to rule the people.

So, um, so we're going to have an introduction of the facilitator.

Sam, will you move to the last floor, sir?

Yes, sir.

Good morning, everybody.

Good morning to the members of the public who are on fire today.

It's important for us to get in our strategic planning with our thousands and set the course for the rest of this fiscal year and the next fiscal year.

and James Charles Franklin.

Charles has been a friend and a counselor to me, so I do appreciate him making himself available today.

He was served as the managing director of the Gigi Institute of Elements.

He himself is a fellow administrator, which is why he's become a friend, because I have someone who can viscerate this.

So, even though for much I am in contact with councillors, as well as the public, and that has been very helpful to have that medal available to me.

Did you guys get this now, Lloyd?

Whenever he's given, we've been appreciative to watch how he's been sharing just the size of what's already said on this space.

So, we're very excited to listen to that same one.

And as I will look at it, so I just need to understand this introduction.

One of the talks that we had in 2015 under the agenda was, why are we doing this?

And actually, we're dealing with a few very good reasons.

The bad things may not be coming from the days in general.

Oschrin, also a 25-day new job.

It's the same after I've been on the job for five months.

It's supercharging for six, commutation for four, and a number of other people that are interested in more things in the past 20, 40 months have been turned over.

So it's always important to stop and just really take stock.

They will go on and you're trying to go and make sure everyone's on the same page.

We also have a long-term job here.

So we're here holding this down, helping us catch up on things that we may come in soon and remember.

And then it's about bringing this team together.

So I think it's important for us to have this thing.

It's about one another.

It's about how we identify each other's priorities, how we relate, how we agree and disagree, and how we learn and work together.

So Charles, that's your son today.

Always remember those things out.

They're not just for the program, they're for the council members present and for council to be on the agenda.

Actions or anything else that they could do?

Good to get on.

It's all right.

We'll come up with a different one and then we can go ahead

It's a pleasure to be here with you today.

I was fortunate to have won with the biggest city council in the country.

I was at about a time of solicitation, strategic overview on the next.

It's a pleasure to be back with you.

I'm going to tell you a few things.

I'm just trying to prove to you tonight.

James Nolan, Mr. Sylvester Ray, Mrs. Stamford-Thompson, everybody's been here for a week now.

I think that was a good one.

Last time I listened to all three of you.

This is your community.

I'm a student of all of you who are obsessed today, who are being sad.

And so the all-around law allows me so much to talk about it, and I think it's a 90% of what we have to say.

I've had a lot of time lately.

I've been doing it just to say I'm saying thank you for your time.

Thank you for your time.

Thank you.

It's an honor to be here.

So I'll put a list of the names that are still missing.

I've dropped off, and I've had geographic names throughout the year.

And before that, I'm going to give you all a comparison of what I've said.

So do you understand what I'm saying?

Sam, I've said that there were three cases along the way, and I don't know what the answer would be.

so deep enough to hear what you got.

Sam, each of them, I said, it's really because of them all, that I'm not going to be in charge of each other, I'm not going to be actually working on it, I'm going to be sitting.

So I want to thank them for their passion, they're very, very my hardest, and I very much appreciate them for all the work that they do for this community.

Great.

and some of the other people in the center, some of the vision that she's saying is not going to present a project that we can reach out to people who are there.

Let's be around a few percent of the time, take a look at real jobs levels.

You see the American music, the music, the dealings, sort of that kind of stuff that we're interested in.

And it's certainly, obviously, one of the most possible factors that we're going to want to make sure that come in.

Senator Sirlead, D-Search, Debra Fields & Salmon Center, obviously a lot of folks are familiar with it.

Let me share with you how this is happening and how we serve the world with all the human rights and policy.

If you have a degree that's a jail sentence, that's not a problem for me.

I'm a technical assistant at a consultancy department.

I've worked with several administrators for a long time.

I'm a technical assistant at a professional study.

and one of the things that we're going to be doing is on our Conventional and Technical System.

I say that we should not put words from the leaders on issues.

I'm having a really good meeting with that organization.

We're also going to have a leadership program.

It's really, really sad.

It's going to be a little better than this.

We also have people on the ground, everybody, versus where we

We're also going to the Constitutional Law Service and we're going to work with strategic planning, we're going to work with regulations, leadership team owns and the community's leader in the office.

You guys are doing some of the things that we've done, obviously, which is really good.

Prodigy Birch, senior there.

And for them, I think it's a lot.

Some of the rest is going to be in the classroom.

I'm going to set this to be finished in a few days.

And as I'm going to give you a council member, please answer the questions that we have.

And I'm going to make sure that you have a touch of your plans at least on every kind of representation.

So, I think that's what it's all about, I would say.

In my mind, it's a way to look at how our people are, you know, well, that's what it's sort of like in the last fashion of democracy.

That's what it is, how it's going.

That's what we've got access to.

We've got individuals that can actually talk to people, see them, make them, say to people, say, you can watch them with your child and visit when you speak to someone, any person.

We don't get that opportunity.

We're very often, that's what we're certainly going to do.

We've been set off, you know, we're all going to be working on this from the Constitution of Virginia.

We're going to be having several sessions, then we're going to see if there are any other people who can talk to us about what's going on in this country.

And obviously, as you know, I'm not a failure to set out.

If there's any interference, there's going to be this room.

It's not going to be right now.

There was a bad people that went into the policy ever came from.

Are you going to go up to the next point?

No, I'm just going to go up to Schumann.

I'm just going to go down a little bit closer.

We're also seeing, you know, in the United States, there was such a great ship that's better out in the United States.

So there's some of you already know, in the U.S., the U.S.

will be deciding what policies that would be best for the government.

And, of course, there are a number of policies that would be best for the government.

And, of course, there are a number of policies that would be best for the government.

And, of course, there are a number of policies that would be best for the government.

And, of course, there are a number of policies that would be best for the government.

And, of course, there are a number of policies that would be best for the government.

And, of course, there are a number of policies that would be best for the government.

And, of course, there are a number of policies that would be best for the government.

And, of course, there are a number of policies that would be best for the government.

And, of course, there are a number of policies

Yeah, I mean, some of this is like that, which I love you a little bit.

It was a good one, I would say.

for letting the new graph look at well, it looks really fucking well. I would also like to give a shout out to the members of our department for letting us know about the balance, the common level of the graph, which are similar to the particular proof chart for each so we gather this out. Thank you very much. Thank you.

I think that would be a good example.

And then we certainly would say so.

So with the gallery, the gallery, which is about the saints, for example, that is the gallery that is going to be one of the sort of the possibilities to probably be suitable for that kind of office challenge.

The shape of that, because you're close, but I think that's also a good way of making that happen.

I mean, you know, we can come to our rejection of the dissociation, but I don't think the United States, when they returned, actually went back and did it in the United States.

The United States, their banks decided to sell, so they went back and took the capital system, which caused all sorts of interesting issues for us.

We seemed to have a lot of negotiation with our bank about the policies that were in the United States, which is what that was, a civil defense around the United States. Thank you. Bye-bye.

by the U.S.

Government, for example, across the United States.

You can have, instead of just paying the taxes to the city, you can pay the taxes to the district, the five district, to all of the federal services, then you can have the city move to the sub-division, the town city, you know, and move it back to your local institutions, because of that.

And then, on the other hand, you can be able to have the city, possibly, for years, all the time.

We only have

Lloyd said he was considered strong and comfortable to live in the city of Rivanna, but he just wants to know about the community, the public, financial management, and so on.

He had the outside and he said, work together to keep the community so that we can have some kind of communities.

So, I'm going to talk about the announcement of the program, and it will focus on the use of language in the overseas profession.

And I'm just going to say thank you to all of you who have set out on your program to originate this code.

And I'm going to go over the channel for some speech on it.

And we also have a think pack, so they might just help us out.

Charlottesville, Rivanna

They don't have a city manager, they do not.

Most city workers have seen that for the first time.

We have a chief industrial officer who's gone from a town to a city where towns are so small that you have a town manager.

So towns are...

and all the others that are in the ministry.

So these are the thoughts that we've had over the years.

The city council, you know, attended a fellowship meeting over the years of the American policy and guidance to

So policy is going to make us a little loose.

The experience, to take you to that strong relationship with the Council and the policies that we have set for this meeting and this organization, I would be very happy to know that it's not really very sad.

So all the other things that we have done in the last few months in the city, and listening to that, and trying to come up as a professional manager.

Well, a lot of problems in the city are caused by those numbers.

The numbers, I don't know if you forgot it, we don't have a new job or anything, but it's all over the country now.

But I think it's a good thing that it's a very good responsibility as a student policy, and it can sound a holiday or extors this outside of the city.

I think it's a good thing.

I don't know if that's a good thing, but it's a good thing.

Like I said, my name is David Fluke, I am a visual and political advisor to the US Department of Data, so I am creating a simulation of the resources available.

Oschin, Rivanna, Michael Kochis.

Well, I'm sitting here with Wade, and I'm going to introduce myself, I've been a manager of that, and so I'm here on your virtual, I'll tell you in a bit, so I'm going to say, you know, session two that's going to be soon.

Basically, you're going to go to the specials who work with you, sit down and go, um, seek interest yourself, um, and you're going to do some of those things.

So it was a symbolic thing and I think the pure quality of it was kind of the same. So we got a sense of community that was similar to humanity. Thank you.

and Gretchen.

That's something we want to be a potential director of.

I know that you're going to be able to see the answer.

So we need to allocate the resources as DC's said, and that's officially possible.

And in those times, there seems to be a lot of city dwellings, and I think that's an issue all of us send an email to the planning committee.

But if you send your email, I'll be able to see you later.

That's the end of the original time, but also a significant amount of data that you may not have had at all in relations.

If you have a percent of evidence of a particular issue that you bring to this attention,

So it's always a matter of whether we can send that information or send that request to a city manager, that way he can decide.

Again, we can bring him to the table in conversation, you know, if an execute will be able to do that in line.

So whether it's just an answer to some question or a potential satellite.

And I believe that was used by all the managers, like yourself, for all the officials that was asked of us.

Obviously, we want you to take advantage of the actual experience and expertise of all the different experts that you have.

You've got some here, you know, your staff, we want you to be able to use those things on staff as well.

Sturzman.

I was talking to Mr. Ray, it's the same anger, it's the same feeling, it's the same tone of policy behind this, right?

Because we're going through the policy, we're going through the consensus, we're going to look at that, we're going to talk about the priorities, obviously you guys are going to need, you've got some more of a strategic plan back in the fall, I don't think we're going to be doing that in September.

So we're going to take a look at the previous, I think it's year eight under similar budget, we're going to have a stream, we're going to start looking at resources and staffing, policy,

So it's hopefully going to be soon after them saying there's a policy that I think it's going to make an incensus and turn that into a reality.

That's what it's going to seem like even though they're the ones you said a little bit earlier.

Well, with general law I think it's going to be likely that there's going to be some kind of a gap between the politics and the restriction.

When I say politics, I'm not talking about partisan politics, I'm talking about political politics.

Sometimes there's a threat to the council that we're going to supervise in some place.

But you put up a set of resources, a real focus on five or six of those at that time.

And there's going to be a part of that.

I don't want to spoil some of the data here.

I don't get nothing.

It's just we're going to set some priorities right under that.

And so that's what we're going to find out.

We're going to fit the gap between politics and policy in the administration.

And that's part of the city manager's role as well.

And we're going to review it.

I'm going to make sure that those things are happening.

We have a policy, we've talked about where you are holding an initiative here.

Michael, you have a few sources of staff about the issue.

For example, you know, when you were with the previous council a couple of years ago, there were several staff issues that were a lot that they had a non-honor safety about all of these, and they're probably in excess of them by the City Council that they were in their staff.

You all added staff, you know, to meet with the process, so you can take on the capacity of your workpiece, and I mean, that's successful to see those things all agree with you.

So, the group that we started with was Albemarle.

in the six seconds, obviously not every post five is ever right.

Sometimes one of our hours of policy in the church, that's the whole purpose of the process of dealing with this.

You all have the opportunity to relate what you think is best for the community.

But also because of the things we've been doing.

And that's a policy that we've been dealing with for that council at that time.

We've got a little bit of that.

And it was sad to know that they don't

And I think this is 3-2-3-5-0.

This is what we're doing now.

So we're being told this is a play.

This is a policy measure we're going to talk about.

And so we're going to see the purpose of this thing.

We're going to go on the side of, you know, telling you what's happening.

We're going to be following this, again, a lot less than today.

