Central Virginia
Albemarle County
Economic Development Authority Meeting 4/19/2022
Auto-scroll
Economic Development Authority Meeting
4/19/2022
Attachments
1 - EDA Agenda 4-19-22.pdf
2 - Draft_EDA_Minutes_March_15_2022.pdf
4 - Draft_Building Reuse Grant Policy_April_12_2022.pdf
5 - Closed Mtg Motion EDA LCEC 20220419.pdf
6 - Notice of Regular Mtg to Be Held Virtually 20220419.pdf
SPEAKER_11
00:00:02
All right.
00:00:05
Richie, you want to call the roll?
SPEAKER_06
00:00:07
I'll do that.
00:00:08
I guess on the recording, can we just confirm that this thing called the virtual meeting preamble that Director Long, that you read that in its entirety?
SPEAKER_11
00:00:17
I confirm that I read the virtual meeting preamble in its entirety.
SPEAKER_06
00:00:21
All righty.
00:00:22
So we'll go to the roll.
00:00:23
Let's see, Director Long?
SPEAKER_11
00:00:25
Present in the city of Charlottesville.
SPEAKER_06
00:00:29
Director Ray?
00:00:31
Present in Albemarle County.
00:00:35
Director Shreve.
00:00:37
Present in Albemarle County.
00:00:40
Director Munson.
SPEAKER_09
00:00:42
Present in beautiful downtown, Scottsville.
SPEAKER_06
00:00:47
Director Imhoff.
SPEAKER_04
00:00:48
Present in Albemarle County.
SPEAKER_06
00:00:51
Director McNaughton.
00:00:53
Present, Troy, Virginia.
00:00:57
And Director Mottola.
00:00:59
Present.
00:01:03
All right, Director Long, we have everybody's present, so we have a quorum and can proceed.
SPEAKER_11
00:01:09
All right.
00:01:10
Welcome, everybody.
00:01:12
So we will, next will be matters from the public.
00:01:16
Do we have anybody signed up to speak?
00:01:19
No, sir, we do not.
00:01:21
Okay.
00:01:23
Anybody present wish to speak?
00:01:28
Anybody?
00:01:29
Raise their hand.
00:01:31
All right, then we will proceed.
00:01:32
So on to approval of the minutes.
00:01:36
I only had one thing I noticed in the minutes.
00:01:41
In the discussion regarding the, on page three, at the very end of the discussion about the Broadway corridor, there's a paragraph
00:01:55
It says Mr. Munson shared that Scottsville is vexing over a similar situation.
00:02:01
And I was not sure what vexing I mean, they might be vexed, I guess.
00:02:06
I don't know if that's what he said or not.
SPEAKER_07
00:02:07
But that was that was more of a creative license.
00:02:11
I like it.
SPEAKER_09
00:02:12
Actually, it's very descriptive of what I was doing.
SPEAKER_07
00:02:15
I can I could strike the comment if required.
SPEAKER_00
00:02:20
They talk differently in Scottsville.
SPEAKER_11
00:02:23
I'm not sure what was intended to be said there, but considering maybe?
SPEAKER_07
00:02:29
Considering.
00:02:30
I will change it to considering.
00:02:33
I'll note that it changed.
SPEAKER_11
00:02:34
All right.
00:02:35
Were there any other comments to the minutes?
SPEAKER_00
00:02:39
Mr. DeLoria, I'll move approval.
SPEAKER_11
00:02:41
All right.
00:02:42
Is there a second?
00:02:43
I'll second.
00:02:44
All right.
00:02:44
All in favor?
00:02:47
Aye.
00:02:47
Aye.
00:02:47
Aye.
00:02:48
Aye.
00:02:48
Aye.
00:02:49
The minutes are approved.
00:02:51
Financial report, the financial report is the same.
00:02:54
There hasn't been a change.
00:02:57
Dave, is there anything else you want to add or anybody have any questions?
SPEAKER_10
00:03:01
No, unless you'd like me to just reiterate the cash position so that we're all reminded and and what we have outstanding.
00:03:10
Yeah.
00:03:11
Net revenues for the year seventy thousand seven hundred forty three thirty four cents cash position, current balance of eight
00:03:21
131,768.01.
00:03:24
And we have 109,000 potentially to be spent on incentives that we've already underwritten.
00:03:37
Although in one case, with Castle Gaming, 17,000 out of the 21,200, my understanding is that
00:03:48
Agreement has expired and so we're still negotiating whether that's going to be extended or not.
SPEAKER_07
00:03:53
That is correct.
SPEAKER_11
00:03:56
All right.
00:03:58
Any questions or comments?
00:04:01
Thank you, Dave.
00:04:03
So on to new business.
00:04:07
Director's report, I understand J.T., you're going to be handling that today.
SPEAKER_05
00:04:12
Well, unless Roger, I see you've joined us.
SPEAKER_03
00:04:19
No, sir, I'm afraid I'm going to be coughing all over the place.
00:04:22
Please proceed.
SPEAKER_05
00:04:25
OK. Yeah, thanks, Chair Long.
00:04:29
The director's report today is just a brief one, a simple announcement to invite all the directors and your closest friends to an upcoming
00:04:41
event at North Fork for the Defense Intelligence Committee.
00:04:46
This is a panel that will be moderated by the director, Roger Johnson, and include a number of folks who will share with the community the impact of the defense sector on our community and lunch will be provided.
00:05:09
And you can register, I think the easiest way to register for lunch is through the Chamber of Commerce calendar page.
00:05:18
So if you go to the regional Chamber of Commerce page, go to their calendar, click on this event, April 28th, you'll be able to sign up for what type of lunch you would like to have.
00:05:33
Just a short and sweet director's report today.
SPEAKER_07
00:05:36
I'm also happy to help facilitate any registrations if any directors need assistance.
SPEAKER_11
00:05:43
So sort of following on that, related to the fact that this luncheon is going to be out at the UVA Business Park, I just wanted to
00:05:58
make a quick report or mention of the fact that we had a meeting with the UVA Foundation.
00:06:05
It was Roger, J.T., Doug, and myself.
00:06:13
We had a really good discussion.
00:06:14
We can share more details later, so I know Roger has some thoughts, but I just wanted to mention that we had a discussion.
00:06:21
I thought it was good.
00:06:23
We sort of shared thoughts about goals and intents for both groups and I think helped understand sort of what each group has in mind and where we can work together and I think set the stage for having some good discussions with them down the road.