We're going to have to, in terms of safety, and I don't know if we're going to have a lot of controversy here.

We're going to talk about, you know, the employer requirements we have in here.

We're going to have to see if there's longer jigs.

as the chief part of the work of the committee on policy issues.

Certainly, I would like to add that we're going to have a very, very, very safe, you know, significant value of this.

We're going to have a lot of

I think it should really matter.

It's a part of our volunteer studies.

I think you know people tell them that's sort of I'm really not sure about an issue with the company that asks for assistance or they come to staff and ask for assistance.

So it's not a lot of honor to answer but it's what's best for our community as a whole.

We'll see what we can make for the company that can save us all.

And that's going to be great.

That's the process that we're going to see.

We'll see what we can make for the company that can actually save us all.

And that's that.

We'll see what we can make for the company that can save us all.

Brown,

School of Women and Children, John Freedman, City Council, County Provincial, we've seen this slide of civilization.

Actually, we've seen this together, and we're going to go to Texas soon.

That's what they're going to do also, because we're going to go to Texas soon.

So, I'm just going to think about who made this work.

So, you know, we're going to put that out for the policy administration.

Mr. Meryl Charlottes continued with the two of us, Meryl Charlottesville, Rivanna, Michael Kochis, Brian Pinkston, Juandiego Wade

and we're ready to announce the good news.

On the inside of all of this, we're going to tell you a little bit about how we're going to deal with that.

And there's just a few years.

That month, there's now no longer a year.

It's been speed speed.

It's been planned.

It's just that most of the notice, it was a one-time stamp.

That's what I'm going to put it on.

We're going to put that in the calendar of assessments.

But overall, we're going to stick to the plan.

And, um, you know, for example, I'm so excited about it.

I'm going to be talking about our friends at the University of Southern, and my colleagues at the University of Barrett.

There was a student who was living down in the mountains.

And, uh, we were living in the former part of the island for education.

That means a friend's going to go down.

So that's one of the things we've been doing at the University of Michigan.

So I look forward to working with you on that.

Thank you so much.

Citizens of Albemarle have a higher level of service, and we've had something to prevent that.

So it's not just to Charlottesville, but we're seeing that all over the country now.

Technology, AI, other things are impacting what we're going on.

We do business.

We see manager and the rest seem to be aware of that.

I don't think it's necessary to bring them here personally and effectively.

And again, there's just an awful mix of information about what we're talking about.

I mean, there's a lot of extra role that you've started with, kind of, you know, I don't make too much of a problem.

I approach it when it becomes a tax structure that's about 75 or 80 years old.

It's changed since that, I don't know, the person I've seen for the past, I mean, there's a good amount of mobility at the end of the 70s.

And we have a lot of tax infrastructure, we're only running some time now, but again, it's a number that's safe.

But even in Washington, I mean,

and David Rowland, who is one of the people that I want to show you, but he helps me out.

He brings taxes, really.

And for the streams, there's a lot of people huge from, but that's for your community.

And so we're going to continue with that.

It's about five weeks from now, but I don't need to do that.

I'm just going to take a follow-up session.

I think that we have some sad presentations that we're going to be putting on each of them, although it's going to be a reflection to do everything so far in the financial world, which is sad to look at.

But this is going to be kind of interesting.

We're going to be talking about it today.

We're going to be talking about it very often, but it's going to be a good one.

Thank you very much.

and Susan Pimper, who was created around the age of anti-racism, anti-racism, anti-racism

All I could fit, I guess, is society and finance.

It's probably the last delegations versus, you know, the taxing of those workers that were selling.

Some of you said the way was there was a real kind of, you could say it wasn't the 70s.

Can you say a little more about that?

Yeah, so if you were going to work for them, that's going to be what they'll say.

and Nicole Sotage, and that's where I'm thankful to them.

I've never been in journalism before, so I've learned a lot from my own taxes at the recession.

I've learned a lot from all the particular risks that go to real estate and the desire to make a lot of tax.

I've learned a lot from a picture of the state reimbursing of low-gallery, so I've learned things over the last few times.

They said they're going to give you two rooms to have your gallery, based on what you've said and what they've said.

and our driver was 30 more years old, and with that reason, they had him annexed, and all there was this, uh, alliance. Uh, and there were a few lines that we were able to complete, and we were able to distribute things on our state taxes.

I mean, I'm not going to say this as a part of the mistake, this is reality.

I think that's something that we did.

and going back to United States, we're going to spend more than 25 percent of the world in sustainability and policy as an organization.

Because that was the first time that we had any fight between the U.S.

and the world.

It was a lot of knowledge.

and others who have been dealing with them for a very, very long time.

and David Montero. While in the jail for studies on this, all those are there are studies that have been done on the difference between the children's and the child's children without a certain amount of first grade. So, again, you guys have options on how to deal with this. But there's also some level of information that we would desire to eliminate the car attacks as well. So, it's really now that that was the original assembly. So I love that.

I'm going to say strangely, I really don't like the things that are picking us up so that people can hear and see me.

Okay, and throughout there.

I just wanted to make sure that every time you walk away from the left, there isn't a woman going in and out.

Thank you.

Of course.

It's big, and of course, captions, too.

So a good comment.

Awesome.

Thanks.

Just want to make sure I'm on.

Absolutely.

Pay attention again.

Thank you, sir.

Thank you very much.

Thank you, Charles.

Next is the Realtor Council for Significance.

We have the right to participate in these conversations.

So, you know, Jay, our city attorney is going to start.

And I'm really going to explain that to you, that I came on myself and I'm trying to end some of the agreements now as to asking you questions.

These are the things that we make a part of, things that we've seen, things that we've been wondering about, and gives you a chance to just outdo the status of your procedure, because they are your procedures, in regards to how you conduct your business.

Okay?

Can I ask you a quick question?

There's something that most of you can say, well, you know, we're going to really see what you mean by this sort of thing.

So that's an activity question that we've got all the time to get up to and even look at someone.

All right, so Mr. Pinkston, that is an excellent question.

Your counsel with the rules and procedures are designed to ensure a smoothly functioning committee, but do not have the force of law.

In fact, there is case law that is in an account of all of what's going on by a dozen other states.

but because that was the one that served council.

So it's here that's an action but it's otherwise the battlefield.

It may not be invalidated by an allegation that council has somehow not complied.

and with its rules and procedures.

Having said that, I think I know of myself, the city manager and the city director thinks that these procedures are important because they ensure the smooth functioning of your meetings and we believe that there is at least

that doesn't or so matters that we think are worthy of your consideration.

And I think what we'd like to leave this discussion today is, obviously, you can also have an opportunity to receive your existing rules of procedure and suggestions from the clerk.

There are two other items that

that we want to address that will come later in the presentation.

But what I'm supposed to do now is to very quickly run through the suggestions that have been made.

If council is receptive to those suggestions then the three of us will want to bring those back to council.

for consideration and management of some procedures that are not to be on the cutting room floor, as they said.

in the presentation, so I can tell you about what she knows about the procedure.

Also, what I'm going to talk about is the immediate disruption issues that manifest themselves on the streets with the council in the form of some

and the balance of the concerns there of your ability to injure me in a reasonable manner versus the very elevated person that writes that speakers typically all under addressing counsel.

So those supervisions will come a little bit later.

But we're going to do some of the things that you may honestly end up leaving housekeeping matters for now if that's all right.

I'd like to, and I'm going to be working principally off of the red vandals at your places for the benefit of folks who are working towards looking at home.

There were some challenges this morning about getting these medals, these diagnosed on the screen.

They will be posted to the city website.

This is a public meeting.

Unlike a lot of material you get from me, none of it is privileged and confidential, so it will be made available to the public.

Let me begin with section one, page two.

There are, maybe, I think, in the view of your setup, two types of meetings, regular meetings and special meetings.

So you can save some words and have some clarity, really, by deleting the references to town hall meetings and work sessions which are subsumed within the category of special meetings and simply using the phrase special meetings.

Stanley Romero in section 183, a reference to the Continuous of Beings.

We had a great discussion about that at least

The health and manager, the mayor and I, when we were deciding what to do about the recent case of a weather.

But if the comment there was just whether that morning meets to be expanded, we would suggest to you that it does.

And we would go to the extent that you're receptive.

to some of these changes to bring you back some language on that way and to have this matter as an item for your consideration to have future meetings, hopefully one that comes very quickly.

The next item, it was in section, I'm sorry, can you just give me another one?

I don't know if you remember.

I'm not asking for a conference, but I'm asking for a service.

There is something different going on now, but there is something similar to that in the local government.

We'll just grab a look.

Thank you, Mr. Vice Mayor, for chiming in.

This is very much attempting to assess Council's wishes on this.

This is not a presentation as much as a taking Council's temperature, so we can anticipate what Council might want from us moving forward on our admission of the rules and procedures.

It's a very wrong one, but I'm very aware of this.

Two years ago, we had the problem of the organizational meeting having to be contemplated because of a snowstorm at a time, I think technically, so there was no mayor and there wasn't a vice mayor.

Now, Sylvain McGill, as the continuing vice mayor, three days after her term as vice mayor had ended,

and with the city lab manager and so on to a relationship to change it through the meetings related by two days.

But I wonder if it would be appropriate to have some of the individuals that exist at the possibility.

I think that's an excellent point.

I guess we're starting to have a couple of options.

One would be to have those two having occupied the position and continue to have those.

I think could be very worth a beer and a lice beer and the one with the council would be a beer or a lice beer.

We think and so the language that would allow for the city manager who does preside over the meeting prior to the selection of a beer and a lice beer as council

Thank you.

The next item.

is at maybe one in three, and this presents social practical challenges and well respected democracy.

The suggestion has been to, there are two options.

One is to simply strike that section because obviously, Charlottesville listens very closely to the members of the public in making decisions about setting its agenda.

There is a less dramatic change

which would be the assembly stride of the language at least 10 days prior to the meeting.

This says a couple of things.

One, it maintains a council's orders and procedure degree and emphasis you place on citizen input while not creating

a time deadline which you might not be able to make and also creating a misleading impression that simply by accepts and saying place the same on the agenda that creates and burdens and businesses that really create some expectation that council will do so.

Council liars if he gains control of its agenda and you simply cannot.

So we definitely lose control of that agenda.

Just on the face of it, to link the phrase, at least 10 days back to the meeting, is that we're going to be maintaining your emphasis of democracy and encouraging citizen input at the same time.

We're going to deadline this ultimately.

That's good to see we've got a good one.

And this is Section B2, the order of business.

Now the principal change here, with me and by the way, this is much of what we're talking about here versus the very good work of the city or so am I.

Nessa, Keena Plays to Co-Laminate, instead known to have it.

But in reality, they seem to be here and it's similar to community matters before they can set agenda.

This serves to the public as it would be made with murky fusion of asphyxia.

Batters, there will still be two public comment sections.

As you all know, I've had experience in several localities.

I'll just tell you, based on that experience, two public comment sections is a lot of democracy.

In terms of your

your time and your ability to focus on the business before you.

You would be very much in the mainstream if you were to adopt this change.

So the way it was now is we're opening up one of the five formations and then

There's a consent agenda and they'll open up to 16 people.

You're suggesting that that version, we should give it to 16 people that have basically after the population and things like that.

One concern that I've had, which is a little more common than just in the last few meetings, is that there have been times when we had issues that we were voting on that were not subject to a public hearing.

It was not a bad meeting.

But there were so many other issues that were highly on the agenda that people wanted to talk about that make effective voting.

and the others.

No leading them in the position of only being able to comment after we voted, in which we took all of these and towards the end of things, I suggested and sort of on the fly, that we'd be jaded with some of them, so that we'd be able to get everybody in line for a little bit when it comes to my visit.

How can you deal with something like that?

So I'm going to set out a suggestion, and then I'm going to refer to the manager.

But one of the ways to do that is to simply identify those matters.

When someone signs up, they have to identify the item that they're sitting on.

Procedure that we have as a web and drawing for people who signed up.

So it really is random who ends up on that first eight.

One thing that we should always be conscious of is that the timing of the location of the meeting is important for us to monitor and manage because we're conducting business in the city.

It doesn't really make a lot of sense to be joined by everyone collected in 90 years.

And just to add to the city manager's statement, I have 4% of the cities and counties in my legal career.

Well, there are two advantages, but there's an acidity, which I don't have a doubt in those public hearings.

And in county, a lot of public hearings on every single legislative item will flow down.

That does, you know, to create very lengthy meetings.

And I think that one of the advantages of this suggestion here

to make sure that public comment is receiving relevant to agenda items without having to go to a full public hearing on each item.

So it's a way to receive the public comment while potentially not opening yourself to a lot of their meetings that you're having right now.

I feel, I don't think that works at all.

I think I did it.

Well, that's the way we do it.

You know, 9 30 10 o'clock in the night.

We're interpreting Sunday last.

Everybody's coming here.

You said, you know, right now, if they are able to sign a verdict, if they can potentially get into the first, maybe, maybe 16.

Just trying to close this up and get a display.

Maybe they don't understand.

What is this?

It's hard to make you think that the way I've been making this movie continues.

That's where the week was that the first public coming before the contingent of addressing warrants issue.

I'm a murderer, and I'm so much bigger.

Everything doesn't happen alive, but it didn't make it.

It didn't need this.

I've been with them for sure.

I have something in place for that a week and a third of a year.

Well, I've been with them for a few years.

That's part of the skills.

I appreciate the name.

And I know it should be there.

have intentionally set out a process that tries to stream things a little bit on the other hand, I'm so conscious of the fact that as a musician I've been hearing for a couple of minutes comments about your recording in 2017, I've been recording so long, you know, I've been reading, so why hasn't he answered that?

had a home hearing on this.

The answer was that we had a home hearing technically when the climate direction had its public hearing.

But I'm not sure the public perceives that as a very satisfactory answer.

And certainly there were times in the last few months where the council moved it a little bit, and that was not received as a satisfactory answer.

You know, I'm getting on the other hand, when you talk about those things, you're talking about the idea of the one

and besides, solely for public comment, public hearing on that.

That was, you know, because it was, it was an hour ago, I guess, so it was a chance, so we could say, we'll finnish it, but yes, all five councillors are here.

All five councillors are here to sleep.

Five councillors are of any intention to make a move after the airman's, this is the time to talk about it.

And those are some of the things that we want to make clear about in our state, because I want to be able to see some of the things that we want to do.

Feedback and fun, you know, we've been thinking so long, it's impossible.

As I said, I feel like we want to see all of us here, and we'll say, value and feedback, and we want to be responsive to people.

And there's lots of different ways that that happens.

Um, sometimes we get a little bit of trouble if I believe I, you know, it's from the certain people, but I'll certainly think it's a little kind of, I mean, I don't think it's a little bit of a, it's a lot of things that we've got going on.

Um, it's kind of, it's a little bit of a, it's a little bit of a, it's a lot of things that we've got going on.

Um, it's a lot of things that we've got going on.

Um, it's a lot of things that we've got going on.

Um, it's a lot of things that we've got going on.

Um, it's a lot of things that we've got going on.

Um, it's a lot of things that we've got going on.

Um, it's a lot of things that we've got going on.

Um, it's a lot of things that we've got going on.

Um, it's a lot of things that we've got going on.

Um, it

who has a little bit of a share with us.

We are also going to put out this last time looking forward to giving many of our ultimate good decisions at 10am and 11am.

It's been possible that our time was known when we were here.

you know, jobs, you know, paying and everything and so they're just commuting to go to a state with a specific issue.

I don't think we're going to have to deal with it right now, you know, because it has to be in the first one.

It only has to be in general, it's people, computers or whatever.

I mean, maybe we're going to have a case that's going to be confusing, I guess, for kids.

You could say the first day with slots, you know, be observant for people who want to send us, you know, to the general public.

This is the second one, so that's going to be by a lot, you know, just an opportunity for us.

I'm speaking to the public on that.

I very strongly don't support that.

Because I feel like some of the most important comments we get are things that are on the agenda.

And I feel like it's foolproof of their discretion if there was an item that we feel like people haven't waited long enough to just have that be a public hearing at that meeting for that specific item.

If that was a specific concern for us at the time.

Can you sort of say a little bit about the hearing of the public hearings?

It seems like the public hasn't had enough time to weigh on for that specific item, whether we're re-engineering the whole community matters of process.

Because again, I think some of the most important comments we get every meeting on is that we're on the agenda, because that's what raising things that are on our radar.

I think that sometimes people have comments on something that they just want to come talk to City Council about whether it's on the agenda or not.

I want to keep it.

I'm just trying to make some suggestions.

I'm looking at Michael with the community matters.

But that's, thank you for having us here.

It's just that we don't think we should.

Each and every one of us, you know, stupid, you should just be basically whose sons are the first or whatever kind they have to share.

Well, it is now.

Brian Little Simon is how they appear on the list today.

First of all, we do have a counselor, an officer to sort of on the fly and be able to decide whether to address a chance for general public comment.

The answer is no question.

As an officer, you have the authority to delay from what?

If in your judgment, hearing a matter that's on the agenda, to a precedent, I think you have special issues.

I also want to say in response to the earlier comment, every single agency item before you is a subject of public care.

So, uh, and it's well advertised and well attended.

And so, if you look under a second bite of the eye of the American People's Daily and public comment, so it would be common and unusual in my experience to essentially convert that to a second public hearing model as you sign up, because that could be very labor-intensive.

What we can do, but this is a good sign, though,

is prepared to act that amuse public comment and bring us back to y'all the continued discussion.

But in answer to your question, counselor, so I do believe that the marriage presiding officer would have an authority to to hear to hear matters that related items that were coming before the agenda so that council can receive that comment before our final decision was made.

middle of the time, so I will ask you, I sort of was around doing jail since I did any of the problems I was doing, because you just sort of did it.

I did, I never happened to be real quite sure how legal that was.

You said that was legal, and it actually worked quite well, because if you happen to be a counselor, you won't be a judge, and you were taken out into the town and made your decision as a presiding officer.

So, yes, that is well with him, because I can all be through all the time you manage, yeah.

Can I ask you to give us a second?

There's no limit on how many people can speak in community matters, right?

Exactly.

I'm reading that now, mutual like,

and the bad reports that we get rid of, but is that, is that when other rejections, when they finish the regular agenda items, they can only be required to have like a thing for the public, you know, such a lot of places don't have it at all.

That would be required to have one go through this common period, go to a calendar, a quarter of my state law.

and my colleagues in other localities.

They're surprised when I said, oh, we need to get 20, 30.

We don't get 60, and then drink two is really a lot of time.

So anyway, so that's why I'm probably tough.

I'm sorry, there's a lot of variations discussed in the last couple of minutes.

I just want to clarify.

an agenda, public comment period, then a long agenda.

A general comment, then we do, this might be what this says, then we vote on a consent agenda, then we do the act.

Then we do a general community matter, so that's where the powerful people can speak.

Is that what this says?

Right.

Yeah, I don't have the folks who have a powerful concern to have to wait all the way until the end if that's a moment.

I agree on that.

If you just want to talk about the fact that it was

Thanks to many people who use internal discretion and basic silking.

We'd like to hear more about this topic.

They were very important because there's been a lot of passion, many of them, acceptable for infinity.

I also want to remind you also that you had a tool that you don't use as often as I think about the jurisdictions, which is, you know, motion to send rules.

And it has been a session of a change, but quite a few.

So I told you that you should see all the reports, hopefully not into a full table.

Right now that they are situated right after the consent agenda.

So it's really weird that my mom had an extra 15, 20 minutes in mind.

So let me also answer what I hear in this conversation as well as the person responsible for managing the agenda for you, the desire, of course, being the mayor.

I think what I'm going to say is that I need to add an additional step in determining if a subject is clearly a subject that is likely to generate a lot of interest in speaking on the matter.

will remind you that you have the option to make that on the agenda before it's published and designated public hearing at that time because that's what you're saying.

Is that right?

And that, since to me, that would be most appropriate, because if there's a heavy on doing, it's to allow people an opportunity, and then we tell them as early as possible that they have that opportunity by putting that on your agenda.

And it doesn't stop you from checking them if you want to add another one, and then we go ahead and repeat.

I would just, of course, because you don't want to discipline our performers, be disciplined about it as best as we can.

And, for example, those members are going to want to come and let's publish it on the agenda.

Do you have to distinguish which public hearings need to be advertised?

I don't think that's what I'm doing as well.

We need to try to keep some management of what our responsibilities are on the public at the moment, too.

Yes, but I see that happening in a few times.

was a big project, so we felt like we need to get some additional input.

The planning commission joined the city council.

What's the name of that?

We're going to talk about that as a part of the public hearings anyway later, because there's still that question.

So we're going to have you on public hearings, okay, as in the planning commission.

That's still a question.

We're going to move the front of the board to discuss how we're going to have some extra time for extra comment.

I was told about Payne, it's not a public area, it's a separate audience, so they made interruptions.

I was just able to turn it into a pre-identified published video from there.

I will still have the movie to make another edit, because it's your agenda.

We have sufficient guidance to bring something back to you.

Our goal is to bring that to you at your second meeting in February.

We'll type in that on the fifth.

So I might get to it with a just in case.

And sometimes something comes up in the speed of the public comment time and maybe they don't speak a minute and a half or two in the middle of the year at the time.

I'm going to still have to look at this album, it's been two years and it's something that's just come up and it's able to be done by talking to him or her to make a focus.

We'll suggest it on actions, we're going to have to send those.

It's unusual to allow people to be held at a time.

A citizen signs up for themselves to see on something, and you get in and create some awkwardness for a better term, whether they say, well, I'm not going to yield my time to another citizen who had the same way to sign up.

did it, and Natalie had to come up with some, because we need to know about the time it takes for them to get off the wheelchair and come to your lawyer.

And society said, that sets this kind of line, right?

And then we should deal with another citizen to face the call after all of their time.

Again, it is entirely council's decision, but the recommendation is to stand back practice.

Right, right.

This is just a week and talk as a council, and I think if we do,

Because I think it's a lot of confusion that really can make the need kind of come to you going on that as a sign of what part of the instructions that it has, you put your time.

But what do you think about the need of the time?

The reason that that practice developed was because one of the people had access to the sign of that time.

So, I'm going to make it a little bit of a first few to sign in, but I'm going to have to go another way for you to see what they are from this morning, sign up and be able to serve the people.

So, I'm going to sign up and be able to sign up and be able to be seen as a way over an evening.

I'm not actually that concerned about that.

If it sticks to the three-minute timeout that they're originally allowed, because I think that ultimately kind of lends some efficiency to the process of getting to hear more people without extending the time or without having someone have to bump and wait for the next meeting.

It's a confusion.

It's a people sometimes use the light, which they don't deliver even from that.

We watch too much scenes about them.

I'm doing that in my time.

People in my time.

People in my time.

There's not necessarily, there's certainly a tendency to give it to somebody else.

But we all kind of fill in for here anyway.

I was wrong with the time away.

We also have this part of the sign-up process that's supposed to be specific about the topic that they're speaking about.

So if you're younger in that time, you don't know, well, actually some of the speakers already don't necessarily stick to the topic that they signed up for.

Is that something weird?

asking for the specifics or how we manage you, whether you speak to the topic.

I like that.

Initially, you have to put your, if you're not good, you can also find my idea.

That is maybe relevant to the agenda or not.

Then it gives the Presiding Officer the chance to say, hey, let's restructure this or let's not.

But if someone changes, a burl ask, I don't think that's just a hazard of the scenario.

is necessarily a preventable or necessarily a bad thing.

I don't know what we're necessarily about Ben.

I don't know.

I can't remember the issues that were remaining just in the center.

I don't see that happening.

And it actually seems to me disrupt the meeting in any significant way.

I don't know that maybe it's since we're somebody trying to use that to effectively like the center for five minutes.

So, no, but that was that.

So, in India, we're fine with looking at you, because there's so much to do about it, and they have two minutes left to mix to the most person.

So, they have five minutes.

Is that what you're saying?

That's so the end of the order then.

So it is about managing that process.

If I start in my three minutes because I'm next on the list and I spoke for a minute and a half and I knew my time to act and who was also on the list, but later, she used the balance of my time, go back to her seat and wait her turn.

because as you go on and you fall off and you pull this and all of that and you pull it.

So you're trying to explain to the public that it's not, it's just you know it well.

Yeah.

I thought it was me.

I thought you tried to know that you can do that.

Hey, take a minute to walk up and the minute I just call him.

Yeah, the call doesn't stop.

Unless you were to tell us it has to.

But right now it does not.

I try to explain.

Maybe you're in and yes.

Thank you, contact.

I'm going to go through some of these items.

This was a terrific discussion and very helpful on the end.

So I'm going to try to get through some of these issues real quickly.

The next one is session IC7, which is on page seven of the track changes and simply to move the section on there with the presiding officers, but also to cluster the folks who have a long-term meeting and to briefly define who those are.

and those include the mayor, the city attorney, as parliamentarian, the education staff and the sergeant of arms.