00:06:40
I don't know if anybody else wants to add anything to that, but that's just sort of to let everybody know that happened last week.
00:06:48
All right, hearing none, we'll move on to the draft building reuse grant.
00:06:55
J.T.
SPEAKER_05
00:06:57
All right.
00:07:01
So my screen seems to have frozen here.
00:07:05
All right, back on track.
00:07:09
So distributed with the materials for today's meeting was a draft policy for a building reuse grant.
00:07:18
and I thought I would begin this item by just providing a little bit of breadcrumbs from when this topic was last discussed, which was at the joint board EDA meeting back late last year.
00:07:34
We shared that a consistent problem that the office was observing in the community were companies that were delaying or reducing
00:07:46
their investment or contemplating leaving the county because they were having difficulty finding space for their expanding business.
00:07:55
And so we proposed an idea of a building reuse grant that could be used for businesses that were consistent with Project Enable within a target industry, a primary business, which as a reminder is one that generates
00:08:12
more than 50% of its revenue from outside of the area.
00:08:16
And we just talked about some very general guidelines.
00:08:21
What types of spaces might be appropriate for this type of grant and what type of costs and at what rate would we want to participate or subsidize or provide a grant to help businesses use that space.
00:08:41
So we looked at an example that was a company, this is just a fictional example, but it's rooted in conversations that our office has had with businesses looking across the region that was looking for 10,000 square feet, found a place in Albemarle County at $17 a square foot, but would require $100,000 of investment before the business could move in and be operational.
00:09:12
and then adjacent counties, counties B and C where the rent was much lower and the space was ready to be occupied and put to use by the company.
00:09:26
So in this example, we were seeking feedback on whether or not up to $50,000 reimbursement for capital costs associated with the building would be appropriate
00:09:42
and from that general discussion, we've built out a policy that we're seeking your feedback on and we have some questions.
00:09:52
I'd like to go directly to the primary document to go through it so the directors can see the language and provide any feedback on what's included in it and then we'll come back to these questions.
00:10:07
What we're gonna do with the director's feedback, this will inform
00:10:11
a consent agenda item that goes before the Board of Supervisors in late May and then we'll come back to the EDA for formal adoption or further work after that.
00:10:26
So I'm going to exit the PowerPoint and go to the primary, the document that was distributed with today's meeting materials
00:10:39
And I won't read all three pages, but there are just a few items I wanted to highlight before getting to the director's feedback.
00:10:49
So much like our other grant policies, this policy begins with an overview of our mission and of the office and that our work is governed by our strategic plan, Project Enable,
00:11:07
It talks about some of the other county policies that this policy would support and that includes things like the climate action plan.
00:11:18
One of the things that we didn't talk about when we discussed it in October was the county's new core value of community, which expects diversity, equity, and inclusion to be integrated and how we live our mission.
00:11:34
So one of the factors that
00:11:36
could be considered for a building reuse grant would be is the business that's being served under-resourced?
00:11:45
And we have historically defined that as businesses that are owned and operated or owned by women, minority, or veterans, which data has shown consistently these businesses face significant barriers to access and capital.
00:12:06
So the policy goes further from there to say that the grants would range between $25,000 and $250,000.
00:12:15
This would be subject to budget resources because currently economic development doesn't have a dedicated revenue source.
00:12:28
So we're dependent on things like positive year-end variance or federal monies or other
00:12:36
revenue sources.
00:12:37
And so to prioritize how these grants would work, we would first look to existing county businesses that are growing and expanding and at risk for leaving.
00:12:50
There would be two types of entities that would be eligible, property owners and businesses.
00:13:00
And so a property owner that had a commercially or industrially zoned space within the development area that was renovating the space for a business subject to these criteria below would be eligible for the grant.
00:13:20
And those types of businesses would be in good financial standing with the county, consistent with Project Enable,
00:13:27
and signing a lease to be in that space for at least two years.
00:13:33
The costs would be shown in the bullets, these four bullets right here.
00:13:41
Water, sewer or power, extensions or expansions, site work that's necessary to establish those capital investments.
00:13:56
and there would also be eligibility for internet connectivity, recognizing that that's such a critical part of businesses in today's economy.
00:14:07
Things that would be ineligible would be fixtures, furniture and equipment, landscaping, proffered improvements that may have been proffered during a rezoning process and just
00:14:24
Generally, anything that could be easily removed from the property.
00:14:29
There are very few zoned or designated properties that are currently of significant historic resources.
00:14:41
But if there was a business seeking to use a building like that, for example, we had the Potter's Craft move into Neve Hall down Route 29.
00:14:54
There's an expectation that the character defining features would be maintained through the use of this grant.
00:15:03
Other factors that the EDA could consider when a grant came forward would be a statement by the company about the critical role of a grant like this in working with other businesses who are looking at Albemarle as well as
00:15:22
like the example showed counties B and C. We've heard how much something like this could make a difference in deciding between moving to somewhere else in the region or being able to grow here in Albemarle County.
00:15:40
The EDA could consider other factors like did the business receive other state grants?
00:15:49
You could also consider whether or not
00:15:51
The grant could catalyze other business activity adjacent to where the business is making these renovations.
00:16:02
To determine a specific amount of grant, this criteria here mirrors a lot of the existing adopted policy that we have for our Commonwealth Opportunity Fund or our Virginia Job Investment Program.
00:16:20
Would the improvement contribute to the community character or public good?
00:16:25
Does it grow the tax base?
00:16:28
To what degree are the jobs of significant wages and benefits offered to those jobs?
00:16:40
Basically, are they career ladder jobs?
00:16:44
Does it achieve a specific goal outlined by
00:16:48
A specific county policy and any other factor by the EDA determined by the EDA.
00:16:56
So we would envision that a business or a property owner would make an application according to our meeting deadlines.
00:17:05
And they would answer a few of these questions in addition to providing evidence of the other criteria listed above.
00:17:14
You know, what would the grant be used for?
00:17:18
and an intention to sign a lease of at least two years.
00:17:23
And the budget would be determined annually, again, because we don't have a dedicated funding source.
00:17:33
And even though the grant would be performance-based, we're still recommending a performance agreement.
00:17:41
This would protect the county against a situation like a business that gets started,
00:17:48
but then for some reason decides to move away, a performance agreement would reserve the right for the county to try to claw back any funds that may be possible.
00:18:06
So just wanted to hit the highlights there of that particular of the proposed grant and then come back to the PowerPoint where we have
00:18:17
specific questions, and then also want to hear any feedback that EDA directors may have.
00:18:25
So maybe I'll just start with, are there any general questions?
SPEAKER_02
00:18:30
I've got one for you.
00:18:33
Why two years?
00:18:34
I mean, if it's, you know, 250 grand, it would seem like a little bit longer term commitment, especially if they want to stay in the county.
00:18:45
I mean, you don't want to make it unbearable, but two years doesn't seem that long to me.
SPEAKER_05
00:18:49
That's a great point, Director McDonough, and exactly the kind of feedback we want.
00:18:56
Some of the feedback in providing the draft policy to other economic development offices, as well as other internal offices, was that the criteria was too limiting, and they didn't feel like anybody would be able to meet it.
00:19:11
So this was an attempt to establish a minimum of two years, but certainly that could be a factor in determining the amount of grant.
00:19:26
Or you may have a suggestion about what an alternative minimum should be.
00:19:34
Yes, George.
00:19:35
Yes, Director Ray.
SPEAKER_00
00:19:38
In my experience, tenants always want a one year lease.
00:19:42
As a landlord, I typically want a five-year lease.
00:19:47
Ordinarily, we'll compromise on a three-year lease.
00:19:51
And I think you guys ought to give some thought to making that a three-year minimum.
00:19:56
OK. Kind of a related question.
00:19:58
And thank you, Steve, for that comment.
00:19:59
I felt the same way.
00:20:02
The other thing is, whatever the duration of the lease term is, what happens after that term
SPEAKER_05
00:20:10
Our goal would be to only fund improvements that would be generally useful to a commercial or industrial user.
00:20:28
So those capital improvements should remain.
00:20:31
There shouldn't be anything that has been funded by the grant that would not improve the space or otherwise make it ready for
00:20:40
Another business to move in and become operational.
SPEAKER_00
00:20:46
Does that new business in that example is that new business also have to make these guidelines?
SPEAKER_05
00:20:55
We have not contemplated that, but we can note that feedback.
SPEAKER_11
00:21:02
I mean, I think if the if the original one has satisfied the requirements, I don't know
00:21:11
why the sort of follow on one would need to do that.
00:21:16
Now, maybe if they left beforehand, they'd have to find somebody to sort of step into their shoes.
SPEAKER_00
00:21:25
I think it's a little fuzzy because if in an extreme example, you fund $250,000 in capital improvements for a tenant who's going to stay there two years,
00:21:39
And after the two year period, that tenant goes away and maybe even goes out of this area.
00:21:45
Then you've improved the landlord's, the owner's property by a quarter of a million dollars.
00:21:52
And that seems to me to be a pretty darn good boon for commercial property owners.
SPEAKER_05
00:22:02
Yeah, it's a great observation, Director Ray, I think that
00:22:08
One of the things that one of the minimum criteria is that the space prior to the initial tenant coming in will have been vacant for six months or more.
00:22:21
And my overall experience in the county for spaces that have been vacant for that long.
00:22:32
Generally, a grant of that amount would
00:22:38
hopefully make it so that we don't continue to have vacant space for that period of time.
00:22:48
But certainly if you, I could note the feedback of considering a reduction in the overall maximum or we could alternatively
00:23:07
extend the minimum lease period?
SPEAKER_11
00:23:12
Well, I think it comes back to the question of sort of what, you know, of balancing those, where you, you know, if it's $25,000, maybe two years is fine.
00:23:26
But if it's $250,000, then you have to look at it long term.
00:23:29
And you maybe have to think about whether there are other conditions you need to
00:23:33
to attach to it to make sure that it's not a windfall for somebody.
00:23:39
Dave, you had your hand up?
SPEAKER_10
00:23:42
Yeah, related to all of what you've just discussed, I wanted to start by asking George if he had any experience with a situation in which a tenant
00:23:59
made substantial capital improvements and did you make any concessions in your leases with that kind of a tenant?
SPEAKER_00
00:24:09
Dave, we handle that on a case by case basis.
00:24:13
In order to secure a quality tenant, we will frequently make a contribution to things like their fit out.
00:24:25
Normally for sort of a run of the mill business, we don't do that.
SPEAKER_10
00:24:29
I guess I'm looking at it from a slightly different angle.
00:24:34
So if a tenant came with the intent of making capital improvements, whether they got it from us or they had it in their own pocket and they said, you know, look, we'll rent this space from you for X dollars per square foot.
00:24:51
And we plan on making these kind of improvements, which will accrue to your benefit in the long run.
00:24:59
Do you make a concession on the lease rate or anything of that sort, or have you had any experience with that at all?
SPEAKER_00
00:25:09
I think we probably would, I mean, if it was a situation where those improvements were something that ordinarily had to be done regardless of the business, then we certainly would give them a break on the rent.
00:25:23
If it was something that was specific to that business, then we would not.
SPEAKER_10
00:25:27
I'm thinking of that because maybe the leverage we bring here and it connects back to the term, whether it's two years or maybe a sliding scale as Don seemed to suggest.
00:25:41
If it's a smaller amount, it's a shorter term, a larger amount would imply a longer term.
00:25:48
But we might also couple that with some kind of a lock-in guarantee on the lease rate.
00:25:57
because it strikes me that going back to the hypothetical example that J.T.
00:26:01
introduced that one of the problems we may be facing here is that we have higher lease rates within our county boundaries than they might find elsewhere.
00:26:12
And this is part of an incentive to keep them here with higher rates.
00:26:17
So the last thing we really wanna do is introduce a windfall for a property owner that is likely to help them increase their rates in the near future.
00:26:28
So if you combine perhaps a longer term with that kind of a guarantee, maybe that secures the kind of guarantee we're looking for and public value on both ends.
00:26:43
That is the tenant's going to stay and also you're likely to improve a capital asset without encouraging higher lease rates.
SPEAKER_00
00:26:55
I think those are two great points and the suggestion that Chairman Long made of the sliding scale, which you've kind of endorsed, I think that makes a great deal of sense.
00:27:09
Yeah.
00:27:09
So if it's $100,000, it might be a three year lease.
00:27:11
If it's $200,000, it might be a five year lease or whatever.
SPEAKER_02
00:27:16
Yeah, I definitely concur.
00:27:17
I mean, what is that $50,000 a year, George?
00:27:19
So if you had a five year lease, that's $250,000 and then it slides on down from there.
SPEAKER_10
00:27:26
And it won't make up the difference in the hypothetical example, for example, between, you know, even a medium term difference in lease rates.
00:27:38
It'll just help.