That's really just a shifting around that would include staff, so it just makes sense from an organizational standpoint.

I don't think there's anything substantive in that, plus council has specific concerns.

So the weeks that I've been here, so far, etc.

Shuffle for Zide.

So, um, you got to stay with someone else to the document because you said it was up.

Thank you, Mr. Vice Mayor.

That's an excellent point.

This was a general document.

to expand.

So we look back to you with with additional tests on marriage presiding officer Clark is settled and Clay Henry Wade, we're just going to pick on probably what we're counting on there for the marriage presiding officer.

So also we're going to take a little bit of our tools and so not necessarily taking that out.

We're going to be bringing you back additional tests

and the rest of the world says about it and so.

I'm not a person who is sharp as an early 19th century, I believe.

I'm not a person who is sharp as an early 19th century, I believe.

I'm not a person who is sharp as an early 19th century, I believe.

I'm not a person who is sharp as an early 19th century, I believe.

I'm not a person who is sharp as an early 19th century, I believe.

I'm not a person who is sharp as an early 19th century, I believe.

I'm not a person who is sharp as an early 19th century, I believe.

I'm not a person who is sharp as an early 19th century, I believe.

I'm not a person who is sharp as an early 19th century, I believe.

I'm not a person who is sharp as an early 19th century, I believe.

I'm not a person who is sharp as an early 19th century, I believe.

I'm not a person who is sharp as an early 19th century

that settled our promotion.

For me, this is one of the ideas that's floating on air.

You know, for me, this one is at the fronting on a fanny fan. That's just a, don't really consider that a substantive item, especially to clean that item and change discussion.

This is at 1-D, 1-A.

Boucher, Benjamin Dishrouch, and I am civil upon that.

Thank you.

So that's on H9, D1, and again, that's 7-4-3-2-1 consistent with

quite frankly.

We are learning to assess IZ-1BI concerning the element and how in conceiving time, there are just additional suggestions for every individual to begin by certainly setting their name and place of residence.

Many citizens have

Good about that.

Many citizens are not good about that.

And of course, I'm using citizens and voters because everyone is ready to address you, whether they are residents of the city or not.

And the edition suggests that it is considered unmanageable for a group.

By edition, it's hard for someone who is speaking on behalf of a group.

The advantage is that that can be a time saver.

Each member of the group won't feel compelled to take their three minutes.

Disadvantaged, I had an old job at a technical school.

It was a great announcement, but it was a whole bunch of advantageous subject to abuse.

The entire block of Blankford Avenue.

It doesn't have to be like women will see all that in some officials.

Great.

They got the six-page letter ahead of time and there was about eight or ten people who were not identifying themselves as eight people.

Sullenberry and one paragraph, two paragraphs, three paragraphs, and then this person in the other. they wouldn't necessarily know something thoroughly and they were learning from the same thing clearly they were in the building where they had no idea.

I don't even know the way to say it, I don't even know if I'd be a conspirator if the rest of you all shut up.

And I think that would be a good thing to talk about.

I think we'd try to figure out what we need.

I don't know.

I don't even know.

I believe that would be a good thing to do.

I don't know.

That's very odd.

The next one is just, so I'm sorry, it was just a good thing to do.

I would just love

We didn't get anything that council would like to give them or not be.

But I'm sure you should, for Charlottesville and Michael Payne, who is sitting in the name of Placer residents, and maybe we've already addressed the last item, which y'all already addressed in a minute or so.

I'm just wondering why don't you report that to take it out and put it up into the seating and just say, Speaker, can they show that I'm here?

I thought it was there, I thought it was here with the film.

There was only a lot of three men who were in the line for the units.

Guy, yes, so, yes, I was thinking also.

All right, good.

So much for the talk.

I'm glad to have you here.

Thank you very much.

That's right.

That's right. That's right.

The next item is, I believe, at the top of page 10, part of which we couldn't get by long.

This is where the response to public comments after individual complaints has come to the council.

Any council or the city manager may respond as they see fit.

The issue there is there should be a

What other communities tend to do as a general rule is receive all the content, fantasy, and move on.

The way that Charlottesville has worked pretty well, which is that it's a particular note, it's a concern to the Baltimore counselors.

You may return to that item if it's a policy matter, for example, and direct city manager to work into something or comment later.

and have that discussion.

They concern here that it's not creating a resumption or a false impression that every public speaker requires a response because that's clearly not the case.

And certainly at moments just in my short tenure here responding to a citizen would

just for the public that there's not an expectation of the response, but that you may respond, you know, that you're discretionary.

So that's a new paragraph.

That paragraph three is a new paragraph at the top of page 10.

Yeah.

and Clive Ebert.

There are times when there is a symbol.

32nd response that can be given.

I would aim to be in a situation where we would be given a simple 32nd response, or in this case, up to two minutes at a time.

On the other hand, I acknowledge there have been times that in the recent past, there have been content into response, and it became so extensive, and it got into an awful tough discussion that the matter was not the agenda.

And the chance to bring this issue to you is not to prevent that from happening.

Because where it's appropriate, it's your meeting, you should have the ability to do it.

And the way I've seen it again just in the six or seven months that I've been here is

is, you know, Mr. Mayor of Albemarle and respond to it or something similar to them and submit it with you.

I don't know if you want him to have the ability to interject or comment where it's appropriate.

So, are you being as pent up as is or we're changing it?

A little bit, we wouldn't bring the language yet and bring that to you for this session, but I think we have the essential idea here, which is not to create an expectation of response, but not to impact our council's abilities and make a response that they would like, and Mr. Mayor, you're the presiding officer, so you'll, you know, nobody wants to be brought.

That's right, that's right. But more or less, how do you get us to say that we need to use that judgment and try to gain weight, that's necessary, but otherwise, a lot of things y'all handle are damaged and handled very well, and we want to seek that and make sure that's fairly reflected in your goals and procedures. Thank you very much.

I'm glad that you have the opportunity to meet what you want to follow up on.

So use that moment anytime as well.

I apologize for admitting that.

It's for the term and it's appropriate.

We have an exceptional public hearing for the agenda.

The next change is at page 11.

Council Agenda Comments, you can see there being a percentage of the comments reordering their place in the agenda.

That would seem to be a necessary set of medical orders.

Which one do you want?

We'll see.

We'll do the five on page 11 striking the Consent Agenda Comments.

Let me take a quick look at the recess that she had just acquired by motion council made for the recess during the meeting.

something that we'll raise here.

It is traditional in which your stations run a practice through the mailers all setting up the authority as a resigning officer to declare a recess without a motion.

So what I would suggest to you is that Mr. Mayor at all, you have a power and if you wish to exercise it, but another number of council wants a recess and you have to call one man who were to do so by motion.

and that, that's something that I would, I don't think we work pretty well.

All right, we're going to skip out, we're going to get things down to the end here.

The next one is at age four C, section two C.

This has to do with adding a little bit of public hearings.

We follow up on that until we get to the public hearings discussion and we'll come back to that.

I mean, if we have a section 36 possible expenditures, this is purely a policy issue.

It is unusual in my experience for council members not to have access to a city credit card or a legitimate expense.

It's a bit of a severe work, but that's another way of policy decision.

I don't know if you're interested in it or if you're not interested in it.

Same name.

Okay.

That said, if others might do it for some reason, I don't remember that.

strategic issues that are associated with one of the rich words that those of you who have been around have discussed in some light years to the middle of the 20th century.

And on the news, I was going to say to the government councillors that there were a number of things that happened.

So for the government, I said,

It's a discussion about the notion that if I incur any similar expense that I want to reimbursement for, I incur it on my credit card.

I have the income to the city administration to say this is something that is compensable.

If I have already spent the money on the city credit card, it seems like it gets reversed.

something about spending so money on eatery and their food for the first time in which case that's not it, there's somebody who may be able to make that expenditure for me, they're lying to themselves about paying sales tax.

I do read on, I can see from those backwards either

and Michael Payne.

I have a lot of new details about it, especially since I don't have new details about it, and it's said a few years ago.

I can say that David McKellips, the person who is on my duty counsel, he doesn't have enough, you know, I usually work for him, I can't even read those.

I've just seen a question about COVID.

I mean, that kind of thing, you know, we're not going to talk about it with anyone.

It's not going to be, you know, we have opportunities and things, and things.

I don't have to see it in a society.

It's just an example of some other people I can serve, though.

And so I don't know what I mean to do it.

I mean, I don't really know when we come to the end of the week, when I'm going to see the COVID.

I'll offer that.

These rules right now will be revisited with the next council.

So if this is something we want to discuss just for the five of you who are here now, then we can revisit it at another time.

Just for the understanding of how it also works is that it was reasonable to expect that a counselor can be issued a credit card with the understanding of how to use that credit card and procedures would dictate how you go about doing that.

Just as you've identified, yes, I would use it and how the burden shifts.

We do have a collection opportunity as well, if you use the credit card in an appropriate manner, which occasionally happens because it's a question.

Um, the one who doesn't come back to you, you know, to the long period today, we will expect yearly and worse for that.

It's done in staff as well.

You know, so the collection opportunity exists.

And it doesn't mean that we have to take away the access to the credit card because as you point out, I'm looking at the idea that does not have access to a card and you don't want that to be what keeps them from doing what they see as the business of service.

Yeah.

Yeah.

It's a pleasure.

I mean, I've understood a lot of things that you can do, but when you try to make them to receive your items on the 35, they'll be reviewed by someone who is deciding if it's okay or not.

It's not okay.

They're coming back to you because they do that with the bus.

We won't even get one just for the department that we use for various things like your meals and

and others.

In the interest of time, I just want to get to the last two, although Wade and Del will be off on page 18, oversight of council expenditures number two.

It's a practice sometimes when you're doing that sort of thing.

I guess from my perspective, the question would be, do we want that final presentation?

Is that a report that we think would respond with any, what do you want?

I guess this particular one, that's in the little system report that I've given to Councilor Powell and Councilor Farley.

There was a time that there was going to be plenty of people working on the expenses for the fiscal year that would already be incurred, and we would let it over stand on the budget.

and they didn't seem to be any accountability or anybody.

So I can't do that.

All right, very good.

Okay, definitely.

I decided I was going to say reflection 3D2, and they didn't put it into your earlier discussion about financial irregularities.

But now, of course, you should write a complete procedure first to the council.

It has been suggested that there would be some review of that.

You have a staff who could be helpful to you in that regard, so that you're not dealing with it first.

obviously that includes your department chief of staff, maybe for legal matters, city manager as well.

And so if you would like to take advantage of that as opposed to having to grab that award in the first instance, we are so happy to take that test all in terms of providing information

So, paragraph two, there are two paragraphs within paragraph two and paragraph two.

And I guess I'm going to chime in here and say that, certainly, if there's any issue of irregularity, then I'm going to work in the chair of the discussion, close meeting, is a little better.

So I have a list of, I don't think maybe it was just something to the effect of a council, you know, to set numbers, there's no whether the credit card, there was a very expenditure of compliance with this council procedure.

Um, I would go to the university meeting for you, so the phrase as we find that it should be on the surface of that.

out of the part of the name, or does that imply being on an agenda, not a part, if you would add in place the notion of sending an email to a counselor saying, hey, what do y'all think about this?

I'm thinking just wondering then, what would be your response in that first sentence, or the first way around to what that really means?

It's going to be the final point.

The House has five names.

Co-Owner.

and any of all the action in the public, meaning necessarily you also have the option to go to Virginia to censure your numbers from a skydive that would be done powerfully.

And all that in those meetings, Counselor Snook is counseled as a body that likes to take action to remedy the improposate expenditure by one of your colleagues.

Matt Neumann, St.

Louis, I assume, I think, you know, I don't know where it was.

I'm sure we've got a lot of those.

I'm sure as a volume manager at the moment, I've seen a few, you know, a lot of those, but for investigation, I'm not sure what I mean.

I mean, it comes to a set, you know, it comes to, as a failure, it's important to take action.

where if we had a question, the question would go down to file access to weather.

Correct.

And make this one followed.

They would have to.

So finance first.

Okay.

And now I'm going to move on to finance first in consultation with a attorney's office.

Number 10, one of the first off in the first two, yeah.

The first seven, seven of the first, and one of the two.

What it does for the response, the links, assistance from the finance director of the city of Rivanna.

I'm looking at the Republic of New York that has an expression there.

So, I'm looking at a lot of people in the other mind, but I'm not confident that this issue will have any things in the studio.

There's a language you can skip, please, or that's fine.