00:27:40
So the tenant has got to find our community attractive for other reasons as well.
00:27:47
And I think we stand in such a position where we don't have to worry about that too much.
00:27:52
We are an attractive community.
00:27:53
People want to be here for the
00:27:55
Talented workforce, and so on and so forth.
00:27:57
So I don't think we have to bend over backwards to make up the complete difference here in what they're likely to see between us and some other remote location.
00:28:10
But a little bit might help.
SPEAKER_11
00:28:21
Yeah, I think the one thing I'm thinking about, and I welcome any other comments is, we do have, we have had issues with properties that are sitting and have been sitting vacant for a long time.
00:28:36
And while I don't want to encourage sort of windfalls for landlords who won't do what they need to or have the ability to do, at the same time, encouraging
00:28:49
Properties to get fixed up and get people in them and and having functional businesses in those properties.
00:28:56
There is some benefit to the county for it, for having that, even if it's is the slight windfall for somebody.
00:29:03
And I think that just needs to be part of the evaluation in the process.
SPEAKER_10
00:29:06
Well, it may also, Don, give us more ability and latitude with which to impose a kind of a
00:29:15
lease freeze requirement of some sort whether we whether we inflate it you know to be fair or whatever we consider to be fair that we have some kind of requirement there because again you're looking at a situation where it's likely to be something rather than nothing right and i and i think that's that's a pretty good deal um um yeah yeah i think and and i know Kat's uh got her hand up i guess the uh the other piece that i
SPEAKER_11
00:29:45
I mean, I think that that Roger often cites is the sort of but for requirement of what we want to be doing is doing things that allow things to happen that might not happen if we weren't present, which I think is what you're saying.
00:30:02
You know, Dave, is we need to step in a situation where if we can't provide some help,
00:30:10
It might not happen, but we also need to protect and say if we are providing this help and good things happen, then there shouldn't be a windfall for somebody.
SPEAKER_10
00:30:22
And the windfall is one thing.
00:30:24
We shouldn't be all that jealous so that we want to stop all windfall gains.
00:30:35
Sometimes those are good for the community, too.
00:30:37
Right.
00:30:38
but more than a windfall problem is the problem of exacerbating another problem and that is high lease rates for commercial enterprises who are looking in vain for an affordable place.
SPEAKER_11
00:30:52
Yeah, that's a good point.
SPEAKER_04
00:30:55
Kat?
00:30:55
I wanted to say the thing that appealed to me about this is the use of existing buildings and I'm increasingly looking at everything with a climate change lens and one of the best things you can do is try to
00:31:08
Reuse, refurbish, reinvest.
00:31:12
I wondered if there are any thoughts of maybe creating some priority areas and I bring this up for Director Munson to comment on, but one of the things I've heard about Scottsville is that there is somewhat of a situation where there's a couple of people who own many of the buildings and don't live in the area and frankly haven't been that amenable to renting them out.
00:31:36
or doing much with them.
00:31:37
They're kind of sitting on them as long term, you know, real estate investments.
00:31:42
You know, I'm wondering if this is the kind of project or grant program if we tried to target some of the areas where we know we've got sort of long standing underused or nonoccupied structures.
SPEAKER_09
00:31:57
Yeah, that's a really great point.
00:32:00
We do have quite a few absentee landlords here that are
00:32:06
holding onto their buildings and asking rents that most businesses find exorbitant and can really ruin a business plan.
00:32:18
So I think if we can, anything that we can do to encourage those owners to maintain those buildings or get them into a state where they can be affordable,
00:32:33
and used.
00:32:34
I think that would be really helpful to us.
SPEAKER_10
00:32:38
Stuart, do many of those property owners have property in far flung places out of state or are they just other towns nearby?
SPEAKER_09
00:32:46
A lot of them live in other countries.
SPEAKER_10
00:32:50
Okay.
00:32:51
All right.
SPEAKER_09
00:32:51
So they're just, you know, and this is, it's something that, you know, they've got a fair amount of money and a fair amount of other properties.
00:32:59
And this is just really low on their radar screen.
SPEAKER_10
00:33:03
So I asked that because one of the really weird phenomena that has emerged in the last few decades is where owners of vacant commercial properties
00:33:16
whom you think would want some rent rather than zero are happy not to take any rent because in some ways it plays back into their ability to borrow money on better terms.
00:33:30
If they can speak to common lease rates that are higher than common lease rates that are lower.
00:33:38
And so it's a bit of a game.
00:33:39
It's one that I don't think you can play for very long before,
00:33:45
People start to, you know, the CPAs ask questions, but nonetheless, I wonder if that's happening where you are.
SPEAKER_09
00:33:53
It may well, I really don't know, to be honest with you.
00:33:55
That's kind of the first I've heard of that.
00:33:58
It's common in New York.
SPEAKER_10
00:33:59
Really?
00:34:00
There's a lot of vacant storefronts and people always scratch their heads and say, why won't they take some rent?
00:34:07
And they're not dropping their lease rates as a result, even though the vacancies are quite numerous.
SPEAKER_09
00:34:15
We do have a situation where Tiger Fuel has bought the shopping center up by the Food Lion and they are putting in a new deli and
00:34:38
Gas station right on the corner there at the top of the hill, six and 20.
00:34:44
And so there is, I think their expectation is the increased traffic is going to increase the value of the storefronts in the shopping center.
00:34:55
Because most of those at this point are, at least half of them are vacant.
00:35:00
And we've had several businesses that have made inquiries in there and just found the rents to be
00:35:06
So I don't think this is the case of what you were, this is different from what you were talking about, that it is a situation where
00:35:22
They might be more amenable to renting to a business if some of the internal, some of the costs of doing the build out are facilitated by a grant that might bridge the gap between what the business would be able to pay and at least take the money that they have.
00:35:47
Set aside for building that and put that toward rent, for example, make that a feasible business base.
Diantha McKeel
Board of Supervisors Liaison, Economic Development Authority
00:35:54
Stuart, this is Diantha.
00:35:55
What you describe is really interesting.
00:35:58
I had no idea that that was happening in the Scottsville area where people were, you know, we all know that we have folks from other countries that swoop in and buy up large farms and properties in Albemarle County.
00:36:11
Certainly I have a number of them in the Jack Jewett district.
00:36:13
and they live here a month or two or three months or whatever it might be, but they're really not part of the community and don't live here.
00:36:21
They're using us as a way to, you could say shield their money or buy property or whatever it might be and the cases may be different.