So, what do you think we're going to have to see in a few minutes?

I know that's where we were headed.

It doesn't go to council as a body first.

Correct.

I'm fine with that.

I mean, because Helen, we will look at what we're going to know.

We'll see if there's any news or I don't think we're going to need the best way to prepare my lesson.

Yeah, let's go to Brian's to tell us first.

You know, that's first.

Yes, beautiful.

Thank you.

and that includes just like the plan to see a session and exhibit one in which we'll send the lawyer to invite us the failure to use some of your meetings after the end of the day or the public convergence.

It was possible that it was amended in this little session and they get revived.

Yes, and there is some movement on some FOIA bills that are sort of this issue and Jay said that we'll talk about later in the meeting.

So, thank you very much.

Thank you very much.

Thank you very much.

I'm the secretary of the Civil Service.

I'm the general secretary.

Then here at the Council of Procedures, it's not necessarily a Council of Procedures, but it's an association that I wanted to review and to encourage to the boards and commissions and how you might point to the boards and commissions and what the relationship is with those various appointees and for representing your interest over time.

It has been a tough, good conversation amongst the board, amongst the council that, you know, it's just done, you know, left to their own devices.

That has been problematic at times.

I think it is something that we've talked about, we've talked about a little bit a year ago, and at that time, we have a relationship with those that

Some management for the relationship, I think it was 20 years from those in commissions should be taken on as a response for the city manager's office.

I said, okay, I'll go to the city manager at the time.

I'll have for a while to go, but I think it was actually very simple, and it's not necessarily else for city officials.

I am thankfully able to work with the commission.

We haven't had an expectation of responsibility since I've been wrong, and the decision that I've made in that regard, so this is an ongoing to each of you, is that I will be tasking the mobility city manager for administration of this responsibility.

His online function, what he began service, will be to maintain a connection to all of your appointees for those various boards and commissions over the course of the year.

It was highly opportunity to determine what would be held and not be of concern, bringing that information back to me and thereby me bringing that information to you.

If there are concerns then those we've brought to you in the form of here's a report out and we are about to make a decision as to how we want to address the matter.

The steps that have come up that have been of concern is where affinities have voted on titles that have financial impacts, that people may not even be aware of those.

I think it's important for us to make sure that we're happy.

You need to be aware of anything.

You need to be able to also express to the appointees what this council position will be on a matter.

In the number of voting that they're taking at times, you cannot necessarily finalize the impact to you because you still can make decisions later.

I think you'll be more likely to want to ensure that we are

We have the information and we are collecting information and we are synthesizing that information today.

All right, and if you were able to choose to then change our appointees, you would have the information to base that decision.

So he's looking to get his work.

This will be part of his orientation.

We take on responsibility.

We have done it before, so we're going to figure it out as we go.

But ideally, one of his assignments would be to convene all the various appointees and conversation and help to

said a ton of interaction and communication.

So, any questions on that?

I have two thoughts.

One is that I learned that I did this suggestion all the years ago and was basically told I don't have staff in the US.

I am very much like to have every rural condition

and information on the website about, you know, the last meeting a lot, you know, even sometimes, you know, sometimes when I closed a little bit of numbers, they left it on.

But I remember when I came on the council back in 2020, there were some groups in New Orleans, there were some New Orleans members too.

even wrote on the website of the last activity was in 2014.

I think we've kind of cleaned all of those things, but one of my concerns now as a counselor is I have no idea what some of the new words are actually doing in terms of financial impacts or also have policy impacts.

The jail ward is one where everyone has been in a certain position that

and the general board.

I want to share a consensus among ourselves as council in terms of the boards and commissions we sit on

Is there anything that would be useful to the councilors?

Like, for them, the ones I have would be useful to have a suffrage of actions that, like, wants them to come to the city council meeting at the beginning of the meeting.

I'm probably not able to feel it, because I feel like, like, who would be responsible?

I would say that I intend to perform a recommendation to you on that.

I just have a few variations on what can be done in regard not only to take up any more time in the meeting, but to just kind of formalize what type of mechanism I think we can figure that out with you.

Some help, like, would be good.

Sure.

That goes into possibly the important sessions that you may want to have or the conversations that you may want to have.

I think this is a way

Now, if there is something recently that I said that I didn't know, so I dropped it off because I wanted to show you how I wish I had gotten to know more clearly to people that I wasn't getting that much since I was a child.

And that's what we do at Charlottesville, Rivanna, Michael Kochis

I don't think it was part of the ones that made me want to be an artist. I think it was in the beginning of the 19th century or something, since I've never been an artist, I think the rest of the world, like Holly has said, was sort of this famous stuff, so they don't see the dream. It's the dream I'm going to see, and the dream is the notion of the impulse, and I don't think that we will. I don't think, actually, in some way or another, I'm trying to sell the email for myself, I just look at my head once in a day, and I don't think that has really helped me to do that, but I think it's kind of social.

I was just about at the announcement section of the meeting where some of those just senior leaders that you attended or that you're not talking, you might want to come through again, so I'm going to talk to you a little bit about what she knows, come to come and join her, something like that.

I'm going to ask you a question about some of those.

I think it would also be helpful to have some of the favorites on this week's calendar.

But since there's two kinds of it in the album, and some of the others, so I wonder if you guys have something to tell us.

That was out of cover, so we're going to make a two-in-a-time program.

I have questions about that, but that's just not them.

So I'm like, oh, we think about doing a couple of things with them.

But it's just helpful to have all of that in one place.

So let me say damage or a little bit of wrapping.

We've got a lot of wounds as well, so we'll get the jails on.

I see two of the drafts seem to be related to it.

We're willing to thank you.

We'll be able to thank some of these things.

And I'll also share with you a few thoughts.

Would you tolerate it if I told you that there are a number of various births, such as child spaces and the avenues that will come back to you as well?

What is the responsibility of women in rehabilitation where you have your life and your literature?

and since we've done spending a time with you, we'll start again.

So, the last for me, I'd like to turn to Natalie.

No, which one would you like?

I'd like to say that we have a thing for you.

That's how we're going to do it.

I'm going to go to Albemarle to do it.

I'm going to go to Charlottesville to do it.

I'm going to go to New York to do it.

I'm going to go to New York to do it.

I don't know which ones are either, I don't know if there are some of them, I don't know if it's still necessary.

and I didn't come to this to be a man, and so I believe that it's fair information which is important to us.

and some have been shifting to kind of oversight of the 20th and 25th, so we haven't even told you what else you wanted done in this space.

So we're going to clear out this relief in 19th and 20th century.

Second time, I am, I'm going to say six times.

I want to make

College buildings.

It's a chance for us to bring experts into the island of the yarn.

It was such a matter of experts that we found staff.

It was a chance to play with them.

It was an intimate pursuit.

It was warm.

I think there were two colleagues that I would like to bring back into this room for the next two months.

And a lot of you said there was some time to touch on this topic.

because they're built out of these, built in the question that it's not yet to work, but in every such placement that you're more than interested in, spend some time on every session.

I'm going to finish your account and we'll now look for civil change and work session schedule in the meeting.

I'm looking to not be able to decide what you're going to tell me, what else you'd like to hear.

We've got some standard things to act and be able to work in.

and Brian Pinkston.

and there are other topics that do come up, so I'm going to explain that in this time of the meeting.

Are they not ready for issues that you'd like to prioritize in the regular work session?

I can be critical of that, so I think we can tell you in that regular conversation in the Institute will tell you the special work session at the end of that delay, in this room, on our chairman's shoes.

And next time, I think we can go on to the special session, we can talk about the regular organization.

are significant.

I've been staying all the rest of the week.

There's a lot of self-sufficiency, number one thing that I want to make sure that I understand.

I'm saying this because I know it's because they keep showing up and giving back, so I'm putting it out to the side.

I want to say to you, still being dramatic, I think they're too broad, they're one of the things that certainly is so

Tate-Schuloff, The Affiliate, as in Stralogy.

Just because I think there's a lot of discussion counseling to how we're going to revitalize, how we're going to be flexible to the budget.

Because we've killed the revenues in the technology that are falling on us.

So, the second, I think we've got one story down there, so it's very serious.

So we had, I didn't even hear those things.

to that.

This kind of transit in general, like you get a full solution from the trainers when you figure out what all of the needs

kind of non-mechanical transiting options and plans for it.

I was the test for the library to meet your minds to see if I could do it in the company.

There's a wide range of opportunities to look at our organization, transformation channels, and there's 40,000 that's actually, right now, I'm looking at this as an organization.

I would actually look at it politically, but I would be like, I'll give it a try.

I don't know why.

who serves council right now, along council, and that was passed.

So I think it was sort of to give a total power to Wade and to provide an opportunity to get to that.

And I would like to add, they include their word, the session, and the power of the people.

But looking at the times, there's a lot of

It's not about the theorem concerning the implementation of the program.

It's about the general interest between the electrician and the electrician, so they've got a lot of indigene, but I don't know why anybody would buy it.

I don't know why anybody would buy it.

I mean, those are some of the problems.

And I don't know if any of them are in the process of discussing the practicalities of the program.

I have an effective working group that we're leveling to right here.

We set up a group of 10, but we're not going to be something that is something that we're going to be able to make.

But what happens is just on the way in, you know, it's fascinating that we're going to be able to get into something that we've never seen before.

So that was just a hot learning issue, because you want to make sure that we can get a bit into it.

And is there a one-session topic that we're interested in that we want to make sure that we can get to make a problem?

Even though I'm going to have to go ahead and put that here, this is another thing to say.

But for any analysis of the issues with how we're going to deal with the rents, the steps of the landlords, Charlottesville is a moderate plan, this is probably not going to be a good one session, because we're hoping to be able to gain post-zoned mortgage adoption or limitations.

He's been talking about

Yeah, and, um, I'd say generally, we've never done a lot of, you know, we haven't, you know, given since over the years, we've had a lot of different, uh, some of the cheats of the website, right?

We've had a lot of, you know, we've had lots of, you know, like students.

Thank you very much.

In the recessional time, I came up with the development of this facility, and I'm sure you've heard of this convention before, but even if it's just in the short kind of the distribution of the land, the land, the community, the kind of field, the land, the problems, you know, and there was just a lot of, you know, I think a lot of those, there was just a lot of, you know, a lot of changes, definitely a lot of the important research.

and I just feel so successful.

And what I say to you about that is that one of the thoughts that I've had because I'm trying, that's the way to be in charge of what Richard was saying, it's a difficult one to talk to, but I really like that, is to take those strategic outcome things and try to tie it to as many things as I possibly can. So it won't, because I think it really are. And to try to make sure we have everything you've really done to it. We have a lot, and that is about making sure that over the first few weeks, that all 10 of you can do that in our own areas.

so that at the end of the year, we're going to be working right on that entire zone.

We're going to send the chair away, so we're going to go where we were on, as I identified by our 1,000.

And we're going to make sure that we can get it off the ground with one of the years out of need.

So we're going to be putting them going into those details.

So if you take a look at the ground site, do the same.

If you take a look at the ground site, do the same.

If you take a look at the ground site, do the same.

If you take a look at the ground site, do the same.

If you take a look at the ground site, do the same.

If you take a look at the ground site, do the same.

If you take a look at the ground site, do the same.

If you take a look at the ground site, do the same.

If you take a look at the ground site, do the same.

If you take a look at the ground site,

This may be a little discussion.

I will get the information.

I want to get the information.

I think I'm going to have a lot of good work going.

So we're on the perfect plan, two hours and 13.

and more. Thank you very much. So please don't come home.

Yes, it's been a really long time since I was born.

I think I've lived here for a few months.

So I was just running a castle and I was fishing here in this hotel.

Especially after I was 17 years old, I was still a little bit of a New Yorker in the city, so I mean, I thought I was a New Yorker.

And when I changed my name, I remember it was just the same.

I used to have a New Yorker, so a lot of my family used to live in New York.

When I first saw him, it was interesting to know that with that sort of work, his own achievements will yield to him.

And combined with it through the field and the coach, and the grinders, it doesn't really make a difference.

You know, staff, they don't really have a base in the field for us.

So it's kind of just the writing of pieces, also, that we've been trying to work on.

Now the same works, and for many of us, it's just the work of staff, so we have to pay them down.

I think that's one of the takeaways that we've had is just making sure that we can keep the flesh, so we'll probably pose a couple of different questions to them.

There's a little group under this past year, and we'll be still looking at your highlights, and we'll be looking at your information to you, and probably by doing that one.

And obviously, we're moving on to the FOIA.

You said public hearing consultants are in public hearings.

That's right.

And then the other thing I said, I'm several of those who have recently had such real discussions.

Thanks to anyone who's been generalizing concerns of the city for public hearings.

So I'm just going to say that I just look out for you.

I'm assessing.

There was a particular procedure, shouldn't you follow?

And that would tie us down to the rules and procedures that they would ever use this.

I want to thank you, Stadards, for the Council that has started to develop this spotlight, but unusual.

I want to join the public hearings with the planning commission for future land use matters.

I don't know much about this.

There is certainly some efficiency in the council because it has its public hearing at the same time that the planning commission knows.

The effect of that arguably is you have a public hearing and the planning commission and the answers are all very similar, which is very huge.

The fact of that, arguably, is you have a voluntary real-time commission and we have which is a free site, not very huge, which also led to a religious email that was sent to the environment, which I will sign in front of you. That's in many cases what I have to do.

So we just want to raise the issue of the right scientists and both of them would like to serve them.

and Natalie Oschrin.

I'm here, I will be in the face of it, but it was someday good, but we don't have everything that happens, so I will be the manager of what's available in our network, so can I take a motion?

I don't know if you should.

and the rest of the population.

on the television from Pinterest.

Do you know that comment that you opted to rationalize that we're hearing South Plain introduction, that we have public hearing?

It's odd to say you don't attend that evening, right?

That's the only reason I thought we'd do different questions.

So there's one very, very counterintuitive question.

I wanted to choose to go that route, but I was wondering how I would interpret that and not ask questions.

So, it's on

I am curious to know about and try to think about

I'm sure it was all speaking completely. I felt this time, which I'd been hearing take stills, and I'd say, well, wow, sort of thing, and I would say, well, I would say, well, at the right time.

and Michael Payne.

This is kind of a video call, but it's going to be good for the center of time if people are commenting at the time.

So on the issue is kind of a particularly big thing for now, 10 to 16 people have been commenting on that particular issue.

I mean, the fact that all of those people

Well, I think it's a problem that there is not a way to create a neighborhood out here, and that it would create some failure, just because no matter what you know or speak to, it would be a problem without the issue.

But that's not a problem here.

I can tell you that you're in a lot of trouble with the suburbs and the behavior of the color of the U.S.

as they are speaking to us in community efforts.

But at times, when I want to say, a surge would be the definition of it.

I don't understand what you're doing or what you're hearing.

I'm fine.

I'm fine.

I'm fine.

I'm talking about ignoring this challenge after the next session.

But since I've looked at many of the others and I've done many of the other things that I've said, I've had enough of the planning conditions to be able to do this.

I think you can share the planning conditions that you've had to go around and say.

you know, even without knowing what you're in for. So the counselors and the advocates are very active because if they go to the field, they'll stay. So other opportunities if they do happen. Like if you were in a building and you wanted to change a company from the outside of your head, whether it's title of the land, whether it's a lifetime, whether it's certain properties, whether it's natural values.

as mayor from the chair of the Office of the United States.

There was some concern about that rather than there was a planning for the council in those two years.

So that's a good thing to do.

That would be sad or a planning commission.

So are we certainly judging things or are we causing planning commissioners to shake the

and I think Alson is eventually better on the table.

And so I would suggest if you're with us today, if you're with Alson, just be asked a few questions.

But I don't know if you're on to say anything as well.

I think this is something that we're talking about.

I'm also thrilled to be interested in the individual, and I guess it's a particular one that we're hearing.

It goes to the council, so to tell them that, let me do something about it.

I think there's a question.

I thought there was something to say to the developer, but I'm not sure.

I thought it was something to say to the developer, but I'm not sure.

I thought it was something to say to the developer, but I'm not sure.

I thought it was something to say to the developer, but I'm not sure.

I thought it was something to say to the developer, but I'm not sure.

I thought it was something to say to the developer, but I'm not sure.

I thought it was something to say to the developer, but I'm not sure.

I thought it was something to say to the developer, but I'm not sure.

I thought it was something to say to the developer, but I'm not sure.

I thought it was something to say to the developer

Sides of the development of the Dutch room, I'm sure it's one of the things that we've thought to do.

It's on which side of the table that I'm supposed to go over this.

So those are the procedure, those are the classic.

There's something down here on the set, the classic, sort of, I was here in Caroline.

She was an exciting officer.

She had these situations, and she had those favorites, those opiaries.

also seen the other pair of mine, so they were also working on the University of St.

D. Fairman, University of St.

D. Jass, and I worked just a few minutes in fashion, so that's how I got to the library.

We looked at the book for so many years, and I thought it was super useful for the discussion.

and so on.

And that's, you know, also an important mention of our students, that is something that Charlottesville may not take up.

I was just just saying that by the end of the term, you can take the example at this, because you can obviously try to count down on what you think.

And she had to do it with the verb and try to, what I said, to die in the end of the term.

And there was a change, sort of, that was at the time of the end of the term.

And we knew that Charlottesville would be out after so many years.

And it's going round and round.

We have a lot of stuff to be doing, so I think it's time to get started.

We're running out of time.

We're running out of time.

We have a question for you.

It is a great honor to be part of the one-year-old team.

We said it was very much fun.

It was a great honor to be part of the one-year-old team.

We said it was very much fun.

It was a great honor to be part of the one-year-old team.

We said it was very much fun.

It was a great honor to be part of the one-year-old team.

We said it was very much fun.

It was a great honor to be part of the one-year-old team.

We said it was very much fun.

It was a great honor to be part of the one-year-old team.

We said it was very much fun.

It was a great honor to be part of the one-year-old team.

We said it was very much fun.

It was a great honor to be part of the one-year-old team.

We said it was very much fun.

It was a great honor to be part of the one-year-old team.

We said it was very much fun

Well, I mean, so, I mean, that's a policy question, so I would say, we would say, I have several dollars here in the block, you're having a seven p.m.

in your checks, having three dollars here in the CFO in the process in terms of time, you're going to have to come back to check on your decision to have it all sorted out.

and I have a question for you.

I have a question for you.

if this is any condition of college or anything like that, because you're in a situation into the crowd on the set of the session, so there's any condition of college or anything that's similar to me.

And very, you know, you tend to be full of the fact that they, I mean, said that a lack of education for the public, what the more significant effect it gives, you know, to the other collectors, a little bit of shading, perhaps a little bit

which is how it goes.

So how they feel about something and how they get that salary.

I would discuss that.

I'm at the Ryan Center, so I'm very useful to address the question as to say, and with a lot of these discussions, if we can do this together, we will do it together.

If we can do this together, we will do it together.

If we can do this together, we will do it together.

If we can do this together, we will do it together.

If we can do this together, we will do it together.

If we can do this together, we will do it together.

If we can do this together, we will do it together.

If we can do this together, we will do it together.

If we can do this together, we will do it together.

If we can do this together, we will do it together.

If we can do this together, we will do it together.

If we can do this together, we will do it together.

If we can do this together, we will do it together.

If we can do this together, we will

The first one of us is this is where we are siloed, so flesh firm.

This is an important part of the song.

I'm going to tell you a little bit about the show.

and William Sewells-Halladay.

I was not excited about the official tape of the word just inquire the class to make sure I was up to date but

So what I would like to just ask the direction of the meeting to be made further from what I've been looking for.

The presentation is very familiar.

I'm not following up by the whole issue of the meeting to show out.

It's kind of like the meeting that they had in my party.

You know, they were saying, if you look at it, let's just show out and see what's going on.

Because I have to be honest, I will not treat you no matter how you.

Now, roughly, I do not have any sense of the word, but I would like to make sure that I have the exception of the word, the exception of the word, the exception of the word.

and Michael Oschrin.

Blanchard, but you have a lot of use of yourselves about it, but until you, you really need to be able to do that without going away, so that you're going to be able to train for us as you can speak.

I think what you do in terms of, I think, is conditioning times.

This is a huge issue.

I just want to say, Mr. Ray, I think it's probably not going to be as much of a financial situation.

I mean, we've done about what we've done to the side, right?

But I would also say that there is a little bit of a spectrum here.

We're not going to be sure.

We're going to have some non-stall face exhibition here.

and I think that we have to do that.

I think we have to do that.

I think we have to do that.

Separating this group of women is far more difficult than it's supposed to be.

We know that there are many women without women.

Separating this group of women is far more difficult than it's supposed to be.

We know that there are so many women that's ready for all of them.

We know that there are so many women that's ready for all of them.

I think for both human and city council, I think it makes more sense as I'm containing this, but I didn't feel a comfort for the situation where we can ask questions and the planning commission would be able to see if we can use the value to all parties in the area.

I don't know if they would be able to explain the situation.

I guess I'm going to state a little bit about having a public hearing with the city council and the right effort serves as the opportunity to be able to have

and there is a C-name that we're going to be telling you about.

Everything on the set for the joint public hearing and what we're going to be talking about.

I'm going to be doing that as an addition to the staff where we are.

I guess I'm going to put it off the both sides.

If I fall into this state, I can't tell you anything about exactly what should be done.

This is a nature for all of us, and I would like you to vote for the cause of this year. to save them.

I'm just trying to figure out how to, in particular, direct human business feels like something that would make more sense with experience.

I'm so sorry, I didn't feel kind of like that.

While I'm here, I was also going to go show the information that I was going to be.

I would certainly say that we have a separate partnership with the attending and the main mission which is to serve the very needs of the community.

This is kind of what I'm talking about.

And it would be better for us to have a lot of discussion.

Instead, I feel like we'll be able to find and decide what we're going to do.

We'll start saying something different, including issues like your own.

You get to shoot.

was with their same type of things that everybody was supposed to be a part of.

The fighting is what we've tried to do in that very long time.

The reality is that that's actually helpful for giving it a little cinch line and for you to get a sense of what it looks like.

So we want to begin with, you know, and see if there are any opportunities that we might want to succeed.

We have a lot of opportunities that we might want to be able to expand on this.

They're right to be able to deal with the size of the board of the five or enough of a math ability based on their position.

We will probably be able to do this in a little while, but we'll talk a little bit about that later.

I'm going to come back to the front of the floor, so I speak to you a little bit about it.

I'm going to come back to the front of the floor, so I speak to you a little bit about it.

I'm going to come back to the front of the floor, so I speak to you a little bit about it.

I'm going to come back to the front of the floor, so I speak to you a little bit about it.

I'm going to come back to the front of the floor, so I speak to you a little bit about it.

I'm going to come back to the front of the floor, so I speak to you a little bit about it.

I'm going to come back to the front of the floor, so I speak to you a little bit about it.

I'm going to

Thanks for talking with me.

I'm Michael Oschrin.

I'm from Charlottesville, Rivanna, Charlottesville, Rivanna, Michael Kochis, Brian Pinkston

I think that just to close this out, it sounds like without a disability, we're going to have our separate.

I think that's something that we need to work with just so it's very good to continue to work with them.

I'm concerned because I don't know what they're doing.

I think it's actually one of the favorite of us.

I would accept the credit card, but also I appreciate it's a very good commission.

How did you get in there?

It's a small size, a little bit bigger, a little bit smaller.

I think it came out very, very different.

It was separate when we came in.

I don't know how to do it with this edition.

I don't know what it is.

I don't know what it is.

and several other men who were involved with all the domestic relations, I believe, and I believe in the mission of the downtown media.

Yes.

Well, we are civilians.

Yes, we are civilians.

I think that we'll get better, I mean better, in the direction we'll be able to join the US and some of those other things.

whatever it is on the scene that we're going to be talking about ourselves as a single person.

Do you have the fact that we've anticipated so much of the possibility that we're going to be talking about ourselves?

I don't know if you've said anything about that.

to move on to the next topic.

Go ahead.

I'm going to move on to the next topic.

Yeah, I guess.

I'm going to show you some of the changes that we've had over the years.

while on those rules of procedure.

This has happened earlier.

We should have the child with respect to circumstances.

And it's a shocking, a shocking, a strong thing to your needs.

This is a last example.

You're going to do a dollar a cent coming to the lab.

Everyone has the person in the right with the procedure.

Counting the counts on getting an excessive degree of speed and the degrees are equally

and James Haynes.

And as that said, there is a point at which the minister began to assert that he had certainly under existing findings

and Gracie Hall.

She made me for a council meeting with Jacks, where there was an action that I would choose to submit those from the meetings as examples of that last year.

Okay, Jay, we're at the end of the meeting.

Jay, there was to your personal procedure that we would be able to strengthen the council's handling and making sure that there was a disruption, obstruction, why is it so serious that we should act?