00:36:32
And I've certainly have been following in New York and Washington how we have folks from out of the country buying up
00:36:39
Commercial Properties, and then just letting them go fallow and sitting empty.
00:36:44
And that is a huge problem in neighborhoods right now.
00:36:47
But I didn't realize, I guess, naively that we have that happening in beautiful downtown Scottsville.
SPEAKER_09
00:36:57
We are an international center.
Diantha McKeel
Board of Supervisors Liaison, Economic Development Authority
00:37:00
Well, it's very concerning.
00:37:02
I mean, that really is concerning.
SPEAKER_10
00:37:04
Yes, Mr. Lukashenko, we'd love to.
00:37:09
J.T.?
SPEAKER_05
00:37:11
Yes, thank you, Mr.
00:37:12
Chair.
00:37:13
I was just going to comment based on the discussion happening.
00:37:18
I think it all speaks to question number two.
00:37:27
The purpose of the grant is to support for-profit businesses and if it would address all of the concerns that have been raised to just eliminate
00:37:39
an individual property owner from being an applicant that we could maintain the example here where if only businesses were eligible, they could approach us with proposed lease terms from a property owner and only businesses could be eligible.
00:38:03
But it felt like a lot of the discussion really spoke
00:38:08
to question number two.
00:38:09
So I thought I could transition us there and see if that.
SPEAKER_10
00:38:13
That's a good idea.
00:38:14
The other thing that might be worth considering, folks, is that bullet point number three, is this criteria too restrictive?
00:38:25
Not just with the whether it goes for property owners or tenants, but also whether primary business is too restrictive.
00:38:34
And I think sometimes that is an overrated category because
00:38:38
Part of the implicit assumption there, which I think is kind of blind to reality, is that the reason a primary business would be more attractive is because they're bringing in revenue not from pockets of Albemarle County or Charlottesville residents.
00:38:58
But again, the assumption there is that if it's not a primary business and Albemarle County residents and Charlottesville residents are spending prominently in such a business,
00:39:09
that they're somehow not getting value for their dollars spent, that they're throwing it away.
00:39:14
So, you know, because the only proposition in that equation that should really matter to us as a public entity or a quasi public entity is, would be the tax revenue implication, which should be close to neutral either way.
00:39:31
You know, so I don't know.
00:39:34
I think maybe that might be too restrictive as well.
00:39:38
And it might also stand in the way of fulfilling the one aim that you cited earlier, J.T., for approaching minority or women-owned businesses of great need.
00:39:52
Because I think when you move into this category, you might still find some women and minority-owned businesses, but they're usually not the ones in great need compared to some of the others.
SPEAKER_04
00:40:07
I want to agree with what you just said, Dave.
00:40:12
And also, while it won't fit this category, I often worry about businesses that we're not thinking about that need support.
00:40:20
I've been in a lot of conversations recently.
00:40:22
There is no kill facility that's even close by.
00:40:27
We have talked to some folks who've started reinvesting in agriculture and have a, you know,
00:40:34
Sheep operation just started and I was going, well, where's your abattoir?
00:40:38
How are you going to do that?
00:40:39
And that's come up a lot of times as we begin to think more about keeping local food local.
00:40:45
So while this wouldn't fit that, I'd love at some point to think about what are those pieces of the puzzle in the agricultural community that we could support?
00:40:53
Maybe not with these funds, but that is a facility that we do not have in Albemarle County.
SPEAKER_11
00:41:04
Yeah, J.T., in response to your question about whether a property owner could apply, I guess I would want to keep that as an option just because, you know, it might be, you know, in some ways the economics is the same regardless of
00:41:19
of how you sort of slice it up.
00:41:22
And it may be a situation where a business owner or a property owner comes and said, look, I've got a tenant and I can only do this in my situation.
00:41:34
They can't afford to do something else.
00:41:37
Can you fill this gap so that we can do what we need to do?
00:41:42
And then I could potentially give them a rent break or whatever over that
SPEAKER_10
00:41:48
And you think, Don, that the property owner in that hypothetical situation might be in a better position than the tenant to undertake the change?
SPEAKER_11
00:41:56
Yeah, I mean, yeah, I think they may where they may know what needs to happen.
00:42:02
I mean, I sort of feel like we almost have to
00:42:08
put this program out there and see who shows up looking for it.
00:42:12
I mean, we obviously need some framework for people to work on, but until we see what people are gonna come up with, as long as we've got some flexibility to decide whether or not we wanna do it, I think the- Yeah, and what you could do perhaps is leave that category in as an eligible partner, but then put stricter terms on that end.
SPEAKER_10
00:42:34
Right.
00:42:34
So that maybe we, again, we put some kind of a lease freeze
00:42:38
guarantee subject to an inflation factor or something to be fair, and maybe even take a page out of Henry George's playbook from 1876 in which George proposed in New York City a single tax for capital improvements and capital gains, I should say, where say a business like this received public funds, improved their asset,
00:43:07
and then sold it and pocketed the difference, George proposed that that be taxed at 100% and siphoned back to the community.
00:43:17
We could even put some version of a Georgist property tax on this just to protect ourselves.
00:43:27
So as to not make a property owner ineligible if, as Don says, that was the need.
00:43:34
that it's clear that that property owner was the only one in the position to make the change.
00:43:41
You wouldn't want to discount that opportunity.
SPEAKER_11
00:43:46
Yeah, I mean, my perception is from a process standpoint, you know, if we create this program, people would apply and then we'd evaluate it and say, you know, here's what they want to do and here's what we're willing to do under these conditions.
00:44:00
And we could sort of balance those things
00:44:02
and see what those needs are and evaluate the situation.
00:44:08
And obviously if we require the financials and we know what's going on, I think we're just gonna have to look at it on a case by case basis.
SPEAKER_00
00:44:19
I'm happy to sort of put the program out there and we can always say no and see what sort of issues come up.
00:44:30
I would like to see a sliding scaled on as you suggested on the lease term based on the amount of the grant.
00:44:40
And I'm also curious what people think about the assets of the owner, the property owner.
00:44:46
Does that make any difference?
00:44:48
That might address some of the comments that were made about, you know, folks from the Far East buying farms in Alamoire County.
SPEAKER_11
00:45:01
I mean, I think that's relevant to what you're doing or to the decision you make if they're making a decision to not do that when they've got the capacity to do it, that would factor into the decision making, it seems to me.
00:45:22
Now, maybe you could argue that they would say, well,
00:45:27
But this business, we're not willing to make that investment because our return's not going to get us where we need to.