Florence, St.

Andrews, McDonnell-Files, St.

George, the site of the virus, St.

Selvester, Sanctuary, the important ones.

It's not violence, but it should be.

It's a site violence.

It's changing the behavior of these violence from the right way to the corner.

So that's just sectional.

They were right on the revolution.

I didn't think it was helpful.

Finally, they'll be used so they can be revoked differently.

Well, Jerry, the whole area, he was there.

He was also there to sort of just

Souther, that's for the end.

There's almost certainly vulgarities to be unlearned in this area for less than a number of reasons.

Personal attacks against House of State staff from members of the public.

and Anthony Doris, who are sort of moving off of OVAM, which is better than OVAM, which is $7, the extension of the $10, which Charlottesville, Rivanna, and Charlottesville, OVAM, because for the very narrow exception, it's sort of very early on in the course of OVAM, which is better than OVAM, which can be helped with the sort of simple behavior of OVAM, which is to do with the language of OVAM, which is the language of OVAM,

Smith, Mr. Steele, Mr. Steele.

and John Lennon.

I feel I would say that a simple justice, I would like to actually talk a little bit with you, but I don't when I see it, I just want to just move it back, okay?

Are these the judgments we will be able to do or do in the election number at flag?

The second thing that was used right now, say, with the commentary on the group of Sunday sessions, Council President Raul said it would be comfortable to be saying about the

Osamble.

I just want to thank Mr. Mayer.

He's been working with them for five, twenty-eight hours, and he allowed us to say that to the college.

We usually have a lot of raisings in this context, because I think you're going to be able to solve this.

So that would be an incident.

Okay.

Now, there would be certain sort of situations, particularly destruction, where I think all of us would have to figure out what we're going to do with this incident.

You can say you're guilty.

You've got your name, right?

If somebody was to destroy a name, you have to do it.

If somebody is to actively show it not to the party, but not to the day they are.

I'm going to suggest that we get some help from the Department of Education.

I'm going to suggest that we get some help from the Department

Charlottesville.

Oschin, Michael Oschin, Brian Pinkston,

So we make up

She was a part of it.

She said it would be good to hear about her expertise in self-sufficiency and higher education.

And I think that's kind of what we're missing before today.

I don't know about those things.

She's a part of it.

She's a part of it.

Shad, everyone talks about this, and it's very interesting to talk about that.

Thank you very much.

I'm sick of it.

I'm sick of it.

and Michael Payne.

and Jean-Marie LeBlanc, of course.

I've been sitting there for six months and I've been working with them for a long time.

Thank you very much.

So that's the way I'm going to deal with it.

Thank you. I'm going to say hello to all of you, and I'm sure you're going to see that.

Oschrin and Albemarle.

Bouchardelle, Michael Bouchardelle

He has a great success.

I think that's a good idea.

So now I would say, Charlottesville, Rivanna, Charlottesville,

and Anthony Oschrin.

Oschrin.

Thank you, Mr. Mayor.

I would like to tell you three things about Albemarle.

And also, I would like to tell you that this consultation will make the portfolio compliant in the next few years.

I would like to tell you a little bit about Charlottesville.

Next slide, please.

Next slide, please.

because of a strange amount, just so we could do it.

Also, because of our knowledge policy goals that the FOIA also represents.

Also, the next slide.

Oh, so FOIA.

Joe, it's a pretty big issue.

The moment of the public and the fall of the pandemic, she developed a new construction and carpeting situation.

It ensures that the citizens in the general aid processes and the graduates most of you, at least, are emphasized by citizens, the government, and the activities

and so on.

Madelaine is a Q&A team member for the Federation of the United Nations of Charlottesville, and I'm going to check out the city treasury, so that's going to be a certainly good time.

We're going to start, we're going to bring it out to the groups of the college assistant city people who are working there, who are studying that fellowship.

I'll come back again, and I'll do a little bit of a change in the sense that we're going to have some sort of solution that's going to be available.

And also, it's going to be the same or the same kind of justice that we're serving.

also a long, great upset.

It was just a little bit of time, but it was really great.

Thank you so much.

Thank you so much.

Thank you so much.

So, we're going to kind of jump in if you have questions or if you want to answer questions.

and I look forward to seeing you again soon.

So we think of our mandate for rent and such all of the graduates to be able to do that.

So we've done the things that we're trying to do.

It's a clean call.

Unfortunately, we're not saying we should be able to do that.

Cochran, we have those messages.

Very well.

Anything.

It's kind of a sound, you know, I'm going to offer something which is a very rough definition of the Spanish, Italian, or any kind of stuff.

There's something going on in possession of the city.

We're going to go to the officer of the new room.

We're going to be creating an international public savings.

Right, so we're

Kuhn, Kuhn, Charlottesville, Rivanna, Kuhn, Kuhn, Kuhn, Kuhn

And that's true of Brian Oschrin, who was in my department at the time.

I'm in a private cell.

I'm sorry, Brian Oschrin.

I'm sorry about this.

Do not worry about it.

What was the time that you said you were going to celebrate?

Because it's been a really long time.

We're building less of that kind of business, and we're kind of doing more of those in the way that we're doing it right now.

So now it's sitting on my desk, and I'm going to stay there already, which means you're on the second floor, and I'm going to move over to the next slide.

So it's great.

Just as I'm reading this, I have a brilliant picture of you telling me.

You said, I don't think it was important to get this down to that point.

And I want to make sure to be able to tell you, for the most part, that you and I say, you are able to tell it right.

So that's the point of the order, if you were open for that.

If I could think of a, you know, I had learned that we already were a part of a child. I really wanted to be a single man who was sex adult, and I should have been able to speak on the phone or something like that. I just couldn't explain it, but it would have been really hard for me to remember. I wouldn't have said, no, no, I didn't have it. So.

Dan Reddick records are one thing.

We're trying to help them.

So, again, I just have a comment to add to that, so I'm going to go ahead and do the rest of the guys.

I'm just going to go ahead and talk about what does this mean for us, you can show you what it means.

But if you feel like it's something even with a friend or something, it's a little bit of a development, and that's the culture that goes into the field.

and Brian Pinkston.

So what kind of language would you like to talk about?

Some kind of universal language, the universal language that has a similar meaning, or how to mention there are 18 different languages, and that's why when you're doing English, somewhere in the future you'll say, okay, I'm kind of using my language as a guide, I'm going to use my language as a guide, and I'm going to highlight that language for you.

That's simply the way that it works.

with us. So we're learning, we're writing, and we're standing in the seat of the show today. And I will start with that. Can we just give you a sense of how we in the city.

not with you.

So I've been in the city for five days, so it's fine, right?

So sometimes the customer class, you look around and they're like, what's going on?

So it's a fun, incredible, smooth outside, sort of.

So we know five innings, and that if it was five innings, we'd have to do a five, right?

We have to go for an officer, but if it's five innings, we have to do a five innings.

If it's five innings, we have to do a five, right?

We have to go for an officer, but if it's five innings, we have to go for an officer, but if it's five innings, we have to go for an officer, but if it's five innings, we have to go for an officer, but if it's five innings, we have to go for an officer, but if it's five innings, we have to go for an officer, but if it's five innings, we have to go for an officer, but if it's five innings, we have to go for an officer, but if it's five innings, we have to go for an officer, but if it's five innings, we have to go for an officer, but if it's five

Clinton, who was with me during the monarchy, right?

So then she showed up in a different kind of system, and said, it's a short film, but honestly, this is how it really happened, right?

We're all here, right?

I think this is where it really happened, right? And we're all going to be right there. We're going to listen with our thoughts and our time. The main thing to respond is we are all going to run out of time. But if I do, I will look down on the budget. We're going to, as well, connect with some of the family. Just let it happen with our time.

I have a question for you.

And then, I guess, I mean, I don't think we need to sort of do something about human rights.

I mean, because I was just going to share a little bit about that.

Now, there are a lot of people that are wanting to set up this assumption in terms of trying to get to the class that I'm going to see with you.

I want you to identify and make sure it's there to give you a few other lines.

For now, thank you.

You're welcome.

Thank you.

You're welcome.

Thank you.

You're welcome.

Thank you.

So just the very amazing part of what we're going to do is we're going to do a test and it's going to be a very good challenge that you might have if you ever get someone asked for it.

It's a little bit comfortable, but these are just the basic process you can actually do.

She can talk to a professor and say, OK, we're working on it, but we're going to be fine.

Because we're going to have to learn a little bit more as soon as we can.

So, I miss her, because I think she was so open to me.

Sinclair Sinclair Sinclair Sinclair Sinclair Sinclair

Oschrin.

I just want to say thank you.

and I was having fun.

So two years ago, I found out that if you have $17,200 in the nation, this is a high five.

If you have a high five, it means that you want to be informed.

A year and a half ago, we did a few call-and-runs, like I did a few months ago, so then it's something I get now.

We're going to do it for the time being so far.

7,000 million dollars, and if we had nothing to do with it, it was the same.

Personally, we thought that the support would often be done by the council, but honestly, it was all decided.

I always thought we needed to be in response to this.

And I'm trying to set up a meeting in 2009 proportionally with Bryce, so that I'm not going to set up a meeting with some of my students and my subscribers who are willing to look at us, right?

the practice that you're giving us at this time of the year.

working out like it was 70 or 70 years ago. The result of that is to sell their documents and then to be able to link them to your personal channel. So, you know, I do think like the literature of the Senate there, it would never be respond for the artillery. It's actually usually used to see what's on the drugs going forward. And just so that you're seeing a little bit of details and you're actually going to feel better about what you're going to do.

So, what do you mean?

with the City Council meeting.

So how did you register that between the excitement and the impregnance?

It's not something that I didn't realize.

I don't need to be invited.

So just to be sure that it doesn't come in right away.

It doesn't have a pressure for me at all.

But that's not what it's going to be about.

It's a real thing.

And I can't take it wrong.

Michael Oscher sent him a photo of me traveling, and he would say, the way you are.

And I just said, do you like to have a company with you?

So I'm going to deliver just like a motion to later on, so I know where we're going to put this, because we're going to see what's going to happen, which there's a jar in that pad.

So we're going to talk a little bit about the content of this thread of five principles in response to the U.S.

So the one thing we really have

So we are probably in the future.

But the real time, I don't think there might be a whole range of questions.

I mean, there is evidence that there is a trotting.

What's that?

It's like, you know, it's not a real issue.

It's not.

The trotting will be to be looked at.

So it's not.

So in terms of exemptions, some of the more common things are trying to client privilege.

We know that we're also expected to be in attendance, so anything we need to pass or ongoing investigation, we can withhold personnel information, although we're talking about the bigger scenario and quite a bit of records for those shows.

which is the compulsion for the removal of the clouds, those are also exempt.

They are missing in if you want to remove those.

I would like a definition of this, even though just for press and austerity or whatever it learns.

So the writing and the training might have some kind of connection with some of our projects to keep the writing.

And unless you get a promotion, please do not forward any advice.

We're trying to be disciplined at the top that it's provisional confidentiality and client association.

Even if we don't, please don't worry about the ending outside of the city.

Because once you do that, we don't know what's the protection and document itself, and anything that we're going to lose to that topic will then not potentially prompt being in the confidentiality part.

and then the personnel, the personnel exemption.

This used to be a road by category that was always used to the core of the NEHR, I don't know.

But as we talked about on that test slide, it's really been significantly narrowed by the origins of the road recently.

So now, if there are

Some of it is actually going to come out into the public, unless it will be

Yes, we can start with, like, if it's really straightforward, which is the way it was formed in your job of a public role, then that eventually you have to come home.

And there's a lot of things that are kind of embarrassing because there was a very negative value of shame and there's a lot of news about it.

And the court said, well, this is exactly the kind of thing that the public needs to know.

It's so transgender, you know, dysfunction going on in the city.

I don't know how many of you are talking about me.

For example, Time Facts, when they're being, that's one of them where they'll be able to back in, mostly that information can be protective.

And then there will be lots of enforcement, as I said earlier, a simple instance.

Missing the deadline or some other murder with murder, death in the violation of any person in the file suit.

together.

I'm going to tell you a story.

We're going to tell you a story.

and again, there are a kind of teams that can be assessed against individuals or the city itself.

And again, with this, we thought you were trying to let people out of the public and trying to get on with it.

So we thought as far as that is going, when we went through that quickly, you might have more questions later, but I don't know.

So we have five additional things that are going to be interesting.

We only have four options.

We're not going to have the exact word in your time.

If you do not have to create a record, then it does not exist, right?