00:45:34
And that regardless of how much money, we're not going to invest more.
00:45:38
So I think that would just be the analysis that we need to do when you're looking at the transaction.
SPEAKER_00
00:45:45
That sounds like the argument of the State Farm Building.
00:45:51
Well, I think the idea is a great idea.
00:45:56
to recycle buildings and for us to encourage people to do that.
00:46:00
And I don't wanna handicap the process by having too many rules and regulations.
00:46:07
Right.
SPEAKER_05
00:46:14
Chair Long, I think just to sum up, I think for the application process itself,
00:46:22
We should be directing applicants to illustrate and highlight the gap that the county's participation would be filling.
00:46:30
Is that accurate?
00:46:33
Gotcha.
00:46:36
I think we've got great feedback on one, two, and possibly three.
00:46:40
I'll just quickly note for members of the public that may be on the call and directors that may have not been with us when Project Enable was established,
00:46:51
The reason that primary businesses were favored over consumptive businesses, those being local businesses that help circulate the dollar around, was that the goal was for our office in the targeted role that we would play in the ecosystem of economic development partners
00:47:18
was to focus on the primary businesses that were importing new money into our community and growing the pie that circulated around by the consumptive businesses.
00:47:29
That was the thinking of it.
00:47:32
Certainly not to not give credit to all of the consumptive businesses, the more than 95% of businesses in our community that are considered consumptive
00:47:48
in terms of just serving our local metropolitan statistical area.
00:47:53
But can I just make sure that I've got the EDA's feedback on question number three, whether or not it's too restrictive.
00:48:03
I think there's been a point made that that will undermine our goal of under-resourced and under-served entrepreneurs.
00:48:13
But was there any other feedback for number three?
SPEAKER_10
00:48:17
Well, I could add to your concern, J.T., which is a really smart one.
00:48:25
The multiplier that we get here is significant, whether it's high or low, and how it redounds to the benefit of all citizens.
00:48:35
But that's partly dependent on the way in which the business operates, too, and whether looking at the career ladder jobs
00:48:46
Network is an important factor but not the only one because if it's lopsided and you've got, you know, a dozen of those at the top and then they're hiring minimum wage workers at the bottom, it's a different kind of a multiplier.
00:49:02
Presumably, a business that would be local and consumptive that would seek this kind of assistance is going to have a pretty terrific multiplier
00:49:15
for folks who were already living here, who may be underemployed, you know, and who stand to gain pretty demonstrably by this, particularly if we're not cutting out, you know, women and minority-owned businesses in the process.
00:49:30
So I wouldn't discount that.
00:49:32
I think, again, it's understandable why you would target primary businesses for that simple revenue effect, but it's not always that simple, and I think we ought to consider that.
SPEAKER_11
00:49:44
I think maybe the way to treat it is as a factor to be evaluated, sort of like the equitable considerations is this is one of the things that we consider and obviously we want to encourage primary businesses, but there may be other factors that make a different business a better choice for this particular.
SPEAKER_10
00:50:07
Yeah, in the same manner that we see an applicant, a property owner applicant, and it's traced to a company
00:50:15
based in the Seychelles or the Isle of Man or British Virgin Islands, then we know it's a automatic red flag, so.
SPEAKER_11
00:50:25
All right, anything else?
SPEAKER_05
00:50:26
Thank you for that feedback.
00:50:28
No, unless I do want to give an opportunity to recognize Roger Johnson or Doug Walker or any of the other county executives that may be with us that would like to see clarity on any
SPEAKER_03
00:50:46
J.T., I have nothing of substance to add.
00:50:50
Thank you so much.
Doug Walker
Deputy County Executive
00:50:51
Thanks, J.T.
00:50:52
Okay.
SPEAKER_03
00:50:58
All right.
SPEAKER_05
00:50:59
All right.
00:51:01
Well, just to wrap up the discussion, thank you to all the directors that provided this excellent feedback.
00:51:08
We'll make these changes, and then over the next week, we'll begin to prepare the materials for the board meeting.
00:51:15
that will take place on May 18th.
00:51:19
Unfortunately, that is one day after our EDA's next meeting.
00:51:23
So it will be coming back to the EDA on June 21st for final adoption.
00:51:32
Thanks everybody for that.
SPEAKER_11
00:51:33
All right.
00:51:35
Thanks.
00:51:36
Yeah.
00:51:38
So now we are going to go into closed session.
00:51:42
I will read the closed session motion.
00:51:45
There we go.
00:51:47
I move that the Albemarle County Economic Development Authority go into a closed meeting as authorized by the Virginia Freedom of Information Act.
00:51:54
Section 2.23711A of the Code of Virginia under subsection 6 to discuss and consider the investment of public funds for the development of the Lewis and Clark Exploratory Center at Dardantown Park where bargaining is involved and where it made public initially would adversely affect the financial interest of the county and
00:52:16
Subsection 8 to discuss and consider consultation with the EDA legal counsel regarding the Lewis and Clark Exploratory Center Loan, which would require legal counsel's advice and if provided an open section would adversely affect the EDA's negotiating posture.
00:52:34
Is there a second?
00:52:37
I'll second the motion.
00:52:39
All right.
00:52:40
All in favor?
00:52:41
Hi.
00:52:44
All right.
00:52:45
So we don't need a roll call vote on that, do we, Richie?
00:52:49
Yeah.
00:52:49
OK, so now we need to leave this meeting and move to the Teams meeting for the closed session.
SPEAKER_05
00:52:59
That's right.
SPEAKER_11
00:53:02
So everybody over there.
00:53:05
OK.
SPEAKER_09
00:53:09
How do I get there, mind me?
00:53:12
It's not in the chat.
00:53:13
It used to be in the chat, wasn't it?
SPEAKER_05
00:53:15
Yeah, Director Munson, in your email, there'll be a link to join a Teams meeting.
SPEAKER_09
00:53:22
Okay.
00:53:23
Is that one that you just posted?
SPEAKER_05
00:53:26
Yes, at 3.30 this afternoon, we sent the closed meeting link.
00:53:31
Okay.
00:53:31
And then we'll rejoin this meeting.
SPEAKER_09
00:53:35
Thank you, sir.
SPEAKER_05
00:53:37
Yeah.
01:23:53
you you
SPEAKER_07
01:24:51
I guess, do we have everybody?
01:24:52
I think we do.
SPEAKER_11
01:24:55
All right.
01:24:59
So let me see here.
SPEAKER_05
01:25:04
Is anyone else having trouble hearing Chair Long?