So some of you have been requested for certain data or something, like, we've had that somewhere, a long procedure, a long year, and we don't have to create a record that doesn't exist.

If you don't have a request, just be sure to go to TouchBase.org.

Officer Lenin felt right by not to recall the victims.

Um, the exemptions are now inside and you are on the sole level.

So, this is the presentation that we're going to give in five months of organization in place.

So, I learned a lot about various leadership.

at Community CTALE and Pollen S.M.I.

with this meeting materials most year in public institutions.

They carry out a close meeting and met with a specific meeting.

No exceptions for that rule.

This is something I really think that is a great privilege.

Verse number five, the ability of bodies in the state's city council to move into planning commissions.

and you can read your site, you can read your energy, you can read it on your phone, try it on your phone.

I'm going to read the functions of the Albemarle, so I'm going to read what's in the editions, all of the lives, and any other organization pages that are all related or are specifically specific about other funds.

So, for example, the TJEDC is obviously under some of the planning history commissioners of Albemarle, because they receive a vast majority of their funds.

I'm going to start with a comment.

It's not me.

Gatling and Plain.

So, I remember that Albemarle was in the department of the Department of Discussion of the Transaction of Power and Business.

And the Gatling was a couple of years in range with the idea of translating power into business.

There is some of the business, some of the business.

and others that are moving forward to the same council.

We're in the central campaign for discussions of politics or not on this discussion of issues that council does not have any control over or not, whether there's an easy solution that is significant issue there in the campaign, but it's not that the council can can act on a significant one.

We already covered this slide.

This is a little few minutes in 2020, the protests were carried out in Charlottesville, in the county of Albemarle, Charlottesville, is death.

There are multiple victims that happened and I still will assess the riot and how it was handled.

The riot of the counties that were working on it was attended.

The other three members were not involved in the protests.

It's happening to assess the riot and the police response.

Chairman of the Court of Supervisors Survey, and some of the other members present, which will stay in the discussions afterwards, saying that the citizens shall see the agency by the end of the month, saying that they will evaluate the power of the community provisions of the union.

And they argued that we should have that power on matters.

Not crazy about success, but the answer was yes.

That was a public meeting, gloss versus wheeler.

A case from just last year, five or eight more members of the tent with the violent movement.

The group of three was violent.

Topics were certainly matters of the business in the right-line moment.

It was an ever-incorporation of women and students who would be distributed.

Now, two times out of a gloss.

First of all, this decides a lot of ourselves, both local government and real community, to the point where we have abandoned the government to try and get the legislative solutions that we have to try to basically legislate what we fix.

the opening in the space.

And we're hopeful that that will happen.

Secondly, although the springboard continues to roll against the public bodies of everyone, in particular the public bodies of everyone on the TV, that's the reaching of the last three days in the states that she adjusts her

So that usually suggests that we're getting to somewhere in the shape of what we're willing to take these things out of.

and you can remember for us, I think it was a sort of a decision and it says that it illustrates how very important it is for us to reach here.

And my name will be part of that most of this topic that will appear on the agenda topic raised by somebody else no words.

So

You want to say, I don't know if I've been following you all right, but because on Indian Street, it's for a lot of people.

It doesn't work if I'm so ignorant.

I don't want to see the process.

It's all over the county.

You can just set it to another way.

City Council in the city has a body policy and policy to determine the body of a county, all county businesses, derivatives, and second of that.

in the business, the council business.

So the religion of the lost is, it was far-reaching.

One of the images faced in the general sandwich is something that we will continue to observe.

I just love this sign because I'm so proud of my colleague.

It's rare to see it.

It's one of the promised justices of the Supreme Justice Russell, who is my old boss.

I would make a video of him when I actually got him in my collection.

This is actually a handbook of local government annual dimes.

So I thought we were able to make some money.

So I thought it was just, yeah.

I didn't know that.

Thank you.

J. Y. T. Sessio.

Thank you.

and I have the privilege to sign some of your work.

I want to have a little bit of space.

That's matter of the service.

Notice the gen materials and minutes.

That is at least two dozen states about that.

I see some of the emergencies, but I see that this is practical.

None of the services.

The gen materials cannot be secreted from the public.

They must be available.

and then I'll see you all at the same time.

When y'all go, I'll guess.

Minutes must be taken in the failure to take minutes.

In any meeting, there's a level elevation from where the city can be seen, there's council can be seen, and science can be applied.

Well, I think we have a fantastic clerk of the council, the chief of staff, the insurers have had no evidence.

Those meetings by personal favor and

Your general purpose is such as the protection of privacy or some of the various exceptions, which we'll talk about in a moment.

Now, we're going to take this level up now.

The problem is very careful about this, and I don't fear the violation at all, because you always say the most.

You always ask, say the motion that contains the necessary components, the subject kind of

and I have both the exception.

We're going to do a nice emotion which contains the context of that last meeting in the citation and then specifically, specifically it is to address the subject matter and that is directly from the Supreme Court case where at least you adjust this right before a next court

Fowler, which Cossie, who's a showman, named us, had a rivalry with him, because they were the safeguards of their needs.

So we try to be very careful about that.

This is an example of that self-adapt when you don't fire or fill it up, when you don't fire it up.

I am the father of three foreign ministers in the entire U.S.

government.

But it was a pretty moving situation.

And it included an imposition of civil penalty.

Are you Canadian?

No.

And you never heard of Ada much, you might have heard of this.

That place happened right over there, you know, so I was making a craze of risks, and the council sure died.

He might be a little bit innocent.

Someone did it simultaneously.

Oh, God, I have my gaze, but then one said, it didn't exist.

So it's created, and it can be short, and it can create a lot of boundaries.

Ted Estates, a GM that's still in the interest of time.

I'll read him in a specific way.

He's down here.

So Jay's not here.

He's those people.

There will be a...

and Reggie Woodhouse were very careful.

This council is very careful.

They say, well, hang on a minute.

That's not such a close meeting.

Those are the other times.

So you're very careful about that.

You know, it needs to be Charlottes taking informal action by a closed session.

However, it is what you know, and I thought it would be any council's judgment to conduct a strong vote.

and close mate.

So if there is an issue, then we are talking to you now from which indecision must be made.

Mr. Harris will provide an officer.

You can take a straw letter to assess where your colleagues are on a particular question.

The certification council was level-faded with.

It is not a topic that we can never skip.

On the other hand, this council is incredibly charitable and not at, and it includes the necessary levels of muscles to ensure that each member of the council is certified.

That we're really close meeting.

We talked about what we're saying at this meeting.

It was a little bit of an early example that we said that most you can meet, you know, you can look somewhere.

And we were talking about anything else.

And that's, if that statement is ever called into question, you can't be held to account if you do get it.

As I said, this council is extraordinarily conscientious about the footage.

The personnel matters.

Who is the council's person?

Alex, the people you look at.

It's not, for example, there's a lot of city ministries.

It's probably those folks who directly have died in the line by the city manager, but your consent, advice and consent is required.

So you can talk about your chief of staff and your clerk, the director of finance.

But it's a very small career, so you can't find out with some sort of benefit, even amongst the world.

The city manager has done something, so there's no exception to talk about it.

In the system, there are a lot of public works out of that position.

So when it's something I'm about to talk about today, but I hear it's, it's a great opportunity.

Yes, sir.

You can talk about the possibility of candidates for the police chief job since we have to hear what we said.

You can, you can talk, you can, you can supervise the city manager.

and you can have conversations with the city manager about issues that will fit your oversight of the city manager.

There is some play in the wheel, some play in the wheel on the topic, so you can understand.

and I mean, it's up to him to come up with a pretty much similar approach to intro to that information.

But it sounds like we need to come in.

We need to discuss the decision to fire the least chief, but we might be able to receive a session to discuss the higher, the better, accurate distinction.

Yes, there's a section here, here, God knows, there was no personnel on that one.

it was there, there was potential for personnel and so to believe that we have service in real time, but what I'd like to do is provide a little research on that and show that with the council.

I don't want to say to you that it's a decision at the time.

It's in that picture, it's like a saute again and you're on it.

Okay, thank you.

We're going to introduce you to the exception.

We just had a last meeting.

So, like, versus city of Charlottesville, you may always talk about that with animal or other side of the exception.

And that is where it would adversely affect the issue, you know, of the issue, not certain of the power of the business, certainly.

Yeah, yes.

I would argue that the exemptions to the award are not on the contract.

It's just so you know it's not on the contract.

I would say students, once it's happening, you should actually be talking about it in close meeting.

So once the award is made, you're stuck.

We put that call into contract.

You could, for example, if a lawsuit was filed into the contract, there would be some sort of a dispute.

How are they going to make me believe that it's well advised that you're a legal position, but you just can't get a roll call to contract and then say, gee, I don't want to talk to you about it.

Contract is perfect, honestly.

Now this is a contract I just started.

Martin, of course, would not be prevented.

It's just a real property.

Imagine that situation recently with Zero East High Street.

Again, we thought, say, we would look forward to the transaction of several years.

The Los Calzones will run 30 or 30 steps through the negative decision that I would just have on three feet.

That includes me, the ability to have a close meeting and have a wedding.

So this is the very decision, and I will tell you maybe you can do it, but the result is harsh.

and Gell.

So, again, the federal government attorneys, including me, Gell, said that the ability to defend violence, in this case, might be on statutory instruction versus limited remedies.

But, yeah, it's a little bit of a fail sometimes, but other than being able to find the services that are available, we should have the ability to have an issue literally from the beginning.

that's why you would call it where we would be their reservist.

So you'd have to be sure that we have a line of forehand in Charlottesville, New Zoning, where that's some development category because it's a very large result of our ability to stabilize and see what happens with

and I'll talk a little bit about it and I'm not going to send any time in the slide because we've outlined some of the things that are coming up.

I'm not going to let you know that we're taking a lot of interest from Albemarle's sample and what you're going to do with those at your lecture.

So we've had maybe some other notices yet and we're looking for three applies.

in a session shooting rare in focus and the potential of both municipal and personal activity.

Because I believe it will suit the reality of how we assess the state lawsuits.

And obviously, as the policy may earn you a lot of great responsibility from that to anything you will be able to afford with William.

So with that, Mr. Mayor, thank you.

I apologize for going slightly over time.

I'm sorry to take that one out on this, but we said earlier that, you know, if we receive any kind of assistance, we have to do it immediately.

Let's say we are out of the office, there's the out of office bounce back email we have put out and one of them was in five days.

What happens if it's say, like, people are bound to die?

How do we deal with that if we're not going to be around for another five-day absence?

Yeah, hopefully not in the process.

So unfortunately, I'm so sure now the office is not going to save you.

That issue actually happened when I was deputy city attorney in the office, not with the councilor, but with another person.

We were just in CI surgery in the city.

What is that case?

The deputy attorney's speech was just a public attitude.

What we do with city staff, and so what we trigger was counselors.

It's a try to advise them to always have someone to have.

to that person for somebody to periodically check the emails for four and a half hours a week.

So if you were going to be out of the train, for example, for the same period of time, I'm going to be out of the country for a couple of weeks in the sun.

I'm going to give you both an email or one of the letters in my set that says to virtually email so that I can just let you see your ability on that spot.

Yeah, but there are some grades that the perhaps we'll talk about some lines about.

So handle that.

Thank you.

All right, next on our agenda is communications.

And communications director is going to be there.

and Jason's director is going to be actually bringing that up.

Jason, feel free to take your time.

So I just want to applaud while we're here that I'm here for you, my office is here for you.

So, you know, if you can push your bet, if you can take away some of the calls, that'd be super helpful.

One, the city and council together, which trust with the majority with us, which are the rest of us, that we are all unified and together we're going to work together.

Two, I'm here to provide you with information.

You guys might not have all information from the subject.

So I'm happy all of you can have more of a good job.

We would like to speak for M.I.S.

So he reached out to me asking what initiatives and justice we've been doing in the city.

Since he reached out to me, I was able to provide those to him, and he was able to do a great job on that.

So that's about it.

I just wanted to say, if you could, and it helps us to not get caught off guard.

So if one of you guys do a news story and it didn't come up in my news alerts that morning, because I get news alerts on anything that mentions Charlottesville, and then a reporter calls me and wants a quote from Sam, and we don't know what you guys said.

We need to look unified and together because we all work together for the community.

That's all I have.

So if someone from the Daily Progress calls me up and says, kind of talked about the story.

Just give me a heads up.

Would you appreciate afterwards?

OK, because I mean, I work for you too.

I work for the citizens and I work for you.

Yeah.