01:25:08
Everybody else okay?
SPEAKER_11
01:25:09
Hold on.
01:25:10
Am I too quiet or?
SPEAKER_02
01:25:14
He sounds good now.
01:25:15
There was an echo on the team's call, but he's good now.
SPEAKER_11
01:25:19
Okay.
01:25:21
I move that the EDA certified by recorded vote that it is the best of each director's knowledge only public business matters lawfully exempted from the open meeting requirements of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act and identified in the motion authorizing the closed meeting were heard, discussed, or considered in the closed meeting.
SPEAKER_06
01:25:42
All right, I'll do the roll call.
01:25:43
Director Long?
SPEAKER_11
01:25:45
Aye.
SPEAKER_06
01:25:46
Director Ray?
01:25:47
Aye.
01:25:48
Director Shreve?
01:25:51
Aye Director Munson Aye Director Imhoff Aye Director McNaughton Aye And Director Mottola Aye That's unanimous, the motion passes.
SPEAKER_11
01:26:09
Alright, thank you.
01:26:13
So, other matters, the only other matter that I'm aware of is that
01:26:20
Mr. Munson has announced his intent to resign from the EDA.
01:26:27
I have considered that and decided that I am not going to accept his resignation.
01:26:33
So he's going to have to continue on the board for an indefinite period of time.
01:26:38
So I'm sorry that we're not in a position to do that.
01:26:41
We want to make sure that we hear from lovely Scottsville periodically.
01:26:46
So sorry about that.
01:26:48
Thank you for that.
01:26:51
We certainly understand.
01:26:54
We appreciate what you have done and the contributions you have made.
01:26:57
And I hope you can find or I should say that Supervisor Price can find someone is able to ably represent Scottsville and the Magisterial District as you have.
01:27:08
So thank you so much for what you have done.
SPEAKER_02
01:27:11
Thank you.
01:27:12
Thank you, Stuart.
01:27:13
Thank you, Stuart.
Diantha McKeel
Board of Supervisors Liaison, Economic Development Authority
01:27:15
Stuart, I understand you're going to be traveling.
01:27:17
Maybe you can send us a couple of pictures.
SPEAKER_09
01:27:21
Actually, I'm going to have an Instagram account and I'm going to be posting pictures as I drive across country and then paddle around Nova Scotia or around British Columbia.
01:27:33
So if you're interested, you can just search me on that and you'll get updates real time by pictures.
01:27:41
You say paddling, Stuart?
01:27:43
Yeah, I'm going to take a month to drive out to British Columbia and then July and August I'll be paddling on the inside passage between British Columbia and Alaska.
SPEAKER_10
01:28:00
So while you're doing that, I'll be bringing some adaptive paddling students down to the James River.
01:28:06
Not far from you.
SPEAKER_09
01:28:08
All right.
01:28:08
Fantastic.
01:28:10
I was out there on Sunday.
01:28:12
Beautiful.
SPEAKER_11
01:28:16
Your students will be less likely to get eaten by killer whales than Stuart.
SPEAKER_10
01:28:19
The hardware river doesn't have any of those.
Doug Walker
Deputy County Executive
01:28:26
Some like salmon, some like bass.
01:28:31
Thanks again.
SPEAKER_11
01:28:32
Anything else?
SPEAKER_06
01:28:37
Can I raise one matter in terms of electronic meetings that are coming down the road?
01:28:43
Okay.
01:28:44
And I just want to plant a seed because the General Assembly has passed a bill permitting certain public bodies to conduct virtual meetings on less than a regular basis.
01:28:57
I do know that the EDA does not have a written policy for
01:29:01
even for the members to have electronic participation, such that if you were out on personal business or medical reasons, we don't have provisions for electronic participation during normal times.
01:29:14
And these aren't normal times, but they're going to come to an end, as I understand it, in June.
01:29:18
So what I want the board to think about is, one is whether it wants to adopt
01:29:27
an electronic participation policy which will allow members if they're traveling in Nova Scotia to dial in and to participate in the meeting.
01:29:37
I know Don goes out west so sometimes that policy would allow him to participate if he were out west.
01:29:45
Separate policy is whether we want to
01:29:47
to adopt standards for conducting all virtual meetings.
01:29:53
Those are extremely limited in their applicability.
01:29:57
I don't know how practical it is to do that, but that's just, I wanna plant that seed and we'll have to have that discussion going forward.
Diantha McKeel
Board of Supervisors Liaison, Economic Development Authority
01:30:04
And Rich, I really thank you for bringing that up because just so everybody is aware, the Board of Supervisors did adopt
01:30:12
members can zoom in if they're out of town or if they have a medical reason.
01:30:23
There are limitations.
01:30:24
And I think, Rich, the Planning Commission is planning on doing the same thing, is my understanding.
SPEAKER_06
01:30:29
And that's a pretty easy lift.
01:30:33
The tougher lift is going to be determining under what circumstances this body can meet all virtually.
01:30:40
And the law does require that
01:30:42
We identify those circumstances.
01:30:44
And so some thoughts are, I don't know if they can be scheduled around Christmas or other times.
01:30:52
A thought that crossed my mind is, you know, special meetings that the policy could provide for all virtual meetings if an emergency came up or some special issue came up.
01:31:04
It's tough to plan those because you can't
01:31:07
You can't have you can't have two meetings that are all virtual.
01:31:11
They can't be back to back.
01:31:13
So if you have an all virtual meeting, then the next meeting has to be in person.
01:31:18
So just logistically, it's difficult, but it is out there.
01:31:21
And so I just want you all to start thinking about that.
01:31:26
It doesn't come into effect until September 1st.
01:31:28
So we have a couple of meetings.
SPEAKER_10
01:31:29
What kind of capacity does the county have if let's just say one or two of us were to take advantage of that?
01:31:37
chiming in from somewhere else.
01:31:40
Would you have like a projection screen and an audio system so that everybody wouldn't have to have some kind of a laptop connection still in person in the room or?
SPEAKER_06
01:31:55
So for, oh, go ahead, Doug.
01:31:57
I was gonna say for the personal, if it's just a personal electronic participation, my understanding is the capacities
01:32:05
Pretty good, whether it would just be telephonic or whether it would be by Zoom.
01:32:09
This body would be scheduled to meet room 241, which is, IT has set that up to do electronic meetings.
01:32:18
And I understand it can do an all virtual meeting also.
01:32:22
So I think we have capacity for that, but I'll defer to Doug on that.
Doug Walker
Deputy County Executive
01:32:26
No, you're right.
01:32:27
All virtual, all in person are the easiest.
01:32:29
The hybrid, so it's difficult.
01:32:31
But if the member is just, is the one that's participating electronically, you're not trying to then conduct a hybrid meeting to pull the public in.
01:32:40
Virtually also, it becomes measurably easier.
01:32:43
We're going to have to work through this in all kinds of instances, but we've got a plan.
01:32:48
I also wanted to clarify that return to in-person meetings for group two, that's the ticket that you're holding as EDA, is no sooner than June.
01:32:58
The board's going to have this conversation in May, and then depending on when, if they make the decision then, depending on when the bodies that are in group two meet and what the notice requirements are, it may be June, it may be July.
01:33:12
but that conversation is coming up.
01:33:13
So I just wanted just to add that, that Gabby up in there.
SPEAKER_03
01:33:18
And Richie, I think for purposes of clarity, you're talking about either having virtual meetings or in-person meetings, but not having hybrid meetings, correct?
01:33:26
Or are you suggesting we have hybrid meetings?
SPEAKER_06
01:33:28
Well, I, so it's, hybrid's a bit of a misnomer.
01:33:33
A hybrid is an in-person meeting.
01:33:36
that allows the public to participate electronically.
01:33:41
So that's more of an IT logistical type thing.
01:33:45
It's not a legal issue.
01:33:47
So we either have all virtual meetings or we have in-person meetings.
01:33:54
And if one or two members are
01:33:57
out of town for personal reasons or medical reasons, then they can be brought in.
01:34:02
But that doesn't create a virtual meeting.
01:34:04
We still have to have a quorum in person, and we can just accommodate those types of things.
01:34:10
So they're actually two separate categories.
01:34:13
It is confusing, but they're two separate categories.
SPEAKER_03
01:34:16
Thank you for that.
01:34:17
And I will say, and Doug asked, did you correct me if I misspeak here, but hybrid meetings require additional staff support that go beyond the normal.
01:34:25
So having hybrid meetings could be problematic, not from the technical side, but also the resource sides for after-hour meetings.
01:34:33
So that's a consideration as well.
SPEAKER_11
01:34:35
Right.
01:34:35
Well, is the expectation that our in-person meetings are not hybrid meetings or just in-person or
Doug Walker
Deputy County Executive
01:34:50
I think the expect, well, that's part of what the board's gonna need to discuss.
01:34:55
I think that the expectation for group two is that you have the ability to do hybrid meetings.
01:35:00
And I think that Richie explained that very well, which is allowing the public to participate virtually, but having the members there in person with the caveats that the new state legislation then kind of carves out for that.
01:35:13
So there's a relatively small group of people
01:35:18
boards, commissions, authorities that would fit into that category.
01:35:22
And that's part of what the board will be discussing in May.
SPEAKER_11
01:35:26
I mean, I certainly, to the extent we can do it, I think it's good because it allows more people to participate and to listen in and to the extent it doesn't cause a strain on resources.
01:35:39
If the facilities are there and we can do it, I think we should be doing that.
01:35:42
I think we should, you know,
01:35:44
have our policy in terms of meeting participation be as broad as the statute allows in terms of individuals missing the meeting, because I think it is important to have people and it eliminates some of the quorum issues and if people are available, well, I guess it doesn't if you still got to have an in-person quorum.
01:36:05
So I think we should do that in terms of when we want to have virtual meetings, I guess we should just look and see what other
01:36:13
You know what other folks are doing.
01:36:15
I do like the idea of, you know, being able to call a quick meeting to have for, you know, special sessions for a one time thing seems to be the best, you know, a really good use of that.
01:36:26
Because it's, you know, it's easier to get people together for 15 minutes by Zoom than it is to try to get everybody together for an in person meeting.
SPEAKER_10
01:36:37
Lessington, Scottsville, down at the James River Brewery.
01:36:40
That's right.
01:36:41
That's right.
SPEAKER_09
01:36:42
Great idea.
01:36:43
Yeah, I mean, we've seen that the format works effectively and enables us to do what we need to get or get done what we need to get done.
01:36:52
So I don't see any reason in limiting its use if we have to.
Doug Walker
Deputy County Executive
01:36:57
Part of the decision about allocating or designating 241 for the EDA is that is the room where the technology improvements have been made to allow the public to participate virtually.
01:37:12
I'm trying to think if we're going to come up with another word than hybrid, Richie.
01:37:16
and so yeah, so it's kind of pre-programmed to be available and then we'll just have to make the determination about the use of that technology for that purpose.
01:37:26
I will say, and Diantha knows, is that the board has expressed the same amount of enthusiasm if not more for kind of continuing to take advantage of the increased participation remotely from folks who otherwise aren't necessarily going to get up and drive to call McIntire for a meeting.
01:37:45
I don't know why they wouldn't want to come to an ETA meeting in person, but we could call it the beam them in Scotty provision.
SPEAKER_10
01:37:58
Yeah.
SPEAKER_11
01:37:58
All right.
01:37:58
Anything else?
Diantha McKeel
Board of Supervisors Liaison, Economic Development Authority
01:38:00
Low hanging fruit is to go on and go after your all's ability if you're ill or traveling to be able to.
SPEAKER_07
01:38:07
Yeah.
Diantha McKeel
Board of Supervisors Liaison, Economic Development Authority
01:38:08
Yeah.
01:38:09
Yeah.
Doug Walker
Deputy County Executive
01:38:11
So what I understand then is with this change in the state law, Stuart is not resigning, is that right?
SPEAKER_09
01:38:19
As long as there's no coverage in British Columbia, yeah.
SPEAKER_10
01:38:23
I'm sure it's there.
01:38:25
Thanks so far.
01:38:27
You'll be showing us a pot lash ceremony, right?
01:38:31
Indeed.
SPEAKER_06
01:38:32
I was going to say so far, Don and I have chimed in and we both denied his request.
SPEAKER_09
01:38:39
Well, I will be here next month.
01:38:42
I'll negotiate with you on that one.
SPEAKER_11
01:38:46
All right.
01:38:50
Well, thank you, everybody.
SPEAKER_09
01:38:51
Thanks a lot, y'all.
01:38:53
Stay healthy.
SPEAKER_11
01:38:56
Enjoy.
01:38:57
See you.
SPEAKER_07
01:38:58
Bye, everybody.
01:38:59
Thank you.
SPEAKER_09
01:39:00
Thanks.